Foucaultanddeath

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

DEATH AS THE FINAL ESCAPE?

Foucault is endlessly fascinating in his elliptical and paradoxical conclusions. I


have been reading his lectures at the College De France from 1976 which dealt
mostly with the theme of war as the determining factor in civil society. In a nut-
shell, the dynamics of power in a state are determined by the results of the last
war it fought in. Fascinating as this idea is, I was taken by another point in one of
the lectures. Foucault tells us that since the 19th century the state has practiced
a kind of bio-control with its plethora of statistics and information about life ex-
pectancy, population growth and medical treatment of illness. Foucault makes
the point that before the 19th century death was seen as an occasion for a great
ceremony that symbolically marked the transition from earthly to heavenly do-
minion. However, since the onset of bio-control death has been hidden away as
the secret that cannot speak its name. In fact, Foucault makes the point that
death has replaced sex as the taboo subject in modern society. The reason, for
this, according to Foucault, is that death represents something that bio-control
doesn't want to admit to: the limits of its own power. Death is precisely the mo-
ment when the individual is finally able to escape from the all encompassing
power of the bio-state. The individual, upon his/her death retreats into a region
where the bio-state no longer has dominion and, for this reason, it faces bureauc-
racy with the reality of its own inevitable failure.

Now this is all very interesting, but it occurred to me that it might be possible to
give an extra Foucauldian twist to this idea. Is the call for the abolition of the
death penalty no more than an attempt by the bio-state to maintain its power
over criminals for a little longer? Surely, to immediately send them off to a place
where the bio-state can no longer touch them, no longer control them, doesn't
seem like a punishment at all. Why not keep them alive and in suffering instead?

An appropriately Foucauldian--if somewhat Mephistophelian--thought!

You might also like