Professional Documents
Culture Documents
07 Pavement MGT System
07 Pavement MGT System
For City of Pittsburgh By KMS & Associates, Inc. 800 638 8040
Problem
Deteriorating Pavements
More traffic, trucks, buses Less funding available Road materials are more costly Useful life of materials seems shorter
Answer
Do nothing (doesn't work)
Westerville ( Jeff Kessler 614 901 6669) Franklin Co. Oh (Jaime Tickle 614 462 3839)
Similarities
Miles Old&New Streets Snow Founded Population Area River Hills Pittsburgh 800 Yes 43 1758 350,000 55 sq mi Allegheny Monongahela Yes Akron 900 Yes 47 1825 210,000 62 sq mi Cuyahoga Yes Cincinnati 900 Yes 23 1788 331,000 77 sq mi Ohio Yes
Pavement Management
Plans, Organizes & Documents Helps make better decisions Provides support data for decisions Answers what if scenarios Objectively answers what can be left out Shows the progress or lack of Objective recommendations
Inventory
Street Name (block - to & from) Length, width, area Type of pavement (asphalt, concrete, etc.) Rank (arterial, collector, residential, bus route) Last const. date Zones Other Items
Sections
WINCHESTER RD
SMITH RD
Inspections
ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) Objective Distresses Severity Quantity Feet on the ground Data must be correct Training & Dedication is essential Micro PAVER produces a PCI (Pavement Condition
Index) 0 to 100
$ Savings
Utilizing a Pavement Management System will save a minimum of 10 %.
Pavement Deterioration
Excellent Condition
$1.00 for preventive maintenance here . . .
$5 to $7 for Severe Maintenance Repair here or several years of pothole patching if money is short !
Failed Age
Preventive Maintenance
If Only
Call line
Condition
& again
& again
Age
Illustrations of just what is the result will provide sooner refunding Be Proactive (something can be done)