Professional Documents
Culture Documents
New Igc 3 Jan 2012 v2 New New New
New Igc 3 Jan 2012 v2 New New New
IGC 3 2011/2012
Wasyl Terych & M Kamarajan
This reference material is aimed at the unitised NEBOSH IGC Unit 3 Practical Application. It has been designed in such a way that it provides a guide to candidates to successfully complete the requirements of this course unit.
Table of Contents
Foreword to NEBOSH IGC Unit 3 Revision For 2012 ....................................................................................... 3 About the And MArkers of the IGC For ETA Consultancy ................................................................................. 7 About the Editor ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 An Opening Thought ............................................................................................................................................. 9 The Assessors Marking Sheet ........................................................................................................................... 11 The Observation Sheet ...................................................................................................................................... 13 Date of Assessment .......................................................................................................................................... 14 Observation Sheet ............................................................................................................................................. 14 Completion of Observation Sheets ................................................................................................................ 14 1.0 1.1 1.2 Completion of Observation Sheets .......................................................................................................... 17 Range and Number of HAzards / Good Practices ............................................................................... 17 Identification of Suitable Control Measures and timescales ..................................................................... 19
Table 1 Typical Issues ................................................................................................................................ 20 Completion of Report......................................................................................................................................... 21 2.0 2.1 Management Report ................................................................................................................................ 23 Introduction Providing an Overview of the Chosen Area ..................................................................... 23
Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 23 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 4.0 Report Main Findings of the Inspection ................................................................................................. 25 Quality of Interpretation of Findings and Clear Reference to Strengths and Weaknesses .................. 25 Identification of Possible Breaches of International Standards ............................................................ 25 Persuasiveness / Conciseness / Technical Content ............................................................................ 26 Report Conclusions and Recommendations ......................................................................................... 27
4.1 Clear and Concise Conclusions Which are Clearly Related to Report Findings and are Effective in Convincing Management to Take Action ....................................................................................................... 27 4.2 Recommendations Which Present Realistic Actions to Improve Health and Safety in the Chosen Area 27
Appendix 1......................................................................................................................................................... 29 IGC3 The Health and Safety Practical Application ...................................................................................... 29 Appendix 2 Observation Exercises ................................................................................................................. 31 Appendix 3 Some General Hazard Spotting Practice Pictures ..................................................................... 57
Page 5 of 61
Page 6 of 61
revision and has been written to abide by the 2011/12 course syllabus as
NEBOSH IGC Unit 1 Element 5 Health and Safety Management Systems 4 Measuring, Audit and Review
Page 8 of 61
AN OPENING THOUGHT
Page 10 of 61
Course Provider Name Student Name Maximum Marks Available Assessors Marks Awarded NEBOSH Moderated Marks (If Different)
Criteria
Completion of observation Sheets Range and number of hazards/good practice Identification of suitable control measures and timescales Report Introduction and Executive Summary Introduction providing an overview of the chosen area Executive summary Report Main findings of the inspection Quality of interpretation of findings and clear reference to strengths and weaknesses Identification of possible breaches on international standards Persuasiveness / conciseness / technical content Report Conclusions and Recommendations Clear and concise conclusions which are clearly related to report findings and are effective in convincing management to take action Recommendations which present realistic actions to improve health and safety in the chosen area Total Marks 15 5 5 15 15
3.2 3.3 4
5 10
4.1
15
4.2
15 100
Page 11 of 61
Page 12 of 61
INTERNATIONAL GENERAL CERTIFICATE (2010 specification) IGC3 THE HEALTH AND SAFETY PRACTICAL APPLICATION
Sheet number of _____
Page 13 of 61
DATE OF ASSESSMENT
Assessment of the practical unit (IGC3) must normally take place within 14 days of the date of the IGC1 and/or IGC2 written papers (the date of the examination). If a candidate is absent from the written papers because of illness corroborated by a doctors note, but successfully completes the IGC3 unit within the 14 day deadline, the result will stand. If a candidate is unable to complete the NGC3 unit under similar circumstances, NEBOSH may allow it to be taken at a later date beyond the normal 14 day deadline but candidates must inform ETA Consultancy as soon as possible so that the appropriate notifications can be made.. ETA Consultancy will advise the candidate of the latest date by which the completed report and observation sheets must be received by them for marking. Candidates are advised that the completion of study for both IGC1 and IGC2 is recommended in order to undertake the practical application unit IGC3.
OBSERVATION SHEET
COMPLETION OF OBSERV ATION SHEETS
Candidates will be supplied with a sufficient number of observation sheets from ETA Consultancy which may be photocopied for the purpose. An example observation sheet is given earlier. The observation sheets must be completed during the inspection and no alterations should be made to it. Only brief details of each hazard are required including: 1. 2. Where the hazard was located and The nature of the hazard.
For example, housekeeping could be better does not give enough information about the particular hazard. Candidates should avoid the tendency to simply identify the tasks being undertaken, or the equipment that is being used, instead of providing an indication of how the tasks or items of equipment pose a risk. Candidates must demonstrate their understanding of how identified hazards have the potential to cause harm, for example, boxes stored on the floor may cause obstruction of access, egress routes and / or a risk of musculoskeletal injury if lifted. The observation sheets should be completed by: Identifying, in the left hand column, any hazards, unsafe work practices and examples of good practice observed during the inspection; Providing in the next column, an indication of the urgency of taking action (high, medium or low priority) which should reflect the level of risks. Commenting, in the next column on the adequacy of existing controls and identifying any immediate, medium term and long term remedial actions needed; Stating, in the right hand column a reasonable timescale for the actions identified.
The distinction between timescales and priorities should be expanded i.e., that a low priority action, in terms of risk, might still be completed quickly because it can be done easily; conversely the most appropriate solution for a high priority (high risk) area might only be possible in the longer term (in which case interim measures might be necessary). There should be sufficient information on the observation sheets to enable the candidate to complete a comprehensive report to management on their findings. Candidates are also advised to make notes on the area inspected, including activities taking place, in order to complete the introduction to their report.
Page 14 of 61
NEBOSH IGC 3 Practical Application Based on the 2012 Requirements Whilst poor spelling and grammar will not be marked or penalised, if the assessor is unable to read or to understand the notes made by candidates during their inspection then invariably fewer marks will be awarded than would otherwise have been the case. What Has to be Submitted for Marking to be Undertaken The submission to ETA Consultancy for marking must include the following: 1.0 Completed observation sheets covering a number and range of hazards and good practice, identifying suitable control measures and timescales An Introduction and Summary Main findings of the completed inspection Conclusions which summarise the main issues identified in the candidates workplace Completed Recommendations table. The candidate declaration form
The practical application must be carried out in the candidates own workplace. The workplace should be large enough to provide a sufficient range of hazards in the areas covered to provide and adequate range for identification. If the workplace is very large, in order that the practical application is manageable the candidate should limit the area considered. Where a candidate does not have access to a workplace, ETA Consultancy (your course provider) should be consulted and we will help in making arrangements for that candidate to carry out the application at suitable premises. Management of the premises being used should be consulted to ensure that the candidate can carry out the inspection without endangering their own health and safety. Where confidentiality requires, locations and company names may be omitted from the report, but ETA Consultancy need to be made aware of this so that they can comply with the appropriate NEBOSH requirements in this regard.
This information regarding what has to be submitted to ETA Consultancy to allow marking of the practical application is repeated later in this material Please be sure you are clear on these requirements.
Page 15 of 61
Page 16 of 61
1.0
1.1
Appropriate hazards/good practice for the chosen area 2 to 3 different types of hazards identified 7 to 13 uncontrolled hazards identified
Some appropriate hazards/good practice for the chosen area 1 type of hazard identified 1 to 6 uncontrolled hazards identified
If no reference to good practice take mark down by one mark, e.g. 3 types of issues but no reference to good practice 2 marks to be awarded 1 Typical issues are listed in table 1 and internal assessors must complete table 1 on allocating marks 2 Only one example of good practice is required for the mark to be awarded Candidates are expected to identify different types of hazard such as hazardous substances, fire, electrical, machinery, ergonomic, housekeeping, noise, vibration, transport, manual handling and health hazards and should also consider if there are any welfare and environmental problems. At least five different types of hazard must be included for maximum marks. Candidates are expected to comment on situations where there is adequate control of hazards and where good practice is being observed, although candidates should place the emphasis on uncontrolled hazards. Table 1 that follows indicates 20 typical issues, but candidates are reminded that the list is not an exhaustive one and they may include relevant issues that they identify during their observation exercise. Markers will consider all topic areas and will mark them accordingly if relevant. Think back to your IGC Units 1 and 2 included in these study units there are many topic areas discussed and workplaces often contain others. Be sure to include at least ONE example of good practice.
Page 17 of 61
Page 18 of 61
All sections of the observation sheet completed Identification of mainly immediate actions for the identified hazards Recommended actions generally effective in reducing risk and realistic in terms of timescales
Some sections of the observation sheet completed Reference to immediate actions only Recommended actions limited in reducing risk and unrealistic in terms of timescales
Candidates who repeat identical hazards will only be awarded one mark for that hazard Candidates who repeat similar hazards relating to different areas or equipment may only be awarded a maximum three marks for that particular hazard type. For example the repeated identification of machinery guarding, missing or damaged would only ever attract three marks maximum. Assessors must complete Table 1 to assist in allocating marks
3.
Candidates are expected to give thought to what is required to immediately control the risk from each identified hazard AND to identify the need for medium and long term actions to control the risk. This requires candidates to distinguish between the symptoms and the root causes of hazards. For example, the immediate action on a spillage may be clean up spillage and inform supervisor whereas medium term actions might include appropriate supervisor training, regular inspections, and investigation of the source of the leak. A longer term action may be to modify the work process to tackle the root cause. If existing controls are in place and considered adequate, candidates should consider any measures required to maintain this level of control. Candidates should avoid generic phrases being repeatedly used e.g. monitor and train staff. Candidates should give appropriate clarification by giving examples of appropriate monitoring and the type of training required. Candidates should be aware that if unsuitable control measures are suggested full marks cannot be awarded. Short term measures to improve housekeeping will do little to improve the lack of safety management systems and procedures evidenced by materials and equipment left lying around. The proposed control measures must not only remove or control the hazard but must also be realistic in terms of timescales.
Page 19 of 61
Issue Description
Comments
Electricity Ergonomics Falling Objects Fire First Aid Good Practice Hazardous Substances Housekeeping Information Machinery Manual Handling Noise Obstructions (trailing Cables) Personal Protective Equipment Signage Vehicle Routes Vibration Welfare / Hygiene Working at Height Work Environment Any Other Appropriate
Total
Page 20 of 61
COMPLETION OF REPORT
The practical application may be submitted in either the candidates own handwriting or be word processed. There is no time limit assigned to the practical application, however, candidates should aim to complete the process of observation and report writing within two hours (unless reasonable adjustments have been agreed by NEBOSH). Candidates should refer to the practical unit marking sheet (included earlier in this guidance document) for the headings under which marks will be allocated for the report and observation sheets in order to help structure their report. Candidates must not use previously prepared or organisation checklists, or any other prompts. The report should not contain photographs, printed text or any other extraneous material. The length of the report should be between 500 and 750 words and should not simply duplicate the observation sheets. The report should be written in such terms that a manager would be able to take reasonable action based on facts. Reports based on unsupported generalities and those that simply reiterate the contents of the observation sheets will be awarded low marks.
Page 21 of 61
Location ______________________________________
Date of review
Structure report under the following headings: Introduction including overview of area inspected and activities taking place
Executive Summary
Conclusions
Recommendation
Priority
Review date
Page 22 of 61
2.0
2.1
MANAGEMENT REPORT
INTRODUCTION PROVIDING AN OVERVIEW OF THE CHOSEN AREA
2.1 Introduction Providing an Overview of the Chosen Area Marks To Be Awarded 4 to 5 2 to 3 1 Limited description of the chosen area Lack of details on the activities taking place in the area
Clear and appropriate description of the chosen area and of the activities occurring in the area
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2.2 Executive Summary Marks To Be Awarded 4 to 5 Concise overview of important points and main conclusions / recommendations 2 to 3 Overview of some important points and some conclusions / recommendations 1
Limited overview
Page 23 of 61
Page 24 of 61
3.0
3.1 QUALITY OF INTERPRETATION OF FINDINGS AND CLEAR REFERENCE TO STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES
3.1 Quality of interpretation of findings and clear reference to strengths and weaknesses Marks To Be Awarded 11 to 15 Quality of interpretation of findings and clear reference to strengths and weaknesses Logical progression from the observation sheets Key issues identified in observation sheets have been appropriately discussed Clear reference to strengths and weaknesses 6 to 10 Logical progression from the observation sheets Some key issues identified in observation sheets have been appropriately discussed Some reference to strengths and weaknesses 1 to 5 Limited progression from the observation sheets Limited discussion of the key issues identified in the observation sheets Limited reference to strengths and weaknesses
3.2
Page 25 of 61
3.3
Convinces management to take action Report is well structured and appropriate length Report does not duplicate observation sheets
Some legal, moral and financial arguments Some persuasiveness in management action
Page 26 of 61
4.0
4.1 CLEAR AND CONCISE CONCLUSIONS WHICH ARE CLEARLY RELATED TO REPORT FINDINGS AND ARE EFFECTIVE IN CONVINCING MANAGEMENT TO TAKE ACTION
4.1 Clear and concise conclusions which are clearly related to report findings and are effective in convincing management to take action Marks To Be Awarded Clear and concise conclusions which are clearly related to report findings and are effective in convincing management to take action 11 to 15 6 to 10 1 to 5
Findings in the report summarized clearly and concisely Relevant and appropriate information provided to persuade management to take action
Logical progression from the report Some key issues identified in the report have been appropriately discussed
Limited progression from the report Limited discussion of the key issues identified in the report
4.2 RECOMMENDATIONS WHICH PRESENT REALISTIC ACTIONS TO IMPROVE HEALTH AND S AFETY IN THE CHOSEN AREA
4.2 Recommendations which present realistic actions to improve health and safety in the chosen area Marks To Be Awarded 11 to 15 Recommendations based upon conclusions Realistic recommendations Appropriately prioritized recommendations Appropriate cost estimations for all recommendations 6 to 10 Most recommendations follow on from the conclusions Most recommendations are realistic Some attempt at prioritization Appropriate cost estimates for most recommendations 1 to 5
Recommendations which present realistic actions to improve health and safety in the chosen area
Limited progression from conclusions Recommendations not all realistic Limited cost estimations
Page 27 of 61
Page 28 of 61
APPENDIX 1
IGC3 THE HEALTH AND SAFETY PRACTICAL APPLICATION
CANDIDATE AND COURSE PROVIDER DECLARATIONS:
NB: This declaration must be completed in full, submitted and retained with the candidates script. If this declaration is not submitted the candidates result may be declared void..
Page 29 of 61
Page 30 of 61
Page 31 of 61
Page 32 of 61
Page 33 of 61
Page 34 of 61
PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED
PROBLEM REMEDIAL ACTION LIKELY BREACHES OF INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS
1.
2.
Bolted Door
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Page 35 of 61
PROBLEM
REMEDIAL ACTION
Page 36 of 61
Page 37 of 61
Page 38 of 61
PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED
PROBLEM REMEDIAL ACTION LIKELY BREACHES OF INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Trailing Cable
7.
8.
9.
Page 39 of 61
PROBLEM
REMEDIAL ACTION
Page 40 of 61
Page 41 of 61
Page 42 of 61
PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED
PROBLEM REMEDIAL ACTION LIKELY BREACHES OF INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Overflowing bins
6.
7.
8.
Lack of PPE
9.
Page 43 of 61
PROBLEM
REMEDIAL ACTION
Page 44 of 61
Page 45 of 61
Page 46 of 61
PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED
PROBLEM REMEDIAL ACTION LIKELY BREACHES OF INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Page 47 of 61
PROBLEM
REMEDIAL ACTION
8.
9.
Page 48 of 61
Page 49 of 61
Page 50 of 61
PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED
PROBLEM REMEDIAL ACTION LIKELY BREACHES OF INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Page 51 of 61
PROBLEM
REMEDIAL ACTION
14. Ladder may be on a trailing cable therefore making the ladder unstable and a risk of damaging the cable which could lead to electrocution 15. No PPE being worn (may be a requirement)
Page 52 of 61
Page 53 of 61
Page 54 of 61
PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED
PROBLEM REMEDIAL ACTION LIKELY BREACHES OF INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Cardboard mat
8.
Page 55 of 61
Page 56 of 61
Page 57 of 61
Page 58 of 61
Page 59 of 61
Page 60 of 61
Page 61 of 61