If we construe the grannar of the expression of sensation on the model of 'object and designation' the thing in the box has no place in the language-game at all; not even as a something; it cancels out, whatever it is. For Wittgenstein words like "pain" have a sense only as long as they "are not treated as a name of something whose presence or absence swings free of all differences in environment or behavior"
If we construe the grannar of the expression of sensation on the model of 'object and designation' the thing in the box has no place in the language-game at all; not even as a something; it cancels out, whatever it is. For Wittgenstein words like "pain" have a sense only as long as they "are not treated as a name of something whose presence or absence swings free of all differences in environment or behavior"
Original Description:
Original Title
On Going On_ Rules, Inferences and Literary Conditions _ Nonsite
If we construe the grannar of the expression of sensation on the model of 'object and designation' the thing in the box has no place in the language-game at all; not even as a something; it cancels out, whatever it is. For Wittgenstein words like "pain" have a sense only as long as they "are not treated as a name of something whose presence or absence swings free of all differences in environment or behavior"
If we construe the grannar of the expression of sensation on the model of 'object and designation' the thing in the box has no place in the language-game at all; not even as a something; it cancels out, whatever it is. For Wittgenstein words like "pain" have a sense only as long as they "are not treated as a name of something whose presence or absence swings free of all differences in environment or behavior"