Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Undercurrents 07 July-August 1974
Undercurrents 07 July-August 1974
Undercurrents 07 July-August 1974
SMALL ADS .... SMALL ADS .... SMALL ADS .... SMALL ADS .... SMALL
It is Undercurrents policy not to carry display advertising, but we do
accept Small Ads as a service to our readers. Small Ads cost I p per word,
up to a maximum of 150 words (bigger ads may be acceptable in certain
cases) and must be paid for in advance.
Science for People. 9 Poland Street, London W1 V 3DG. 6 issues a year.
15p each or £1 annual subscription. Library subscriptions on application.
Radical Science Journal The doddering academics answer to
Undercurrents. Issue No 1: Management ·Science· Anthropology and
Imperialism Technology and Ideology. 30p per issue, or annual sub £1.00
From 9 Poland Street, London W1.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Eddies: How Safe Are Our Air Lanes?
Long·standing suspicions that the Aer Lingus Viscount aircraft which
crashed suddenly and mysteriously in the Irish Sea six years ago, killing
all 61 people on board, may have been hit by a runaway British missile or
pilotless aircraft were unexpectedly revived at the end of May when a
trawler off Rosslare in County Wexford dredged up part of the wing of an
aircraft with UK Military markings, only four miles from the spot where
the iIl fated Viscount met its end.
The accident happened on March 24,1968. Two years later, the Irish
Department of Transport and Power issued a strangely·worded report on
the affair which ended with the conclusion that there was ·not enough
evidence available on which to reach a conclusion of reasonable
probability as to the initial cause of the accident·.
This rather lame verdict was preceded by 19 pages of detailed and much
more suggestive analysis in which all the more usual causes of aircraft
accidents were eliminated. Ultimately, in the view of the accident
inspector, Mr RW O·Sullivan, the only hypothesis which·rationalises the
otherwise inconsistent elements in the evidence· is that:
.... while Viscount EI·ADM was in normal cruising flight at 17,000 ft and
within six minutes of reaching Strumble Head (in Wales), another aircraft,
which could have been a manned or unmanned aeroplane or missile,
passed in close proximity, possibly even colliding with the tail of the
Viscount, causing an upset which led to a manoeuvre which was either a
spin or a spiral dive from which the Viscount was recovered in a disabled
condition, to fly thereafter for approximately 10 minutes over the sea
before control was finally lost·.
Though convinced that ·e conclusion that there was another aircraft in the
area is inescapable·, Mr O·Sullivan, like the good civil servant he
undoubtedly is, felt obliged to take at face value British military
assurances that no UK aircraft or missiles from the test ranges on the
Welsh coast were involved in the incident. ·It is to be noted that the firing
ranges in the UK were closed on Sunday, 24 March, 1968·, he states with
barely·concealed sarcasm at the end of a paragraph in which he also
points out that the evidence points to a directly·opposite conclusion.
The latest official statements about the newly·discovered wing take great
pains to emphasise that it can have no possible connection with the Aer
lingus crash, and analyses are said to have shown that the wing has only
been in the sea from about one year. This assessment contradicts the
opinion of at least one eye·witness, James Maddock, a reporter from the
Cork Examiner, who told Undercurrents that the wing, to judge from its
barnacle encrustations, could well have been in the sea
for five or six years. Its dimensions, he said, were 2% ft by 7 ft_ But there
has been a deafening silence on questions, which if answered, would
enable sceptics to judge for themselves·for
instance what exactly was the type of aircraft to which the wing was
originally attached, a question which could easily be answered by
aviation experts_
Moreover, even if the wing does turn out to be unconnected with the
Viscount crash, no explanation has been offered for the curious presence
of British military debris so close to Irish shores. Do UK aircraft regularly
fly, and occasionally come to grief, in Irish airspace? And so,Why?
Even before the discovery of the wing, however, Roger Cox was
investigating the mystery
for Undercurrents. As his enquiries proceeded, he encountered at every
tUrn evidence of a very keen interest in the story on the part of the major
UK newspapers and Broadcasting networks-coupled, however, with an
inexplicable reluctance to publish anything that might call into question
the safety of airline flights passing close to Her Majesty·s missile test
ranges. Could this uncharacteristic reticence be the result of a ·D·Notice·
issued at the request of the Ministry of Defence? Is the affair yet another
manifestation of the rising tide of censorship? Draw your
own conclusions
not the green and white of Aer Lingus livery. Another witness to the
aircraft over Fethard·on·Sea described it
as "coming out of three small black clouds,·with a sudden sharp turn· as if
fired from
the clouds .... while another said that the nose and a portion of the wing
were ·enveloped in a small. dark cloud. which travelled along with
the aeroplane. ·swirling ...
All the witnesses agree that the mystery aeroplane was seen heading off
in a SouthEasterly direction towards
the Saltee islands. "These accounts". says the Report. "could be
satisfactorily explained by a supersonic aircraft coming out of a dive,
causing a boom and the small clouds, and then flying past witness No 2
with the wing covered in condensation cloud typical of near·sonic speed
in humid air·:
To back up this suggestion,
the Report quotes two other witnesses. One observer saw
a ·large splash· in the area of the Saltee Islands (20 miles from the
Viscount·s final impact point and in a direct line with the mystery
aircraft·s reported South Easterly heading) at about noon local lime (II
GMT) which is within the known time span of
the hypothetical collision·and crash. Later that afternoon, another witness
saw an object floating in the sea in the same location. "This evidence" in
the Report·s words, "would not be inconsistent with the supposition that
on unmanned aircraft had fallen in the sea. and remained afloat for some
hours". If the mystery aircraft were indeed a pilotless drone. it would
explain the fact that no aircraft apart
from the Viscount was report· ed missing·a missing aircraft becomes much
easier to con·ceal if there is no pilot.
There appear to be two possible alternatives. The first is
that the aircraft seen over Felthard·on·Sea had already hit the Viscount. &
was itself in difficulties·which would account for the wings and tail being
·on fire·, and for the ·sudden, sharp turn out of the clouds: which could
have been a last attempt to regain radio control of the plane. The aircraft
could have been above cloud level before it reached Fethard, which
would account for
the fact that no other observers seem to have seen it previously. It then
disappeared in a South Easterly direction and crashed into the sea off the
Saltee Islands.
A second explanation is that the aircraft seen over Fethard was out of
control but had not yet hit the Viscount. It disappeared in a SE direction. a
course which would have taken it on a line parallel to that of the Viscount
as
inflated liferaft on board one of the searching life· boats. A more
convincing,
if speculative, explanation
is that the Mayday signals came from the life raft of the pilot of the
·mystery aircraft·, who could later have been picked up alive by one of
the flotilla· of RN vessels in the. vicinity.
Another strange feature is that, as the Report puts it, "there is no report of
(the aircraft) having been observ·ed by any radar station". One would
have thought that the Royal Naval Air Station at Brawdy, near Fishguard,
would have had
a radar set capable of detecting an aircraft at 17,000 ft altitude, only
20 miles out across the
Irish Sea where the accident first happened. Indeed. one fears for the
safety of Naval
it proceeded in its normal flight path between Tuskar and Strumble, at a
speed at least twice as great as that of the Viscount.
Another attempt to regain control of the drone, perhaps to try to bring it
back within the Aberporth range, to the north, could have taken it right
across the Viscount·s path, with disastrous consequences. Whatever was
the actual sequence of events, however, it is curious that according to the
Times report (25 March 1968) "Within minutes (of the accident) the first
RAF and Naval aircraft were ·scrambled· to start the search", that "a
flotilla of Naval vessels changed
course for the designated search area", and that "no less than four British
helicopters took off·, The hypothetical ·mystery aircraft· may even have
had a pilot after all. After the crash, a series of faint ·Mayday· calls were
picked up by rescuers, and at first attributed to automatic distress
equipment on the Viscount·s life rafts. But no such rafts were ever found,
and the Mayday calls were later attributed, unconvincingly, to an
accidentally·
text missing
airmen if Brawdy does not have such a radar. And if nobody was
watching the screens at Brawdy, or anywhere else, at the time, why was
no·one watching? Are we not supposed to have a sophisticated
air defence system?
Suspicions of a ·cover·up·
arc increased by the fact that major British national newspapers,
including the Daily Mail, the Daily Express and the Sunday Express, have
initially shown keen enthusiasm for the "story , and then spiked it.
Granada TV·s renowned World in Action team is also known to have
made a film about the affair which its producer is said to have described
as his ·best yet·. Yet the Granada film
is still in the can.
The safety of Britain·s missile test ranges is obviously
a sensitive subject. Could the additional curious fact that such ranges are
always closed down if an aircraft of the Queen·s Flight is in the vicinity
indicate that they are by no means as safe as the British public has been
led
to believe?
¥ Available from the Government Publications Sale Office, GPO Arcade,
[Dublin I. Price lOp.
hands
of the Prods·, policy.
Yet another snippet on Ireland. Marathon oil, now negotiating with the
Irish government to build a fertiliser factory, are claiming that their strike
in block 49/29·1 south east of Cork (see UC6) is ·comparatively small·.
Don·t believe it Liam! That strike is the biggest thing to hit Ireland since
St Patrick.
A word of commiseration with the Sunday Express. Not content with
claiming
a major strike by Br in the Celtic sea before the drill had been·spudded·,
they interpreted the report 0f a helicopter pilot who had seen a flare on a
Shell rig
to mean that the company had made the first strike west of the Shetlands.
It turned out that they were only burning off excess diesel oil. It could
happen
to the best of us.
Technology and for those who find themselVes puzzled by yet another
term in the alternative glossary the conference will include a session on
·what is Equilibrium . Technology ·. For more details contact Paul Neville,
46 Grains Rd, Shaw, Oldham, Lanes, England.
A ONE DAY conference on World Prospects for Solar Energy Utilisation
organised by the UK section of the International Solar Energy Society will
be held on 9th July. For further information contact Dr JC McVeigh,
Brighton Polytechnic, Moulscomb, Brighton, Sussex,
England, .
OVER THE PAST five years, the Bath Arts Workshop has built up a
community·based organisation engaged in many facets of activating the
machinery of social organisation in the creative and recreational arts.
Community Technology is a new·formed branch of the workshop,
concentrating on planning and housing, and now concentrating on
setting up an alternative means of producing houses in a low·capital
operation. ·We are running an exhibition/get together of individuals and
organisations connected with Community Technology in every field·from
video and AT through to agriculture and medicine·, they say. It runs from
August 29 to September I. If you would like to participate I)r .,.visit it.
_______________________________________________________________________ UC07 page 17
______________________________________________ Undercurrents 07 July-August 1974 Page 18
POOR HOME OIL of Canada! They thought they had made a gigantic
natural gas strike on land at Lockton in Yorkshire. They built, at enormous
cost, a desulphurising plant to deal with the expected half·billion cubic
feet a day. and then the gas ran out·after seven months. Geological
fractures, they say ...
Those of us who find a fIy in our bread can rest assured that science can
now tell whether it has just crawled in or was there all the time. It
appears that cooked enzymes are different from raw ...
DoubleZinc?
WANDERING THROUGH the corridors of the Central Electricity
Generating Board headquarters the other day, one of our spies came
across a survey that the Board has been undertaking for several years
now. Apparently
CEGB men are worried about the longevity of the protection afforded to
their electricity pylons·the galvanised zinc from which they are made isn·t
lasting the 20 years it was expected to. In fact, after only seven years in
certain areas pylons have been known to rot right through. And though
_______________________________________________________________________ UC07 page 19
______________________________________________ Undercurrents 07 July-August 1974 Page 20
cheap minded
environmentalists had been heard to mutter "and a good job too", the
CEGB is more than a little concerned.
To analyse the problem, the Board arranged that lots of small zinc cans
be placed around the country, then weighed two years later to see how
much they had corroded, In certain areas (around Liverpool and
Doncaster for instance) nearly half the zinc had disappeared within two
years. So extensive was the damage that it was quite an easy job for
clever scientists
to isolate some of the corrosion as
being due to the abnormally high moisture in certain areas (for example,
near the coast). This done, it was not difficult to correlate the rest of
the corrosion with high smoke and sulphur dioxide levels in the
atmosphere. It was then suggested that perhaps this faSCInating piece of
research should be published. Papers have not, however, been
forthcoming·a fact which has prompted some cynics to remark that the
strange silence is because the results would reflect badly on the CEGB·s
"high stack" policy, under which pollutants at power stations are
dispersed from tall chimneys rather than controlled "at source".
Undercurrents readers can, however, rest assured that this is not the
reason why the results have been withheld. Reliable sources tell us that
the CEGB is taking a ·responsible· position and is taking action without
having to be spurred
on by any prior adverse publicity.
In future, pylons will be galvanised twice as.thick as previously, thus
saving the CEGB the high labour costs of painting.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Letters
Skinner Boxed
Dear Undercurrents.
What the FUCK are you doing printing material about a B.F. Skinnerite
community? Have you read Walden Two? You surely must be familiar
with the basic notions of SF Skinner, and their total contradiction of
anything that you or I are into. Surely this isn·t Democratic Free Speech
rearing its foolish head?
Love,
Nick
c/o Public Library,
197 Kings Cross Road, Wet.
Hot air?
Dear Undercurrents
Whilst I can·t write an SF story that you might like. I did once read one. It
was in the SF magazine Analog·around 19661 (can·t be very precise as I
used to borrow them from a friend who gave me several years· worth!.
It was a short story centred on a generator that a farmer built which
turned out to have numerous applications. It seemed plausible to me.
The device was a ·chimney· made of t·NO concentric openended
polythene cylinders (possibly welded together at intervals round the
circumference to make ·flues·).
Warm air from ground level rises through the space between the
cylinders. so keeping the structure rigid (it also used guy. ropes and was
brought to vertical initially by pumping
air through. Air also rises through the centre, driving a fan and attached
generator.
The ·hero· of the story eventually built the things in
the 100 it plus class and took one into the city to demonstrate it,
whereupon the updraft drew in a lingering smog and dispersed it from
ground level to somewhere higher up·thus alleviating
the symptoms at least.
Considering your article on
SF in UC number 6. this story seemed to answer some of your criticisms
of ·more entertainment than science·. If the thing isn·t common
_______________________________________________________________________ UC07 page 21
______________________________________________ Undercurrents 07 July-August 1974 Page 22
Dear Undercurrents,
I enclose a couple of thoughts
on the future of Undercurrents, which you may care to print as
commentary upon yourselves as communications media. Incidentally, if
you look at something
like the distribution system of
the Landsmen·s Library, or
the magnificently amateur research network of Henry Doubleday, I think
you have a much better paradigm for Undercurrents than the present
rather unsatisfactory format and distribution. I would like to see you give
more thought to your underground/overground position. Alternatologists
may easily have t:become the victims of their own myth: the myth of the
gentle conspiracy that cannot be gaoled, bugged or media·ized; The risk
Undercurrents takes by entering the heavy media scene is that
you slowly ·I and bug your$elf. George Woolston
I Lauri Anttila, Vatakuja 3A Helsinki 20.
OOPS:
Dear Undercurrents,
It has been pointed out that my suggested method for bottling methane
without a compressor (Undercurrents No 6 letter$1 will require a water
head of several hundred feet. Sorry but for practical purposes a high
pressure hydraulic pump, wind or pedal powered, would have to be
incorporated between a much
smaller reservoir and the drum. R Atkinson
SHEP, 9 Slaithwaite Hall. Slaithwaite, Huddersfield, Yorkshire HD7 5XA.
Home Truths
Hello Undercurrents
_______________________________________________________________________ UC07 page 22
______________________________________________ Undercurrents 07 July-August 1974 Page 23
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Dorrell Science Fiction Competition
Our thanks to all those who sent in stories for the sf competition in
Undercurrents No 6. They went off to Mike Moorcock for judging and the
winner is printed below_ There were several stories that we enjoyed, and
we feel that there might have been more if the closing date printed in No
6 hadn·t been so close to the final publishing date (late again): thus we
are going to run another competition as detailed below.
Undercurrents is now asking for stories of approx 2,000 words for a
continued competition, with a £10 prize again, the winning story to be
printed in Undercurrents No 9, and entries to be in by August.
We hope to publish one sf story of this type in each future issue, (10
going to the author of each story published. The stories submitted for
earlier issues and the present competition will be combined in the
continuing competition.
Dear Undercurrents,
While I was disappointed, by and large. in the general quality of the SF
manuscripts (feeling that both ideas and means of expression were. on
the whole, rather unoriginal) J did allow that these are all submissions by
unpublished writers and therefore one could not expect the measure of
skill be found in established writers.
However. after consideration, I picked story number three Incidental
Dropped Realstate Inc as showing the most originality of idea and
expression. The texture of this story is better than the others. The
statements are more individual, less conventional. I enjoyed it. There was
a/so some humour in it.
There was humour in some of the other stories but I found it WQS chiefly
conventional irony fie wry remarks made in the consensus of the bus
queue) rather than an original way of looking at the world. Number three
wins hands down in my opinion.
Best wishes Michael Moorcock
The resulting curve is then fed into the computer and drawn across the
frictive mode of the first variation.
Third Variation
A hard copy is then made of the master visual and xeroxed to the point of
photographic fade. The hard copies are then put through a shredder and a
collage is made randomly by assistants who have no knowledge of the
preceding stages.
Master collage is then fed into the character recognition peripheral of the
computer.
Automated screen print copies made.
The initial differential scored by the authors and signed.
History of Poem Object
The preceding construct surfaces during a searching of the laser beam
memory archives of the computer ROSARCH II. The search is led by
Professor Edward Hoars, an ex·member of the faculty of Battered Gold
University. and a
believer in the value of decentralised info systems.
Hoars is investigating the activity c a co·operative, anonymous group of
art activists who reportedly worked together during the 1980s.
The Professor is forty·four years old and favours a light grey synth·suit of
faintly contrasting trousers an d jacket. Height, five feet eleven, he has,
despite his current preoccupations, been widely tipped as the likely
successor
to the present Dean of the Faculty
of Battered Gold, Variable Model. Variable Model·His Info Sheet
Model·s publications include an impressive list of hardcopy best
sellers·WHY NOT RETU RN TO THE GOLD STANDARD·MILTON AS
BIOá COMPUTER·THE ORGONE EQUIV. ALENT OF THE DARK
LADY·THE POPULAR SONG 1950·69 AS LIE DETECTOR·
His academic position has remained virtually unchallenged since his
success·fuI refusal of a kidney transplant some years ago. Model·s home,
a glossy colour sup version of the average comptakidney life support, is
also his working base. Recently there have been rumours that his real
time shared access info obtaining method of research has been
superseded by the small scale, field initiative methods of Hears and Co.
WILL HOARS REACH FOR THE BATTERED GOLD TROPHY? WILL THE
PLOT LINE THICKEN AND VARIABLE MODEL MOUNT A NEW
Interjection by Model
Mercoff began to search for the soft lead impression of early graphite
drawings. To be drawn to the human form. To stage a renaissance of the
figure.
To bring reality back to corpuscles
and arteries.
This resulted in a series of cyborg drawings at first. Spare parts, old
computer bits from junkyards. But the centre of the unique paper drawn
spread was always a two dimensional biped.
THE ACCUSATION OF THE SELF PORTRAIT. ART AS THE ULTIMATE
NARCISSISM. THE CULT OF THE ASSOCIATIVE PERSONALITY. OR
IS THE MERCOFF SYNDROME
A MINCED RED HERRING THROWN INTO THE MENU OF THE PLOT?
Description of Pencil Sketches by Mercoff. Claimed to be in Possession of
Battered Gold University Access library.
I} The Nostril
the individualistic sprouting hairs, we find the fascination with the
subjectivity of a true emotional reality. A single existence of each pore.
An insistence
of the right of the cell to exist as an entity in itself.
2) The Eye
The sketches, as always are one eyed. Now this is not monomania, but
rather a rejection of the straight 20·20, of the stereoscopic effects of
vision on a singularly minded individual.
Variable Model·s Singular Deduction
·It was the eye, really, I suppose, that gave my first whiff of the ultimate
reality that lay behind Mercoff·s work.
I began to think in terms of the other eye, the missing one .. It was at this
stage that I discovered the terrible identification. I cast about for examples
of other great artists with something missing, and came up with someone
Mercoff himself had mentioned ..
that other great subjectivist, Vincent Van Gogh, .. Was there a startling
link between this hitherto unconnected personage .. I could hardly wait
to start.
Hoar·s Refutation of the Variable Model Powers of Deduction.
·I can only repeat what I have already said. I stand by the mobility and
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Control & Communication
The study or a society·s communications systems gives a penetrating
insight into how? and in whose interest, it operates. In this special issue of
UNDERCURRENTS we have attempted to do two things: firstly, to show
how the existing structures of communication in Britain are used to
bolster·up the status quo and to perpetuate the basic injustices of our
present society; and secondly,to show how the communications media
could be used in building a better, more humane society.
The shortcomings of Britain·s Post Office reflect the short·comings of the
country as a whole. The Post Office has far too much power · so much,
indeed, that the word monopoly seems an under·statement. It is
controlled neither by its workers nor by the communities which it serves .
And it does not even attempt to spread the benefits of communication
more equitably throughout the population: the poor pay at least twice as
much for calls from a coin·box ·phone as the rich who can afford to have
a ·phone of their own; and every winter, thousands of old and sick people
die because they have no telephone with which to summon help in an
emergency.
But to transfer the Post Office monopoly into the hands of the private
communications companies would solve nothing. A far better model for
the future would be a de·centralised federation of municipally·controlled
Post Offices · of which the city of Hull·s independent telephone system
provides one rough example.
The increasing use of postal and telephone monitoring, allied to the
deployment of TV cameras for surveillance purposes and the construction
of a "hardened" government communications
network, shows yet again that our rulers, far from being interested in
removing the root causes of injustice, are anxious only to suppress the
symptoms. It·s easier to build bomb·proof towers and spy on political
activists than it is to re·distribute wealth, hand the factories over to the
workers, decentralize political power and give the land back to local
communities.
Brute force, though always there as a weapon of last resort, is rapidly
going out of style as the primary III;means of repression. In the Kitsonian
world of "low intensity operations", censorship and subtle manipulation
of the communications media are the state·s major tactics in the fight to
win the "hearts and minds" of the people and stamp out "subversion".
But the entire field of communications is far too vast to be explored more
than superficially
in one issue of a magazine. We hope that the articles in this issue will be
provocative
enough to stimulate some healthy controversy. What about phone
phreaking, for instance ·?
Is the Post Office, like Bell Telephone in the ·States, "fair game" for anyone
who can find a
way to rip it off? Or are such actions dishonest, irrelevant · even
reactionary? Or is
any act which challenges the established order, especially if that order is
founded on technological expertise, worth supporting because it shows
that the machine is not yet invincible? We·ll be exploring these and many
other questions in the issues of UNDERCURRENTS that follow ....
9
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
The Snoopers and the Peepers
ALL TELEPHONE and postal communication in this country is firmly in
the hands of a large bureaucracy. That bureaucracy, the Post Office
Corporation, is like any other as concerned with its own survival and its
own power relative to other bureaucracies as it is with providing those
services it is officially supposed to.
It·s not therefore surprising to find that the Post Office is more than eager
to help where it can to keep the system and State that supports it in
business. It does so by making freely available to the cops, the political
police, the military and all their good friends facilities for snooping into
our letters and telephone calls.
In the pages that follow we·ll survey the known information concerning
PO phone·tapping and letter opening·who does it; who it·s done to, how
it·s done, how and if it can be detected; and what to do about it. We
think the main upshot of this survey is a demonstration that the PO is by
no stretch of the imagination a neutral agent in the struggle for a new
Society. Of course, you surely never had any illusions to the contrary? ...
If so, read on ...
the SNOOPERS and the PEEPERS
Postal Monitoring Who does it
The Post Office have a monopoly on effective snooping into the letters
they deliver. They don·t need a warrant to snoop·the Post Office Act of 1
%9 (which created the new Corporation) placed them under a
·Requirement to do what is necessary to inform designated persons
holding office under the Crown concerning matters and things
transmitted or in the course of transmission· by the Post Office. As far as
known the ·offices of the Crown· that make regular use of postal
monitoring are the political police, who keep their eye on political groups
and very occasionally (it would seem) individuals; and the big·time
straight crime fuzz·Serious Crime Squad and the like. Her Majesty·s
Customs of course have their own mail·opening operation at the points of
intake for foreign post, though they may use the gpo·s interception
facilities as well. No doubt the military use postal monitoring on rare
occasions when phone bugging won·t do. And probably the people who
play spy and counter·spy try the interception game every once in a while.
Except for the surveillance of political addresses, primarily for the
purposes of political intelligence gathering, and the occasional very
_______________________________________________________________________ UC07 page 33
______________________________________________ Undercurrents 07 July-August 1974 Page 34
The bureaucracy that mans this operation is the Post Office Investigation
Branch (IB). It was until about eighteen months ago known as the PO
Investigation Division, and before .that it was sometimes called the
Private Office.
The headquarters of the surveillance operation was said at one time to be
at King Edward Building, King Edward street). It is now at Euston Towers.
Euston Road, NW1 IS). In London there is an area surveillance office for
each of the seven major postal divisions (NW,
SE, SW, N, EC, E and W). Letters are opened in each area office by a staff
of 4·6, who usually manage to get a letter open, photocopy it, reseal it
and get it back into the delivery system by next post).
The rule in postal surveillance seems to be blanket coverage of a small
number of addresses. There have been occasional reports of ·sampling·
however. One story in the Committee of 100 pamphlet 17) was of
interception, on occasional days, of all post to foreign students at a
college of further education. But the consensus seems to be that such
exercises, though they can and do happen, arc rare.
The straight press makes great play of the quantity and quality of
post·opening techniques available to the PO. Without boring you with the
details, suffice it-to say that the PO can if they want get into just about
any letter. And if they want they can get out of it again without leaving
very obvious traces.
..
'The well·known method of opening letters by holding them over a
steaming kettle is effective but messy, and is not normally used by
professionals. Indeed in many cases it is not necessary to open an
envelope in order to scrutinise the contents. Do·it·yourself enthusiasts can
verify this by holding an unopened letter close to a strong light; in this
way most typewritten letters can be read quite easily.
The Security Service have special apparatus faT examining letters by
this method, the device they use being rather like the viewing screen
found
in X·ray departments of hospitals. If this method proves unsatisfactory,
then the contents of an envelope can be extracted through one of the
holes left at the top of the gummed flaps. An instrument resembling a pair
of very slim long·nosed pliers is used to wind the letter into a tight
cylinder and to extract it without visibly disturbing
the sealed flap. (We understand it is rather more difficult to Replace the
_______________________________________________________________________ UC07 page 35
______________________________________________ Undercurrents 07 July-August 1974 Page 36
Detection
If the Investigation Branch want in to your post without your knowing
they·ve been there, they can probably do it.
You could, if you wanted, try posting yourself pieces of unexposed
lightsensitive paper or film in light·proof envelopes (but not obviously
light·proof envelopes!). Exposing an unrepeatable image on the paper or
film which can be verified on receipt by developing might be J good
additional precaution (the
film or paper can·t then be easily replaced if it is discovered and
replaced). If you indulge in this kind of paranoia,
do it properly·send identical envelopes, to addresses you·re pretty sure
are unmonitored. And don·t be surprised if the relevant letters just kind of
disappear ...
Countertechnology
If you·ve got hot stuff to send through the post, use ·drop addresses·places
unlikely to be under the IB·s watchful eye, e.g. your grannie·s (assuming
she·s not a militant revolutionary ... ) There seems little point in trying to
make your letters ·unopenable·. There·s no such thing as ·unopenable·.
And specially sealed envelopes are more likely to call
attention to their importance, than to disguise it.
A better defence against postal surveillance is not to use the post for
sensitive material. And-the best defense Of all is to try not to deal in
secrets·that·s their game, and they·re pretty good at it. The more open
your organisation and activities, the less chance you·re going to be
fouled·up by their detection games.
Phone Tapping Who Does It
In principle, your ·phone can be tapped from either the equipment in
your home, the cable leading to your local exchange, or the local
exchange itself.
When the PO is doing the listening, tapping is done from within local
exchanges. Outside agencies who don·t want to even let the PO know
they·re listening to you·the spy·chasing paranoids maybe·may install their
own taps outside PO exchanges.
Tapping is quite certainly done by CID and Yard ·straight crime· cops. In
theory they need a warrant to do it;
and in practice they probably do get one if they·re going to tap over an
extended period. Straight·crime cops probably don·t use tapping much as
a method
of gathering general intelligence (as opposed to information needed to get
a specific bust)_
The GPO·s Investigation Branch makes a good deal of use of ·TKOing·
and local exchange monitoring, as well as ·printer metering· (see below).
Printer meters seem to be their standard tool for gelling at phone freaks. A
piece
in the straight press of unknown reliability cited an ex·PO IB man as
saying:
·It·s no good pUlling a recorder on the line and coming back tomorrow
tea time to see what you·ve got. When you play it, you always find a
hoarse voice rang at three, said ·It·s me·see you at the usual in ten
minutes·, and you weren·t there_ If you·re tapping people ..no know ..nat
it·s all about, you have to have relays of good men listening
24 hours a day, and a team on the
street ready to follow the suspect. I don·t think tapping is worthwhile
unless you·re ready to use 12 to 15 good men ·.
Even if accurate this view reflects
only the attitudes of ·straight·crime· cops who use the phone as a means
to getting a bust, as distinct from that of the intelligence gathering
machine.
The Special Branch and their friends quite likely do routine intelligence
gathering via phone taps and (possibly) printermeters, most probably by
tapping organisations· phones. Tapping for political intelligence purposes
may be done without all the paraphernalia of stake·outs and continuous
live monitor·
ing. They·re probably quite happy in some cases to just connect up a
recorder, go away, and come back later to see what·s happened. Military
intelligence probably does a bit of the same. American Military
Who·s Done
In theory tapping requires a warrant. The warrants are supposed to be
issued if, among other things, the presumed crime is serious enough that
a person with no previous record might get put away for it for three years
or more. The frequency of warrants was reported as averaging 130 in the
twenty years prior to 19571131. An unconfirmed report in the straight
press in 1972114) had it that 1200 warrants for tapping were issued in
1972 and that about 600 were issued
in 1970. Another unconfirmed report (·not denied in the House of
Commons·) was of twelve thousand taps done by the fuzz in 1966 Take
your pick ...
Of course, quite a bit of tapping.particularly political intelligence
gathering·may be done without warrant.
Tapping is known to have been used in a wide assortment of criminal
cases. Tapping was widely used against the Kray and Richardson gangs..
But it was also used to do a single bloke for receiving stolen goods in
Oxford in 19701161¥ And the Committee of 100 gathered a lot of hard
evidence for the regular and systematic use of tapping of political activists
(17).
Aside from the straight cops, the political police, the PO·s Investigation
Division and the military (US and UK), there don·t seem to be any other
obvious users of the PO·s fine facilities.
particular line merely plugs into a circuit for the required sub·scriber·s
exchange, then dials the sub·scriber·s number on that exchange. He will
then remain connected to the subscriber·s line until the plug is pulled.
Obviously such a facility can be used
by anyone who can get permission to get near it.
It·s not clear how often the cops use TKO boards. Given the noisiness of
the technique (see ·Detection· below) and its relative lack of secrecy, it·s
probably only used when a tap is needed in a hurry and there isn·t time
to wait for
a proper line to a listening post to be established.
In addition to TKO boards, some exchanges have monitoring boards, to
which particular subscriber·s lines can be permanently wired. All calls to
or from a wired·up subscriber·s line arc indicated by a light coming up at
the plug position to which he is connected. A call in progress can then be
plugged into. Clearly this is also a facility with lots of uses to anyone who
wants to snoop·in fact it·s hard to imagine what else the board could be
used for ...
TKO·ing will in future become much easier. Exchanges are currently
being connected up to a new transit system for STD calls, called M F2.
(see phone freeking articles)_ Users of MF2 are assigned a class of
service, various classes allowing access to various facilities not
necessarily available to other classes. Class of service 6 gives the user
access
to automatic diallable TKOing to any subscriber number on any exchange
with MF2 transit access. All of which means that anyone the PO chooses
to give a class 6 user line to will be able
to dial up any number he wants to
listen into from the comfort of his
own padded cell. Fortunately MF2 won·t be too widespread for quite a
while yet ...
Printer-metering
A very useful intelligence gathering tool there are no technicalities about
using (no warrants, no nothing) is the printer meter. This device, when
attached to the equipment assigned to your telephone at your local
exchange, prints out a tape of every number dialled.
Printer-metering is widely used by the PO·s own cops, the Investigation
Division, for tracking down phone freeks. Given that ·traffic analysis· is an
old trick in the intelligence business it might
also be used by cops whose background comes from military
intelligence. But there are bureaucratic hassles here. Installing a printer-
meter requires the PO·s connivance almost for sure. Although any idiot
could install one, engineers at an exchange would surely know that some
outsider had put a printermeter on a line, and they would want to know
what his authority was. Besides, printermeters require daily servicing (the
tape has to be changed). So it·s quite probable that requests to do
printermetering, although they
don·t need a warrant, do have to go through the Post Office. Which puts
some kind of limit on the frequency
of their use.
New designs of exchange are now being introduced (TXE2 and TXE4
electronic exchanges) which, as a matter of course log the originating and
called number of every call made by subscribers. The information is used
for billing (a computer takes the record and computes the appropriate
charge rate
for each call, knowing its origin and destination). But it obviously could
easily be used to rapidly build up a portrait of Who Knows Who, or at
least Who Calls Who, if that was of interest to anyone. Fortunately it·ll be
a long time before TXE2 and TXE4S replace
the majority of exchanges in this country. Recording Calls
1: Listening Posts
There seem to be many reports going around that serious long-term
recording of calls is not actually done at local exchanges, but rather at
·listening posts· established and run by client agencies.
Lines arc run from local exchanges to intermediate exchanges. The lines
required by the agencies for tapping arc included in a standard list of
telephone numbers for which ·sampling· is required which is sent weekly
to local exchanges. The content of all calls made on all
these lines is routed, via a group of
lines reserved for ·traffic analysis·, from the local to the intermediate
exchange.
A Post Office worker writing in Solidarity (Vol 2 No 4) suggested that
there were an average of 25 of these lines per local exchange. Other
sources suggest
much good to tell what those tests _are·they·re easily beatable by any.one
who uses a recorder and knows about them, so telling about them would
be equivalent to rendering them unusable. If you·re specially worried
about tapping, write Undercurrents and maybe we can help you out.
Countertechnology
A good weapon against phone tapping
is the call box. If you think your phone is tapped, make sensitive calls
away from home. If you think the person you·re calling is tapped and you
think it matters, use the phone only to make arrangements·for him to call
you back from a pay phone, maybe.
A second best defence against tapping is to keep your goddam mouth
shut. Most sensitive details can usually wait.
If you·re tapped, talking in circles
won·t help. If you·re involved in planning some heavy demonstration and
think the Special Branch are on to you, don·t think they·ll be fooled if you
say ·The circus·will be at S· instead of ·the meeting·will be at S·. They
aren·t that dumb.
The best defence of all is of course the same defence that·s best against
postal monitoring. Don·t deal in secrets. Or if you have to, deal with
them in your closest circle of friends, who will (hopefully?) sec each other
often enough not to need to talk about heavy stuff over the phone.
Recording Calls
2: ·Blanket· Recording
There·s a sizeable amount of evidence that all international calls arc
recorded going
in and out of most countries. Phone freeking to uncommonly called
countries (Russia, say) is known to be dangerous
for just this reason. The US·s National Security Agency is reported (in
Ramparts, August 1972) to record all trans·Atlantic and trans·Pacific calls.
According to their informant.
·Most of these no·one ever listens to, and after being held available for a
few weeks, are erased. They ·/I run a random sort through all the tapes,
listening to a certain number to determine if there is anything in them of
interest worth holding on to and transcribing. Also, certain telephone
conversations are routinely listened to as soon as possible. These will be
the ones that are made by people doing an inordinate amount of calling
Countertechnology
If you·re important enough to be on the GCHQ·s shit list, you·ve already
made a lotta mistakes. I f you·re not. the usual precautions apply. Be
careful what you say. and if it·s the sort of thing that matters assume
someone might be listening and phrase what you say accordingly_
Remember, though, that unless you say who you are or the person you
call uses your name, you·re anonymous as far as blanket recording
is concerned. (They do, of course, know what number you dialled). And if
you·re doing something they think you shouldn·t do, then you shouldn·t
be calling a number they can trace you to anyway, dummy!
By the way: another routine kind
of listening in is done on all calls
through an operator. She/he will listen
in every nine minutes to make sure the call is progressing OK
(technically, that is). If the content is juicy enough and things at the
exchange are quiet enough, they·re not above listening at greater length.
And of course calls can be and often are monitored for technical quality
all along their path to their recipient. PO personnel vary like any others as
to politics, attitudes to phone freeking,
and so on. Some don·t give a damn·
but some do. So don·t try your luck ...
I. For documentation of the surveillance of political groups and
individuals by the Post Office, see the excellent pamphlet Mail
Interception and Telephone Tapping in Britain, published by the
Hampstead Group of the Committee of 100 and Housman·s Bookshop. It
Was republished in 1973 by Attila Publications (c/o 7 Victoria Road,
Brighton) and is available from them or Smoothie Publications (67 Vere
Road, Brighton) for 15p post paid, It·s an excellent summary of the Post
Offices State snooping activities up to about 1970
2. Time Out, ·The IB Men·. No 130
·11 Aug 1972.
3. In most local sorting offices the post would be set aside by the same
person who delivers your post. Post when it arrives at a local office is
sorted into <walks·; each postman then sorts his own walk into streets.
Before doing so however he sorts a collection of·redirection· and
·retention· cards into
the street pigeon holes. Post is normally retained at the request of the
addressee, who can ask for post to be held until called for. One problem
with this (hypothetical) system is that post,
once removed, cannot be returned into the normal delivery system
without
the knowledge of the sorter. If it were,
it would simply be removed from the delivery system again for
·retention·. The only suggestions I·ve heard that might alone solve this
little problem are (a) that postmen actually know who·s being monitored
on their walk (this suggestion is backed by a first hand story in the
Committee of 100 Pamphlet (cited above) in which the post of a CP hack
was held back by a temporary postman, working over the Christmas
season in 1954. Maybe in the last twenty years they·ve become more
sophisticated .. ); (b) that the IB has its own fleet of postmen who deliver
intercepted letters .. an equally bizarre suggestion.
4. Times, Sunday Supplement article, 20 June 1971.
5. Time Out, as (2).
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Confessions Of A Phone Phreak
TELEPHONES are interesting, and fun to play with. People whose hobby
is playing with telephones are known as ·phone phreaks· in the USA, a
term which is not very popular in this country. The polite term ·telephone
enthusiast· is sometimes used instead.
Anyone interested in amateur radio can go to his local library and find a
shelf of books telling him how to annoy his neighbours by interfering with
their television pictures. Unlike such normal hobbies it is not so easy to
find information on the subject of ·phone phreaking·. When I first became
interested in telephones I was more or less on my own
and I spent a lot of time trying to find other telephone enthusiasts. This
was an interesting exercise, full of odd surprises. On one occasion I spent
a lot of time tracking down rumours of one individual who turned out to
be no other than myself. Some people get interested in telephones simply
by meeting established ·phone phreaks. I feel that one misses something
by this. To understand what ·phone phreaking is all about one needs to
know a little about telephone systems.
The British Telephone System
Telephone exchanges in the UK are arranged in a hierarchical structure
based on about 40 lanes switching centres, 350 group switching centres
and about 6,000 minor exchanges. Each group switching centre (GSC) is
a member of a zone and its zone switching centre is its primary route to
the trunk network. Similarly, each of the minor exchanges has a GSC as
its parent. In addition to this basic structure there are further circuits, GSC
to GSC, minor to minor exchange and so on, provided that there is a
sufficient demand to justify them.
Until the introduction of Subscriber Trunk Dialling (STD) in 1959,
telephone operators handled all trunk traffic. By this time most of the
network was automatic in the sense that one originating operator could
complete a call by dialling, over the trunk network, codes which routed
the call from one centre to another.
Following the introduction of STD, the responsibility for the setting up of
the call was placed upon the subscriber. Now the most costly part of a
telephone system is the provision and maintenance of circuits between
exchanges and this dictates the philosophy behind the working of the
system.
The STD equipment dials calls over the trunk network automatically and
_______________________________________________________________________ UC07 page 47
______________________________________________ Undercurrents 07 July-August 1974 Page 48
in this way replaces the local operator. The equipment is full of safeguards
which ensure that, either by accident or misuse, a subscriber does not
waste time on trunk circuits. For example, a subscriber cannot let a call
ring indefinitely: he will be automatically disconnected after about
3 or 4 minutes.
Most of the automatic switching equipment in the UK is based upon the
older type of electromechanical switching known as the Strowger (or step
by step) system. This type of equipment responds directly to the impulses
set up as one dials. As a result, there is a very close relationship between
the codes dialled and the way in which the call is routed.
If one looks at the dialling code booklet issued to subscribers one will
find
that it is divided into two parts. The
first gives dialling codes for ·local· calls and the main part of the booklet
gives
the dialling codes for ·local· calls and the main part of the booklet gives
the dialling codes for trunk calls.
The local codes operate Strowger switching equipment. If one studies the
local dialling codes published for a few neighbouring exchanges it is
possible to break them down into their component routings. It is then
possible to string them together to reach distances of up to about 70
miles. It is through discovering this that many people, myself included,
first became interested in telephones. This stringing together of local
codes is known as ·chaining· and is of restricted interest since the lines
are unamplified and of low quality.
The STD codes consist of the digit
zero followed by a three digit ·area code· and, in the case of minor
exchanges, further routing digits. The initial zero connects a subscriber to
the STD routing equipment. The next three digits bear no relation to the
routing digits actually needed to set up the call and are the same all over
the country. They were allocated as a mnemonic in the days when
telephone dials had letters on them.
The heart of the STD equipment is a register translator (RT). This splits off
the area code and translates it into the appropriate routing digits, indeed
the same ones that an operator would dial. Meanwhile the remaining
dialled digits are stored in a register. The equipment first pulses out the
routing digits got from the translator and follows them with the digits
stored in the register, these being the final routing digits (for minor
_______________________________________________________________________ UC07 page 48
______________________________________________ Undercurrents 07 July-August 1974 Page 49
exchanges) and the called number. Having done this the equipment
switches through the speech path and the register translator releases itself
in preparation for the next call, leaving control to a piece of equipment
called a register access relay set. This piece of control equipment has
obtained the appropriate metering rate for the call from the translator, and
when the call
is answered it steps the subscriber·s meter at this rate.
Trunk Access
Theoretically, the only way that a subscriber has of obtaining a trunk
circuit is either via the local operator or through the STD equipment.
Neither of these two methods allow one to explore the telephone
network, which is what the ·phone phreak wants to do. In practice there
are other ways of gaining access to the trunk network. For a variety of
reasons there are ways of dialling from the local codes, to which
a subscriber has proper access, onto trunk routes. One way in which this
can happen is that occasionally a local route can terminate at a GSC with
the same status as an incoming trunk route. When this happens one may
dial the appropriate local code followed by the digit ·I· and gain access to
the trunk circuits at the distant GSc.
Another type of trunk access arises when Post Office engineers within an
exchange wire up their own irregular circuits. One of these came to light
last year in Bristol as a result of a Post Office prosecution. One dialled
173 and received a continuous ·number unobtainable· tone (as one
should, it is a spare code). However, if one waited for 30 seconds, this
would switch through to Bristol trunks. One person who was prosecuted
was apparently running an air charter company and making all his
telephone calls abroad free of charge. A more common type of
concealment occurs when, instead of waiting as above, one has to dial a
further code, most commonly a digit zero. If more than one such digit is
required then the access becomes difficult to find.
In spite of such attempts at concealment a large list of these was
compiled. To explore the trunk network using
one of these one would use the ·chaining· method to the nearest
exchange providing such a trunk access. If one was lucky, one·s own
exchange would possess one.
As a result of recent publicity the Post Office has tightened up on its own
internal security and now only relatively few of these accesses are left.
FortunateIy. there is a more powerful way of gaining access to trunks and
this involves simulating the control signals that are used on trunk routes.
To explain how this can be done it is necessary to describe first the
principles of telephone signalling.
Telephone Signalling Systems
Dial pulses. which originate at the subscriber telephone on dialling.
periodically interrupt the DC path between the telephone and the
exchange. This is known as loop disconnect signalling and is also used
over local links between exchanges. It is not suitable for signalling over
longer links because the pulses get distorted, or over micro wave links
where there is no DC path. Over the majority of trunk routes a type of
signalling known as AC9 is used. This employs a single signalling
frequency of 2280 Hz which is within the audio pass band of the circuit.
Digits are transmitted as impulses of this frequency sent at dial pulse
speed (10 pulses per second). Control signals are also at 2280Hz. For
example, on completion of a call a continuous tone at this frequency is
sent to clear down the circuit.
The STD system as so far described is inadequate in many ways. It is
capable of providing only relatively simple translations and this is why
subscribers who have STD cannot dial all of the exchanges on the
automatic trunk network. Further, if congestion is met on any of the links
within a routing then the call will fail whereas an operator would either
redial or try an alternative routing. It was decided from the outset that it
would be uneconomical-to extend the planned STD system to cope with
these problems and so a different approach known as transit working was
planned. Accordingly. a completely independent trunk network is being
built and is now gradually coming into operation. This is known as the
trunk transit network.
In the transit mode the area code is examined by the originating RT as
before, but instead of producing a
complete set of routing digits it simply seizes the first free circuit to the
most likely switching centre capable of handling that call. If there are no
free circuits then it tries its next choice of switching centre.
This distant switching centre then requests the original area code and
upon receipt of this from the originating RT
it will set up the next link in the same way. The intermediate RT is then
released and plays no further part in the connection of the call. This
process continues until the call reaches its required destination
whereupon the distant RT sends back a signal to initiate the transfer of the
contents of the originating register to the final register and the call is then
established as before.
The area code has to be repeated by the originating RT to each of the
intermediate switching centres and a slow signalling system such as AC9
is unsuitable. A high speed signalling system is
therefore used and is known as SSMF2. This uses a combination of two
frequencies out of a total of six to represent digits.
With SSMF2, a digit may be sent in 160 milliseconds, compared to a
maximum of 1 second when u,ing AC9. Signals in the backward direction
arc needed, for example to request the area code, and these are based on
a further six frequencies. Supervisory signals are again at 2280Hz in most
cases, these including the forward clear for example. The Blue Box
It has been seen that the control signals employed within the inland trunk
network are audio signals within the passband of the telephone circuit.
Armed therefore with a set of audio oscillators and some means of
playing combinations of these into one·s telephone one can imitate these
signals. A device capable
of doing this is known as a ·blue box·
in the USA and as a ·bleeper· in this country. With such a device the
entire telephone system of the world is then at your command.
To imitate signalling system AC9 all that one needs is a single oscillator
running at 2280Hz and a method of interrupting this at dial pulse speed.
A second telephone dial is a simple and convenient method. In practice
one would start by dialling an ordinary STD call and then, before the call
is answered, send a short burst of tone. This ·clears down· the call and
one is left with an outgoing trunk route. This first link is not released
because the telephone is
still ·off the hook· and the DC holding conditions are still applied at the
local GSc. A second burst of tone will then ·re·seize· in the sense that the
switching equipment is reconnected at the distant GSC in preparation for
the receipt of routing digits. These are sent using the auxiliary telephone
dial just as if one was an operator or was using a trunk access.
Simulation of the MF2 signals requires, of course, six oscillators and the
procedure is more complicated. However, one does not need to know
any internal trunk routing digits.
Once one has unrestricted access to the trunk network in this way it is
possible to gain access to the international circuits as well. Over these
circuits different signalling systems are employed and these too are
_______________________________________________________________________ UC07 page 51
______________________________________________ Undercurrents 07 July-August 1974 Page 52
reason the initial STD call is chosen to give a low metering rate. I f one
now restricts one·s activities to such areas as, for example, experimenting
with different signalling systems then the law is very unclear on the
subject. There is certainly a good argument against one·s activities being
illegal.
It is so easy to make STD or international calls free of charge, even with
no electronic aids, that anyone wishing to do so would certainly not use a
·blue box·. In this country at least, the ·blue box· user is generally a
telephone enthusiast and fairly harmless.
The world is but a Blue Box away
This part of the article describes the extension of the art of phone
phreaking from a national to an international scale. As already
mentioned, once one has unrestricted access to trunk routes then one
may also gain access to international routes. The way in which one can
achieve this varies between countries. ·
In large countries possessing an advanced telephone system such as
Australia
or the USA, there are centres from which operators can originate
international
calls. Today, most of the world·s telephone network is automatic·which
means that these originating operators can complete their international
calls without
the assistance of an operator in the
distant country. The automatic switch·
ing equipment giving access to international circuits is located at centres
known as Gateway Exchanges, and operator-originated international
traffic is first of all routed over a country·s internal network to these
gateway exchanges. Since the internal network therefore, carries both
national and international traffic, it is easy to see that with the
unrestricted access to this network provided by a Blue Box, the telephone
enthusiast can himself route calls via Gateway Exchange
es {provided of course, that he knows the appropriate routing codes).
In this country, however, the situation is different. Until quite recently the
only international operators were those located at the gateway exchange
itself· that is, at London·s Faraday House·and subscribers were connected
to these operators by the local operator in their own exchange or Group
Switching Centre. There were no ·shared traffic· routes terminating at the
automatic equipment in the Gateway exchange, as in the USA. It was
_______________________________________________________________________ UC07 page 53
______________________________________________ Undercurrents 07 July-August 1974 Page 54
digits arc sent as fourbit binary numbers using two frequencies, 2400 H3
and 2040 H3, to represent 0 and 1 respectiveIy. The control signals also
use these frequencies. Digits are sent in response
to signals received from the distant equipment, and the transit method of
working is generally employed
between different countries. (The principles of the transit working have
been described in the first part of
this article, as they apply to the internal trunk network in the UK). This
signalling system is unsuitable for use
over satellite circuits since these introduce a return signal path of about
100,000 miles in length corresponding to a time delay of some 600
milliseconds. In compelled signalling system such as CCiTT 4 this delay is
added to the sending time
of each digit which makes the overall setting up time for a call for too
high, bearing in mind the need for efficient
use of expensive satellite circuits. CCITI4 finds its main application over
shorter international routes, the main areas
being Europe, South America and
Africa.
Over intercontinental and satellite circuits the system CClTI5 is normally
used. This is a high speed signalling system. Digits are sent in
multifrequency (MF) form similar to the SSMF2 system already described
but using different frequencies. The CCiTTS frequencies
are the same as those used by the American Telephone and Telegraph
Company (AT & T) for the North American internal signalling system,
which is very convenient for the Blue Box user. The two signalling
systems differ only in the supervisory or control signals.
The simulation of CCITT4 was of great interest to the telephone enthusiast
in the early days of ISO when the international RTs handing ISD traffic
had access only to those countries to which ISD was allowed. For
example, Russia was first reached in this way; a call to Switzerland
(which was allowed) was made and then extended to Moscow via the
Warsaw transit.
Since then, the equipment known as International Common Access (ICA)
over which international operators connect calls, has become available
for ISD traffic and most countries are now directly available to the
enthusiast by the methods described above. With
voice frequency band). But provided that one is incoming into Australia
with operator status one can gain
access to the 2VF network at centres such as Melbourne or Brisbane. This
assumes that one knows the appropriate access codes. The 2VF network
employs the AC1 signalling system, which uses two signalling
frequencies: 600 Hz and 750 Hi. Digits arc sent in a similar way to AC9
signals but use the 600 Hz frequency. The supervisory signals are
different, the forward clear for example, consistency of the 750 Hz tone
applied for 2 seconds followed by 0.7 seconds of the 600 Hz tone. This
signalling system preceded AC9 in this country and is still used to some
extent. One
can sometimes hear its very characteristic ·forward clear· tone over UK
trunk routes when crosstalk occurs between channels using AC1.
Australia has one Gateway exchange, located in Sydney, and a second
coming into operation shortly. Modern Crossbar switching is employed at
the Gate way, and this has the facility of restricting the access to the
outgoing circuits in the transit mode to the appropriate incoming routes.
This means, for
instance, that if you were incoming from London, the country code 44 for
the UK would not be accepted, because the equipment can recognise
that calls from one part of the UK to another
are not normally routed via Sydney, even though a telephone enthusiast
might consider it a reasonable thing to do. In practice, transit access from
Sydney to New Zealand, Hong Kong and Malaga is all that is allowed to
UK traffic·which is of restricted interest
to the UK telephone enthusiast since these countries are available directly
via the International Common Access System.
From the enthusiasts point of view
it is therefore fortunate that there is
a way of gaining unrestricted access
to the international exchange and this works as follows. Operators in
certain large exchanges, such as Adelaide, can dial their own
international calls, rather than having to rely upon the international
operators in Sydney. Th is traffic is routed over the 2VF network and .. as
has been mentioned above, it is possible to gain access to this network
incoming into Australia. This makes it possible to set up a telephone call
all the way round the world.
Firstly, set·up a call to Adelaide via New York (or some other US Gateway)
and then send the 2VF access code and the 2VF routing for Sydney, all
using CCITI5/USA signalling. Having allowed this connection to
complete, the distant 2VF circuit will now accept AC1 signals. Using the
pulsed 600 Hz signalling for the digits, one next sends the digits
99 1 442 1.838 7603 followed by a short burst of tone at 750 Hz to
indicate
end of signalling. The digits 99 arc the access code for the Gateway
exchange, the digit 1 is used for discrimination purposes and the country
code 44 is
for the UK. The next digit, 2, is known asa language digit and indicates in
this case that the call is being set up by an English speaking operator. The
area code for London is 1 and this is followed by the required London
number. This rather cumbersome procedure follows from difficulty in
interfacing an older type of signalling, AC1, with the international routing
equipment. A call set
up in this way will be routed, via the Indian ocean satellite, back to
London This feat was first achieved in the June of 1972.
The term ·language digit·referred
to above is rather a misnomer and originated in the days when most of
the international circuits were operated manually. This meant that an
originating international operator could not in
general complete a call but would require the assistance of an operator in
the distant country and the purpose of the language digit was to ensure
that the
call was routed to an assistance operator speaking a specified language.
Today,
the bulk of international traffic is switched automatically and furthermore
the English language has become more or less universally used by
international operators. A few countries such as France and Russia insist
on using the French language. Spanish is used to
some extent within South America but
in the vast majority of cases the language digit has become redundant. Its
use is however mandatory by international agreements and must be used.
Many countries now have ISO and with the increase in subscriber
originated traffic international agreements have come
into force that require such traffic to carry the language digit zero. This is
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Laurie Beneath The Official Secrets Act
PETER LAURIE·S book Beneath the City Streets· caused a lot of interest
when it first appeared in 1970. Though a major part of it was devoted to a
description of nuclear warfare and its effects, the most fascinating chapter
for many people was on ·Government Citadels in Britain·, in which laurie
described the secret network of tunnels and shelters that runs beneath
london·s pavements, the Regional Seats of Government to which civil
servants and members of the Cabinet would be dispersed in time of war
or revolution, and the ·hardened· communications system which would
link all the Government·s vital installations in an emergency. Anyone who
tries to probe below the surface gloss of Britain·s Civil and Military
defences obviously runs the risk of falling foul of the dreaded Official
Secrets Act. To find out how laurie has managed to stay on the right side
of the bureaucrats, and to discover how he now views some of the topics
raised in his book, Undercurrents went along to interview him ...
¥
, The starting point· from my point of view is Spies for Peace. There was,
as you remember, tremendous agitation in Government circles about
Spies for
Peace .. you know, something had got out that shouldn·t have got out. The
real excitement was because they were
in the middle of building this very expensive set of holes in the ground.
An d if there had been a big Parliamentary scandal, MP·s had stood up
and
said ·You·re spending a thousand
million on protecting yourselves·
what about us?·, they could have blown the whole deal. 50 that was why
there was so much fuss.
When I published much more information on the same lines, eight years
later, there was no fuss at all because they·d finished. And in fact, I think
that if anybody subtle in the Home
Office had thought about my book
he would have said:"Well, let this guy Penguin Books (2nd Ed) 1972. now
(curiously) out of print·though a revised edition may be
on the way.
go ahead because when people get paranoid about holes in the ground
in ten years time and they come
running round saying ·Jessus, there
arc these holes in the ground· we can say ·Oh, of course! Didn·t you read
Laurie·s book? It was a very silly book-he was just a journalist·but you
know, it·s roughly there· and they·ll say ·Oh, we didn·t know it was in a
book·, you see, and they·ll go away feeling quite despondent".
The Official Secrets Act I haven·t found any real problem at aiL A couple
of weird guys from Chelsea came around once. I think they were M 16,
or relatives of someone in M 16, trying to get me to say that I had friends
in the Civil Service who told me where to look. But I wouldn·t
have any of that. Afterwards, apparently, one of them went off to Greece
and hasn·t been seen since, and his brother rang me up and said ·I think
he was a spy, you know· and I said
·I thought you were both spies·. Anyway, that was that.
And the last brush I had with them was when we published the thing in
the Sunday Times about the Post Office Towers.
Oh yes I saw that .. about a year ago. It ""s a whole set of pretty colour
supplement pictures of microwave antennae.
Well, we had the diagram out of my book on the Bagshot-Stokenchurch
link and the R5G. And also, just to aggravate the Ministry of Defence,
Orfordness .. and the thing about the ·line of shoot· of Orfordness. If you
carry on the Great Circle, it goes through Plesetsk and Tyuratam,
which are the two Russian rocket launching sites so obviously someone
had drawn a line and said·where can we build this fucking thing?
·Orfordness was the only place.
It \VQS an over the horizon radar installation?
Yes. This led to quite an interesting interview with the D notice committee
bloke. He said: "you can·t publish this". But the situation was that the
magazine had been printed but hadn·t been distributed, so there was
about £100,000 worth of magazines sitting in the ware house, and it was
this Admiral Farnhill who had the responsibility of saying ·you·ve got to
pulp it·. And he·d just started the job and we said "you·d
better be right about this because you·re going to look pretty stupid if it
isn·t". But he still said "Well you can·t print this stuff". And we said "Well,
the Russians invented over·the·horizon
radar in nineteen forty five·or whenever. Do you really think they haven·t
_______________________________________________________________________ UC07 page 62
______________________________________________ Undercurrents 07 July-August 1974 Page 63
noticed that there·s this great sort of river of megawatts trundling across
the middle of Russia?" And he said "Well that·s as may be, but don·t
let·s make their life easier for them".
All this drivel.
Magazines like Aviation Week·
you know, ·Megadeath Weekly·
they just go ahead and publish
articles about over·the·horizon radar, what it looks like, how it works·but
in England they·re all running about wetting themselves if W·e try to
publish anything. Admiral Farnhill caved in because I said, "all this has
been in my book, and the book·s been published in Australia, and the D
Notice rules say that if something·s been published abroad you can
publish it here! Doesn·t a D·Notice mean simply that they serve warning
to you that if you publish something you are rendering yourself very likely
to be prosecuted under the Official Secrets Act?
The way it works .. In the old days, when there were some secrets, what
happened was that if you worked for the Sunday Times then they would
tell you things that in America would re mildly confidential, which you
wouldn·t print, and you would feel
very pleased about being in on the secret, you sec. So you would tag
along with it. But the whole thing
has more or less collapsed now that there aren·t any secrets. There·s
nothing in England that anyone would want
to know.
The only reason it might be secret is that all these hardened facilities con
be of use in repressing insurrection.
For political reasons, not defence reasons. Yes, there·s no external reason
for preserving secrecy but there is still an internal reason for it.
Here·s another" ludicrous example. I·m trying to do an article about
Linesman air defence system. Now in America the whole thing ha, been
openly debated·you know "We·ve got the radars on the coast, and here
are the aircraft control centres, and this is how it works .. and it·, all of
load of old ,hit because,e
it doesn·t work so we·re going to go
into over·the·horizon radar and airborne early warning systems!·The
whole thing·s come out, because Boeing wants to sell the aeroplanes, you
see.
_______________________________________________________________________ UC07 page 63
______________________________________________ Undercurrents 07 July-August 1974 Page 64
But over here, you mustn·t even breathe a word about it, because it·s
terribly secret. And when you ,ay "But the Russian Backfire bomber flies,
at 2,000 mile, an hour at fifty feet, and it·s going to be in Manchester
before it·s even shown up on these radar screens" ·"that doesn·t matter!"
In your book, what were the correct hits that you made, and what were
the things that were wrong?
Getting together with the phone freak, ha, knocked a lot of the stuffing
out of my deduction, about the telephone system in London.
What about that intriguing place
in Hampstead coiled ·Paddock· which you mentioned in your book?
That·, also crap. A guy from Dollis Hill Post Office Research rang me up
and
· ;aid "Everybody know, that Paddock is the name of our ping·pong room,
I
know it·, down 300 feet but that·,
g where we play ping·pong, and keep the old amateur dramatics sets and
stuff" What about your hypotheses about the Box tunnel, on the way to
Bristol. Have you had any more feedback about that? There was a crowd
of people that bust in there·that·, been published. They
, got into the work" and they got up to a door and there were people on
the other side so they didn·t kick it in.
But the interesting thing there is that the underground complex at Box is
going
to be closed down, suddenly, because
of a fire risk, though it·s been in
business for 25 or 30 years, and it·s
all going to be moved somewhere in Wale;.
You haven·t any intimation about INhere the new location might be?
Well, yes, it was in the papers, there·s no secret about that.
Another study I·d like to do sometime is computer bureaux in relation to
the deep·Ievel cables, because you find nearly all the computer bureaux
down the Euston Road. The University of London one is in Gray·s Inn
Road, just next door to Kelvin House which is the trunk exchange. There
seems to be a definite correlation. I was talking to a computer bureau
managing director a while ago and I asked him how he·d found a
place to set up shop. He was terribly vague about it. Maybe I·m paranoid,
Every question you want to ask is being answered over there ... ,
..
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Anon Above The City Streets
FORTY·FIVE television cameras connected direct to New Scotland Yard
are to be installed in Central London streets. Operators in the control
centre will be able, probably by the end of 1975, to pan, tilt, focus and
zoom each camera by remote control. The cameras are part of the
Greater London Council·s CITRAC (Central Integrated Traffic Control)
scheme, which also involves computer·controlled traffic lights. The
decision by the GLC to extend the scheme over the whole of London
follows the claimed success of the West London .experiment which
covered 6% square miles and involved eight cameras. You may have
noticed them on blocks of flats at Shepherds Bush and North Kensington,
or above the busy Knightsbridge junction.
These more ambitious plans are revealed in the Spring 1974 issue of the
Post Office Telecommunications Journal. The Post Office's role in the
television scheme is to provide the transmission system which will link
the cameras and the Yard. Some of
the cables will run under the pavements, but where possible they will be
placed in the Post Office's deep·level tunnels, for added security.
"There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being
watched at any given moment ... it was even conceivable that they
watched everybody all the time. " · George Orwell. 1984
Besides the traffic control cameras, existing and planned, there is another
network, used by the police specifically for ·crowd control·. Sites
mentioned
by the New Scientist (30 May 1974) were Trafalgar Square, Whitehall and
Grosvenor Square, three of the usual locations for demonstrations and
public meetings. The traffic and crowd control systems can, according to
the same article, be interfaced at any time ·though this can only be
regarded as an added electronic convenience, since even if the systems
were not capable
of interconnection, there would always be room in the control room for a
Special Branch man to stand looking over the traffic cop·s shoulder.
The next stage of the CITRAC scheme may call for a further 150 cameras
in outer London, and it is said that similar schemes are envisaged in many
of the larger towns in this country during the next decade. The Post Office
is already developing cheaper CCTV transmission systems, using
..
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Anon People’s radio primer
THE IDEA of providing a general introduction to People·s Radio and the
liberated uses of communications technology is one that has been
festering away in the back of Undercurrents Gestalt mind since we did
the ·Community Radio· pamphlet in Undercurrents 1.
The Medium Wave and VH F transmitters and the other items described
here will work (touch wood) if you build them according to the
instructions but in addition to that I have tried to suggest several
directions for improvements in each case, and a brief description of what
is happening inside the ·black box·. Inevitably, with so little space I have
had to leave one or two ghosts· inhabiting the ·machine·
The assumptions that I have made in presenting the material are a) an
ability to read a circuit diagram b) some experience of soldering an d
metal work at least enough to put the circuit together, and c) an
elementary knowledge of electronics and electronic terminology (what a
valve is, what is meant by impedance, etc.). There isn·t really much point
in starting to build a transmitter without what I would term a ·crystal set·
level of competence in electronics, any more than you would make a
clinker built row·boat your first project in carpentry. However, the
inherent satisfaction gained by most people from radio construction is
sufficient to ensure that the little
bit of expertise and familiarity needed is gained very quickly indeed.
Magazines like Practical Wireless, Radio Constructor, and The Short Wave
Magazine provide a good general introduction to the field for the total
novice, and there are many introductory and ·Teach Yourself· books on
the market.
Legal Aspects
Until recently, the main Act of Parliament relating to broadcasting and
telecommunications was the Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1949, which most
people considered very wide-ranging in its operation. It was an offence
not only to use a transmitter without a (highly restrictive) licence, but it
was also illegal simply to receive, intentionally, transmissions not
intended for public dissemination. Like all Acts, its applicability ended at
the ·three mile limit·, and it did not cover transmissions from ships or
aircraft registered in the UK while they were outside Crown territory. This
loophole made possible the proliferation of the off·shore ·pirate· stations
in the late 50s/early 60s, and was closed by the passing in 1967 of the
_______________________________________________________________________ UC07 page 71
______________________________________________ Undercurrents 07 July-August 1974 Page 72
operating this, or any of the other units a letter c/o Undercurrents will
bring advice and sympathy!
The block diagram of a medium wave AM transmitter using valves and an
external modulator is shown in Fig. 1. Each section will be dealt with
separately, though of course it will be most convenient to build all the
sections shown on the same chassis.
Basically. the mode of operation is as follows: the radio frequency RF
oscillation which will become the carrier wove is produced by the
oscillator section. The RF current is passed on to the next stage, the
buffer/driver for amplification. This, high amplitude RF current is then
used to drive
stage 3 . the power amplifier (PA). The
Direct Current (DC) input power to the power amplifier valve is the
·power· of the transmitter, usually stated in watts.
FI<13. THE;. "l>U.MM·f"
c..RY.5TP\L.
The audio signal, called the modulation, is fed in series with the power
supply
to the power amplifier valve. The audio amplifier providing this audio
signal is conventionally about half as powerful
(in watts) as the transmitter, though 20·30 % extra audio drive may be
needed to compensate for losses in transformers and general inefficiency.
The transformer which matches the modulation signal to the PA valve is
called the modulation transformer.
The pi network, named because of its resemblance to the Greek IT i,
another impedance matching device to couple
or ·load· the aerial in to the transmitter. It· operational theory i, beyond
the scope of this article. The final section,
the power supply, is merely a transformer, rectifiers and smoothing
circuitry, which supplies heater current and high tension to the valves in
the normal manner. The modulating signal is assumed to be derived from
an external audio
amplifier, though of course there is no reason why this could not be
constructed on the same chassis as the transmitter.
pentode ,such as the EF91, EF80 or EF 184 will work well in this, circuit.
When a crystal is plugged into the holder the oscillator will work on one
fixed frequency (the crystal frequency). But it is also possible to make the
oscillator tunable. To do this, a ·dummy· crystal is plugged in, which
consists of
a coil on a small former, in series with
a 1000 pf capacitor and fixed to a discarded crystal·base or a similar two
pin connector (Fig.3). The tuning capacitor CV (which ,should have a
slow·motion drive) will then tune a substantial part of the medium
waveband around 200 metres, which i, the recommended region for
low·power operation.
Crystal, have the advantage of great frequency stability, but this, also
makes them ·inflexible·. The tunable Variable Frequency Oscillator (VFO)
mode i, less stable in frequency but more adaptable and versatile.
Medium wave crystals can ·so prove quite difficult to obtain. When
operating with a
crystal in the holder the variable capacitor CV will have no significant
effect and can be ignored. In general, VFO, ,should be well screened
electrically and well ventilated, but on low frequencies, such as MW,
they are not too critical.
incorporated in the wiring between the PSU and the other stages as
shown in Fig. 9.
The ·net· position allows the oscillator and buffer/driver to be switched on
without the PA, which is useful for tuning the transmitter to a ·blank·
channel, checking for interference, etc. Operation
Only very brief detail, can be given, though experience on·the·air will
soon fill in the gaps. The operations arc numbered so that this section
may be used as a ·check·list· when operating. 1. Connect mains, aerial,
earth and modulator .. A simp Ie method of applying modulation is to use
an old loudspeaker transformer in reverse as a modulation transformer,
and convey
the modulating signal to the transmitter along a piece of ordinary flex
from an amplifier which may be up to 5 · 10 feet away(Fig. 10).
Alternatively, of course, modulation of any impedance can be matched to
the transmitter by the selection of a suitable modulation transformer.
2. Turn on a sensitive receiver and check that the channel to be used is
clear. Use the ·net· position on the transmitter to produce a weak carrier.
On ·Transmit· the receiver will be totally overloaded (and possibly
damaged).
3. Switch off the receiver. Turn pi network capacitor PCL to maximum
capacity (fully meshed vanes).
4. Observe the panel meter. Switch
to ·transmit· and adjust PCT .Quickly for minimum current reading on the
meter. Undue delay may cause heating of the EL36 valve, the chokes, or
transformers, or possibly failure of a component. NEVER AllOW THE
POWER AMPLIFIER TO SIT ·OFF RESONANCE· (with the meter anywhere
other than
at the bottom of its ·dip·).
5. Open the vanes of PCl slightly and retune PCT until the meter needle is
back at the bottom of its ·dip·. The new ·dip· will not be quite as low as
the first one. Repeat this operation
until the meter is reading about 40·50 ma at the bottom of its ·dip·, 40 ma
represents a transmitter power of 10 watts, 50 ma a power of 12.5 watts.
The difference to a listener is barely detectable. Remember that you will
need to be able to supply at least half this power in audio to modulate the
signal fully · and much more when the modulation transformer is an
output transformer. The whole process of adjusting the pi network is
Aerials
The medium wave aerial/earth system is a very important factor in overall
results.
Firstly, for setting·up, testing modulation, etc. the aerial/earth system may
be replaced with a 15W electric light bulb. With experience a great deal
can be learned about the general health of
a transmitter by observing the brightness and behaviour of such a ·lamp
load·. (Fig. 11).
For medium wave transmission, the earth system is almost as important as
the aerial. Ideally, a SHORT length
of stout copper wire should be led from the transmitter to a copper plate
buried in moist soil. Two or three copper pipes, hammered in to the
ground and strapped together at the top provide a good alternative. In an
emergency, a
. cold water pipe often provides quite a good earth connection, but of
course its properties will not be so predictable. Connections should not
be made to copper pipes carrying gas.
A typical medium wave aerial for low power work consists of a long
horizontal length of copper wire, supported as high as possible above the
ground and fed at one end (Fig. 12). The aerial wire is insulated off the
support wires
by egg insulator> and kept well in the clear, as far away as possible from
metal objects such as water·tanks or telephone equipment, etc.
_______________________________________________________________________ UC07 page 78
______________________________________________ Undercurrents 07 July-August 1974 Page 79
(FIG 19).
As a check that this has been done correctly, ensure that the radio
continues to play with the earpiece plugged in to its socket, and that no
output
is obtained from the earpiece under these conditions. The next operation
involves interrupting or breaking one of the inputs to the volume control.
Usually the volume control is wired as shown in FIG 20, and the required
connection is the centre or ·slider·
connection, but exceptionally the control may be wired as in FIG 21,
in which case the ·top· connection (the one most distant from the earth
connection) is the one which must be used.
The correct wire may be simply identified:· when it is broken and the
volume control stub (not the stub leading to the chassis) is touched, a
hum will be heard, varying in loudness with the volume control. If this
does not occur then the wrong wire has been broken and it is necessary
to start again.
When the correct wire has been identified two shielded cables are led to
the redundant earpiece socket (one from each stub end) and wired as in
Figure 22. If this wiring has been completed correctly, the receiver should
play normally
until a microphone or some other input
is connected to the earpiece socket. The plug being inserted should then
mute
the radio, and the unit should operate
as an audio amplifier, still responding normally to the volume control.
C. SIGNAL TRANSFER SYSTEMS (i) SIMPLE LOOP
A loop of wire (around a room, or an entire building, or even a larger
area) will induce a voltage to flow in the loop and will produce a similar,
reduced voltage
in any coil of wire inside that loop. This is exactly the same
power·transfer which takes place in any kind of transformer. (FIG 23).
The loop may be connected up to either the ·audio output· or the ·carrier
output· of the multi·mode transmitter. The use of carrier is likely to give a
greatly enhanced range, but may interfere with other electronic apparatus
and is less ·private·. The basic receiver circuits for reception of either
mode are shown
in FIG 24.
deflect it outwards _ This earths directly to the receiver amplifier. but the
range is greatly reduced. Due
to the enormous variations in the wetness and chemical composition of
soils the results are very unpredictable, but a range of several miles can
be achieved if the carrier mode is used.
ream could be received on equipment generally similar to that described
here. An additional refinement would have been the simultaneous
transmission of several programmes by the use of multiple sub·carriers
falling within the medium waveband. A transistor radio could then form
the greater part of the receiver apparatus (Fig 27).
Amusingly enough, when this system was envisaged the only part of the
operation which could have contravened the Wireless Telegraphy Act was
the ·free air· link between the receiver amplifier and the transistor radio.
Now, since the 1969 Post Office Act, the system would be clearly illegal.
At its absolute simplest, modulated light can be generated using the
circuit of Fig 28. If the ·Universal Transmitter· audio output is used to
power this arrangement great care must be taken not to ·blow· the bulb
by turning the volume control up too high. Correct modulation will be
seen as a perceptible, but not excessive increase in the bulb·s brightness
on peaks of speech.
The modulated beam, being weak, needs to be directed to the receiver by
means of a lens or, preferably, a mirror. An ordinary concave
shaving·mirror
is ideal for this purpose. The bulb should be held at the focus of the
mirror by a piece of stout iron wire (FIG·!9)
The most convenient form of receiver uses a similar optical system with a
light·sensitive transistor or diode at its focus. The light·sensitive element is
connected to an amplifier and the original sound is recovered, as with a
simple radio transmission system.
Many variations in ·receiver· design
are possible, and no components are critical. FIG X shows a complete
circuit which I used for a number of years and which proved very
sensitive. However the Texas Instruments H60
is now difficult to obtain, and phototransistors such as the OCP71 and
various silicon photo·devices are
more popular. Practically any photosensitive element will serve, with a
little experimentation, but not the ORP12 cell or similar ·light dependent
resistors· (or solar cells for that matter). These respond too slowly to
follow
the variations in the modulation.
There is no reason why a ·receiver head· (FIG 30) should not be built to
plug in to the ·universal amplifier·.
A glass·type OC71 may be converted into a (slightly crude)
phototransistor merely by scraping off the black
paint. Similarly the metal·bodied BC107, 108, 109 series can be
converted into remarkably efficient photo devices by carefully filing away
the
top of the metal can, cooling frequently with water or a volatile liquid to
avoid over·heating the junction
Finally, a complete light·telephone unit may be constructed by mounting
two mirrors side·by·side at each location, using one to transmit
continuously and the other to receive continually in each case. An
absolute range of
several hundred yards is possible, even with the 2.5 volt bulbs specified,
but beyond about 50 yards the mechanical adjustment and rigidity of the
optical systems becomes a major problem. ¥
..
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Macdonald Ham Radio and TV: The Big Switch·on is Beginning
HERE IN THE United State, we·re exploring some alternative uses of
amateur radio. The basic idea is to put amateur hardware and frequencies
into the hands of people actively trying to get their own lives and their
world into somewhat better shape. In Peter Harper·s AT ,spectrum (,see
Undercurrents 6) it would probably be clarified as ·RAT! Te· with such
features as user control, low cost per mile·hour of communication over
the life of the equipment, and relatively low environmental impact. The
equipment itself use, high technology components which are not readily
manufacturable on a cottage industry basis. It is very much survival
technology, however, if you get your rig and bag of spare parts before the
industrial collapse.
While there are some people rubbing their hand, gleefully in anticipation
of such a collapse. they must be envisioning a sort of gentle
disintegration. An abrupt collapse would probably result in the starvation
of millions, with marauding band, of armed people combing the
country,side for food. There would be no escape, even for
back·to·the·Iand people_ One of your countrymen, Robert Theobald,
considers the primary task of our time to be ·Rebuilding Grand Central
Station while keeping the trains running·_ We·re trying to establish
communication links and activities that aid the rebuilding process and
minimize the chances of an unmanageable collapse.
Current Activities
Radio broadcasting is basically a one· way medium where those in
control decide what will be aired, and there are few opportunities for
listener involvement and feedback. Ham radio, on the other hand, is a
two·way medium permitting real·time dialogue at a distance. (Oneway
·broadcasting· by radio amateurs is actually illegal.)
One of our first activities, launched in September 1973, we call the New
Direction, Roundtable. On Sunday afternoon, we gather at 1900 GMT on
a frequency of 14253 KHz. Participant, check in from many sections of
the US and Canada. Sometimes we just share what is on our minds.
Other weeks we have relatively structured sessions where one of the
group makes a ·presentation· on some topic, followed by a question/
answer/rap session. Often there is a
Cop Macdonald at home in Minnesota with his home radio and SSTV
equipment. The unit with the round screen is an oscilloscope he
Slow Scan TV
There is a ham radio technology that I·ve been excited about and
involved with since 1957. It·s called slow·scan TV, and is a technique for
_______________________________________________________________________ UC07 page 91
______________________________________________ Undercurrents 07 July-August 1974 Page 92
..
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Murdock Cable TV What·s in it for the Media Moguls
AT ROOT, the commercial based mass media are industrial and
commercial organisations, which produce and distribute commodities.
Their profitability, and hence their development, is therefore inextricably
bound up with the general economic situation.
For a variety of reasons, the second half of the sixties saw a decline in the
rate of profit (ie the return on capital expressed as a percentage of the
capital employed). Whereas, in 1964, the pre tax profit stood at 11 per
cent, by 1970 it had fallen away to 5.8 per cent 111. One of the
responses to this situation
was the boom in mergers and takeovers as companies attempted to
consolidate their market position and extend their operating base. In the
four years between 1967 and 1970, commercial and industrial enterprises
spent almost £5,000 million on acquisitions·considerably more than the
total for the preceding sixteen years(21. The media industries were
enmeshed in the same web of economic pressures occasioned by varying
combinations of rapidly rising costs, shifts in consumer demand, and
fluctuations in advertising. Their strategies for meeting the situation
followed those devised by other sectors of industry. The result was an
increase in acquisitions and mergers leading to an increase in the
concentration of ownership both within and across various media sectors.
This is not to say that this period saw a dramatic and unprecedented shift
towards concentration. For some time before this there had been a
marked degree of concentration in a number of media sectors such as
national newspapers, commercial television and cinema exhibition. But
the bout of mergers and takeovers during the latter half of the sixties
undoubtedly increased the degree of concentration still further. In 1948,
for example, the four leading newspaper publishing concerns accounted
for 45 per cent of the total circulation of all daily newspapers; by 1972
the figure was 61 per cent.
Dimensions of Concentration
Under the general heading of ·concentration· we can distinguish three
inter·related but separable processes: horizontal and vertical integration;
diversification; and intermeshing.
Horizontal integration refers to the process whereby firms acquire
additional units at the same level of production. Notable examples
include: the acquisition of the Times an d Sunday Times by the Thomson
_______________________________________________________________________ UC07 page 95
______________________________________________ Undercurrents 07 July-August 1974 Page 96
their control within particular media sectors, the leading companies are
acquiring significant interests across an increasing range of the
communications and leisure industries. In addition to the film industry
interests mentioned above,
for example, EMI is the country·s leading record manufacturer and a
sub·stantial shareholder in Thames TV, the London weekday contractor.
Diversification in turn shades into
the third facet of the concentration process: intermeshing. Not only is the
control of the mass communications system increasingly becoming
concentrated in the hands of large multi·media corporations, but the
leading companies are increasingly intermeshed through reciprocal
shareholdings, interlocking directorships and reciprocal arrangements of
various kinds. The emerging pattern of inter·relationships is immensely
complex, but a relatively simple example will suffice to illustrate the
general point. The institutional share holders in ATC include Reed
International and Beaverbrook Newspapers ltd (respectively the first and
third largest newspaper publishing companies accounting together for 47
per cent of total newspaper circulation), and (via
the intermediary of the Birmingham
Post and Mail Group ltd), Pearson Longman, whose operating companies
include Penguin Books. the country·s leading paperback publishing
house.
Intermeshing, however, proceeds
not only directly through shareholdings and interlocking directorships,
but also more indirectly through reciprocal arrangements. Often such
arrangements have the function of facilitating the marketing of ·spin·offs·,
thereby extending the profitability of particular products. Here for
example is ATV·s description of the success of ·The Persuaders·, a
television adventure series featuring Tony Curtis and Roger Moore:
.. ·The Persuaders· . _ has been sold to more than 62 countries. American
Broadcasting has scheduled the rerun of 13 episodes ... the theme,
composed and recorded by John Barry, has sold more than 116,000
records in the UK, Pan Books have sold 180,000 paperbacks based on the
series·. (5)
This quotation also underlines a further key factor in the present situation
of British mass communications; growing internationalization. The
multi·media companies operating in Britain are in fact increasingly also
multinational concerns.
novel and untried, and relying instead on products which arc already
familiar and popular and which therefore have a proven profit potential.
The recent revival of previously successful programme formats such as
·Sunday Night at the London Palladium· and ·Candid Camera· on
commercial television is one obvious example. The cinema provides
another. The top two box office films of 1972, ·The Godfather· and
·Diamonds are Forever· were both based on best·selling paperbacks, and
four other films in the top twenty were derived from successful television
comedy series.
The profitable life·of a product can also be extended through recycling.
Examples of this process include the re·releasing of relatively recent ·Top
Twenty· hit records on cut·price compilation LP·s, and the sale of cinema
feature films for reshowing on television. In addition to extending the
profitable life of media products, recycling has definite cost advantages_
Original television drama and documentary productions, for example, are
expensive relative to their likely audience; feature films on the other hand
are quite likely to attract two or three times the audience at a quarter of
the cost (7). Again, given the economic logic underlying the situation,
concern for creative innovation is likely to be increasingly displaced by
considerations of accountancy, and genuinely novel productions or those
with ·unprofitable· minority appeal are likely to be curtailed management
techniques and marketing ed or Jettisoned In favour of repeats strategies
in the interests of corporate or revivals of already successful formulas.
growth. The result is again the deletion of choices and alternatives.
The logic of the situation also leads to an increasing emphasis on the
production of commodities which are internationally exchangeable, and
more particularly commodities which will sell in the American market.
Production for export as a means of maintaining profitability puts a
premium on material which will be intelligible and attractive to most
people in most places at most times. In terms of television this has
increasingly meant deleting explicitly topical or localised clements, and
concentrating either on material featuring international name stars against
international ·jet set· backgrounds, or on material which appears as
stereotypically ·English·.
The A TC series, ·The Persuaders·, and ·The Protectors· exemplify the
first of these genrcs*, while the second Is well represented by ·The Forsyte
Saga· and ·Elizabeth R·. It is against this background of the increasing
consolidation of conglomerate control and the concentration of choices,
and within the contex t of ·encral economic situation which underá pins
_______________________________________________________________________ UC07 page 100
______________________________________________ Undercurrents 07 July-August 1974 Page 101
The primary motivation behind the ·Box Office· channel is the continuing
decline in cinema attendance. The hope
is that by making new or recent feature films available in houses,
apartments
and hotels, this channel will enable film producers su bstantially to
increase their audience. Certainly this calculation
was a major factor in precipitating the entry into the American cable
market
of the Warner Communications Corporation, whose operating companies
include Warner Brothers Motion Pictu res: The Olairman explained the
corporation·s 1971 decision to acquire the Continental Telephone
Corporation (America·s second largest cable network) as follows:
" · .studies of future cable growth have concluded that one of the major
thrusts for growth will be the ability
of cable TV to provide on a fee basis special entertainment programs such
as first run motion pictures. The advantage of our expandinil into cable
TV were thus apparent·. 11 I
It seems likely that the same calculation also informs EMl·s present
involvement in Swindon Viewpoint. Similarly the general hoi ding
company (The British Electric Traction Company Limited) which owns
Rediffusion Ltd, whose subsidiaries include Rediffusion Cablevision Ltd,
the company operating the ·Bristol Olannel· station, owns Rediffusion
Holdings Ltd, whose subsidiaries include Wembley Stadium Ltd.1141
This places the company in an advantageous position with respect to the
other main function proposed for the ·Box Office· channel, the ·live· relay
of major sporting events.
The ·Second Chance· channel would provide broadcast television
companies with a further channel through which to recycle their
programmes, thereby further extending their profitable life. Again, it is
significant that both EMI
and Rediffusion Television Ltd (a further subsidiary of the BET Group)
have substantial holdings in Thames Television Limited, the highly
successful weekday London contractor, (151
Revenues from rentals an d programme sales are only two of the possible
sources of profit provided by cable systems, A third, and potentially
greater source derives from the provision of the specialised equipment
required for the transmission and reception of various cable facilities.
Given favourable decisions by the various European governments
_______________________________________________________________________ UC07 page 103
______________________________________________ Undercurrents 07 July-August 1974 Page 104
currently considering the expansion of cable systems, the next ten years
could see the European
market for cablevision equipment increasing from the present £20 million
per annum, to up to £400 million per
annum. This makes it potentially a very significant growth area for the
electronics industry, Consequently, companies like EMI which have
sizeable interests
in electronics manufacture, cannot
afford not to be in on the Fround floor
of these developments. (16 From the point of view of the companies
involved, then, the present cable experiments
fulfil two principal functions. Firstly, they act as public relations exercises
aimed at establishing the present operators as cable of running a
domestic television service responsibly, and persuading the govern ment
to allow cable to proceed on a commercial basis, Secondly, they provide
convenient opportunities for electronics manufacturers to develop and
test ·hardware· facilities. They are,
in fact, one component in these companies· overall ·Research and
Development· programmes. In addition to their involvement in Swindon
Viewpoint, for example, EMI are currently engaged
on a joint project to develop equipment for showing feature films in
hotels and recording customer charges onJ;omputer memory, and to
extend Reuter·s existing relay of commodity and stock exchange prices to
hotels and offices.
The companies involved in the current cable experiments therefore
represent a coalition of interests comprising the relayárental companies,
companies with interests in electronics, and companies possessing or
producing potential programming material. To a certain extent these
various interests
are separable, but at the same time it is also important to recognise the
degree to which they are interrelated and interdependent. Clearly then,
cable cannot be considered in isolation from more general trends in the
communications and leisure industries. It is already to a considerable
extent incorporated into the developing pattern of concentration. Cable,
in common with developments such as satellite broadcasting. video
cassettes and local commercial radio, has been colonised by the
conglomerates primarily in order to provide additional channels for
marketing products and services.
_______________________________________________________________________ UC07 page 104
______________________________________________ Undercurrents 07 July-August 1974 Page 105
This situation raises several issues which urgently demand discussion and
debate.
Private Interest and Public Need:
Questions of Ownership and Control ·Freedom to operate on the basis
of a normal marketing relationship between supplier and consumer .. ,
VIOuld open doors to a new era in neighbourhood communications,
with widespread benefits to life and leisure.·1171
·Uke other innovations since wireless telegraphy, cable has been
introduced to the public with a vision of a better life for a slight
additional charge .. , The public is asked to believe that those same
entrepreneurs who have done a questionable job of applying older media
to social improvements and mass enlightenment are now going to do
something entirely different·. (18)
The Cable Television Association argue that a commercial cable system
would simultaneously provide ·the broadcasters with outlets to reach
wider audiences· and offer ·an important new means of communication
for individuals and communities·. Given the recent history of commercial
provision in other media sectors, however, this assumption that the
private interests of the companies
are synonymous with the public needs
of the communities they serve, is open
to considerable doubt.
Under the system proposed by the CT A, the relay·rental companies
would retain control of the cable system, while programme companies
similar to those currently operating would control the stations and
provide a significant
sector of output. Revenue would be derived from a basic customer
subscription, supplemented by various mixes of advertising, customer
payment for individual items and subsidies from interested bodies such as
local authorities,
The eTA·s proposals rest qn a division between control over·hardware·
and control over ·software·. The fact that the cable companies will be
separate from the programme companies it is argued, provides a sufficient
guarantee against the extension of conglomerate control. This argument
is. however, belied by the emerging pallern of interrelationships between
·hardware· and ·software· interests. So far, British provisions for the
regulation of commercial mass communications systems have
conspicuously failed to address
_______________________________________________________________________ UC07 page 105
______________________________________________ Undercurrents 07 July-August 1974 Page 106
their licence. There is, therefore, a gap between what is being promised
and what is likely to be delivered, between the possibilities for public
access and democratic participation held out by cable systems and the
economic dynamics underpinning the present pattern of ownership and
control. This is inevitable as long as the cable companies are accountable
primarily to their shareholders rather than to the community; as long as
accountability is subordinated to accountancy.
In response to these kinds of arguments, the eTA has proposed a network
of local or area panel!l, possibly surmounted by a national panel. These
panels, it is argued, ... would effectively shoulder the Minister·s burden of
responsibility for ensuring quality of content from the stations· and
guaranteeing ·public accountability "and .. proper representation of
community interests·. (211 The currently available precedents, however,
tend to indicate that this kind of regulatory system does not provide a
sufficient guarantee of public accountability.
Public regulating bodies cannot alter the basic economic dynamics
underlying the situation, and therefore they cannot prevent the criteria of
profitability from becoming the ultimate determinant of programming. As
the ·BA·s recurrent failure to ensure that the present commercial radio
and television companies abide by the programme proposals outlined in
their franchise applications makes clear, in the final analysis profitability
takes precedence over promises. There is no reason to suppose that this
equation will be reversed in the case of cable television. Indeed,
extrapolating from the record of the American Fe dcral Communication
Commission in cable regulation, there is every reason to suppose that it
won·t,
"Although the FCC·s cable rules called for a ·minimum· of one ·public
access· channel, Sol Schildhause, Cable Bureau Chief has stated that
what the FCC really meant by ·minimum· was maximum; that cable
operators do not have any reason to grant more than one ·public access·
charlOci per franchise; that the commission has no intention of
encouraging the expansion of ·public access·."(22)
The starting point for formulating an alternative structure for cable
television is the principle of guaranteed access. This involves two things.
Firstly, that equipment and facilities to record, edit and present a
programme should be available to anyone who asks. Secondly, that in
addition to making facilities available, steps should be taken ·to ensure
that the right is exercised· providing technical and financial assistance to
·groups unlikely to otherwise
_______________________________________________________________________ UC07 page 107
______________________________________________ Undercurrents 07 July-August 1974 Page 108
to make the first step to enable them to make their own programmcs:{23)
Guaranteed access, however, can only be ultimately safeguarded if the
station i, controlled by a body democratically elected from among the
station staff and local community, on which the community members
have a majority. And the final guarantee of genuine community control is
municipal ownership. 1241
This sort of alternative raises a number of problems, most notably the
question of finding alternative sources of finance. Nevertheless, if the
possibilities presented by cable are ever to be properly explored, it is
essential that the feasibility of these alternatives should be adequately
investigated. To this end an embargo shoul d be placed on the further
extension of commercial cable provision, and a series of publicly owned
and community controlled cable stations established as feasibility
projects.
A great deal has been claimed for community cable by its proponents. It
is claimed, for example, that it will lead to ·a recognition of individual
potential·, to ·an increased awareness of the importance of identity with
and involvement in the community of one·s fellows· an d to a new era in
democratic and participatory community politics. (251 These are
important claims about the basic texture of social and political
life. They mayor may not be true, but at the very least they deserve to be
seriously discussed and, more important, to be tested in concrete
practice, ¥
Graham Murdock
See Andrew Glyn and Bob Sutcliffe (1972) British Capitalism, Workers and the
Profits Squeeze (Penguin Books)p66.
Glyn an·d Sutcliffe, up cir, p 143. (3) For full details of the figures and sources
referred to in this section see:
Graham Murdock and Peter Golding (1974) ·For A Political Economy of Mass
Communications· in R Miliband and J Saville (Eds) TIle Socialist Register 1973
(London: The Merlin Press) pp205·234.
(4) The eompany holds 37.6 per cent of the ordinary shares in Southern
Television.
(5) Associated Te/el·ision Corporation Umited Annual Report and Accounts
1972. P II.
(6) R£·ed ·ntemational Limited Annual Report: Year Ended 31 March 1971.p8.
(7) Sec: CF Prallen (1970) The Economics of Television (London PEP
Broadsheet No 520) p26.
(8) John Read (1970) The Leisure Market · Patterns and Prospects, The
Adl·ertising Quarterly. No 25,p33. (9) CA Lambert (1973) RediffusiunBritish
Rday: The Cable TV Sector, (Buckmaster and Moore, The London Stock
Exchange) p II.
\10) British Relay Wireless arId Tele)·ision Umited: Annual Report 1973 p7
(II) British Relay Wireless and Telel·ision Limited: Annual Report 1973,p6. (12)
Britain·s Television: A Plan for Consumer Choice. (London, The
Cable Television Association of Great Britain, March 1973).
(13) Quoted in The Network Project (1973) Notebook Number Five: Cable
Telel·isiun, (New York, Columbia University, The Network Project,)p5. (14)
Wembley Stadium Ltd provides sport and entertainment at the
Empire Stadium, Empire Pool and Sports Arena, and the Wembley Stadium
Bowl.
(15) Of the ·A· Ordinary (voting) shares in Thames Television Ltd, Rediffusion
Television Ltd holds 49.99 per cent and EMf 50.1 per cent.
(16) Electronics manufacture accounted for 23 per cent of EMf·s 197t·2
turnover, as against the 15 per cent derived from films, and the 7 per cent
attributabJe
to television interests.
(17) Britain·s Television: A Plan for Consumer Choice, up cit, p5.
(18) TIle Network Project: Notebook Number 5, op cit. pI.
(19) Canadian concerns have interests
in two of the current cable experiments; Selkirk Holdings in Wellingborough
and Albion in Greenwich.
(20) This has been proposed by the Post Office Engineering Union. Sec: Bryan
Stanley, Cable TV ·An Integrated Network, POf.·U, Jjnuary 1974, p t 8·20. (21)
Britain·s Television, op cit p9
(22) The Network Project, Notebook Number Five, op cit p21.
(23) AC·IT (1973) Forry·Eighr Times the Usual Junk? (London: Twentieth
Century Press).
(24) For a detailed outline of one proposal for municipal ownership see:
Roy Madron and Lesley Johns (1973) The Case for Community Control of
Cable Television (Hebden Bridge York· shire Television Practitioners Limited)
(25) See: Roy Madron and Lesley Johns, op cit.
(This article was originally delivered as a paper at the conference on Cable TV
organised by the Standing Conference on Broadcasting last autumn).
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Many of these will figure in the following extracts. I should point out that
the letters were not necessarily written for publication, so they sometimes
wander about a bit. I·ve tried not to carve them up too much·to preserve
the spontaneous flavour and disguise the fact that I didn·t always
understand what they were trying to say.
Let·s start with this one, from The Farm and Food Society:
I don·t know how far you have investigated alternative agriculture, but we
remain convinced that this must come, and also that there are a great
many farms demonstrating its effectiveness, Of course, it means much
more work, but not necessarily lower productivity in the long term. As we
are likely to have a growing number of unemployed, and are in any event
as a nation overfed, we feel the arguments in its favor are still viable.
For my part, I have never really found the evidence necessary to persuade
a sceptic that soil fertility can be maintained without any artificial
fertilisers and still feed fifty million people in Britain. Of course I hope it·s
true. but that·s another thing. The ·special circumstances· of this AT which
take it out of the domain of ordinary folk are a) living in the country; b)
doing a lot more work (ie getting le· pay); c) higher prices for eggs etc.
We freaks may revel in this, but I don·t think many people would fancy it
(notwithstanding the critic who protested ·everyone in my street has an
allotment now·). Potentially, the real clincher for organic agriculture is
that we may be forced into it by certain circumstances, (then everybody
would be into it!) but I have yet to see this argument convincingly
presented.
As to the money thing·that reliable alternatives are very expensive·this
didn·t bug some people at all. Here·s a fine slab of rhetoric from Harold
Pooley:
The crux of my disagreement is in the use of arguments about the
practicality of any technology based on cost and time. These, like
pollution and nature, are very much culturally bound concepts. Money is
a man·made toy. Its relation to so much skillful work is no more real than
the equation given by our frail conventions, The last thing we should be
trapped into seeking is an alternative technology \<which Is cheaper than
capitalism. Firstly because we want a higher standard of honesty than that
of a system \<which evades much of the true costs of production in the
form of resource depletion and pollution. But more importantly we
should be glad to accept a technology predicated on different values than
cost, for cheapness (and hence profit) is the supreme goal of the system:
everything is subordinated to this end, even if it destroys communities,
_______________________________________________________________________ UC07 page 111
______________________________________________ Undercurrents 07 July-August 1974 Page 112
eradicates \é1YS of working that give meaning and dignity to labour, and
rapes and poisons on a global scale. In its appalling accountancy,
capitalism, or rather, technocratic ma· production, does not reckon these
as costs.
Why should we be afraid of inefficiency and time·consuming labour?
Producing by means of traditional craft based technology shoes, books,
furniture may be inefficient but the products were usually as beautiful and
satisfying, A proce· of producing labour saving washing·machines which
involves the mechanical drudgery of the production line, ,creates with
one hand the drudgery it takes away with the other, If we had satisfying,
leisurely work we wouldn·t need to escape into telefantasies or spend half
a year amid the din of the factories dreaming of the fortnight flight to the
Costa Bravo, So if time and money are the rocks on \<which A T will
founder, then I say let us avoid cheapness like the plague and be content
to spend more time doing \<hat is satisfying,
I like this because it grasps at least one nettle firmly; that alternative
technologies are not dreams of an ideal Utopia, but alternative choices of
advantages and disadvantages which for some people are more
satisfactory in aggregate and in the long run, We may be lyrical about the
advantages but we must be honest about the disadvantages. In this
particular case, by a deft feat of puritanical alchemy" Harold is lyrical
about both, but we cannot fail to see that bourgeois values· (as they say)
pervade the whole thing, and not only because at least in the short run,
poor people couldn·t afford to try anything like this.
Of course, Harold may be talking about ·after the revolution· when there
are no rich and poor, but at the moment his Utopia is neither financially
nor culturally acceptable to the le· affluent. Richard Clarke of the
Morning Star sees the whole thing rather differently:
I·m afraid I feel there is little of the radical, much le· the revolutionary in
the ·alternative technology· movement as and insofar as it exists. A
pleasurable pastime for those with the leisure and cash to follow it·but
having lived for some years on a Welsh hill farm myself I tend to be a little
irritable about those \<ho propound the virtues of ecological living from
the comfort of their suburban semis.
But Harold is not particularly an ecofreak. He is a romantic socialist who
(bless his heart) sees the essence of the movement in terms of socialist
ideals:
I·m surprised that you consider that A T enthusiasts are in the main,
interested in windmills or biotechnic, ·oft· gadgetry for their own sake,
_______________________________________________________________________ UC07 page 112
______________________________________________ Undercurrents 07 July-August 1974 Page 113
Surely BRAD, Street Farm and RadTech in pact are saying that Biotechnic
A Tis both a metaphor and the appropriate technology for a society not
based on the alienating, destructive world of monopoly capitalism (or
state socialism), They are into A T for political reasons, viz for
non·alienating work, workers· control, and self·management. Granted
that choosing a technology for all these goals may be unrealisable, and
almost any technology will be polluting to some degree, but such
technology can hardly fail to be better than the main cast of
developments during the past 30 years, which has been tailored to values
inimical to those of radical critics of the technocratic state.
A movement which has no common theme, it may be, but in uniting to
seek for non·alienating work, self· sufficiency and demystifying expertise
there cannot fail to be a central bond of sympathy,
It·s probably fair to say that Street Farm and Rad Tech are exceptional
cases and that most ATers are more interested in windmills than politics,
but even Harold·s proposed unifying values are full of problems.
Alienation is not abolished by AT, but as with environmental impact,
substitutes one form for another (carrot·pulling backache instead of
a·embly line blues); and only the simplest and most horribly rugged forms
of AT abolish specialisation and expertise altogether. As for self-
sufficiency, its implications are more ambivalent than many of us have
suspected. As George Woolston asks:
And then, when we have learned how to live self sufficiently, isolated in
commune or ghetto, shall we too, like so many suburbanites·, become
imprisoned by the separation we desired?
This raises the whole question of autonomy and communality, both
commonly·expre·ed values of the movement, rut whose,ambivalence and
mutual antagonism are generally kept out of sight. Here·s a very clear
statement by Robin Clarke of BRAD:
Many soft technology communities exist simply for their own sake. Their
motivation is a horror of the values of Western society, their problem is
how to survive, and the solution adopted is primitive and/or
neo·technologies. characteristically, such communities solve many of their
problems by having a low input and output, adopting a puritanical
approach to material demand and coupling this to a very catholic attitude
to social and sexual organisation. In other words the easiest solutions to
such problems as energy, food, and shelter are: use less . .
So are these communities freak outs? (ie withdrawing from their
·responsibilities·to the rest of society), Probably yes, in the sense that they
have no demonstration effect (or a very limited one) because (i) their
lifetimes are very short; and (ii) their approach is so puritanical as to be at
best unimpressive and at worst repellent to most members of Western
society.
Withdrawing support from an oppressive and exploitative society is an
honourable enough motivation (comparable perhaps with conscientious
objection in wartime) although perhaps le· honourable than actively
opposing the exploitation. On the other hand, while this ·freak·out·
position has been called ·elitist·, it probably le· deserves the epithet than
trying to impose unacceptable solutions on ordinary folk with orthodox
tastes, The remaining alternative (which surely at least escapes the charge
of elitism)accepting orthodox tastes as the datum for action·evoked this
response from the venerable Basil Druitt:
I don·t see the point of ·rejoining the human race·, which, under its
present power·holders and their political agents, would be rejoining the
Gadarene swine.
The real i·ue seems not to be between on the one hand those groups who
are doing their own thing and for whom
ATs are no more political than making model aircraft and on the other
those ·vanguard· groups who are try ing to get their ideas more widely
practised. No, the real i·ue is whether the projects demonstrate valid,
general alternatives or not. The question to ask is whether AT
communities are really living ·within their means· or by hidden subsidies
from the rest of society, disappearing into the countryside with an
enormous stash of capital in the form of land, property or education. This
is what Alph Moorcraft calls ·laager AT· (on the South African model)
·finding a nice place to maintain privileges.
Bill McLarney of the New Alchemy Institute puts it concisely:
If you can·t save the world, save your a·.
Of which Jim deKorne says, ·If everyone did just that, the world wouldn·t
need saving·. Unle· a subsidiary clause is understood: ·but not at the
expense of others·, this seems to me exactly wrong: the worst kind of
reactionary individualism.
Let me change the subject to some responses which more or le· agreed
with me (although sometimes for surprising reasons). This first one has an
interesting ecological interpretation of the ·model aircraft· school of AT,
but then goes on to suggest some heterodox (that is to say, scandalous)
alternatives based on the (Odumy? Zipfy?) idea that the patterns of rank
and wealth may flow from ecological forces from which it is our day and
destiny to liberate ourselves:
Nineteen A. T. Four
The ·stinging reply· which Peter Harper desires, should it materialise, is
likely to give little comfort. Slowly I have arrived at the same conclusion,
and decided that the A T movement will come to be seen as a romantic
backwater based on an outmoded system of ecological values. If this
movement is romantic, then the necessary conclusion must be that
ecology (as perceived by the movement) is dead, or at least dying. The
central theme has been that since the impact of man is now global, ·he is
obliged to revert to the parasite strategy, and manage his host·. AT seeks
solutions to this dilemma, but has so for not questioned its own premises.
Within the framework of ecology, A T can certainly be justified by analogy
with rare biological species which exploit rare resources, or resources
requiring specialised manipulative techniques. But accepting that diversity
and stability are somehow linked, this role will not do much to hasten the
revolution.
But why should evolution stop at this stage? Can we not imagine a totally
synthetic life·support system freed from all ecological constraints? Plastics
(synthetic) are replacing paper (ecological) and it is not hard to imagine
the same proce· taking place in all industries. Conservation of nature
becomes a purely aesthetic necessity·and will remain so, I suspect, until
we rewire the insides of our heads.
While we retain ecological roots, we are not likely to realise those human
ideals so often found hand i11 hand with the A T movement. The
distribution of wealth and power among us is surely what we would
anticipate so long as we remain trapped in the network of an ecosystem.
Only when we turn our
backs on it can we hope to be free.
Tim Wyatt
I can·t decide whether that was seriously meant, or whether I·ve been
taken for a ride.
Finally, there are two letters pointing somewhere in the direction I took in
the article in Undercurrents 6· The first accepts the problem of goal·
conflict and suggests the possibility of a composite measure (I could
hardly have hoped for details). Among many other interesting points is
for that very reason, be something you can prescribe with a formula. All
we could predict would be the kind of decisions people would have to
make,
I don·t know what kind of economy you have in mind yourself, but for me
one of the valuable things about A T is the hope it gives people of being in
charge of their own live seven if one does sometimes get carried aIWY by
Robinson Crusoe euphoria.
Finally how nice to have someone playing devil·s advocate for a
change.
Love and peace
Diana Forrest
And this last one also sees AT·s as part of an overall strategy, particularly
highlighting the dialectical relationship of technical, social and economic
factors:
I was very interested to read the first port of your restatement of aims in
UC5. I think you·ve raised a number of fundamental questions which
need to be discu·ed as rigorously as possible. Far from making your past
work obsolete, I would say your new approach could only have come out
of that. That·s evolution brother.
·The ideal of a unified movement seemed hopele·· .. is that what you ""re
looking for? Failure to apply the ecological model to the social/
organisational dimension: our best hope is. a complex of different
research directions surely; we should emphasise flexibility and diversity
and interaction of same. So this does not mean everyone disappearing
into rural retreats but presupposes good communications amongst not
only A T devotees, but also with those into related fields. Hence the
overriding importance of Undercurrents etc.
Utopianism .. is a concept that seems to creep into UC for too often .. ""
are all aware of the mind fucking potential of a liberatory technology so
1) it·s not necessary to talk about ·what it will be like· (it won·t anyway).
This will be impliCit if we talk about what actual developments we can
make now .. no miracles, just as many as possible do·more·with·Ie· ideas
that really work. 2) It·s clearly not a question of just redesigning the
technology and expecting everything to be OK from then on·this is one
crucial change that must be a) ongoing, and b) parallel to those in the
economic and social spheres. Not a oncessand·for·all revolution, but
permanent revolution (stand up Leon) on as high a level as possible
continually feeding back to and questioning its own a·umptions and
consequences.
Most important,you raise the question of economics, which has been
sadly mi·ing from UC so far. In a very real sense basic economics is what
radical technology must be about .. increasing productivity, changing the
nature of cost inputs and value output, reorganising the structure etc.
Conventional economics, in not counting the environmental and human
factors in its costs comes up with some pretty lopsided production and
distribution systems. Eco·technology must take account of all factors, and
if one scheme can·t be done yet without ma·ive time inputs .. well that
one still needs to be worked on.
Really I believe that ·alternative economics·is what the whole proce· must
be about .. what soft technology does is to make practically possible
alternative systems of organisation .. social and economic structures are
heavily influenced by the given technostructure, and your work
constitutes a crucial contribution to the proce· of continuous revolution
(or, as it is known in the sociology trade, rapid social change).
Fraternally,
Richard Reynish
I·d be pages trying to comment on these two letters, so I·ll let them speak
for themselves.
Morte d’ A. T.
I have not done justice to the subtleties of any of the replies, but I
certainly don·t feel refuted. I become even more certain that, although
some still wait in hope, the central millennial vision of Alternative
Technology will ultimately refuse to be made flesh. It should at least be
clear that at the present stage of development. AT·s cannot be wheeled
into a typical domestic situation and provide all the basic amenities
reliably and at reasonable cost. They are only practicable in conjunction
with changes of lifestyle and standards of consumption.
.. To which one response is, ·Exactly, we want life·styles to change!·
·Whose?·
·Everyone’s·.
But this is the grossest arrogance: what Robin Clarke calls ·Blueprintism
the desire to stuff the whole of humanity into a mould of your own
devising. Oh.
In that case, another response is, ·We won·t presume to tell anyone else
what to do, we·ll just go away quietly and do it in a corner somewhere·.
_______________________________________________________________________ UC07 page 118
______________________________________________ Undercurrents 07 July-August 1974 Page 119
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Reviews
IT COULD HAPPEN HERE The New Technology of Repression. Lessons
from Ireland. BSSRS paper No 2. 52 pages. 30p. Available from The
British Society for Social Responsibility in Science, 9 Poland Street,
London W1 V 3DG. Tel 01·437 2728.
TO SELECT the most spine-chilling pieces of military technology from the
BSSRS paper and to briefly rivet your attention with them would be to
miss the point. The newspapers (the more liberal ones, anyway) and the
television give you plenty of that, simultaneously concealing the political
logic which underlies the use of each technological weapon in a specific
situation. In Ireland, British forces are getting their first real practice in
suppressing insurgency in a fairly advanced capitalist country. The
experience of the Army·s thirty·odd counter·insurgency operations around
the world since the second world war has not all been wasted, of course.
But the techniques must be modified or improved: the wooden
·baton·round· developed in Hong·Kong is replaced by the somewhat less
lethal rubber bullet; the sheer physical brutality of the Kenyan
concentration camps makes way for the subtler mental torture of sensory
deprivation. The BSSRS paper finds little evidence that these ·improved·
techniques save lives and suffering, as the Army sometimes argues. CS
gas, for example, is not an alternative to guns but an additional weapon
specially suited for punishing the population as a whole. Canisters are
fired into houses. In Andersonstown CS was fired into a Wendy House
where young children were playing·not a ghastly mistake but a typical
event, described by the children·s mother at the recent Troops Out
Movement conference on the Army. The conference, incidentally, was
worthy of a full report. Hopefully, the TOM will publish one in one form
or another, but for the time being the BSSRS paper is the best summary
available. It contains most of the information from Jonathan Rosenhead·s
conference paper on ·Technology·, and also some background and
historical material which shows the influence of the other conference
speakers. And the message of all this material is that after Ireland, the
Army expects its next assignment to be in Britain itself. The joint
operation with the police at Heathrow, the mobilisation at the time of the
miners strike, and statements by senior soldiers of whom Kitson is merely
the most publicised, are all signs that the army is actively preparing for
operations within Britain. Whatever illusions the Left may have that class
from introducing new and nasty gadgets; but it certainly can interfere
with the subtle political use of those gadgets in a war where the object is
not to annihilate /he people but to control them. The people can take the
matter a stage further by developing their own counter·technology. This is
still at an early stage, but the BSSRS paper does at least give some
treatments for victims of CS gas, and tells you what to do when faced
with the dreaded ·photic driver· (close one eye or wear an eye·patch, and
flashing lights will have little effect on your brainwaves)_ This information
will be of immediate use to those currently receiving the attention of Her
Majesty·s forces. It should also stop the rest of us from getting so scared of
what they can do to us that we give up any hope of resistance. Resistance
to technological warfare is possible. Vietnam showed it, and so does
Ireland. CS McCanister
(The address of the Troops Out Movement is 28 Lammas Park Road,
Ealing W5).
The subtitle, The Politics of Technical Change, indicates the author·s main
argument. Neither science nor technology are socially neutral forces_ In
the two best chapters, The Ideology of Industrialisation and The Politics of
Technical Change, Dickson attempts to show how technology and more
especially the development of technology responds to social needs rather
than the other way around; the notion that human ·progress· has been
due to the more·or·Iess accidental discovery of new theories and
invention of new techniques, is not only historically
false, but helps to bolster up the idea of the neutrality of science. For my
money, I think he overstates his case;
to the non·determinist, history is, above all, about accidental interactions
the debate about technology and political requirements seems to me to
be akin to another eternal unanswerable historical dualism: are the great
revolutions in man·s past due to the emergence of changing political and
social needs, or to the existence of great men ready and able to act as
leaders?
But let that pass; too often theorising about alternative technology
degenerates into a set of ill·assorted reading lists of ·relevant· subjects.
One of the more tragic by·product of early specialisation in the English
education system is that outside their own murky and arbitrarily defined
subject area, intelligent people seem totally lacking
in any awareness of ideas about the constructs other disciplines have put
on how the world works. David Dickson
is extraordinarily well·read ·history, anthropology, politics, philosophy,
literature. economics, even semiology-he seems to have been able to
draw ably from all without arousing too much suspicion that he has
pulled his information from the back·cover blurbs rather than the inside;
and even if he has, he shows considerable skill in relating sets of ideas to
one another. This book gives probably the first coherent ·world·view· of
the ideas behind alternative technology and for that we must be very
grateful. The fact that most insiders will probably want to apply some
degree of corrective to
bring the theory into line with their
own perception is more·or·Iess irrelevant; Dickson has given us a starting
point for reasoned discussion by fitting the
various strands of socialism, humanism, anarchism, and libertarianism
together.
The second line to his argument about the politics of technical change
is that whilst one must not see technology as politically neutral, neither
should one see it as a force of itself for change. He describes in two
chapters some forms of what he calls Utopian technology and in a
following one, intermediate technology (he does this adequately but
without conveying any real sense of excitement or involvement and why
aren·t there any illustrations?) but at the end, he makes a criticism of
those who think that merely by
utilising some of the techniques of AT, change will take place
immediately_
We still have to think a·;,d act politically_ Building an autonomous
house,
utilising non·depletive stocks of energy, or devising small scale egg·box
making machines are experiments in technique. Unless translated into
political action, however, they get you nowhere.
And there, at the moment,is ATs weakness; it seems simply to be
substituting ·progress through alternative science and technology· for the
conventional wisdom of ·progress through science and technology·. But
this begs the question of what is meant by ·progress· and though Dickson
doesn·t really enter this zone, what now becomes at stake (as it was all
along, if only we were aware of it) is our sets of needs, ambitions and
values · what sort of life·style do we want and how do we achieve it?
What is our model for change · do we develop I and aim for a theoretical
Utopia (libertarian, elitist, Marxist, Buddhist, anarchistic) or do we drift
along ·pragmatically· or unilaterally because there is too much chance
and hazard in life anyway for such constructs to be more than intellectual
vanities and the important thing is what goes on inside one·s head?
It is this personal worry about how ·change· is to be effected that
concerns me about David Dickson·s book, which itself is presumably
intended as a vehicle of change. In many ways, given the opportunity at
his disposal to write a searing polemic which, though ·irresponsible·,
would make a wide public stop and examine its basic assumptions
(remember the Fontana sales force can move vast quantities of Alastair
Maclean and Agatha Christie), he has failed. His book is not subversive in
that sense. On the other hand, his careful and restrained style, with little
hint of immodest anger, may commend itself to the thousands of scientists
and tech·nologists who have not the slightest idea that their work is
anything but value·free. I f some of them are seduced by Dickson·s
arguments, then one of the cornerstones of capitalist power will start to
crumble as technologists make their own minds up about how they
_______________________________________________________________________ UC07 page 124
______________________________________________ Undercurrents 07 July-August 1974 Page 125
SELL!
We·re only too well aware that the distribution of Undercurrents to
bookshops and news·stands is highly unsatisfactory at the moment. And
we·ve tried to plug in to the normal distribution channels, but the trouble
with most commercial distributors and wholesalers is that they just don·t
want to know about new magazines unless they·re ·sure·sellers·, backed
by enough money to pay for nation·wide advertising and print runs up in
the hundred thousands.
We·re determined, however, to get around the woeful inadequacies of
Britain·s magazine·shifting system. In a nutshell, we want you, our
readers, to become our distributors. We don·t expect anyone to do it ·just
for the money·, but we don·t see why you should do it for nothing, either.
Selling magazines requires a certain amount of time and effort, and we
think such efforts should be rewarded at rates comparable to those which
prevail in the distribution trade.
So we·re offering you a discount of 40 per cent if you order more than 10
copies from us. After we·ve paid the cost of posting them to you, we·re
hoping to get about the same nett amount back as we would have got
from a straight distributor. *
We reckon there are potential Undercurrents readers everywhere-
Colleges, Factories, Schools, Offices, Universities, Clubs, Pubs, Prisons,
_______________________________________________________________________ UC07 page 126
______________________________________________ Undercurrents 07 July-August 1974 Page 127
Societies, Mental Hospitals, the local labour Exchange ... But if you don·t
feel like being a salesperson, why not just take a few copies round to your
local newsagent or bookshops They·ll ask for a 25 to 33 per cent
discount, usualIy, and they won·t pay you until they·ve sold the copies,
but the few coppers you·ll make on the
deal will at least pay for your bus fare.
ORDER FORM
NAME ..........¥¥..........
I enclose a cheque/postal order for £ ¥.¥¥ in payment for .... copies of
Undercurrents Number .... at 21p a copy. (Minimum order, 10 copies). I
understand that Undercurrents will buy back any copies which I return in
good condition at 21p per copy.
*If you can collect copies directly from us at 275 Finchley Road, London,
NW3 on a ·cash and carry· basis, we·ll even raise the discount to 50 per
cent.
Long·lived phenomenon
THE MAGAZINE which tries to relate the sciences and the mystic arts,
Phenomenon (see UC 6, p46), has undergone a major metamorphosis
before even its first issue burst on the world. Instead of four issues a year,
they now plan to bring out a book size volume every six months or so,
starting late summer 1974. It will be A4 size, with a glossy paper cover
(like Stefan Szczelkun·s Energy Scrapbook, if you·ve seen it). Price about
£1.00. It·ll be widely circulated in ordinary bookshops in Britain and the
USA. At least, it will if Phenomenon·s deal with their big co·publisher
comes off.
Tony Durham
Details from Phenomenon Publications Ltd., 52 lfield Road, london
SW10. Telephone 01·352·9030.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
OBC: We were going to put a funny picture on tile back cover, until we
saw this piece from Peoples News Service ...
Behaviour Modification
Winter Soldier, organ of the Vietnam Veterans Against the War/Winter
Soldier Organisation, reports in its latest issue on the increasing use of
behaviour modification, techniques in US prisons. It introduces the article
with the words of Professor James McConnell of the Department of
Mental Health Research at the University of Michigan: ·The day has come
when we can combine sensory deprivation with the use of drugs.
hypnosis and the astute manipulation of reward and punishment to gain
almost absolute control over an individual·s behaviour·. These extracts
from the article give a glimpse of what Prof McConnell has in mind ..
SINCE THE early sixties, federal and state corrections departments have
been investigating ways to modify the behaviour of prisoners who present
any sort of threat to the order of prison life, As prisoners have become
increasingly politically aware and developed a
history of resistance to the oppression which stifles them every day, prison
authorities have found it ·necessary·to provide facilities for ·aggressive
and manipulative prisoners who are resistant to authority·, (These quotes
are taken from the outline of Project START, a behaviour modification
project of the Springfield, Missouri, Federal Prison).
The basic philosophy guiding these behavioural projects is well expressed
by Dr·Edgar Schein associate professor of the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology and a behaviour modification enthusiast. Schein explains:
·My basic argument is this: in order to produce marked change of
behaviour and/ or attitude, it is necessary to weaken, undermine, or
remove the supports to the old patterns of behaviour and the old
attitudes·. This may be done ·either by removing the individual physically
and preventing any communication with those whom he cares about, or
by proving to him that those whom he respects are not worthy of it and,
indeed, should be actively mistrusted·,
Some of the techniques which Schein suggests for the prisons of this
country include: ·social disorganisation and the creation of mutual
mistrust· achieved by ·spying on the men and reporting back private
material·; ·tricking men into written statements· which are then shown to
others with the object being ·to convince most men they could trust
no.one·; ·undermining ties to home by the systematic withholding of
_______________________________________________________________________ UC07 page 129
______________________________________________ Undercurrents 07 July-August 1974 Page 130
mail· plus the segregation of natural leaders, and the physical removal of
prisoners to isolated areas so as to break or weaken close emotional ties.
Of the new ·sophisticated· techniques of dealing with ·troublesome·
prisoners one of the most widely used methods of modifying behaviour
and breaking the prisoner·s spirit has been ·drug assaults·. Prison officials,
with the help of psychiatrists and drug companies (Updike, Squibb and
Lederle Labs) have been experimenting for several years to find ways to
modify behaviour through the use of powerful and dangerous drugs. One
such powerful drug is Prolixin, a drug which has been used in prisons
such as Vacaville, California, Patuxtent, Maryland and the Illinois Security
Hospital for several years. Prolixin is a more powerful counterpart of
Thorazine and is a depressant which lingers in effect for two weeks.
According to its manufacturer, ER Squibb, Prolixin is a highly potent
behaviour modifier with a markedly extended duration of effect·. ·side
effects· include: ·the induction of a ·catatonic like state·, nausea, loss of
appetite, constipation, blurred vision, glaucoma, bladder paralysis,
impotency, liver damage, hyptertension severe enough to cause fatal
cardiac arrest·. t can also lead to a persistent palsy·like disorder. On top
of this, ·the symptoms persist after drug withdrawal, and in some patients
appear to be irreversible·.
An even more frightening drug is Anectine. a derivative of the South
American arrow·tip poison, Curare. When Anectine is injected into a
person in a conscious state, it slows heartbeat, causes respiratory arrest
and will make the subject feel as if he/she is dying.·
Dr Arthur Nugent, chief psychiatrist at Vacaville prison, says that Anectine
induces ·sensations of suffocation and drowning·. The subject experiences
feelings of deep horror and terror, as though he were on the brink of
death·. Nugent claims, ·even the toughest inmates have come to fear and
hate the drug. I don·t blame them. I wouldn·t have one treatment for the
world·.
Both of these drugs (two of many such drugs used in prison
·experimentation·) reduce the prisoners to vegetables and make them
unable to think clearly or react with emotion. Because of the vulnerable
frame of mind that the prisoners are placed in. while under such
treatment, they are scolded for their behaviour and told to shape up
or they will be given further doses of the drugs. The spirit of the prisoner
is so drastically broken that the prison psychiatrist then is able to control
a person who will be more readily amenable to behaviour conditioning.