Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Peer Review
Peer Review
Description Purpose How did the essays actually affect you? Did the writer's purpose succeed?
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Audience/reader What are the essays trying to get you to consider? From what point of view is the writer writing? Thesis and main ideas What is the writers thesis? What are the main ideas related to the thesis? Where do you agree or disagree? Organization and evidence What kinds of evidence does the author mostly use (personal experience, descriptions, statistics, other authorities, analytical reasoning, or other)? Are in-text citations provided for evidences taken from other sources? Language use Any excessive repetition of the same vocabulary or lack of clarity in describing key ideas? What are some strengths or areas for improvement? Any other comments
Feedback by: Jessica It made me understand more on the history of the M symbol in a simple summarized manner. Clear writing allows me to fully understand design objective. The Essay successfully convinces me that the M symbol is a good design idea. Essay flows well
Very good descriptive, good use of citations, and statistics to further prove points in writing. Good reasoning to prove point. References are appropriately used. Sources are citated accordingly Wide use of vocabulary, very clear in explaining key ideas using simple proper English.
Well written, clear piece of writing, interesting points brought up to explain why the M symbol is a good design idea (Font should be bigger)