Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cag of India 150 - Year
Cag of India 150 - Year
Cag of India 150 - Year
A brief introduction
The Indian Audit and Accounts Department (IA&AD) is the Supreme Audit Institution of India, set up over 150 years ago in 1860. We, the members of this service, assist the Comptroller and Auditor General of India in discharging the duties mandated to him by the Constitution of India. In this booklet, we have encapsulated the origins of our organisation, our vision and mission, our duties, responsibilities and the work that we do.
Contents
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Who are we? Our Vision, Mission and Core Values A bit of history Independent CAG in independent India Our organisation Whom do we audit? The audit process What are the types of audit we do? The final product of the audit process The Audit Reports
5 7 8 9 12 17 18 20 25
10 11 12
What happens to the Audit Reports? Impact of our work CAG a few misconceptions
27 28 34
The origin of auditing is as ancient as the origin of organised governance. The Arthashastra provides detailed guidance on the manner of accounting and the verification of accounts. During the medieval period, the mushrif and the mustaufi performed the accounting and auditing functions respectively.
In the Indian system of governance, the policies set by the Parliament and State Legislatures give the goals to be achieved through public spending. These policies are translated into programmes and implemented by various departments of the government. For this, the Parliament sanctions the budget which prescribes how Government will collect money through taxes and how much and for which purposes it shall spend. There are also financial rules which the Government departments and other public bodies must follow when they receive and spend public money. The spending departments are accountable to the Parliament for both the quantity and quality of their expenditure. Articles 148 to 151 of the Constitution prescribe a unique role for the Comptroller and Auditor General of India in assisting the Parliament to enforce the said accountability of the Government departments. The SAI of India audits both Central and State Governments and also maintains the accounts of the State Governments.
It's all in words.In the 15th century, the word Controller developed the alternate spelling Comptroller as a result of an association between the first part of the word, cont, and an unrelated word count and its variant compt. Many people pronounce comptroller like controller but both are acceptable. But the word Comptroller has a different meaning - someone who maintains and audits business. Comptrollers are controllers but all controllers are not comptrollers.
Our mission enunciates our current role and describes what we are doing today
Mandated by the Constitution of India, we promote accountability, transparency and good governance through high quality auditing and accounting and provide independent assurance to our stakeholders the Legislature, the Executive and the Public that public funds are being used efficiently and for the intended purposes.
Our core values are the guiding beacons for all that we do and give us the benchmarks for assessing our performance
n n n n
n n n
3 A bit of history
Government audit in British India
The role of the CAG evolved through practice and tradition in British India. Just prior to the mutiny of 1857, Lord Canning had initiated a major administrative reorganisation. This led to the setting up of, for the first time, in May 1858, a separate department with an Accountant General at the helm. He was responsible for accounting and auditing of the financial transactions under the East India Company. After the mutiny, the British Crown took over the administration of India and passed the Government of India Act 1858. This Act introduced a system of an annual budget of Imperial Income and Expenditure in 1860. The budgeting system laid the foundation stone of Imperial Audit. Sir Edward Drummond took charge in November 1860 as the first Auditor General. The term Comptroller and Auditor General of India was first used in 1884. Under the Montford Reforms of 1919, the Auditor General became independent of the Government. The Government of India Act 1935 strengthened the position of the Auditor General by providing for Provincial Auditors General in a federal set-up. Till 1947, when the last British Auditor General Sir Bertie Monro Staig handed over the reins, the department remained an integral part of British administration. Under various nomenclatures like the Accountant General, the Auditor General and the Comptroller and Auditor General, it provided unified accounting and auditing arrangements for the whole of British India.
Foreseeing the problems inherent in having an auditor who is subordinate or open to pressure by the Government in power, the framers of our Constitution put in place several provisions in Articles 148 to 151 to ensure that the CAG and the officers of SAI of India are able to conduct their work in an impartial and upright manner. Article 148 imbues the CAG with the immunities Sh. V. Narhari Rao, from executive action accorded to a Supreme the First Indian Comptroller and Auditor General Court Judge (making him independent of (1948 to 1954) Governmental and political influence). Articles 149 and 150 define his duties and powers. Article 151 prescribes that his reports are to be submitted to the President/Governor and placed before the respective legislatures (Lok Sabha or Vidhan Sabha).
The Constitution enables the independent and unbiased nature of audit by the CAG by providing:
Appointed by the President of India Special procedure for removal (like a Supreme Court Judge) Salary and expenses are Charged (not Voted) Cannot hold any other Government office after his term expires
All receipts into and spending from the coffers (called the Consolidated Fund) of the Union and State Governments. All transactions relating to the Emergency expenses (called Contingency Funds) and relating to the monies of the public held by the Government e.g. Postal savings, Vikas Patras (called Public Accounts) at Central as well as State levels All trading, manufacturing, profit and loss accounts, balance sheets and other subsidiary accounts kept in any Government department. All stores and stock accounts of all Government offices and departments. Accounts of all Government companies and Corporations e.g. ONGC, SAIL etc. Accounts of all autonomous bodies and authorities receiving Government money e.g. municipal bodies, IIM's, IIT's, State Health societies. Accounts of any body or authority on request of the President/Governor or on his own initiative. Power to inspect any office or organisation subject to his audit.
10
n n
Power to examine all transactions and question the executive. Power to call for any records, papers, documents from any audited entity. Power to decide the extent and manner of audit.
The DPC Act also provides for compilation of accounts by the CAG. We compile the accounts of State Governments from the subsidiary accounts submitted by treasuries and other officers of the State Governments. While compiling accounts, we do not just mechanically total up incomes and expenditures but act as financial advisors. We raise an alarm if monies are being drawn in excess of authorisation or if there are no supporting bills to an item of expenditure. We actively monitor expenditure patterns and issue advice on excesses/surrenders/ lapses of funds. This ensures that systemic corrections are made in time and acts as an important circuit breaker that prevents frauds. In 2007, the CAG has issued, under section 23 of the DPC Act, 'Regulations on Audit and Accounts' which define in detail the scope, manner, and extent of his auditing and accounting mandate
The infamous Bihar Fodder Scam was a result of chronic financial indiscipline in the State Government treasuries which were notorious in not submitting accounts or delaying them badly. Without the Treasury account or with incomplete accounts, there was no way to know what was the total amount spent under each grant. This helped a government department to draw huge sums of money in excess of the authorisation from the Treasury for fodder, medicines and other supplies to non-existent animal stock. The Doranda treasury in Ranchi had withdrawn Rs.104 crore against a budget provision of Rs. 74 crore! Each of the six government farms in Ranchi spent Rs. 20 crore every year to feed pigs and cattle. Since 1998, CAG has computerised compilation of accounts and has actively assisted and guided the state treasuries in computerising their work so that such overdrawals can be immediately detected and alert messages generated.
11
Our organisation
The Comptroller and Auditors General
Shri V. Narhari Rao was the first CAG from 1948 to 1954. The CAGs after him were Shri A K Chanda, Shri A K Roy, Shri S Ranganathan, Shri A Baksi, Shri Gian Prakash, Shri T N Chaturvedi, Shri C G Somiah, Shri V K Shunglu and Shri V N Kaul. Shri Vinod Rai is the present incumbent.
Subordinate cadres
Our total staff strength is approximately 50000. The gazetted supervisory cadre (Group B) consists of Senior Audit/ Accounts Officers, Audit Officers and Assistant Audit/ Accounts Officers. They may be directly recruited or promoted from the lower cadres. Apart from this there is support staff cadre (Group C). We have a large network of Regional Training Institutes and Regional Training centres to provide extensive induction and in service training to our staff.
13
14
Offices of the Accountants General (Audit) in every State are responsible for audit of all receipts and expenditure of the State government, audit of Government companies, corporations and autonomous bodies in the State. There are 57 AG Audit offices in India. Besides, there are 29 offices of Accounts and Entitlements (A&E) headed by Accountants General (A&E) engaged in maintaining the accounts of the State Governments and authorising GPF and pension payments of their employees. Offices of the Principal Directors of Audit (28) are responsible for audit of the activities of the Union Government, including Civil Ministries and Departments, Defence, Indian Railways and Posts and Telecommunications. We also have Overseas Audit Offices in Washington, London and Kuala Lumpur for audit of embassies. The Offices of the Member Audit Board (MAB) are responsible for the audit of Central Public Sector undertakings. They certify the annual accounts of the statutory corporations and conduct Supplementary Audit of Government Companies.
15
Administration
State Accounts
Administration
Civil
Works
Local Bodies
16
Whom do we audit ?
The organisations subject to the audit of the SAI India are:n
All the Union and State Government departments including the Indian Railways Defence and Posts and Telecommunications. About 1500 public commercial enterprises controlled by the Union and State governments, i.e. government companies and corporations. Around 400 non-commercial autonomous bodies and authorities owned or controlled by the Union or the States. Bodies and authorities substantially financed from Union or State finances. Notable among these are some of the local bodies and Panchayati Raj Institutions which are critical grass root agencies for implementation of developmental programmes and delivery of services
17
Field Audit
The annual audit plan details the units to be audited during the year which are selected after a risk assessment exercise. This plan is carried out through quarterly audit programmes. The departments to be audited are informed in advance. Field audit parties comprising Audit Officers and Assistant Audit Officers conduct local inspection of records according to the audit objectives. Our teams visit the audited entity and check all financial and operational documents. Based on this they make queries and obtain written replies of the department.
18
Thereafter, an Inspection Report (IR) is prepared by a field audit party and finalised and issued by a Audit Objective middle level IAAS officer who monitors the audit Fieldwork process. The IR is then Analysis served to the audited entity. It contains the preliminary & Reporting audit observations. This Presentation gives an opportunity to the audited entity to verify all facts and figures and put forth its views or to take corrective action. Where significant audit observations remain unattended, we bring them to the notice of the highest level of Government as Draft Paragraphs (DPs). When either no explanations are given or when the explanations given are not substantiated, the cases feature in the annual Audit Reports placed by the CAG before the concerned Legislature. The Accountant General monitors the entire process of planning, execution and audit reporting by a field office.
19
Compliance Audit Financial Attest Audit Performance Audit Apart from these traditional audits, we have successfully done a number of audits of Information Technology (IT) Systems and on Environmental issues.
Traditionally, auditors checking procedural adherence would use a red pencil to underline all lapses - an image which endures - though auditing techniques are highly evolved today.
Compliance audit
Compliance audit is often called a transaction audit in which some selected transactions (for e.g. a purchase by a Medical Officer, a contract executed by a Public Works Division for building a road or a tax assessment order by an Assessment Officer) of an entity for a particular financial year are chosen for examination.
Government rules require that a supplier of equipment will be paid only when the office where it is to be installed, submits an installation report. We found that expensive equipment purchased by Chhattisgarh Government Health department had been paid for on the basis of installation reports furnished by the supplier, instead of the receiving Chief Medical Officer. While this may seem just a rule that was not followed, further investigation showed that the installation reports were fake. We found that a local supplier had appropriated the purchase orders addressed to a well known firm and faked the invoices and letter heads of the firm to supply substandard equipment.
20
A compliance auditor would ask what has been/ not been done in a transaction against rule, sanction, provision and propriety. He checks whether a transaction:
n
conforms to sanction/provision of funds; adheres to all rules and regulations; adheres to the principles of financial propriety, which go beyond mere observation of rules.
n n
Our reports on Central PSUs have found substantial discrepancies in the accounts of many PSUs. We found that BSNL had overstated its profit for two years by Rs 1,000 crore and Rs. 587.38 crore respectively.
21
Performance audit
Pe r f o r m a n c e a u d i t d o e s n o t correspond to the traditional image of auditing as a process centered on 'checking the books' to attest their correctness. It seeks to establish at what cost and to what degree the policies, programmes and projects are working. Performance Audit, apart from asking whether things are being done in the right way, goes a step further and analyses whether the right things are being done. In addition to all the financial audit checks, the Performance Audit seeks to assess whether a programme, scheme or activity deploys sound means to achieve its intended socio-economic objectives. A performance auditor would ask what should have been done to achieve the objectives; how can we do things better and how to do better things.
Our review of Governments flagship Health care scheme NRHM revealed a sluggish fund-flow mechanism, especially in the states which have poor health indicators. This has a cascading effect on development of infrastructure at Primary and Community Health Centre levels. The procurement and supply system of medicines in many states was plagued with delays, poor stock management and poor quality control. In nine states, not a single PHC/CHC test-checked had the requisite two month's buffer stock of essential drugs/vaccines and contraceptives.
Our review on the Farmers' relief package in Maharashtra found that the Rs. 1075 crore package was not only tardily implemented but also left out a large number of distressed farmers. The package addressed short term relief measures like rescheduling of loans and grants for marriage, illness etc. but failed to correct the root causes of indebtedness such as low minimum support prices of cash crops and high cost of seeds, water and electricity.
22
The IT Audit of E-governance in Andhra Pradesh revealed that key data and huge volumes of cash pertaining to various departments linked with the system were left to the administration of a private service provider without adequate internal controls IT audit of Land Records Computerization Systems in several States revealed that the information fed was incomplete/full of errors. Therefore, they have been unable to replace the manual systems despite putting in huge amount of funds and resources.
The IT Audit initiative of SAI India has been awarded with Prime Minister's Award for excellence in public administration in the year 2008.
23
Social Audit
We are conscious that the general public has become much more discerning and seek reports evaluating the performance of Government Schemes. Since Civil Society Organisations have been conducting close scrutiny of the implementation and outcomes of the schemes, we have taken various initiatives to synergise our Audit Reports with these organizations. The objective has been to muster the local knowledge and competence of these civil society organizations for a better reach of the formal audit process. Such social audits are being carried out for social sector schemes such as in health, education, rural employment and water.
Environment Audit
Our department has done a number of performance audits on various environmental issues in the past. This has been identified as an area of specialised auditing and we are in the process of establishing an international centre which shall provide training on environment audit and conduct research on environmental issues and sustainable development.
In our report on Management of Waste we raised question about flawed waste policy in India which was directed only at 'waste disposal' and ignored 'waste recycling' and 'waste reuse'. We recommended that 'waste recycling and reuse' should be incorporated as waste management strategies as they have long term viability and are internationally accepted best practices.
24
Our report on Income Tax Refunds revealed that while the number of refund cases has reduced significantly over the last decade-the Tax department still takes an average of a year to finally refund the excess tax. This compares poorly with the department's target of 3-6 months and international average of 40 days. The CAG has suggested to the Finance Ministry to incorporate a mechanism at the Bangalore-based Central Processing Centre so that the refund claims are dealt with on priority basis.
25
Types of Reports
The Audit Reports of the CAG submitted to the Parliament and State Legislatures consist of compliance and performance audit reports covering revenue collection and expenditure of Government, separate audit reports on the functioning of certain autonomous bodies as provided by legislation, reports on the Financial position of Central and State Governments and reports on the adherence to the Appropriation Acts passed by Parliament and Legislatures. The CAG also submits the certified annual accounts of the States, known as the Finance and Appropriation Accounts, to the State Legislatures.
Audit of e-SEVA
26
10
27
28
Our report on a scheme to save the Dal lake of Srinagar revealed that while the Government had spent Rs. 236 crore on the project, the efforts were misdirected and concentrated on mechanical removal of silt and weeds rather than checking the unauthorized construction, polluting effluents and encroachments around the lake area. Thus the lake had reduced to half of its size and became shallower by 3 metres during the project period.
A review of visa, Passport and consular services had pointed out 21 instances where, due to weak internal controls, passports had been issued on fake identities by our Passport offices. These assume significance in view of the heightened internal security threats.
Indian Railways handed over pantry cars to IRCTC without making any provision regarding realisation of haulage cost of pantry cars. Based on the audit recommendation, a clause on this has been incorporated in the MOU. Ministry of Finance amended section 18 of the Custom Act, 1962 to provide for levy of interest on differential duty payable on finalisation of the provisional assessments. Ministry of Finance amended the Service Tax rules to enable the assessee to make adjustment of the amount paid in excess from the amount of service tax liability to be discharged in the succeeding month/ quarter.
29
Government departments in strengthening internal controls and understanding risks to improve delivery systems. The Finance Commission to gain an informed opinion on State Government's finances. The State Governments in putting in place better, transparent accounting systems for Local Bodies and PRIs. Through the Government Accounting Standards Advisory Board (GASAB)* in framing Government Accounting Standards for greater transparency.
* GASAB is a high power body which aims to make Government accounts understandable, reliable, relevant, timely, consistent and comparable across departments and organisations, both at Union and State levels. It includes representatives of the Ministry of Finance, GOI, Finance department of four States, RBI and nominee of ICAI. It also has stewards of six major accounting departments of the GOI including the SAI India.
30
31
Gorton Castle
Yarrows
32
33
34
unbiased reports. The SAI functions as the eyes and ears of the Parliament. We track expenditure of each of the hundreds of Government schemes and programmes, pinpoint leakages, report inefficiencies and corrupt practices and ensure that the accountability chain of the executive to the legislature does not suffer complete breakdown. At the same time we have appreciated and pointed out good practices followed by the Government departments. Moreover as befits a developing economy, the SAI India has attempted to link performance of Government programmes with 'outcomes'. We have used clear, concise and measurable performance indicators and recommended performance benchmarks and Good Practices Guides to Government departments. Pointing out procedural lapses and violation of rules is a part of ensuring financial fair play. Today when transparency and accountability are key concerns and demand for thorough scrutiny of Government spending is growing, the key issue is how audit findings can be acted upon by the concerned agencies in a time-bound and effective manner. Any talk that audit by SAI cramps decision making is nothing but a red-herring to take attention away from the fact that accountability needs to be enforced for every rupee of public money that is spent.
Citizens have every right to know how the tax-payers money is being spent by the government to implement various programmes. If any funds spent by the government do not come under the scrutiny of Comptroller and Auditor General of India then it is nothing but a "lacuna". Vice President Shri Hamid Ansari (June 2010)
35