Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • HPWS

    Uploaded by

    Athar's Page
    11 views1 page
    This document discusses a survey given to 30 respondents about the importance of a performance management system (PMS) called NPWS. The survey measured responses on a scale of 1 to 5 for how important NPWS, employee performance, and firm performance are. The results show that on average respondents believed NPWS is very important and important for improving firm performance, though employee performance was considered somewhat important. The low standard deviations indicate responses were consistent across participants.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document discusses a survey given to 30 respondents about the importance of a performance management system (PMS) called NPWS. The survey measured responses on a scale of 1 to 5 for how important NPWS, employee performance, and firm performance are. The results show that on average respondents believed NPWS is very important and important for improving firm performance, though employee performance was considered somewhat important. The low standard deviations indicate responses were consistent across participants.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    11 views1 page

    HPWS

    Uploaded by

    Athar's Page
    This document discusses a survey given to 30 respondents about the importance of a performance management system (PMS) called NPWS. The survey measured responses on a scale of 1 to 5 for how important NPWS, employee performance, and firm performance are. The results show that on average respondents believed NPWS is very important and important for improving firm performance, though employee performance was considered somewhat important. The low standard deviations indicate responses were consistent across participants.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    nWS

    Importance of
    nWS
    Lmp|oyees
    performance
    I|rms
    performance

    Mean 101 429 280 347
    Med|an 100 433 273 330
    Standard
    Dev|at|on 007 043 021 026
    M|n|mum 100 300 223 300
    Max|mum 130 300 323 400
    Count 3000 3000 3000 3000

    Mean Med|an Cn Lhe average all employees know PWS and Lhls sysLem ls lmplemenLed ln
    almosL every organlzaLlon As for as lmporLance ls concerned employees belleve LhaL PWS ls
    lmporLanL 1he employee performance ls some whaL lmporLanL however PWS ls very slgnlflcanL for
    lmprovemenL of Lhe flrm's performance
    Standard Dev|at|on Cn average Lhe value of sLandard devlaLlon ls less whlch shows LhaL Lhe sample
    whlch ls selecLed ls approprlaLe and Lhe varlance among Lhe responses ls also less whlch ellmlnaLes
    chances of error
    M|n|mum 1he respondenLs choose Lhe value beLween leasL lmporLanL and mosL lmporLanL
    Count 1he LoLal numbers of respondenLs are 30


    nPw5 lmportonce
    mp/oyees
    Performonce
    lirms
    Performonce
    nWS 1
    Importance 0012687627 1
    Lmp|oyees
    erformance

    0031471417

    0034783237 1
    I|rms erformance 0016606806 0104390613 0049321703 1

    You might also like