Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2011 OFC OPS Meets Myth Busters
2011 OFC OPS Meets Myth Busters
2011 OFC OPS Meets Myth Busters
Rod Tucker
University of Melbourne
Fibers
k J
mxm Switch DEMUXs m O/E Converters MUXs Switch Fabrics Electronics Buffers Optics
Reduced bit rate (i.e. parallel processing) Speed (throughput) is not a limitation
Electronics
Optics
Optical synchronization and buffering not viable in practice. See, for example, Tucker JLT, pp. 4655-4673, 2008.
Forwarding Engine
k:1 MUX
(20 pJ/b/stage)
E/O
2
1 2 1 2 m m
1 2 k k 1 2 m m
(B/k)
Input wavelengths
O/E (30 pJ/b)
(B)
(30 pJ/b/stage)
Output wavelengths
(B/k)
(B)
Wavelength (WL)
Optical Frequency
Waveband (WB)
Optical Frequency
Forwarding Engine
(45pJ/b)
k:1 MUX
1 2 k
m k
(B/k)
kxk Electronic Switches
Input wavebands
(B)
(30 pJ/b)
Output wavebands
(B/k)
(B)
1
switch switch switch
Power consumption = 21 W Ebit = 20 pJ Assuming Benes architecture, p = 2 log 2 144 1 = 14 Ebit = 1.4 pJ / stage
10-8
10-9
Wavelength
10-10 Waveband 2010 10-12 10 100 1000 Switch Capacity: mB = 1000 Tb/s
10-11
m k:1 MUX
m TWCs
m TWCs
m FWCs
1
m
AWGs AWGs AWGs
1 2
2 log 2 m 1
ER 3 dB
3 dB
Psignal
Extinction Ratio
n control lines
1xm switch
mx1
switch
n control lines
1 2 1 2
FWC
1xm switch
mx1
switch
CMOS driver
4 resonance controllers
O-Spanke
10-8
O-Benes/Spanke O-SOA
10-9
E-WL
10-10
E-WB O-AWG O-Micro-Ring
O-Benes/Spanke
10-8
O-SOA
10-9
O-Micro-Ring E-WL O- AWG
10-10
105
O-AWG
104
E-WL
E-WB
103 100
1000
Optical packet switches can scale to massive throughput The electronic bottleneck constrains electronic throughput Optical to electronic (O/E) and electronic to optical (E/O) converters need to be eliminated Conclusion: Dont underestimate the potential of electronics
1 mxm
switch
2 mx m
switch
p
1 mxm
switch
P 1
Ebit
P 2
Pp
i= p i =1
Pi
mBp