The document compares and contrasts three different types of in-situ walls for construction projects: sheet pile walls, soldier pile walls, and slurry pile walls. Sheet pile walls are lightweight and reusable, but can cause noise disturbances during installation and have limited shapes. Soldier pile walls are flexible and inexpensive but cannot be used in high water conditions and only provide temporary retaining. Slurry pile walls provide underpinning and minimize settlement, but require specialized equipment and have high costs.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The document compares and contrasts three different types of in-situ walls for construction projects: sheet pile walls, soldier pile walls, and slurry pile walls. Sheet pile walls are lightweight and reusable, but can cause noise disturbances during installation and have limited shapes. Soldier pile walls are flexible and inexpensive but cannot be used in high water conditions and only provide temporary retaining. Slurry pile walls provide underpinning and minimize settlement, but require specialized equipment and have high costs.
The document compares and contrasts three different types of in-situ walls for construction projects: sheet pile walls, soldier pile walls, and slurry pile walls. Sheet pile walls are lightweight and reusable, but can cause noise disturbances during installation and have limited shapes. Soldier pile walls are flexible and inexpensive but cannot be used in high water conditions and only provide temporary retaining. Slurry pile walls provide underpinning and minimize settlement, but require specialized equipment and have high costs.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The document compares and contrasts three different types of in-situ walls for construction projects: sheet pile walls, soldier pile walls, and slurry pile walls. Sheet pile walls are lightweight and reusable, but can cause noise disturbances during installation and have limited shapes. Soldier pile walls are flexible and inexpensive but cannot be used in high water conditions and only provide temporary retaining. Slurry pile walls provide underpinning and minimize settlement, but require specialized equipment and have high costs.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
1. Light weight 2. Can be reused on several projects. 3. Easy to adapt the pile length by either welding or bolting Long service liIe above or below water with modest protection. 4. 5. Joints are less apt to deIorm during driving. Provides high resistance to driving stresses D|sadvantages of a Sheet ||e Wa|| 1. Sheet pile driving may cause neighborhood distrurbace 2. Excavation shapes are dictated by the sheet pile section and interlocking elements. 3. Installation oI sheet piles is diIIicult in soils with boulders or cobbles. In such cases, the desired wall depths may not be reached. 4. Sections can rarely be used as part oI the permanent structure. 5. Settlements in adjacent properties may take place due to installation vibrations Soldier Pile Wall System
Advantages of a Soldier Pile 1. .Flexible enough to Iit around existing utilities 2 Inexpensive and easy to build
Disadvantages of a Soldier Pile 1. Poor backIilling and associated ground losses can result in signiIicant surIace settlements. . 2. Cannot be used in high water table conditions without extensive dewatering. 3. They are primarily limited to temporary construction 4. They are not as stiII as other retaining systems. 5. Because only the Ilange oI a soldier pile is embedded beneath subgrade, it is very diIIicult to control basal soil movements.
SLURRY PILE WALL SYSTEM
Advantages of S|urry Wa|| 1. Provides underpinning 2. Proven technology 3. Provides strong and watertight wall 4. Minimizes settlement oI adjacent buildings
Disadvantages of Slurry Wall
1. #equires special equipment 2. Utility impacts 3. High cost