Forensic Psychology Marilyn McMahon (16.3.

1999) Issues in Forensic Medicine

Select Bibliography General: Canter, D. and Alison, L.J. (1997). Criminal Detection and the Psychology of Crime. Brookfield, VT: Dartmouth. Melton, G.B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N.G. and Slobogin, C. (1987). Psychological Evaluations for the Courts: A Handbook for Mental Health Professionals and Lawyers. New York: Guilford Press.

Interviewing of VictimslWitnesses: -

Cognitive Interview: ,. , . . ': . i : Fisher, R. P. and' GJlsel:m~h, ~R."E.I (1992).' Memory Enhancement Techniques for'lnvestigative-lntefv~ewing. ,Springfield,lL: ,Charles Thomas.
.. ,. " ..

Children:

'

, '

;,

'

;',

Spencer, J.R. and Flin, R. (1993). The Evidence of Children: The Law and Psychology. London:Blackstone Press (2nd edition). Confessions:
Gudjonsson,
,

.
, "

,I

G. (1992). The Psychology of Interrogations, Confessions and

, ,

, :~i

ro::'
'"

;festimony. London: Wiley..

"

Criminal Profiling: ". Blau, T. (1994); Criminal' profiling. In BlaLi Douglas, J. and Olshaker, M. (1996). Mindhunter. London: Mandarin Douglas, J. and alshaker, M. (1997). Journey into Darkness. London:
:'
"

Heinemann.

'

Douil,a~,';J.E., Ressler, RK., Burgess, AW. and Hartman, C.R. (1986). Criminal
!..1profiling fro'm crime scene analysis. Behavioral
' ,

SCiences and the Law, 4,

' ,

IJ:;~O1-42f
,

::

'

Koc~J!:(R, Irwin, H, and Hayes, A (1998). Organised and disorganised criminal

':;/behaviour syndromes in arsonists:"A validation study of a psychological !"profiling concept.' Psychiatry, Psychology and Law,S, (1), 117-132. McCann, J.T. (1992). Criminal personality profiling in the investigation of violent crime: Recent advances and future directions. Behavioral Sciences and
,

11 .11 :CI!:""

:f'r'the Law, 10,475-481.

" 0"

Pinizotto, AJ. and Finkel, N. J. (1990). Criminal personality profiling: An outcome and process study. Lawand Human Behavior, 14, (3), 215-233. Turco, RN. (19). Psychological profiling. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology,' Wilson, P., Lincoln, R and Kocsis, R (1997). Validity, utility and ethics of profiling for serial violent and sexual offenders. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 4, (1),1-12.
,

Battered Woman Syndrome: American Psychiatric Association. (1994). The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual
of Mental Disorders

Fourth Edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric

Association. American Psychiatric Association. (1987). The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders- Third Edition (Revised). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. Anson, 0., and Sagy, S. (1995). Marital violence: Comparing women in violent and nonviolent unions. Human Relations, 48,(3),285-305 Ball, P and Wyman, E. (1977-78). Battered wives and powerlessness: What can counsellors do? Victimology,'2,545-552. '
"
'

Blowers, A., and Bjerregaard,' B. (1996). The admissibility of expert testimony on

,

I
,

the battered woman syndrome i,nhomicide cases. Journal of Psychiatry and

Law,,22, (4), 527-560. ,,' , , ' , '

Bricl<er, D. (1993).'Fatal defense: An analysis of battered woman's syndrome expert! testimony for g'ay; men:and lesbians, who' killiabusive:pahners. Brooklyn f.aw Review, 58, 1379-1437. Brodie, J. (1996). 'All youse three will be dead in the morning': The Kontinnen case. In Greenwood, K. (Ed.). The Thing She Loves: Why Women Kill. St.
, " Lebnards, NSW: Alien and Unwin.

Brown, H. (1997r Unpublished M.A thesis, Monash University. Bro~nej A~(1988). WhenBattered Women Kill. NY: Free Press. Buhde v State, 627 P.2d 1374 (Wyoming 1981). Coffee,C.L. (1986). Note: A trend emerges: A state survey on the admissibility of expert testimony concerning the battered woman syndrome. Journal of Family Law, 25, 373~396. Comack,'E.(1987):Women defendants .and the 'battered wife syndrome': A plea , " '"
, ' ,', '

fb'rthesociological

imagination.

Crown Counsets

Review, 5, (12),6-16.

Cr6c~'er',pi.(1985)!The meaning of ~q~ality batteredWomenwho kill men in for self;'defense.:Harvaid Women'sLawJourna/, 8, 121-153. Coughlin, 'A (1994). Excusihg'wome-n, California Law Review, 82, 1- 89,. Dershowitz, A (1994). The Abuse Excuse: And Other Cop-Outs, Sob Stories, and Evasic?ns:ofResponsibility. NY: Little Brown & Co. Dobash,RE. andDobash, H.P. (1992). Women, Violence and Social Change.
,

NY:' Routledge:'

, and
"""

' 6;:(4),271-282:
"r-"

Dodge,' M.and Greene, 'E. (1991). Juror and expert conceptions of battered
,

, ) wbm;en.
. :: r' ,,'..\1 ,r r' '1 ,

Violence
!: '",'

Victims,
,,:,

I'

I' ':; 'lh:

:-;'\ ',j~i

I"

Douglas, M.' (1987). The{ baftered I WOmEInsyndrome. Iri'Sc:mkin, Dj,

(EdJ)

Domestic Violence On Trial. NY: Springer. Duncan, KL (1996). Lies, damned lies and statistics? Psychological syndrome evidence in the courtroom after Daubert. Indiana Law Journal, 7, (3). Dutton, M.A. and Goodman, LA. (1994). Posttraumatic stress disorder among battered women: Analysis of legal implications. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 12,215-234. Dutton, D., and Painter, S.(1993).The battered woman syndrome: Effects of severity and intermittency of abuse. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 63, (4) 614-622. Easteal, P. (1996). Till death us do part. . In Greenwood, K (Ed.).The Thing She Loves: Why Women Kill. St. Leonards, NSW: Alien and Unwin. Easteal, P., Hughes, K. and Easter, J. (1993). Battered women and duress. Alternative Law Journal, 18, (3), 139-140. Ewing, C. (1987). Battered women who kill: Psychological self defense as legal justification. Lexington, MA: eath. ", Ewing, C. And Aubry, M. (1987). Battered women and public opinion: Some realities about the myths. Journal of Family Violence, 2, (3),257-264. Faigman, C. (1986). The battered woman syndrome and self-defense: A legal and empirical dissent. Virginia Law Review, 72, 619-647. Faigmari, C. (1995): The'labyrintn of scientific evidence. Hastings Law Journal,
' ,

,"46:",

'

'

',"

'",

Faigmah, C.and Wright, A. (1997). The battered woman syndrome in the age of
"ts'tience.ArizonaLawReview,39,67-115. ' ' "" ':;

Freckelton, 1."-(1992).Batter'ed woman syndrome. Alternative LavI/Journal, 17,

39141!'"
"," ,":,

Freckelton, 1 (1997)." JudiCIal pe'dagogy and expert evidence' on victims' responses to trauma:.PsycHiatry;,Psychology and Law, 4, (1); '79-86.' Freckeltoii,~I.'(1994). When plight makes right - the Forensic ':1b~~e syndrome.
,

,Criminal "H. (Eds).

Law

Journal,'18, Evidence.

(1),29-49. Sydney: ' " Law Book

' Company." ",

:" "

, '" 0'

Freckelton, I. (1993). Novei'psychological

,

evidence. In Freckelton, I. And Selby,

Expert

Gesilioj
"

J.~Smith, H.; and Keckich,;W. (1982). The battered woman grows old.
1, '59-67.

: Clinica(Gerontologist,

Gleascin,W.J. (1993).Mental'disorders
, ;i Viola'nce and Victims, 8;' (1), 53-68'

in battered women: An empirical study.

.

','

Goodni~m-Delahunty,
,

J. (1997). Forensic psychological

Behavior, 21, (2),

expertise in the wake of

" 11 , :~" ,( /, , ,::

i Daubert.Lawand Human

121-14d.

Gree'nwobd, ,K. (Ed:). The Thing She'! Loves: Why Women Kill. St. Leonards, : ' i NSW: Alien and Unwin:, :':, ' ,,'

Hancock, L (1997). Aboriginality and lawyering: Problems for aboriginal ;, defendants:in partner homiCide;<::ases. In Cook, S. and'Bessant J: (eds.);
,

.Women's, Encounters' with Violence.

Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage.

'
,: ,',.,,::,'

Hawt~ori1e v State
'::460-470. ';'

(1982).
"!'"

408

So.2d
','

801"

Hilb~rrTlan, E. and Munson,K. (1977-78).Sixty batteredwomen. Victimology, , 2 Hinchcliffe', , S. and Lloyd, D. (1996). Provocative behaviour: , 'vyomen who kill be given speCial ,treatment in law? ' ,': ': "
,

Should battered

.' . I
", .

", , I'
'-,

,"
: ','

. ,':

"

"

http:/www.informinc.co.uklLM/LM86/LM86_Taboos.html Ho, R and Venus, M. (1995). Reactions to a battered woman who kills her abusive spouse: An attributional analysis. Australian Journal of Psychology, 47, (3), 153-159. J v The Queen (1994) 75 A Crim R 522-540. Jacobson, N., Gottman, J.M., Gortner, E, Berns, S. And Shortt, J. (1996). Psychological factors in the longitudinal course of battering: When do couples split up? When does the abuse decrease? Violence and Victims, 11, 371-392. Kissane, K. (1998, September 5). Kiss or kill? The Age ( Saturday Extra), 1,6. Kuhl, A. (1984). Personality traits of abused women: Masochism myth refuted. Victimology, 9, 450-463. Kuhl, A. (1986). Implications of justifiable homicide verdicts for battered women. Response, 9,6-10. Levit, H. (1985). The battered woman. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 3, 9-14. Levit, H.(1991 ).Battered women: Syndrome versus self-defense. American Journal of Forensic Psychology; 9, (1) 29-35. :
Maguigan, H. (1991 ). Battered women and self-defense: Myths and : ( misconceptidns in current ,'reform;proposals.UniversIty of PennsylvaniaLaw

Revie"v,'140',379: i':--;::: r, ;': : ,i'" ;', I;': : Morse, is. (1990). The misbegotten marriage of soft psychology and bad law. Law and Human Behavior, 14, (6), 593-618,
Murphy, ,S., (1992r
"

Assisting the jury, in understanding victimisation: Expert psychological testimony'on battered woman syndrome and rape trauma
'

syndrome. Columbia Journal of taw and Social Problems,' 25 276-3,10. NicolsOh, D.and Sanghvi, R'(1993).: Battered women' andprovocatibh:The

iMplications of R v Ahluwalia. Crim.L.R. 728-738. O'Dcinovan,K. (1991). Defences for battered women who kill. Journal of Law
: I and Society, 18, (2), 219-240.' , !:', ' :':' .! O'D6novan, K. (1993).' Law's knowledge: The judge, the expert, the battered ': I woman and her syndrome. Journal of Law and Society, 20', (4),427-437. R v Bradley (1994). Unreported judgement of the Supre~e Court of Victoria,
" ' ,

"14.12.1994. R v C (1993) 60 SASR467-480. R v Gilbert (1993). Unreported judgement of the Supreme Court of Western AiJstralia,'4:11.1993.""
"

Rv. 'Hickey (1992). ~Unreportedjudgement of the Supreme Court of New South

Wales; R, 14.4.1992.'! ':,' "':' ,'d:, ;,

v McEwen(1996). Unreported judgement of the Supreme Court of Western

'::Australia,18-25.4.1995,18.3.1996.':

",'",

R v Runjanjic and Kontinnen'(1991) 56 SASR 114; 53 A Crim R 362. R \i Kontinnen (1992). Unreportedjudgement of the SUpremeCourt of South
Australia,
': ': Australia,'3.2.
, 'r'

26.3.1992,
1994.'

30.3.1992.'
!,O,'
.'.

,
',I
",

,
"" :

R v Taylcr (1994), Unreported judgement of the Supreme Court' of South

,;

R v Woolsey(1'993): Unreported judgement of the Supreme Court of New South

':'",...::::~:<,;~,~)':::"'" !i,: ' :' ',;'

woman and her syndrome. Journal of Law and Society, 20, (4),427-437, R v Bradley (1994). Unreported judgement of the Supreme Court of Victoria, 14.12.1994. Rv C (1993) 60 SASR 467-480. R v Gilbert (1993). Unreported judgement of the Supreme Court of Western Australia, 4.11. 1993. Rv. Hickey (1992). Unreported judgement of the Supreme Court of New South Wales, 14.4.1992. R v McEwen (1996). Unreported judgement of the Supreme Court of Western Australia, 18-25.4.1995, 18.3.1996. Rv Runjanjic and Kontinnen (1991) 56 SASR 114; 53 A Crim R 362. R v Kontinnen (1992). Unreported judgement of the Supreme Court of South . Australia, 26.3.1992, 30.3.1992. R v Taylor (1994). Unreported judgement of the Supreme Court of South Australia, 3.2, 1994. " R v Woolsey(1993). Unreported judgement of the Supreme Court of New South Wales, 19.8.1993, Reddy, P., Knowles, A, Mulvaney, J" McMahon, M. And Freckelton, I. (1997): Attributions about domestic violence: A study of community attitudes, Psychiatry; Psychology'and'raw; 4,(2), 125-146." :' i". . Rittenmayer, S. (1981r Of battered wives, self-defe'nse and double standards of justice. Journal of Criminal Justice, 9, (5), 389-396. Rog~r~; N: :(1996). To save her life: Gender, justice and battered women who "kill.. In Gre'enwood, K. (Ed.): The'Thing She Loves: Why Women Kill. St. Leonards, NSW: Alien and Unwin. Rosewater, L.(1987). The clinical and courtroom application of battered women's personality assessments. In Sonkin, D,J. (Ed). Domestic Violence
,

<~

..,'.onTrial.'NY:"Springer..':;
,
,

'J'r'~:,.

',';

d:'i,;",,'

;'1.'

SchoPP, RF., Sturgls, B.J:, arid Sullivan, M. (1994). Battered woman syndrome,

expert testimony, 'and the distinction between justification and excuse. University of Illinois Law Review, 1994,45-113. Schuller, R (1992).The impact of battered woman syndrome evidence on jury decision processes: Lawand,Hiima/fBehavibr, 16,(6),597-620
; .' , , .',

Schuller, R", and Hastings,P. (1996). Trials of batteredwomen who kill: The
. impact of fiiternative forms of expert evidence. Law and Human Behavior,

20, (2) 167-187.'

Schuller,. R, Smith, V" and Olson, J. (1994).Jurors' decisions in trials of battered women who kill: The role of prior beliefs and expert testimony, Joilfnalof Applied Social Psychology, 24; (4) 316-337 .. Schuller, R and Vidmar, N.' (1992).. Battered woman syndrome evidence in the
.

:' .291.

courtroom:A review of the literature. Law and Human Behaviour,16, 273. ' . '

Sheehy, E., Stubbs, J.'And Tolmie','J: (1992). Defending battered women on

trial: The battered' woman 'syndrome and its limitations. Criminal

Law

':I.~J6Urna/,16,I,369.
.

'j

~:",,:;.:\;

",.,1;0::';.

'

Simdhe'" O!'(,t997). ,"'Killerniahwasla' battered 'wife': The'application of b'attered

worhar\'s'yndrometO homosexual defendants, The Queen v McEwen.

r", ' ' ';.; . .~, l, :, ~: I" I.

. ( !, " i':i

54

Sydney Law Review, 19,230-239. Spiers, M. (1998). Which chicks are the liars? An undemocratic universe i chaos, lies, representation and the law. Http:/lwww.iq.com.aul-dtebbuttlojlojchaosll. htm State v Green (1990). No, 90-0039, Florida District Court of Appeal. State v Kelly (1984).97 NJ 178,478 A 2d 364, State v Thomas (1981). 66 Ohio St.2d 518, 423 NE 2d 137. The Queen v Kina (1993). Unreported judgement of the Supreme Court of j Queensland, 29.11.1993. The Queen v Lorenz (1998). Unreported judgement of the Supreme Court of NSW 14 August 1998. Thyfault, R, Bennet, C., and Hirschorn, R (1987). Battered women in court: Jury and trial consultants and expert witnesses. In Sonkin, D. (Ed.), Domestic Violence on Trial. N.Y.: Springer. Walus-Wigle, J and Meloy, J. (1988). Battered woman syndrome as a criminal
" defence. Journal of Psychiatry

and Law, 16,(3),389-404.

Walker, L (1977-78). Battered women and learned helplessness. Victimology, 2.

Walker, LE. (1984a), Battered women, psychology and public policy. American

Psychologist,. 39, 1178':1f82i' '~;'S Wc'iIKer,11:(1992). Battered wbmafri'syndrome and'self-defense!'Notre"Dame

Journal of Lawj<EthicsandPublit Policy, 6,321-334.

':

"

',','

Walker,' .' (1991 L r

,f
,1

PosHraumatic stress disorder in women: Diagnosis and

with

treatrrientofbattered woman syndrome. Special Issue: Psychotherapy victims. ~ Psychotherapy; 28, (1) 21-29
, ""'" ' "

Walker, ~. (1989). Psychology and violent women. American Psychologist, 44, 1':(4),695-702. Walker, L (1989). Terrifying Love, New York: Harper Perennial. I" ", Walker, L (1984b). The Battered Woman Syndrome. New York: Springer. Walker, L (1995). Understanding battered woman syndrome. Trial, 31, (2), 30, Walker! L (1983), Victimology and the psychological perspectives of battered
'
"

women.:Victimology,8,82-104:

,;':

",

',:

'

Walker, L (1983).'Who are 'the battered women? Walker, L, Thyfault, R, and Browne,'A (1982). Beyond the juror's ken: Battered Wo'men.Vermont Law Review, 7, 1-14. ' Winnett v Stephenson (ACT Magistrates Court, unreported, 19 May 1993). Yeo/S, (1992).Hickey: A case note. Criminal Law Journal. Zde~,~owski,G, (1992~October 6).' Killing to survive. The Bulletin, 18, '
,I ~! "

" 'I
i 'J , ; ,\, 'r ':'
, t: 'i'1 ~ 'I

,
, ;,

" I

'"

"I ;

:,',

"

THE HOLMES TYPOLOGY (PART I)

This typology is based on obsessive-compulsive charactedstics of the serial killer as indicated from verbal interview data on the reasons they kill. It contains an implicit theory of interpersonal (socio-emotional) development, based upon their position in a cycle of violence (similar to the cycle of victimization for any self-defeating or addictive pattern). The labels "disorganized" and "organized" refer to the degree of pe."sonality aberration, which is evident in how chaotic or controlled the crime scene is. The labels "asocial" and "nonsocial" refe." to whether the pe."son is a loner because of weirdness or by choice.

I SO
I

GAN
o

l :~ ~!! ~ "~ :~

. .. . 1,",",oo"""",--,,,!~,!~,~,,~.!~.~.~!,~.~~--~.!~.r,,~.~.~,~..~.~,!.~.~~~",--,oo",w".,...jL,.""w"",I,~~,~~,,~.i,~~,.P.,~,~~~.~~ 0." dates frequently

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

I
;
I

R ~ r~! f~ ~ ~~1"O: ~
~ E~
m

~ ~ ~ ~ '= Q
'

' ~~ ':~ ~I ~
~.~~,~~,~..!~~

{ rIr~!!~ ~ ~ ~ ~
':

:g

:!

C,',:'.,.,:.",...,'..

:.::',:'::~_~i~~!'~'~',:~~~~~:~,~:~}~.!~~,~,::.:.,

::.. '.~,', ':'~'.,:','.,',','..~]!" .,.'::',0.':--:0,."0.:".',",'.""

(r"""""""i~.;ii;;.;~'~ti'~~~l';'b.~;'~~'i~~~~~'i~'t~~t"".""""'.'1

f"."""'..""""""'.i~;i'iy..ph.y~i.~';

,, :,
..

[::~~~~~~~t~~~~~~ E::~~~~~~~~~~l~~:::::-J

:.

"::'::::::::::::::::::';::'::'::;

usually a high school dropout'

'::;'::""'::::::::"::'::'~::"::::,::::,::::~.,.::,;::::.::,::,::;.::
.

..

[:::
I

may be college educated

skills
~ i; ~:~I ;.; ~~::.';;.::'.~" .:.::'J

:1

poorhygi~ne/housekeeping

skills"
~I;~:! E;:E~;

::.:;:::;::::::.::,::.::::::,,: .

f:::':';:::""":'::::""":'::';:::::'::'::::::::::::":::::':':::.:;:.:,::::.;.:::.::':::'::;"::::.;:::.:.::::,::::,:,~,::::::::,','",::,.,:

;1,

good hygiene/housekeeping
;.;~;E i:~f~:~p;;.;':E

[
I

Ir ~~~:; :';~;

;
.

;f;.;;:.;.:~~~~;. E~l;i ~
~'~.~;",~~,~',',;,

~.ii;~;

~ .::~.:~::.:JC: ~:;;:;;;~:;;. .;;;;;.~.~;~; :.:;. :~.;

nocturnal (nighttime) habits

",' ",:"", oo,~.~,:,i';~;','~','.~~ ~'~~ ~~~'~"'~'~';~'H

;r

diumal (daytime) habits

;',~~'~,~ ;', '~'~"~~""H'" "~:~'~'" '~~~=~"I

:;

I C,

"""', '"," "[r"', '~~","~~"~~--'::'~'~~'~~;~'"

i
.

iI

memories have done to see ';h~;'p~i;~~il :~ needs to return to crim~ scene for relivi~g -'I : need;-;~';~;;;;~'t;;~rime scene
~~~'~~'."'.' 'j ,"'" """""~~~'~'il;c~~~'~~~ ~'~~";~Ii'~~' '~'~"~I~;"~~~~~" "H' ,..'"., .':

,00 H"~~;"~'~'~~~~~'~'i~~i~';'~'i~'~'il;"~~';i~;'

I1 attacks in a "blitz" pattern ' =;=::=;:.:=::::::::;:.:;:::::::::: : ':::=;:.::;:.:===:--:==;:.:==:: ir depersonalizes victim to a thing or it

. .

i!'-.~tt;-;;k;'~;i'~g-~eduction into re;t;~~.t~--'---'--11 ::::::::=::::::::::::::::c:::=:::::::==:=:::=:::::=::=::=::::::=::::::::=::;::::::;

1

keeps pe."sonal, holds a conversation

:~

IE~:~~~~~~~~~===j !I respondsbestto counselingil1tervie;

f::=-:=::~f~~1~~~~~~~~~~~~,":=:
I

,.;::::.:::::::.:::::.:::.::::.::.:::=::::::c::::===::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::..:::::::::::::::::::::::::."...::::::::::::::::;::::::::::::;

T---oo~:;~'p-~~d';-b~.;t t~ di.:;~t intervi;~:::::::::~::::::=:H co:;::;;::;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::=::.::::.:::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::;J

Adapted and modified f."omR. Holmes (1996) Profilin2 Violent Crimes. Sage Publications"

'-

'"

.'

I. Profiling inputs Crime Scene Physical Evidence Pattern of Evidence Body Positions Weapons

2. Decision-Process Models Homicide Type & Style Primary Intent Victim Risk Offender Risk Escalation Time for Crime Location Factors

3. Crime Assessment Reconstruction of Crime Crime Classification Organized/Disorganized Victim Selection Control of Victim Sequence of Crime Staging Motivation Crime Scene Dynamics

Victimology Background Habits FamilyStructure Last Seen Age Occupation

Forensic Information Cause of Death Wounds
Pre/Post Mortem

r
Feedback No. I Validation of Profile with CrimeiDeath Scene with Evidence with Decision Models with Investigation Recommendations

1
4. Criminal Profile
Demographics Physical Characteristics Habits Preoffense Behavior Leading to Crime Postoffense Behavior Recommendations to Investigation

Sexual Acts
Autopsy Report Laboratory Reports Preliminary Police Report Background Information Police Observation Time of Crime Who Reported Crime Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status Crime Rate

r
Feedback No. :2 New Evidenc~

1
~
15. Investigation
I

Photos Aerial Crime Scene Victim

I

1
6.. Apprehension
I

Figure 1. Criminal profile generating process.

p ~ ...0 R t S6'~ I g II,~~. ~S -.---------)

-~--

"'0 ~~.

J"

~t.

..

....----...