Download as pdf
Download as pdf
You are on page 1of 6
000403 ISSUE 16 Were German Militarism and Diplomacy Responsible for World War I? Imperial Germany, 1871-1914: Economy, ferghahn Books, 1994) © YES: History professor V. R. Berghahn states that, although all of ers player in the onset of World War I, tes the process was Ore cote argue tat he st salva events rerponse for the dt (ius, usin, asta and German), fac nd communism, eal exsed mee death anda tp fo tat time, Tao rested an age ofa Hungary, Europe divided into two armed camps—the 300 sland, France, and Russia, and later Italy) and the Central Powers (Germany, tes, respon: ipablity to go around? Or was one smages since the war was im ied and Associated Governments "by the aggression of Germa ttle or no the war's onset, Ina monumental two-volume the World War and After Sarajevo 18 Company, 1928), he state hhad to be shared by all involved parties, To find Germany and sponsible for it, “in view of the evidence now available, i his (ol. 2, pp. $58). ely, the influence of Fay’s work was minimized by the effects ej ‘War was temporarily put on hold. It ing results 's Germany's Aims in the First World red more than 30 years apa ished the framework of the nical scholarship seems to balance both sides of the World |. War historical pendulum. V. R. Berghahn, working within the framework of Germany's economy, sock 301 000404 vere Berghann > YES The Crisis of July 1914 and Conclusions After many years of dispute among hi the outbrea YES /V.RBerghahn 303 ans about who was responsi- in August 1914 in which German movement quickly

You might also like