Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Remedial Law Reviewer A C B O 2002: UST Faculty vs. Bitonio
Remedial Law Reviewer A C B O 2002: UST Faculty vs. Bitonio
Remedial Law Reviewer A C B O 2002: UST Faculty vs. Bitonio
Rule 64: Review of Judgments and Final Orders or Resolutions of the COMELEC and COA COMELEC Rules of Procedure, Part VII, Rule 37 E.O. 292, 31: COA on Certiorari COMELEC, COA
Rule 45: Appeal by Certiorari to the SC Rule 65: Certiorari, Prohibition and Mandamus COURT OF APPEALS
P.D. 1606 amended by R.A. 8249 Rule 45: Appeal by Certiorari to the SC Rule 65: Certiorari, Prohibition and Mandamus SANDIGANBAYAN
UST Faculty vs. Bitonio (under Rule 65) Fabian vs. Desierto (under Rule 43) National Federation of Labor vs. Laguesma (under Rule 65)
Rule 43: Appeals from the CTA & Quasi-Judicial Agencies to the CA
Rule 41: Appeal from the RTC Rule 45: Appeal by Rule 42: Petition for Review Certiorari to the from the RTCs to the CA P.D. 1606 SC Rule 44: Ordinary Appealed amended by Rule 65: Certiorari, R.A. 8249, Cases Prohibition and Rule 47: Annulment of Mandamus 4 Judgments Rule 122, 3c Appeal or Final Orders and by Notice of Resolutions Appeal (Criminal Rule 65: Certiorari, Prohibition Cases) and Mandamus Rule 122, 3d: Rule 122, 3a Appeal by Automatic Review Notice of Appeal (Criminal (Criminal Cases) FAMILY COURTS REGIONAL TRIAL COURTS Rule 40: Appeal from the MTC to the RTC Rule 65: Certiorari, Prohibition and Mandamus Rule 122, 3a Appeal by Notice of MTC, METROTC, MTCC, MCTC
(ADMINISTRATIVE)
OMBUDSMAN
BLR
NLRC
LABOR ARBITER