Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

The Relationship between Illuminations and Architectural Components of Bridges

(Light revealing Forms)


(superstructure) (shape)
(form) 157

96.18

100
66.67
Architectural lighting, bridges, lighting techniques


(bridge aesthetics)

(urban
lighting)i

-
(contrast)

(visual art)

( , 2540)
(.. , 2508)
(attention value) (stimuli)


5


Universal Exposition 1889





1. city marketing built environment



(Frank O. Gehry)
lighting
masterplan Leon

2. bridge aesthetics


10





(Light revealing
Forms)
(superstructure)

3
light revealing form
Millet light and city-what is fundamental
Schepetkov
Brandi
Brandi


(outline or contour)
-


(superstructure) 6
(beam) (arch)
(cantilever) (truss) (cablestayed) (suspension)

1. (superstructure)





tower (main cable)
(suspender)
pylon
2. (bridge deck)


2
(solid) (skeleton)
3. (substructure)


(pier) (abutment)


157
Characteristics of Icon Bridges Transportation
research board (TRB) 2

1
2
3



(Venns diagram)
2
Schepetkov
2 right Image counter
Image



( A B C
)

1.1

157
1
96.18




100

2

1
2

Cable-suspension
25
Cable-stayed
46
Arch
52
Cantilever
7
Truss
9
Beam
18

30
16

33

10

13

1.1 Suspension bridge

1.2 Cable-stayed bridge

1.3 Arch bridge

10

3
5
2

1
0

13

2 3

3
1

1.4 Cantilever bridge


1.5 Truss bridge
1.6 Girder bridge
1 A B
C

2 A
B C
No

Bridge

Event
N
157
151
51
29
93
2
3
34
5
7
13

0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

[%]
96.18
32.48
18.47
59.24
1.27
1.91
21.66
3.18
4.46
8.28

Cablesuspension
N
[%]
25
25
100.00
9
36.00
1
4.00
16
64.00
0
0.00
0
0.00
8
32.00
0
0.00
0
0.00
1
4.00

Cable-stayed
N
46
46
13
3
33
0
0
10
0
0
3

[%]
100.00
28.26
6.52
71.74
0.00
0.00
21.74
0.00
0.00
6.52

Arch
N
52
52
19
9
30
0
0
13
0
4
5

Cantilever
[%]

100.00
36.54
17.31
57.69
0.00
0.00
25.00
0.00
7.69
9.62

N
7
7
0
2
5
0
0
0
2
0
0

[%]
100.00
0.00
28.57
71.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
28.57
0.00
0.00

Truss
N
9
9
3
4
3
0
2
3
0
0
1

Girder

[%]
100.00
33.33
44.44
33.33
0.00
22.22
33.33
0.00
0.00
11.11

N
18
12
7
10
6
2
1
0
3
3
3

[%]
66.67
38.89
55.56
33.33
11.11
5.56
0.00
16.67
16.67
16.67

1.2
8

11
B
2

15

C
1

Given S= Samplings
A= Tower
B= Main Cable
C= Suspender
No
Event
Bridge
N
[%]
0

25

23

2
3

1 29
1 C

Given S= Samplings
A= Pylon
B= Outline
C= Cable
No
Event
Bridge
N
[%]

Given S= Samplings
D= Rib/ Tie
A= Member
E= Side
B= Outline
F= Bottom
C= Whole
No
Event
Bridge
N
[%]
0
52
1
2
6.25
2
6
18.75
3
28
87.50
4
10
31.25
5
14
43.75
6
8
25.00
7
1
3.13
8
1
3.13

46

92.00

46

50.00

16

64.00

22

23.91

16.00

31

33.70

32.00

15

16.30

8.00

0.00

4.00

0.00

11

44.00

0.00

4.00

29

31.52

0.00

1.09

10

12.00

10

1.09

10

3.13

11
12

4
1

12.50
3.13

21.88

Given S= Samplings
A= Member
B= Outline
C= Whole
Bridge
No
Event
N
[%]
0
7
1
3
3.26
2
4
4.35
3
2
2.17
4
2
2.17
5
2
2.17
6
1
1.09
7
1
1.09
8
0
0.00
9
1
1.09
10
0
0.00

Given S= Samplings
A= Member
B= Outline
C= Whole
No
Event
Bridge
N
[%]
0
9
1
4
4.35
2
3
3.26
3
3
3.26
4
4
4.35
5
2
2.17
6
2
2.17
7
0
0.00
8
0
0.00
9
2
2.17
10
0
0.00

12

Given S= Samplings
A= Side
B= Bottom
C= Whole
No
Event
Bridge
N
[%]
18
0
14
15.22
1
4
4.35
2
2
2.17
3
12
13.04
4
2
2.17
5
2
2.17
6
2
2.17
7
0
0.00
8
0
0.00
9
0
0.00
10

1.2



tower

pylon




A
C

2
Schepetkov
1
157
counter image

96.18



right image

(contrast)


. .
: , 2545
, .. ,
. : , 2508
Brandi, U. Light for cities- lighting design for urban spaces. A
handbook. Basel: Birkhauser, 2007.
Millet, M. S. Light revealing architecture. New York: Van
nostrand reinhold, 1996.
Schepetkov, N. Light and city- What is fundamental.

. Lighting of cities. 10:47-11:47


(2547): 96-97

You might also like