Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Panchajanyam July 2012 Editorial
Panchajanyam July 2012 Editorial
Panchajanyam July 2012 Editorial
u ~ |:
UP&21
n
g\
2012&158
J 7
v[Pzv
v[P G
vvUS Hmk
Bzx!!!
1. v[P P A:
BP v[P, S\P
v[P P shz vv P[P [P
Psh. P uh[Q x va _P
Axx S\P va_. Cuz va_ u
|PUPmh \ Axx. |PU Pmh
\US Ax Evzvu PiU P,
h Ax. S\P va_ S Sv
sh P[P Avux \v sh Gk
P. ] AP _iP xPUPmk u. ux
Aua ] AP CiUPmk u u
AuSv x.
& 2012
g\
|P va_
B|h va_
11
12
15 16
13
10
14
g\
22
23
24
19
25
42
25
a
8a
41
31
123
12328
123
27
40
&2012
18
37
20 21
17
38
32 30 29
39
33
7
34
6
5
4
1
36
2
35
& 2012
g\
26
va_
S\P va_
1234567
1234567
1234567
1234567
12
14
1234
1234
1234
1234
13
14a
15
16
4. v[P P Cn Bn 28.5.2012
uvmh Piuzv v[P G
vvUS Hmk Bzx.
26
11
12
AS A[P|u P \ A
uh 28.5.2012 uvmh Piu RUPsh
uzx.
25
10
17
AS A[P|u_ vUP, [P
|.P.G.n 3926/1421/i5/| 28.05.2012.
24
8
7
12345678
12345678
12345678
123456785
12345678
12345678
12345678
12345678
12345678
12345678
123456
123456
123456
123456
123456
123
123
123
4
1
123456
123456
23 123456
123456
123456
1234
1234
22
1234
1234
1234
: sS ua\ u
AS A[P|u_ vU
P, [P.
18
123456789
19
123456789
123456789
123456789
123456789
21 20
Pq ua\ u Cx
Piuzv UuP \vUPP Pmhzv
E P Chzv u uzv 3 AP, u
uzv 3 AP Pmi UuP _ 600 A,
&2012
g\
: 1. ua\ u Piu Gs
E/79962/Ty/2012 19.03.2012.
- - - & &&&&&
& 2012
g\
i Ax Pmi xPzv
CUQ |Pmh P u\ \uS Bn
\ P mkx. C Szx u[Px
B\ Px Eh 01.06.2012 A P
4.30 oUS [P AS A[P|u_ vUP
Cn Bn/\ A APzvS u[P
ux PmkU PsQ.
J P v sh u Psh.
Cu RUPsh v |v B v Pn
Blog S ukzxQx.
Excerpts from Dr. Nagasamys article:
" As long as even a single slab belonging to the ancient ruined temple is found in the site, the temple continues to exist in the
eye of law and has its right to claim its possession was the historic
judgment delivered by the London High Court with the reference to
an ancient Hindu temple that was ruined and remained with out
worship for long. The Appeal Court in London presided over by
three senior judges, to which the case was taken upheld this judgment, but the case was taken to the Privy Council and the apex
court also upheld the judgment. Thus three Foreign courts that command greatest respect in the world of judiciary held that the presence of even one slab in the site empowers the ancient temple to be
treated as an existing entity in the eye of law, irrespective of whether
the temple was in ruins or was not under worship. This decision of
the London high Court was delivered hardly fifteen years ago when
the then Congress Government headed by late Rajiv Gandhi was
Prime Minister of India, who enthusiastically supported and got the
case filed in the London high Court in the now famous London
Nataraja case. The present writer appeared in the case as an Expert witness in that case on behalf of Government of India.
5. vUP PzvAx J
P, sh zvUS Ax uz
uUS Jx.
1.6.2012 A |h Tmhzv Px
Psh CzuP AuS Guz
uh C G uzxuP |zuSu
mh[P uUQ. B A G i
GkUPmhx Gu 21.6.2012 A Amh uP
A Ea\mhzv R PmPmkx.
(J) P. u_,
.....Cn Bn/\ A, (T..)
Ezui/AkQx
,
|:
vUP Ax U[P mk
u hzu A. AuU P Ax
&2012
g\
& 2012
g\
Among the various legal points raised in the case, a few are
relevant. What constitutes the Hindu temple? Is it the structure, or
the space around it or the enshrined image? When the temple has
been ruined and worship ceased, whether it could claim ownership?
The court agreed that not only the building and the image but also
the consecrated space around the religious building constitutes the
temple. The temple ritual treatises mention various causes of ruin
such as vegetation on the buildings, fire, floods, earthquakes and the
like besides destructions by enemy during invasion. Having examined the ritual and historical position, the court came to the decision
so long as even one stone slab belonging to the ancient temple is
found in the site, the temple continues to exist in the eye of law. Any
ruined temple could be brought back to worship at any point of time
by purificatory rites. to be certain that the vexed question of this
case seems to be nearing an end. "
The Court here means the London Court. But what is important here for us is that the Government of India took a stand in
London Courts was " once a temple it remains always a temple"
and the observation "all consecrated place in and around the temple
are sacred". These points will help us in many cases.
6. EPmhP Azvh A{z
xUS AvP [Ph.
vUP {P, C Pmh
G C\zuzx [Pzx nP
RUPsh UPUS hUP sk.
1. J | m\UPnUP UP Tk
v "Aa`u' vUPzvS Emmh
Sv ukUPzu Guu Pmh
[P \h. Axzu |P
P \US EmmhSv Gu
\UThx.
2. v[P G ]hP
PkQ Azxna ]U Pshx A
Pmi |ixu vS.
&2012
g\
3. vUP S Svx Gu ~
Cu A A. Au
S UPP [P|ua \ u]x Thx.
P S Sv "xu' UP |
P uu { Psk. B|h
va_ S Sv J vmi \ Azu
UP _P S\P va_ \h. H
Cu E nP UP. Ax
A \ AuS BPzv Ch
Ezu S J GkP [Pzx n
P. Au PP Aih Pmhzvx
S\P va_S Ax BP
ua \S.
x vuP E iUPmkP
H C[P sk. A[Pz u]UPa \P
uS Sv x Bmh \ Phx
\u u]UP sk. H v u
mi ushi i Tx "| u
uP x P zxa \x' Bmh
i sk ]P |UQ[P
Ax. A[Pa \\, |UQ[
P sk ]P kzx x[P
mkzu u G S. E[P
zv x |hx \P Cu Ev
G P i?
7. ] B P \zx P
uzuU P UP h }[P {zuu
\x izvh.
PiUPnUP P nPa \z
vh, ] B P zvPP Av
\ uS K sk. Aux Bmh
\ P J \ Chx Pa \
S\P va_ S Sv \ \
mk sh \v sh P
& 2012
g\
&2012
g\
10
J P E mk P,
Ez[P, vUP, P
{zu , EPmhP ], BP \v[PUS
uP , x P APkzu,
A[PPUP, AUPmhzxUP, A
]P Gu AvP [Ph. C
P 1947B Bsk |h Cx ux
uh sk. Gu \ EP,
mk EP, CUPmhz x,
A\ GUPzv Guu SURkP \U
Thx. (B C Emx P[P ukx
u uh u PhP Czx Pskx.
Cx Cu |mi o \ u B[QP |mh
Aikzv \US JS. Cu A{a
\US | P |P.
uzuP GP i u
P k ] Tmhzu mk.
vUP }shP P [P,
UPUP[P xPUP siP. B C
CP K uzu A[PUS |PP [SQ
. H Cu A {? \ 50 BskP
|US Hmh Bzu CP ukzx {zu x
EP? CP BUP ou G?
u[PUS u miU Psk Jh
u Hu J
Ca \u CPh oP Axx.
CP uzuPPz uhuS C Gu E
C. Cx Szx US uhh Ex.
H [Pzv uzuP |US Hk
BzxUP uUPkv. APh _| K[Q
{Qx. C Tu Gu Aa\ Hh
v. _uv mh BP kuUSz
ux J mh |h sk. PP
A\[Pzv A_i Cx G mQ A
| Es BP _uvzu Ahu G
Pshh i.)
& 2012
g\
11
J P, Au k, UP UP[P
BQS uhu Pmih[P P G
u Pmku Thx.
9. uUP \ A J | G \h
i. Au G?
A[PP u PP CUSx
{UPk uUP J hzvS {UPh
Thx. Cv J Azx U T\ \x
Qx AUPmhzx. u x AvPP
"uUPP' PPUS { \x Qx. Cu
h A{ G Au P \
A AuU PUSz uUPP {UP kx
u. "vh u J i iU
P AiUP' G |Px
zvUS x AUPmhz x u.
v[ Pzv \ Bm]x {UPmh
A[PS PUPmk K Bsk BQ v
A[PS {UPh. Pa \
A uUPP {UPmk E. B uUP
GP Au \zua \u UP v{v J
{UPmiUP
sk.
A
|
Phi C Pmkx BP
u \ G T UP. B v[Pzv
\ A, uUP JP Cu CuS
.
UPh na] Hkzu si
x Cz uP JS. J mh
G ""|UP '' G Jx[Q {P 99
UPk "UuP'. Av n \Pzua \u
nP AzxPUS xnx mk
"G G [P' G uzxU
P Gsn[ PshP PnkQ.
CzuP ` RUPsh K zvPa \v Bu
AuP Axx.
&2012
g\
12
v
(\
v)
x .
4.6.2012
|u
g\
13
&2012
g\
14
P \k. P , uz
u, \{zzu xPx Cv A]
\\i A]uS.
CiUS,
Czv A\P,
UPb,
6&c,C , 609 Asn\,
\ & 600 006.
\,
02.06.2012.
(vUP PuP ha ][PP
Asnzx, , A u\ Ch
u.PkUP ysP Pk
uP HkP iUPmh. Cx
AzxP A] zuk (n Bsh
Bsh CzuP PP, APU
P, Azx P BPua \P |h
U Psh u CUS. vu
Ch[P w zx Hmk, PkP GQ,
{|kUP[P {PQ, CP ^zu UP
C UP vhQx. AnPx }
vxk AvP hzu ua\
uS n PUS Bnk AvP
hzuP [Sv. CuP Aih
vUPP A[P CzuP BP P
CPa ^[PUSU Pn[PS. vu
A[PUS v En ( A\) v 2.30
oUS hUPk A] H Ex. ml
An G } {. ]vzu h QhUS.
10. nP Ph G? u[PzuUS
|u Pv Cu zvS A sk.
vUP {P Pmhzvx v[P
Pmi v AUS ]
EhiPU Ph sk. CuS uzuP
& 2012
g\
15
&2012
g\
16