Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Case I & Case II Bidding Projects: Evaluating Competitive Regime
Case I & Case II Bidding Projects: Evaluating Competitive Regime
Case I & Case II Bidding Projects: Evaluating Competitive Regime
Rural generation and distribution freed from licensing. Expanded role for the Regulatory Commissions tariff determination etc Role of CEA reduced. Envisages unbundling of transmission and distribution. The Regulatory Commission to promote development of market including trading.
Allows multiple generators to come up and compete Allows larger consumers to choose supplier Prescribes competitive procurement of power on long term Aims to create a National Market via compulsory open access Policy framework assures
Purchasing lower cost supply from market and back-down expensive generation
Long term capacity is set-up without the commitment with the availability of
a market as a back-up
Ensure availability of electricity reasonable & competitive rates Ensure financial viability and attract investments Promote transparency, consistency and predictability in regulatory approaches Promote competition, efficiency in operations and improvement in quality of supply
Procurement by distribution companies shall be done at through competitive bidding. Mandates competitive procurement of power and transmission services transitional window of 5 years period given to public sector companies. Promote Multi-Year Tariff (MYT) framework. Encourage loss reduction strategies. Progressive reduction in cross-subsidy. SERC shall fix a min % for purchase of energy from renewable considering Availability of such resources in the region, and Its impact on retail tariffs. CERC should lay down guidelines for pricing non-firm power, especially from non conventional sources, where procurement is not through competitive bidding. Encourage efficiency in operations by sharing of gains between licensees and consumers
Standardization of Bid documents , Bid submission and evaluation process, timeline for the bidding process, Tariff structure Tariff to be quoted upfront for the life of the plant and the Regulator to adopt the tariff arrived through transparent bidding process Developer has the flexibility to choose optimum unit configuration.
Case-I Bidding
Case-2 Bidding
Location/ technology/ fuel not specified. Generally done by the individual state. Power developer bids for the portion or the total power generated. Bidder responsible for clearances/ approvals etc. More relevant for states with limited fuel sources. Higher risk for developer Lower risk for state
Land/ fuel provided by procurer. Can be done by one or more states by the formation of SPV. The whole power is procured produced from the power plant. States responsible for facilitating all the clearances More applicable for states where fuel sources are available or costal areas exist. Higher risk for State Lower risk for developer
Only quantum of Power & Delivery Contracted Capacity is mentioned. point is mentioned. Supply is at generator bus-bar.
Fuel
Water
Environment & Bidder should have submitted proposal for Environment & Forest Clearance Forest Clearance
Financial
Developing project means successful commissioning of a project in which the Bidder/Parent/Affiliate, as the case may be, held equity stake of not less than 26% from the time of financial closure till the time of commissioning of such project.
Financial
IRG @ Rs 0.3 Cr/MW Networth @ Rs 0.50 Cr/MW for capacity upto 2000 MW & Rs 0.25 Cr/MW for capacity exceeding 2000 MW Annual Turnover @ Rs 1.20 Cr/MW for capacity upto 2000 for capacity exceeding 2000 MW
Tariff Components
Component 1. Fixed Charges Designated To
Capacity Charges
Consideration
Escalable Capacity Charges
To be Quoted
First year charges escalated as per rates prescribed by CERC. Same Value for term of agreement First year charges escalated as per rates prescribed by CERC.
Non Escalable
4. Variable
Charges
Energy Charges
Features of PPA
Terms of Agreement - Condition Precedent/Subsequent to be satisfied by the Seller and Procurer Right to Available Capacity and Scheduled Energy Liquidated Damages For Delay on account of Seller: LD @ Rs 10,000/MW/day upto delay of 60 days from COD LD @ Rs 15,000/MW/day for delay > 60 days from COD
For Delay on account of Procurer: To pay Capacity Charges on Normative Availability for delay period Coordination of Construction Activity Synchronization, Commissioning and Commercial Operation Billing and Payment Third party sale on default Force Majeure Change in Law Termination on Events of Default
Competitive Tariffs.
Faster Development of the Projects.
Bidding Trends
Generation - Case II Bids Project Sasan UMPP Mundra UMPP Krishnapatnam UMPP Tilaiya UMPP Bhaiyathan Talwandi Sabo Jhajjar Lev Tariff 1.196 to 2.251 2.264 to 3.746 2.4914 to 4.197 1.7704 to 2.756 0.81 to 2.387 2.864 to 3.15 2.996 to 3.82 Generation - Case I Bids State Gujarat MP Haryana Gujarat MSEDCL I MSEDCL II PCKL Lev Tariff 2.25 to 2.89 2.34 to 3.044 2.355 to 2.94 3.2 to 3.79 2.7 to 3 2.88 to 3.45 3.7 to 5.5 Transmission Bids Agency PFC REC N Karanpura REC Talcher II Quote Rs mn/annum 1400 to 2400 2580 to 5340 1440 to 4479
Bara
Rajpura Karchanna Dhopave
3.021 to 3.984
2.889 to 3.29 2.97 to 3.984 3.666 to 4.045
Rajasthan
U.P A.P NPCL
3.2
3.24 to 4.3 3.4 to 5.5 4.08 to 5.4
Imported Coal - In case if bidder quotes based on use of Imported Coal, its
bid is not at par with the bidders who quotes via domestic coal Hence, parity needs to be bridged !
Fuel Linkage for the phase of Power Station Bidders are free to quote
w.r.t the phase of Power Station and hence they require the fuel linkage only for the said phase as bidded and not for the other phase/Power
EPC
Commitment of major equipments Cost and Delivery schedule Determination of performance guarantee parameters heat rate, auxiliary power consumption, availability etc
Payment Terms
Hedging for the exchange rate variation. In case of captive mining - Assessment of Mine development Cost - Estimate of the Calorific value Cost of developing fuel transportation infrastructure - MGR, Conveyor system etc Tie - up for the Imported coal Cost of Fuel Transportation freight charges
Fuel (Domestic)
Fuel (Imported)
Option of Re-financing
Tie-up with OEMs for the spares or creating a pool of spares among the power project developers Selling of By-products like ash/ash brick etc
A Way Forward.
Transmission and Distribution next focus area.
Policy formulation to enable participation of more private players and transparency in transmission and especially in distribution.
The progress of privatization in distribution is slow, mainly due to lack of political will as it extremely people centric activity.
Privatization of distribution circles, under the franchisee model, has so far been possible only in select states.
Thank You
Generating plants PLF (April 2010 - Feb2011) All India- 74.33% Almost 100% of Electricity Transmission in India is owned by public sector. About 13 % of Electricity Distribution in India is owned by private sector. All India Aggregate Technical & Commercial (AT&C) losses were 34.54% in the year 2005-06 which reduced by 2.11% to 32.47% in the year 2006-07. AT&C losses varies from 12.65% to 67.68% during 2006-07 in different States. Metering Status:
23 States have achieved 100% Metering at 11 KV Feeder level. 9 States have achieved 100% consumers metering
Source : CEA
UMPP
Sasan, MP Krishnapatnam, AP Mundra, Gujarat Tilaiya, Jharkhand Karchana, UP Bara, UP Rajpura Punjab Talwandi Sabo, Punjab Jhajjar, Haryana Bhaiyathan, Chhattisgarh 4000 4000 4000 4000 Others 1320 1980 1320 2000 1320 1320*60% Jaiprakash Jaiprakash L&T Sterlite CLP India Bulls 2.97 3.02 2.89 2.86 2.99 0.81 Reliance Reliance Tata Reliance 1.196 2.336 2.265 1.77
Successful Bidder
M/s Reliance Power Transmission Ltd. M/s Reliance Power Transmission Ltd. M/s Sterlite Technologies Ltd. M/s Reliance Power Transmission Ltd. M/s Reliance Power Transmission Ltd.