Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Addressing Reviewers Comments

    Uploaded by

    ipspalc
    25 views1 page
    The reviewer critiques a paper submitted for publication. They acknowledge the work done but raise concerns about biases and assumptions in the research methods and flow. The paper could be improved by addressing variables, interfaces, and considering different user perspectives to create a more scientifically rigorous study.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Addressing reviewers comments

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The reviewer critiques a paper submitted for publication. They acknowledge the work done but raise concerns about biases and assumptions in the research methods and flow. The paper could be improved by addressing variables, interfaces, and considering different user perspectives to create a more scientifically rigorous study.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    25 views1 page

    Addressing Reviewers Comments

    Uploaded by

    ipspalc
    The reviewer critiques a paper submitted for publication. They acknowledge the work done but raise concerns about biases and assumptions in the research methods and flow. The paper could be improved by addressing variables, interfaces, and considering different user perspectives to create a more scientifically rigorous study.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    ADDREss

    r
    Reviewer
    ~

    ,rN

    G' D E

    l[

    '

    -.",...,-,,'"'"

    oo=' ,

    'l

    IE 'J/ E D CO MME

    comment:

    / device! ~._Ai-

    method

    &e~~

    ~iewet

    :it~~.

    10---"-

    X "Yes,

    we ~;Wetbouoot

    we

    Rwiewer

    ~to~the

    work~~
    Flow

    X"1iuh.

    to

    I"_&

    v~i

    .t"The review:e:t
    ~

    ~~Ho

    evet,atl1e

    ~of~wOtk
    ~
    ~
    c:n~ltmportan(e

    mt

    anyf!ody

    is,~Jomto~

    ~iasedon~r
    vall.

    ~,nctfmmdt()

    be
    '9

    butiOttof~pa~r.

    the

    WOt"k

    wntn-

    of

    firs~p~litS'we
    .

    use

    vanacDJ..~e$.,
    ~ore

    attractive

    mtetf~.

    and
    gmpbical

    who~_YmIOrltlA
    ...I.""

    ..J'--

    fhe~,did
    p'tehe~

    much

    .1Jcno\\'

    UU

    -'...~"

    ~,\U

    !
    ~.\

    r48MJnterctt

    ~~Cm\.~owev.~twef.l

    ditetent

    user

    iu.-~
    \
    r--

    v.1"1:l\e
    ri,'.~

    differt!nt

    bua

    ~~--

    lW~r~

    "'

    ~COt1rem_fIo~r,ou

    pctfotmalDbased.

    to

    !
    ""

    an mtetest.

    l"'wnttetl and

    -publDtion.
    NOT

    X*ou

    _, ,,~-N

    ""'u- t ....po..~~.

    Cc
    --.""'r-'-.
    ~
    taisC$an~
    !'w~'j"',,"

    ~tt
    ~

    ~d~that..~t1\@ir
    t::- l~"__'L_&_-.'
    -..
    oafN~_\

    COdldstlU~a~oufofit.
    ~."
    """7'

    is

    scientiJbUy'~&-.~do~

    2() ~afP.

    ~-r--

    We didn'tthitlk

    commeltt'.

    "Thi$~

    etaL.who
    ~

    Rn1e problem
    NOT

    T~~6UIJ>E:-

    YOO:M4Y~Tr.ze.:T
    rr ?A5T11tE.~tT~

    L~ANP

    ~ut1\Ot$
    h

    NOT

    9AP~VIe.WS~Y~?APER?F(X;J;o.../

    "'"[.1

    '\"rong;
    ...

    k:1T~

    '

    f\ Y Y1 f\

    -LT-

    ---~--.,.-

    .n~mi$JU:<l~
    on

    "
    notfDy

    me

    scope

    of~
    the~Jt-;

    com-

    WOtk,.

    based

    inConec:ta$$UmpHoM.

    W~W.phgcorn iC6"CO~,:

    '

    ...

    You might also like