GAINMORE Team DNA

Team Benchmark
Conquerer
75% 50% 25% 0% 75%

Example Operations team Tailored Benchmark for Bunge Jens Team for Example 21 Records Included
Craftsman
75% 50% 50%

Chess Player

29%

29%
Pref

0%

25% 0%

19%

0%

19%
Pref

5%

25%

5%

5%

10%

0%

5%

10%
Actual

Actual

Actual

Pref

Controller
75% 50% 25% 0% 75% 50%

Conjuror
48% 24%
75% 50% 25%

Conductor

14%

19%

25% 0%

5%

10%

14%
Pref

19%
Actual

24%
Pref

48%
Actual

0%

5%
Pref

10%
Actual

Compliant
75% 50% 25% 0% 75% 50%

Connector
75% 50%

Cavalier

0%

5%

25% 0%

5%

5%

25%

0%

5%
Actual

5%
Pref

5%
Actual

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

Pref

Pref

Actual

Team Member's Role preference No Team Member prefer a Compliant role 5% of the team prefer a Connector role. No Team Member prefer a Cavalier role 14% of the team prefer a Controller role. 24% of the team prefer a Conjuror role. 5% of the team prefer a Conductor role. 29% of the team prefer a Conquerer role. 19% of the team prefer a Craftsman role. 5% of the team prefer a Chess Player role.

Team Members assumed roles 5% of the team have assumed a Compliant role. 5% of the team have assumed a Connector role. No Team Member have assumed a Cavalier role 19% of the team have assumed a Controller role. 48% of the team have assumed a Conjuror role. 10% of the team have assumed a Conductor role. No Team Member have assumed a Conquerer role 5% of the team have assumed a Craftsman role. 10% of the team have assumed a Chess Player role.

As a team, we would expect is co-operative, averts friction in a supportive team We would also anticipate that the team may lose touch with everyday realities

www.celsim.com

Page 1 of 2

GAPPS4 Team Cohesion Report

Team Benchmark Example Operations team Tailored Benchmark for Bunge Jens Team for Example 21 Records Included

Team Cohesion Report shows the relative strengths of the five critical elements of team cohesiveness of untiy and effort. Clarity of Command Instruction 41% Primary Issue - consider immediate action to recitfy Shared Values 44% Shared Experience 44% Shared Situational Awareness 43% Communication within team 42% Secondary Issue - will require attention soon. Unity of Cohesion and Effort in this team is 43% A united and cohesive team would show a score of abourt 85%. This team requires considerable attention

www.celsim.com

Page 2 of 2