Document from youtu.be/px3h7IMMyP8
A politically incorrect 28 U.S.C. Section 144 Motion to Disqualify a Mormon federal judge (Judge David G. Campbell) written by a so-called "Anti-Mormon. (That is, an Evangelical Christian who specializes in Mormonism.)
According to the Federal Judicial Center plus other experts in the field, a Section 144 motion to disqualify is a dead end. (Especially for the pro se litigant, as, technically, a 144 motion is supposed to contain a "certificate of good faith," signed by an attorney. But since a pro se is not an officer of the court . . . )
Use Section 455 instead, although judges refuse to admit they're biased. Still, it might help at appeal, as it did in Caperton v. Massey.
Original Title
28 U.S.C. Section 144 motion to disqualify judge david g. campbell
Document from youtu.be/px3h7IMMyP8
A politically incorrect 28 U.S.C. Section 144 Motion to Disqualify a Mormon federal judge (Judge David G. Campbell) written by a so-called "Anti-Mormon. (That is, an Evangelical Christian who specializes in Mormonism.)
According to the Federal Judicial Center plus other experts in the field, a Section 144 motion to disqualify is a dead end. (Especially for the pro se litigant, as, technically, a 144 motion is supposed to contain a "certificate of good faith," signed by an attorney. But since a pro se is not an officer of the court . . . )
Use Section 455 instead, although judges refuse to admit they're biased. Still, it might help at appeal, as it did in Caperton v. Massey.
Document from youtu.be/px3h7IMMyP8
A politically incorrect 28 U.S.C. Section 144 Motion to Disqualify a Mormon federal judge (Judge David G. Campbell) written by a so-called "Anti-Mormon. (That is, an Evangelical Christian who specializes in Mormonism.)
According to the Federal Judicial Center plus other experts in the field, a Section 144 motion to disqualify is a dead end. (Especially for the pro se litigant, as, technically, a 144 motion is supposed to contain a "certificate of good faith," signed by an attorney. But since a pro se is not an officer of the court . . . )
Use Section 455 instead, although judges refuse to admit they're biased. Still, it might help at appeal, as it did in Caperton v. Massey.