Review: Correction: Women in Power in the Early Modern Drama Source: TDR (1988-), Vol. 39, No.

1 (Spring, 1995), p. 11 Published by: The MIT Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1146398 . Accessed: 15/05/2011 06:57
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at . http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=mitpress. . Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

The MIT Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to TDR (1988-).

http://www.jstor.org

Letters, Etc. English, Ohio State University, 164 W. I7th Avenue, Columbus, OH, or Anthony Kubiak at the Department of En432IO, (614) 292-6065; Harvard University, 8 Prescott Street, Cambridge, MA, 02138, glish, (617) 495-4585.

Correction
In TDR 38, 2 (TI42), Mita Choudhury's review of Women in Power in Early Drama by Theodora Jankowski contained an erroneously edited sentence. On p. 187, second paragraph, the sentence should have read: While acknowledging the seminal contributions of critics like Peter Stallybrass, Jankowski rejects the psychoanalytic and essentialist feminisms and turns, instead, to a method that has an uneven track record in feminist studies: new historicism.