Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hydrogen Plant For The New Millennium
Hydrogen Plant For The New Millennium
29-31October 2001
HYDROGEN PLANTS
FOR THE
NEW MILLENNIUM
-1-
1 INTRODUCTION
Hydrogen is increasingly being considered as a utility gas within the refining and
capacity tend to be judged by the cost of producing hydrogen molecules rather than by the
reconfigurations of core process units. Assuming that all other hydrogen sources in an
existing facility are fully utilised, there are two routes for the end user to obtain this additional
hydrogen:
! For the end user to own and operate its own hydrogen plant
! For the end user to buy hydrogen over the fence from a third party industrial gas supplier
End users of hydrogen, bought via either route, look for reliable supplies to the specified
hydrogen purity. In this context, there are limited opportunities for product differentiation.
Therefore, the competitive strategy of the hydrogen plant supplier has to be based around
The question to ask is what does lowest cost mean? Is it lowest initial capital investment,
and maintenance costs? Foster Wheeler’s initiatives to develop its SMR hydrogen plant
used for generation of source hydrogen on refining and petrochemical complexes. A typical
SMR is a mature technology and is now unlikely to yield any large step changes in economic
benefit from technological developments. Marginal economic improvements are the order of
the day. These result from continued development and optimisation of the following:
optimum SMR hydrogen plant configurations using the main process design parameters
Economic theory on the benefits obtained through technology development is, at best, a
complex subject. Introductory notes covering economic theory are included in Appendix 1
for reference.
At a practical level, there are a large number of variable factors affecting the cost of
producing hydrogen. Many of these, including the unit costs of feedstock and utilities are
either given factors or pass through the economic evaluation calculations. The flexibility
Foster Wheeler uses DCF modelling methods to establish the lifecycle cost of producing
hydrogen, to quantify the driving factors for technology development and to assist in the
modelling, all major costs elements need to be input covering each year in the lifecycle of the
hydrogen plant. Typical inputs to the DCF model include the following:
! Initial plant capital, typically spread over a two year project schedule
! Residual capital value (if any) at the end of the plant lifecycle
In pure costs terms, the cost of the capital elements of the plant can vary from as little as 10 %
of the overall cost, in cases where feedstock costs are high, to in excess of 40%, where the
scale of the plant is relatively small. This demonstrates the need to select plant configurations
suiting the economics of the project rather than offering the same standard plant configuration
Revenue charges can be arranged to suit the end user’s cashflow requirements. Typical
examples of this include fixed and variable fee elements or combining charges as a totally
C h a r g in g S t r u c t u r e
T o ta l F e e
C h a rg e
V a r ia b le F e e
F ix e d F e e
M in im u m D e m a n d D em and
g :1 5 1 a \p ro p _ n o s \3 6 2 3 0 -1 4 0 4 \g \1 0 8 1 5 _ c h a rt
industrial gas supplier. Options can also be included allowing the end user to lease the plant
and take delayed ownership based on residual capital values at the time of purchase. These
types of option can be used to reduce the end user’s initial capital investments and in some
cases tip the balance of project sanction. Charging structures can be arranged to provide
considerable flexibility to suit the overall project economics and the end user’s cash position.
To establish the minimum life cycle cost of hydrogen, all the major fixed and variable cost
elements need to be established. The choices taken in shaping a hydrogen plant design need
to be economically driven. Some of the choices available are discussed in the following
section along with typical examples to demonstrate their economic effect on the cost of
producing hydrogen.
There are many design parameters ultimately affecting the cost of the product hydrogen. This
discussion is limited to five process parameters affecting the hydrogen yield and the energy
balance. Hydrogen plant variable operating costs are a substantial portion of the total cost of
The steam methane reforming reaction is strongly endothermic and therefore favoured by
higher temperature. Typical reformer outlet temperatures fall in the range 1500 °F to 1650 °F.
reduction of the methane concentration in the reformer effluent, known as the methane slip.
The higher yield means that less feedstock is consumed, for example, a 1.3% reduction in
feedstock can be achieved by increasing the outlet temperature by 10 °F. Due to the lower
methane slip, the energy in the PSA tail-gas is reduced and since this stream is the base load
fuel for the reformer, the supplementary fuel imported to the unit increases. This effect is
enhanced because the higher reformer outlet temperature increases its radiant duty. The
supplementary fuel is a relatively small flow and is strongly influenced by small changes to
the reformer heat balance, so that in this case, there is a small increase in the total feed/fuel
consumption.
The export steam flow will increase by 1.3% for an increase in the reformer outlet
temperature of 10 °F. This effect is due to the increase in radiant duty and reduction in the
steam requirement for the process feed giving the net increase in the steam available for
export.
Taken overall, the higher reformer outlet temperature shifts the heat balance to produce more
steam from more feed/fuel. DCF analysis is a useful tool to evaluate the economic benefit of
design optimisations. The effect can ultimately be expressed as a change in the life cycle cost
of hydrogen product, but in this discussion, the effect on the project internal rate of return
The case study uses a natural gas feed/fuel design configuration with a nominal capacity of 10
MMscfd. The graph below shows IRR against the normally acceptable range of reformer
outlet temperature available to the designer. In this case study, the economic factors have
been chosen to give results with the IRR centred around a nominal 10%.
It should be noted that the nominal IRR figure chosen is for illustrative purposes only and
11.5
Internal Rate of Return (%)
11
10.5
10
9.5
9
1510 1530 1550 1570 1590 1610 1630
Temperature (deg F)
translated into life cycle cost of hydrogen in terms of $ per scf. The case study utilises a
design configuration based around Foster Wheeler’s proprietary Terrace Wall reformer. The
modern trend at Foster Wheeler is to use high reformer outlet temperatures in the region of
1620 °F to take advantage of the economic benefits available with these typical feed and
utility costs.
The feed gas to the reformer is a mixture of steam and hydrocarbon gas. The mixture is
characterised by the “steam to carbon ratio”, which is the molar ratio of steam to the reactive
carbon contained in the hydrocarbon gas. A higher steam to carbon ratio drives the reaction
closer to the equilibrium and increases the hydrogen yield. Reforming catalysts require steam
to be present in excess, increasing the volumetric throughput and cost of the plant and so there
is always interest in reducing the steam to carbon ratio. In doing so, there is an increase in
fuel. A 1.8% increase in feedstock use will be the result of reducing the steam to carbon ratio
by 0.1. The mechanism of these effects is opposite to that for higher reformer outlet
temperature, in that the methane slip increases and the PSA tail-gas contains more energy.
The decrease in steam to carbon ratio gives rise to an increase in the reformer radiant duty,
which increases the steam generated in the convection section. Less steam is used in the
process and the steam exported from the plant is further increased. A 0.9% increase in steam
11
Internal Rate of Return (%)
10.5
10
9.5
9
2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6
Molar Steam/Carbon Ratio
In this case the significant benefit of lower steam to carbon ratio is clearly shown. Today’s
hydrogen plants almost always minimise the steam to carbon ratio driven by these economic
benefits. On this subject the technology edge is with the catalyst performance and an
understanding of the tendency of the feedstock to form carbon at the reformer inlet. A typical
Hydrogen plants comprising a steam methane reformer and a PSA purification section, can
comfortably produce hydrogen over a pressure range of 260 psig to 400 psig. Quite often,
these pressures are suitable for the facility hydrogen network and so the hydrogen plant
operating pressure will be set by the network without the need for product compression. In
this case, feedstock must be supplied at about 160 psi higher than the product hydrogen.
However, it is also common that there is a need to provide compression for both the feedstock
and the product hydrogen, in which case, the reformer operating pressure will be chosen by
consideration of appropriate stages of compression and also the effect on the plant
the catalyst tubes, and therefore the reactions are favoured by lower pressure. The change in
pressure affects the reformer hydrogen yield and the energy contained in the PSA tail-gas in a
similar way to the previous discussion. For a reduction in the pressure of 15 psi, the
feedstock consumption reduces by 1.1%, while the supplementary fuel demand increases by a
For a change in the reformer operating pressure, the change in the export steam flow rate is
insignificant. This is essentially because the reduction in feedstock flow reduces the steam
generation by a similar amount to the reduction in the steam required by the process.
11
Internal Rate of Return (%)
10.5
10
9.5
9
260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400
Hydrogen Pressure (psig)
The graph demonstrates the value of lower operating pressure. Whenever there is a choice of
operating pressure, Foster Wheeler aims to select the lowest practical pressure when
390 °F to 750 °F providing plenty of flexibility in the design of the process configuration.
Changing the catalyst type from iron (HTS) to copper (LTS) together with associated
flowsheet changes, can have significant benefits, whereas optimising the operating
temperature of HTS catalyst has a more mild effect. When its operating temperature is
reduced, the carbon monoxide concentration in its effluent decreases, which improves the
hydrogen yield. For a reduction in temperature of 70 °F, the feedstock consumption reduces
by 1%, however, due to the change in the energy in the PSA tail-gas, the supplementary fuel
increases by a similar amount. The effect on export steam flow is very mild. It is influenced
by the small change in feedstock consumption and the minor variation to the syngas cooling
HT Shift Temperature
11
Internal Rate of Return (%)
10.5
10
9.5
9
620 640 660 680 700 720
Inlet Temperature (deg F)
It can be seen that the effect of HTS operating pressure on the IRR are mild, and for this
reason Foster Wheeler prefers to standardise the design to optimise the performance of the
of hydrogen in the product compared to the moles of hydrogen in the PSA feed gas. Modern
high performance designs can achieve up to 89% hydrogen recovery, while simpler designs
using fewer adsorber vessels can still achieve 84%. As the hydrogen recovery specification is
increased, the plant feedstock consumption reduces accordingly, but at the same time, the
flow rate of PSA tail-gas also reduces, so that more supplementary fuel is required with the
net result being a noticeable reduction in the total feed/fuel consumption. For a 5% points
Higher yield in the PSA means that all of the flows in the front end of the plant are reduced
including the export steam. For the 5% points increase in hydrogen recovery, the steam
export flow reduces by 4.3%. Taken overall, the higher hydrogen recovery shifts the heat
11
Internal Rate of Return (%)
10.5
10
9.5
9
83 84 85 86 87 88 89
% Hydrogen Recovery
The graph illustrates the more moderate impact of hydrogen recovery on the IRR of the
project and therefore also on the cost of product hydrogen. Even so, when optimising a plant
design, this benefit is valuable in today’s highly competitive market. Using the monetary
The relative benefits of the design parameters on the feedstock consumption are presented
below:
Ref T.out
S/C Ratio
Pressure
Shift Temp
PSA Rec
0 5 10 15
% Change in Feedstock
The impact on feedstock consumption is given approximately for the whole of the practical
ranges available to the process designer, for each of the discussed parameters. Broadly, this
indicates that reformer temperature, steam to carbon ratio and unit operating pressure, are
significantly more powerful than PSA hydrogen recovery and shift reactor temperature. This
is most relevant when the feedstock is expensive and the supplementary fuel has only low
value.
However, some project sites have significantly different economic factors, such as very low
cost gas feedstock, which leads to variations in the optimum process parameters.
Additionally, there are other technical factors, which impact the way in which the individual
parameters may be combined into a design. For example, it is impractical to choose a steam
Therefore in the large scale hydrogen plant field, it is still most common to optimise the
design to the site conditions, rather than select a pre-engineered, off-the-shelf unit.
HP steam is a natural by-product from the Steam Methane Reformer because of the large
quantity of waste heat generated at high temperature and because steam raising equipment is
always present to produce the process steam for the reformer feed gas. Of the fuel energy
fired in the reformer furnace, about 50% escapes into the convection section, while only about
15% is required to preheat the process feedstock. Not only this, but there is also a very large
amount of heat in the reformer process effluent and very few cold streams to preheat, leaving
a lot of surplus heat available to generate steam for export. The by-product steam can be
superheated or saturated, at pressures of 600 psig or higher. It is most suitable as a base load
steam generator since the export flow rate is linked to the hydrogen production flow rate, but
also because generation is at a very high thermal efficiency of greater than 90% LHV basis,
In the most simple hydrogen plant designs, all the surplus energy is converted into steam
using coils in the convection section and process gas waste heat boilers. A graph of typical
steam export rate across the range of hydrogen production is shown below:
2
Steam Rate Factor
1.5
1
0.5
0
Β Hydrogen Plants for the New Millennium - 15 -
40 100
Plant Operating Capacity %
The steam rate factor in the graph is expressed as US ton per hour per MMscfd of hydrogen.
An effective method of reducing the steam export flow rate, is to move heat into the
combustion air using air preheaters installed in the flue gas system. To handle the combustion
air, it is necessary to include a forced draft fan with ducting to the burners, in addition to the
usual induced draft fan for the flue gas. A diagram of an air preheat system is shown below:
The steam export flow rate can also be increased above that provided by the simple design, by
adding auxiliary burners in a combustion chamber integrated with the convection section.
hydrogen production rate and typically can produce up to an extra 50% steam export. In this
way, although the steam by-product should still be considered as a base load facility, some
The ability to vary the steam export using auxiliary burners can even be combined with an air
preheat system to achieve the variability at a lower level of export flow rate. Typical
variations in steam export rates with single and double air pre-heaters and auxiliary burners
3
2.5
Steam Rate Factor
0.5
0
40 100
Plant Operating Capacity %
The flow rate of export steam is one of the most variable specifications in the basis of design
of a hydrogen plant. It can often be dictated by the project site steam balance, and will always
of including a single air preheater in the design is given. The effect on the plant performance
is shown in the table below. Quite simply, there is a shift in the heat balance in that less
Using as before the typical feedstock and utility values and the DCF analysis, it becomes
apparent that with the air preheat system, the price of the export steam must increase by 1.3
US$ / 1000 lb when all other factors are kept constant. Therefore, in this case, the economics
favours producing more export steam using the simpler design without air preheat since the
marginal cost of the extra steam is low. The air preheat system is clearly suited to economic
conditions where the cost of the fuel is high relative to the price of the steam.
Consider the effect when the DCF analysis is repeated with the fuel cost at 5.0 US$ / MM
Btu. With the air preheat system, the price of the export steam can decrease by 0.50 US$ /
1000 lb when other factors are kept constant, except the price of hydrogen, which for any
design will rise in line with the cost of feedstock and fuel. In this case, the economics favours
the air preheat system and the marginal cost of more steam is high.
Foster Wheeler’s initiatives in developing its SMR hydrogen technology are driven by
minimising the lifecycle cost of producing hydrogen using discounted cash flow methods.
This has resulted in a variety of new plant configurations, based on the following changes to
The question posed in the introduction to this paper is “What does lowest cost mean?”
Foster Wheeler’s view is that all providers and end users of hydrogen benefit from using
lifecycle cost analysis. With this in mind, it is usually preferable to design with high
reformer outlet temperature, low steam to carbon ratio and high recovery in the PSA
unit for a given operating pressure. Use of DCF financial modelling clearly
demonstrates the advantages gained by this approach and is the driving factor behind
5 REFERENCES
Nellis, J.G. and Parker, D. (1997) The Essence of Business Economics, 2nd Edition, London:
There are a number of defined economic terms relating to the effects of technology
! Marginal costs of production, defined as the additional costs of producing one more
capacity unit of hydrogen, depends on the changes in variable costs in the short run
! Short run average costs (SRAC) of production, defined as production cost over a
period where at least one of the main parameters of production is fixed, e.g., the installed
! Long run average costs (LRAC) of production, defined as the production costs over a
period where all factors of production can be varied in order to alter the scale of
production.
The aim of the plant designer is to select the plant configuration which produces the lowest
short run average cost of production at the design capacity of the plant, using the best
Unit
Production
Cost
Production
Capacity
g:151a\prop_nos\36230-1404\g\10815_chart
hand side of the SRAC curve. If the plant is operated above the design capacity, the cost of
production increases as the capacity becomes limited by the controlling plant design factors.
The effect of marginal technology improvements in the long term is a reduction in the short
run average costs of production. When a technology improvement is implemented, the LRAC
curve shifts down and to the right giving lower unit costs of production. The obvious
message here is that all hydrogen plant suppliers must continuously improve their current
As an existing technology matures, it becomes increasingly difficult to shift down the LRAC
curve any further. Introduction of a completely new technology for producing hydrogen
would have the effect of shifting the LRAC curve down and to the left. The immediate effect
of this would be a step change reduction in the unit costs of production, even for smaller
capacity plant. The longer term effect of this would be to negate the use of the existing
mature technology.
The obvious message here is that all hydrogen plant suppliers must keep their eyes open for
the development of completely new technologies which may supersede SMR hydrogen