D17 - Tablarin V Gutierrez

You might also like

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

D17 - Tablarin v Gutierrez, 152 SCRA 730

The petitioners sought admission into medical schools for SY 1987-1988 but they either did not take or did not succesfully take the NMAT required by the Board of Medical Education and administered by the Center for Educational Management. They filed a petition for declaratory judgment and prohibition with a prayer for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. They sought to enjoin DECS, BME and CEM from enforcing Section 5 (a) and (f) of RA 2382 as amended and MECS Order No. 52, series of 1985 and from requiring the taking and passing of the NMAT as a condition for securing certificates of eligibility for admission, from proceeding with accepting applications for the NMAT and from administering it on Apr. 26, 1987 and in the future. The trial court denied the petition. ISSUE: Whether or not the regulation of the NMAT is a valid exercise of police power. HELD: YES. The police power is the power and authority of the sovereign to secure and promote the public order of the general community. Health and physical safety and wellbeing of the population is an important component of public order. It is a legitimate objective of governmental effort and regulation. The regulation of the practice of medicine in all its branches has long been recognized as a reasonable method of protecting the health and safety of the public. The power to regulate and control the practice of medicine includes the power to regulation the admission of those authorized to practice medicine. The ultimate end of the legislation and regulation is the protection of the public from the potentially deadly effects of incompetence and ignorance in those who would undertake to treat our bodies and minds for disease and trauma.

You might also like