Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

VLADIMIR PROPP AND FORMALISM Was Propp a formalist? Why did he deny it?

What about his Marxist leanings? He did create a formalist approach to forklores Langue/parole kind of approach folklores at langue and folktales, laments, fairytales, wondertales, etc as paroles Morphemes narratemes Folklore as people s literature As a literature of classless society
Propp's approach has been criticized for removing all verbal considerations from the analysis, even though the folktale's form is almost always oral, and also all considerations of tone, mood, character, and, anything that differentiates one fairy tale from another. One of the most prominent critics of Propp is the famous French Structuralist Claude Lvi-Strauss, who used Propp's monograph on the morphology of the Folktale to demonstrate the superiority of the Structuralist approach, and the shortcomings of the Formalist approach. (see Levi-Strauss, Claude. "Structure and Form: Reflection on a Work by Vladimir Propp"). Defenders of Propp believe that such criticisms are largely redundant, as Propp's approach was not intended to unearth meaning in the fairy tales he examined (as may be the case with Structuralist or Psychoanalytic analysis), nor to find the elements that differentiate one tale from another, but to unearth the elemental building blocks that formed the basis of their narrative structure. - wiki

You might also like