Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    Book 1

    Uploaded by

    Guayo Garrido
    The document compares the performance of different schemes for an industrial process. It provides data on the duty, area, utility requirements, costs, energy savings and payback period for various compressor configurations including a base case (CdiC), and schemes using a condenser (CR2.1), reboiler (CR2.6), and internal heat exchangers (int HIDiC1 and int HIDiC2). The internal heat exchanger schemes have the highest energy savings over 60% and payback periods under 2 years, while the reboiler and condenser schemes achieve around 20% savings with paybacks of 6-7 years.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Book 1

    Uploaded by

    Guayo Garrido
    7 views6 pages
    The document compares the performance of different schemes for an industrial process. It provides data on the duty, area, utility requirements, costs, energy savings and payback period for various compressor configurations including a base case (CdiC), and schemes using a condenser (CR2.1), reboiler (CR2.6), and internal heat exchangers (int HIDiC1 and int HIDiC2). The internal heat exchanger schemes have the highest energy savings over 60% and payback periods under 2 years, while the reboiler and condenser schemes achieve around 20% savings with paybacks of 6-7 years.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document compares the performance of different schemes for an industrial process. It provides data on the duty, area, utility requirements, costs, energy savings and payback period for various compressor configurations including a base case (CdiC), and schemes using a condenser (CR2.1), reboiler (CR2.6), and internal heat exchangers (int HIDiC1 and int HIDiC2). The internal heat exchanger schemes have the highest energy savings over 60% and payback periods under 2 years, while the reboiler and condenser schemes achieve around 20% savings with paybacks of 6-7 years.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    7 views6 pages

    Book 1

    Uploaded by

    Guayo Garrido
    The document compares the performance of different schemes for an industrial process. It provides data on the duty, area, utility requirements, costs, energy savings and payback period for various compressor configurations including a base case (CdiC), and schemes using a condenser (CR2.1), reboiler (CR2.6), and internal heat exchangers (int HIDiC1 and int HIDiC2). The internal heat exchanger schemes have the highest energy savings over 60% and payback periods under 2 years, while the reboiler and condenser schemes achieve around 20% savings with paybacks of 6-7 years.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    of 6

    condenser

    reboiler

    compressor

    item
    CdiC
    CR 2.1
    CR 2.6
    duty kW
    1193
    679.12
    674.29
    area m2
    107.97
    61.46
    61.02
    CW required ton/yr 632028.64
    ### 357201.31
    Cost of WC ton/yr
    37921.72 21585.65
    214432
    duty of R1 kW
    1546.72
    919.3
    848.15
    area of R1 kW
    103.12
    61.29
    56.54
    steam required ton/yr 20786.46 12354.6
    11398.42
    duty required kW
    0
    0
    0
    duty of R2 kW
    0
    0
    0
    cost of Steam $/yr 353369.81 210027.7 193773.11
    duty Comp1 kW
    0
    98.51
    130.25
    duty Comp2 kW
    0
    0
    0
    cost of electricity $/yr
    0 73456.7
    97119.4
    energy savings %
    0.00% 21.46%
    19.90%
    energy cost $/yr
    391291.5
    ### 312324.57
    energy cost savings %
    0.00% 22.04%
    20.18%
    8
    area of internal HE m2
    0
    10.63
    6.5

    Payback Period

    Years

    Payback Time yr
    TAC $/yr

    7
    6
    5
    4
    3
    2
    1

    CR0.07
    2.1

    0
    ###
    1

    CR 2.6

    7.48
    ###
    0.00%

    6.75
    813101.88
    3.56%

    item
    steam
    CR 3.1cooling water
    int HIDiC1
    int HIDiC 2
    electricity
    Scheme

    7.12
    813685.45
    3.49%

    Energy Savings
    80.00%
    60.00%
    40.00%
    20.00%
    0.00%
    CR 2.1

    CR 2.6

    CR 3.1

    int HIDiC1

    int

    Compressor Duty

    2
    2.31
    ### 663250.79
    24.98%
    21.33%

    250
    200

    ###

    Duty (kWh)

    riod

    CR 3.1
    int HIDiC1int HIDiC 2
    670.24
    0
    0
    60.66
    0
    0
    355056.93
    0
    0
    21303.42
    0
    0
    778.38
    180.2
    44.18
    51.9
    12.01
    2.95
    10460.77
    2421.6
    593.76
    0
    0
    0
    0
    78.62
    94.59
    177833 41166.8 10093.85
    160.72
    130.25
    214.47
    0
    10.15
    0
    119844.38
    ### 159924.27
    18.50% 61.12%
    55.54%
    318980
    ### 170018.12
    18.48% 62.73%
    56.55%
    5.13
    6.5
    4.8

    value
    $17/ton
    $0.06/ton
    int HIDiC1
    int HIDiC 2
    $0.084/kWh

    150
    100
    50
    CR 2.1

    CR 2.6

    CR 3.1

    Duty (kWh)

    Reboiler Duty
    1600
    1400
    1200
    1000
    800
    600
    400
    200
    CdiC

    CR 2.1

    CR 2.6

    CR 3.1

    int HIDiC1
    int HIDiC 2

    int HIDiC1

    int HIDiC

    Duty

    400
    200
    CdiC

    CR 2.1

    CR 2.6

    CR 3.1

    int HIDiC1
    int HIDiC 2

    gy Savings

    CR 3.1

    int HIDiC1

    int HIDiC 2

    ssor Duty

    CR 3.1

    int HIDiC1

    int HIDiC 2

    You might also like