Professional Documents
Culture Documents
What Happened To Equivalence?: Anthony Pym
What Happened To Equivalence?: Anthony Pym
What Happened To Equivalence?: Anthony Pym
Anthony Pym
Intercultural Studies Group Universitat Rovira i Virgili Plaa Imperial Trraco 1 43005 Tarragona Fax: (++ 34) 977 55 95 97
Basic equivalence?
Basic equivalence?
Basic equivalence 2
Formal vs. Dynamic (Nida) Semantic vs. Communicative (Newmark) Anti-illusory vs. Illusory (Levy) Overt vs. Covert (House) Adequate vs. Acceptable (Toury) Documental vs. Instrumental (Nord) Resistant vs. Transparent (Venuti) Ut interpres vs. Ut orator (Cicero)
Intercultural Studies Group
A non-binary theory?
denotative (based on extra-linguistic factors), connotative (based on way the source text is verbalized) text-normative (textual and linguistic norms), pragmatic (with respect to the receiver of the target text) formal (the formal-aesthetic qualities of the source text).
We know we have translation when: There are problems with footing: Mum says The alien I There are pseudotranslations
A historical theory?
Equivalence presupposes languages with equal capacity to perform functions. Medieval theory does not presuppose equivalence. Nor does postmodern theory?
Please translate
Welcome to Dragon NaturallySpeaking, Canadas most acclaimed large-vocabulary continuous-speech dictation system. With Dragon NaturallySpeaking you can compose e-mail messages, create reports, draft letters, edit proposals, create reports, and more, all by speaking to your computer instead of typing.