C REPORT ON TAITZS VEXATIOUS LITIGATION HISTORY AND ASTOUNDING LOSS RECORD

CS

Taitz Birther Case Activity

Date

Taitz Birther Case Losses

2005
Taitz v. Sheikh filed in Cal. Superior Court (No. 05C106304) (NON-BIRTHER CASE)

Oct. 12, 2005 Dec. 29, 2005

Taitz v. Haas filed in Cal. Superior Court (No. 06CC03941) (NON-BIRTHER CASE)

Brockhausen v. Andrade filed (not by Taitz) (No. 08-1001-C368, in Texas State. Ct.

Keyes v. Bowen filed Nov. 13, 2008 in Cal. Super. Ct. (No. 34-200880000096-CUWMGDS)

Lightfoot v. Bowen filed Dec. 3, 2008 in Cal. Sup. Ct. (No. S168690)

Lightfoot v. Bowen Appeal: App. for Stay submitted to SCOTUS/Justice Kennedy (No. 08A524)

Only birther-case losses are counted here.

Updated: July 17, 2012

ie r

s d n

f o

b g o F e h t
2006
Mar 9. 2006 Mar. 17, 2006 Apr. 24, 2006

Taitz v. Sheikh: CASE VOLUNTARILY DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Non-Birther Case)

Taitz v. Hass: Taitz Motion for TRO DENIED. (Non-Birther Case) Taitz v. Hass: CASE VOLUNTARILY DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Non-Birther Case)

w o

m o .c
#1

2008

Oct 2008

Oct. 27, 2008

Nov 2008

Nov. 13, 2008

Dec 2008

Dec. 3, 2008 Dec. 5, 2008 Dec. 12, 2008 Dec. 17, 2008 Lightfoot v. Bowen Appeal: Application for Stay DENIED by Justice Kennedy (SCOTUS). 2 Lightfoot v. Bowen: CASE DISMISSED. 1

Page 1

C REPORT ON TAITZS VEXATIOUS LITIGATION HISTORY AND ASTOUNDING LOSS RECORD

CS

Taitz Birther Case Activity

Lightfoot v. Bowen Appeal: App. for Stay submitted to SCOTUS/Chief Justice (No. 08A524)

Date
Dec. 29, 2008

Taitz Birther Case Losses

Jan 2009
3 Barnett et al v. Obama et al, filed Jan. 20, 2009 in C.D. Cal. (No. 8:09-cv-00082-DOC-AN) Jan. 20, 2009 Jan. 22, 2009 Jan. 23, 2009

Keyes v. Bowen: APPEAL filed BY KREEP in California 3rd Appellate District (No. C062321) 4 Cook v. Good: filed with Motion for TRO in M.D. Ga. (No. 4:09-cv00082)

Cook v. Simtech, Inc. et al, filed July 22, 2009 in M.D. Fla. (No. 8:2009-cv-01382)

Updated: July 17, 2012

ie r

s d n

f o

b g o F e h t
Mar 2009 Jul 2009
Mar. 24, 2009 July 8, 2009 July 9, 2009 July 15, 2009 July 15, 2009 July 16, 2009 July 22, 2009 July 23, 2009 July 27, 2009 July 27, 2009

Brockhausen v. Andrade: CASE DISMISSED (Taitz appeared on behalf of plaintiff). Lightfoot v. Bowen Appeal: Application for Stay DENIED by full Supreme Court.

w o

m o .c
#1
3 4 5 6 7 8

Keyes v. Bowen: CASE DISMISSED.

Barnett et al v. Obama et al: ORDER re: VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL of Counts II and II and as to all Defendants other than Obama. Cook v. Good: Motion for Temporary Restraining Order DENIED. Cook v. Good: CASE DISMISSED.

Cook v. Simtech: Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction DENIED. Cook v. Simtech: Motion to Reinstate application for TRO and Preliminary Injunction DENIED. Cook v. Simtech: CASE DISMISSED.

9 10 11

Page 2

C REPORT ON TAITZS VEXATIOUS LITIGATION HISTORY AND ASTOUNDING LOSS RECORD

CS

Taitz Birther Case Activity

Date
Aug 2009
Aug. 6, 2009

Taitz Birther Case Losses

Barnett et al v. Obama et al: ORDER Striking Motion to Expedite authentication and Motion for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for authenticity of Kenyan birth certificate.

Rhodes v. Gates filed August 28, 2009 in W.D. Tex. (No. 5:09-cv00703-XR)

Rhodes v. MacDonald et al filed in M.D. Ga. (No. 4:09-cv-00106-CDL)

Updated: July 17, 2012

ie r

Cook v. Good Appeal: Taitz files appeal with 11th Circuit (No. 09-14698-CC)

s d n

f o

b g o F e h t
Aug. 6, 2009 Aug. 6, 2009 Aug. 28, 2009 Aug. 28, 2009

Aug. 6, 2009

Cook v. Simtech: Motion to recuse judge DENIED as frivolous and wholly without merit.

Cook v. Simtech: Motion to Alter Judgment DENIED as frivolous and wholly without merit. Cook v. Simtech: Motion for rehearing DENIED as frivolous and wholly without merit.

w o

m o .c
#1
12 15 13 14 16 17 18 19

Rhodes v. Gates: Motion for Temporary Restraining Order DENIED.

Sep 2009

Sept. 4, 2009 Sept. 8, 2009 Sept. 8, 2009 Sept. 8, 2009

Barnett et al v. Obama: Taitz Motion for Modification of 8/6 order DENIED. Barnett et al v. Obama: Taitz Motion to Recuse Magistrate Judge Nakazato DENIED. Barnett et al v. Obama: Ex parte order vacating voluntary dismissal (Drake and Robinson) and admonishing Taitz for improper actions GRANTED. (Taitz opposed motion.) Barnett et al v. Obama: Motion for stay of discovery GRANTED. (Taitz opposed motion.) Rhodes v. MacDonald: Taitz Motion for Temporary Restraining Order DENIED. Rhodes v. MacDonald: CASE DISMISSED.

Sept. 16, 2009 Sept. 16, 2009 Sept. 16, 2009 Sept. 18, 2009

20 21 22

Page 3

C REPORT ON TAITZS VEXATIOUS LITIGATION HISTORY AND ASTOUNDING LOSS RECORD

CS

Taitz Birther Case Activity

Date
Sept. 18, 2009

Taitz Birther Case Losses

Rhodes v. MacDonald: Motion for Stay of Deployment and reconsideration DENIED. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: RULE 11 VIOLATIONS ISSUED.

Sept. 23, 2009

Barnett et al v. Obama: Taitz motion to file 2nd amended complaint DENIED.

Rhodes v. MacDonald Appeal: Taitz files appeal in 11th Circuit (No. 09-15418)

Barnett et al v. Obama Appeal: Taitz files appeal in 9th Cir. (No. 10-55084) 8

Updated: July 17, 2012

ie r

Taitz v. Obama filed in D.C.C. (No. 1:10-cv-00151)

s d n

f o

b g o F e h t
Oct 2009
Oct. 2, 2009 Oct. 8, 2009 Oct. 13, 2009 Oct. 13, 2009 Oct. 13, 2009 Oct. 20, 2009 Oct. 29, 2009

Rhodes v. Gates: CASE DISMISSED.

Barnett et al v. Obama: Taitz motion to lift stay of discovery DENIED. Rhodes v. MacDonald: MOTION for Recusal DENIED. Rhodes v. MacDonald: MOTION for Extension of Time to File Rule 11 Response DENIED. Rhodes v. MacDonald: $20,000 SANCTIONS IMPOSED.

w o

m o .c
#1
23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Barnett et al v. Obama: CASE DISMISSED.

Nov 2009 Dec 2009

Nov. 4, 2009

Cook v. Good Appeal: APPEAL DISMISSED.

Dec. 4, 2010

Barnett et al v. Obama: Taitz Motion for reconsideration DENIED.

32

Jan 2010

Jan. 12, 2010 Jan. 19, 2010 Jan. 27, 2010

Barnett et al v. Obama: Taitz Motion to transfer DENIED.

33

Mar 2010
Mar. 15, 2010 Rhodes v. MacDonald APPEAL: SANCTIONS AFFIRMED. 34

Page 4

C REPORT ON TAITZS VEXATIOUS LITIGATION HISTORY AND ASTOUNDING LOSS RECORD

CS

Taitz Birther Case Activity

Date
Apr 2010
Apr. 14, 2010 Apr. 14, 2010 Apr. 14, 2010

Taitz Birther Case Losses

Taitz v. Obama: Motion to Consolidate Cases (with Florida PAHA Case) DENIED. Taitz v. Obama: Motion for Preliminary Injunction DENIED. Taitz v. Obama: CASE DISMISSED.

Taitz. v. Dunn filed in Cal. Superior Ct (No. 30-2010-00381664) (NON-BIRTHER CASE)

Keyes v. Bowen APPEAL (KREEP): Petition for Review filed in CA S.Ct. (No. S188724)

Updated: July 17, 2012

ie r

s d n

f o

b g o F e h t
May 2010
May 14, 2010

Rhodes v. MacDonald APPEAL: Motion for rehearing (of 3/15/2010 order) DENIED.

Jun 2010

w o

m o .c
#1
35 36 37 38 39 40 41

Jun. 16, 2010

Jun. 18, 2010

Taitz v. Obama (DDC): Taitz Motion for Reconsideration DENIED.

Jul 2010

Jul. 15, 2010

Rhodes v. MacDonald APPEAL: SCOTUS Application for Stay (No. 10A56) DENIED by Justice Thomas.

Aug 2010

Aug. 16, 2010

Rhodes v. MacDonald APPEAL: SCOTUS for Stay (No. 10A56) DENIED by Full Supreme Court.

Oct 2010

Oct. 26, 2009

Keyes v. Bowen APPEAL (KREEP): Dismissal AFFIRMED Ct. App. Oct. 25, 2010))

Dec 2010
Dec. 6, 2010 Dec. 9, 2010 Taitz v. Obama (DDC): Second Motion for Reconsideration DENIED. 42

Jan 2011
Jan. 10, 2011 Rhodes v. MacDonald APPEAL: Petition for a writ of certiorari (SCOTUS) DENIED. 43

Page 5

C REPORT ON TAITZS VEXATIOUS LITIGATION HISTORY AND ASTOUNDING LOSS RECORD

CS

Taitz Birther Case Activity

Date
Feb 2011
Feb. 2, 2011

Taitz Birther Case Losses

Keyes v. Bowen APPEAL (KREEP): CA Supreme Court Review DENIED.

Taitz v. Astrue, filed Feb. 16, 2011 in D.D.C. (No. 1:10-cv-00151)

Feb. 16, 2011

10

Hornbeck Offshore Services, L.L.C. v. Salazar et al, Motion to Intervene filed in E.D. La. (No. 2:10-cv-01663-MLCF-JCW)

11

Florida et al. v. U.S. Dep. of Health & Human Svs., Motion to Intervene filed in N.D. Fla. (No. 3:10-cv-91-RV/EMT)

Keyes v. Bowen APPEAL (KREEP): SCOTUS Petition for writ of certiorari filed (No. 10-1351)

Taitz v. Dunn Appeal: Taitz appeals dismissal of case (No. G045351) (NON-BIRTHER CASE)

Updated: July 17, 2012

ie r

s d n

f o

b g o F e h t
Mar. 28, 2011

Mar 2011

Apr 2011

Apr. 6, 2011 Apr. 8, 2010

w o

m o .c
#1
44 45 46

Florida et al. v. U.S. Dep. of Health & Human Svs: Taitz MOTION TO INTERVENE DENIED. Florida et al. v. U.S. Dep. of Health & Human Svs: Taitz Motion for Reconsideration or Certification of Interlocutory Appeal DENIED.

Apr. 23, 2010

May 2011

May 2, 2011

Hornbeck Offshore Services, L.L.C. v. Salazar et al: Taitz MOTION TO INTERVENE DENIED. Taitz v. Dunn: CASE DISMISSED. (Not a Birther Case)

May 24, 2011

Jun 2011

Jun. 2, 2011

Taitz v. Astrue (DDC): Motion to Strike Taitz filing in part for failure to follow rules GRANTED in part.

47

Jul 2011
Jul. 21, 2011 Taitz v. Astrue (DDC): Motion to Strike Taitz memorandum in opposition to motion for summary judgment for failure to follow rule GRANTED. Taitz v. Astrue (DDC): Taitz Motion for Reconsideration of Order Striking Taitz documents for failure to follow rules DENIED. 48

Jul. 25, 2011

49

Page 6

C REPORT ON TAITZS VEXATIOUS LITIGATION HISTORY AND ASTOUNDING LOSS RECORD

CS
12 13

Taitz Birther Case Activity

Taitz v. Ruemmler, filed in D.D.C. (No. 1:11-cv-01421) Taitz v. Astrue, filed in D. Haw. (No. 1:11-cv-00519-SOM -RLP; orig. No. 1:11-mc-00158)

Date
Aug 2011
Aug. 4, 2011 Aug. 8, 2011 Aug. 8, 2011

Taitz Birther Case Losses

14

Taitz v. Fuddy, filed in Hawaii State Circuit Court (No. 1CC11-1-001731)

Updated: July 17, 2012

ie r

s d n

f o

b g o F e h t
Aug. 10, 2011 Aug. 30, 2011 Aug. 30, 2011 Aug. 30, 2011 Aug. 30, 2011 Aug. 30, 2011 Aug. 30, 2011 Aug. 30, 2011

Taitz v. Astrue (DHaw): Taitz Motion for Emergency hearing DENIED.

Taitz v. Astrue (DDC): Taitz Motion to Compel Preparation of a Vaughn Index DENIED. Taitz v. Astrue (DDC): Taitz Motion to Strike Defendants Answer DENIED. Taitz v. Astrue (DDC): Taitz Motion for Default Judgment DENIED. Taitz v. Astrue (DDC): Taitz Motion for Clarification of Order Striking her pleadings for noncompliance with rules DENIED. Taitz v. Astrue (DDC): Taitz Motion to Compel Compliance with a Rule 45 Subpoena DENIED. Taitz v. Astrue (DDC): CASE DISMISSED. Taitz v. Astrue (DHaw): Taitz Motion for ECF Access DENIED; Taitz instructed to follow ECF procedures.

w o

m o .c
#1
50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57

Oct 2011

Oct. 3, 2011

Keyes v. Bowen APPEAL (KREEP): petition for writ of certiorari (KREEP) DENIED. Taitz v. Astrue (DDC): Taitz Motion for Reconsideration of dismissal DENIED. Taitz v. Ruemmler: CASE DISMSSED. Taitz v. Astrue (DHaw): Taitz Motion Emergency Ex Parte Motion for Emergency Order To Show Cause and to Compel Attendance for Production of Documents and for Attorneys Fees and Costs DENIED; Taitz v. Astrue (DHaw): PROCEEDING DISMISSED. 58 59 60

Oct. 17, 2011 Oct. 17, 2011 Oct. 26, 2011

Oct. 26, 2011

61

Page 7

C REPORT ON TAITZS VEXATIOUS LITIGATION HISTORY AND ASTOUNDING LOSS RECORD

CS
15

Taitz Birther Case Activity

Taitz v. Astrue Appeal: Taitz files appeal of dismissal in D.C. Cir. (No. 11-5304)

Date
Oct. 31, 2011

Taitz Birther Case Losses

Nov 2011
16 17 Taitz v. Ruemmler Appeal: Taitz files appeal of dismissal in D.C. Cir. (No. 11-5306) Barnett et al v. Obama et al: Taitz files Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus in 9th Circuit Nov. 2, 2011 Nov. 9, 2011 Nov. 9, 2011 Nov. 9, 2011

18 19 20

Farrar v. Obama, filed with the Georgia Secretary of State

Taitz v. Obama NH Ballot Challenge: filed with NH Ballot Law Commission (No. BLC 2011-4)

In re: Orly Taitz: Taitz files Petition for Writ of Mandamus in D.C. Cir. Court (No. 11-5329)

21

Taitz v. Obama HI Ballot Challenge filed with Hawaii Office of Elections (No Number Assigned)

22

Vestal v. Obama NC Ballot Challenge filed with NC Board of Election (No Number Assigned

23

Taitz v. Gardner, filed in New Hampshire Supreme Court (No. 20110880)

Updated: July 17, 2012

ie r

s d n

f o

b g o F e h t
Nov. 13, 2011 Nov. 17, 2011 Nov. 18, 2011 Nov. 28, 2011 Nov. 29, 2011

Taitz v. Fuddy: CASE DISMISSED.

w o

m o .c
#1
62 63 64

Taitz v. Obama NH Ballot Challenge: PETITION DENIED. Taitz v. Obama NH Ballot Challenge: Taitz Motion for Reconsideration DENIED.

Dec 2011

Dec. 2, 2011

Taitz v. Obama HI Ballot Challenge: CHALLENGE DENIED.

65

Dec. 13, 2011 Dec. 14, 2011 Dec. 17, 2011 Dec. 22, 2011 Dec. 22, 2011 Dec. 27, 2011

Vestal v. Obama NC Ballot Challenge: CHALLENGE REJECTED

66

Barnett et al v. Obama et al: DISMISSAL AFFIRMED. Barnett et al v. Obama et al: Taitz Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus DENIED. Taitz v. Gardner (N.H. Sup. Ct.): APPEAL DECLINED.

67 68 69

Page 8

C REPORT ON TAITZS VEXATIOUS LITIGATION HISTORY AND ASTOUNDING LOSS RECORD

CS

Taitz Birther Case Activity

Date
Dec. 27, 2011

Taitz Birther Case Losses

Taitz v. Gardner (N.H. Sup. Ct.): PETITION DENIED.

Jan 2012
24 Taitz v. Nishimura filed in Hawaii Supreme Court (No. SPCW-12000014) Jan. 6, 2012 Jan. 12, 2012 Jan. 17, 2012 Jan. 23, 2012

25

Taitz v. Obama IN Ballot Challenge filed with the Indiana Election Commn (No Number Assigned)

26 27

Farrar v. Obama: Case filed in Ga. Superior Court Challenging SOS Decision (No. 2012CV211398)

Updated: July 17, 2012

ie r

Taitz v. Democrat (sic) Party of Mississippi, et al, filed in Miss. Circuit Court (No. 251-12-107CIV)

Kesler v. Obama IN Ballot Challenge filed with Indiana Election Commn (No. 2012-162); Taitz appeared as witness not as plaintiffs attorney.

s d n

f o

b g o F e h t
Feb 2012
Feb. 2, 2012 Feb. 3, 2012 Feb. 6, 2012 Feb. 7, 2012 Feb. 7, 2012 Feb. 7, 2012 Feb. 7, 2012 Feb. 13, 2012 Feb. 14, 2012 Feb. 16, 2012

Taitz v. Nishimura (Haw): PETITION DENIED.

Taitz v. Fuddy: Ex Parte Amended Motion for Reconsideration under 60B DENIED. In re: Orly Taitz (Mandamus in D.C. Cir): PETITION FOR WRIT DISMISSED.

w o

m o .c
#1
70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78

Drake v. Obama (Barnett v. Obama) APPEAL: KREEP motion for rehearing and rehearing on banc DENIED. Farrar v. Obama (Ga. OSHA): OBJECTION DENIED.

Farrar v. Obama (Ga. SOS): OSHA RULING ADOPTED BY SOS. Taitz v. Fuddy: Taitz Motion for Reciprocal Subpoena Enforcement (sic) DENIED. Taitz v. Fuddy: Taitz Emergency Motion/Request for the Court to Docket "Amended Motion for Rehearing" DENIED. Taitz v. Fuddy: Taitz Amended Emergency Motion for Rehearing and Motion to Stay Final Order Pending Rehearing DENIED.

Page 9

C REPORT ON TAITZS VEXATIOUS LITIGATION HISTORY AND ASTOUNDING LOSS RECORD

CS

Taitz Birther Case Activity

Ripley v. Obama IN Ballot Challenge filed with Indiana Election Commn (No. 2012-163); Taitz appeared as witness not as plaintiffs attorney. Swihart v. Obama IN Ballot Challenge filed with Indiana Election Commn (No. 2012-176); Taitz appeared as witness not as plaintiffs attorney. Weyl v. Obama IN Ballot Challenge filed with Indiana Election Commn (No. 2012-161); Taitz appeared as witness not as plaintiffs attorney.

Date
Feb. 16, 2012

Taitz Birther Case Losses

Feb. 16, 2012

Kesler v. Obama IN Ballot Challenge: Taitz reportedly files Emergency Motion for Reconsideration with before Indiana Election Commission (according to her website)

Farrar v. Obama Appeal: Taitz files Application in Ga.S.Ct (No. S12D1180) Farrar v. Obama Appeal: Taitz files Motion for Stay/Supersedeas in Ga.S.Ct. (No. S12D1180)

32

Updated: July 17, 2012

ie r

Taitz v. Ind. Elec. Commn, filed in Indiana Circuit Court (No. 49D141203MI012046)

s d n

f o

b g o F e h t
Feb. 16, 2012 Feb. 16, 2012 Feb. 24, 2012 Feb. 24, 2012 Feb. 24, 2012 Feb. 24, 2012

Taitz v. Obama IN Ballot Challenge: CHALLENGE REJECTED. Kesler v. Obama IN Ballot Challenge: CHALLENGE REJECTED. Ripley v. Obama IN Ballot Challenge: CHALLENGE REJECTED. Swihart v. Obama IN Ballot Challenge: CHALLENGE REJECTED. Weyl v. Obama IN Ballot Challenge: CHALLENGE REJECTED.

w o

m o .c
#1
79

Mar 2012

Mar. 1, 2012

Mar. 1, 2012 Mar. 1, 2012 Mar. 2, 2012

Taitz v. Astrue Appeal (D.C. Cir.): Taitz motion for ECF number DENIED. Taitz v. Ruemmler Appeal: Taitz motion for ECF number DENIED. Farrar v. Obama (Ga. Super. Ct): CASE DISMISSED.

80 81 82

Mar. 22, 2012 Mar. 22, 2012 Before Mar. 23 Mar. 23, 2012 Kesler v. Obama: Taitz Motion for Reconsideration DENIED. 83

Page 10

C REPORT ON TAITZS VEXATIOUS LITIGATION HISTORY AND ASTOUNDING LOSS RECORD

CS

Taitz Birther Case Activity

Date
Apr 2012
Apr. 11, 2012 Apr. 11, 2012

Taitz Birther Case Losses

Farrar v. Obama Appeal: Motion for Stay/Supersedeas (Ga. Sup. Ct.) DENIED. Farrar v. Obama Appeal: APPEAL DENIED.

Taitz v. Democrat (sic) Party of Mississippi: Taitz files Emergency Interlocutory Appeal to the MS S.Ct. (No. 12-AP-260).

Taitz v. Democrat (sic) Party of Mississippi: case removed to S.D. Miss (No. 3:12-cv-00280-HTW-LRA).

Taitz v. Astrue Appeal (D.C. Cir.): Taitz files Petition for Rehearing en banc.

Updated: July 17, 2012

ie r

s d n

f o

b g o F e h t
Apr. 19, 2012 Apr. 24, 2012

May 2012

w o

m o .c
#1
84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92

May 1, 2012 May 1, 2012 May 4, 2012

Taitz v. Fuddy: Taitz 4/24 Motion for Reconsideration due to new information DENIED. Taitz v. Dunn Appeal: DISMISSAL AFFIRMED (Not a Birther Case) Taitz v. Democrat (sic) Party of Mississippi: APPEAL DENIED; proceedings stayed due to removal. Taitz v. Dunn Appeal: Taitz Motion for extension of time to file Petition for Rehearing DENIED. Taitz v. Astrue Appeal (D.C. Cir.): Taitz motion for default judgment DENIED. Taitz v. Astrue Appeal (D.C. Cir.): Taitz motion for motion for summary reversal DENIED. Taitz v. Astrue Appeal (D.C. Cir.): Astrue motion for motion for summary affirmance GRANTED. Taitz v. Astrue Appeal (D.C. Cir.): DISMISSAL AFFIRMED. Taitz v. Ruemmler Appeal: Ruemmler Motion for Summary Affirmance GRANTED. Taitz v. Ruemmler Appeal: DISMISSAL AFFIRMED.

May 25, 2012 May 25, 2012 May 25, 2012 May 25, 2012 May 25, 2012 May 25, 2012

Jun 2012
Jun. 4, 2012

Page 11

C REPORT ON TAITZS VEXATIOUS LITIGATION HISTORY AND ASTOUNDING LOSS RECORD

CS

Taitz Birther Case Activity

Date
Jun. 7, 2012

Taitz Birther Case Losses

Drake v. Obama (Barnett v. Obama) APPEAL: KREEP petition for cert DENIED (No. 11-1225 (U.S. Jun. 7, 2012) (filed by Drake, Robinson and Keyes (Kreep) Taitz v. Ind. Elec. Commn: CASE DISMISSED.

Jun. 25, 2012 Taitz v. Ind. Elec. Commn: Taitz files motion for relief from judgment under Rule 60. Jun. 26, 2012

Farrar v. Obama Appeal: Taitz submits App. for Stay to SCOTUS/Justice Thomas (No. 12A25). Taitz v. Ind. Elec. Commn: Taitz files (another) motion for relief from judgment under Rule 60. 33 34

Taitz v. Sebelius et al filed in C.D. Cal. (No. 8:12-cv-01092)

Taitz v. Obama et al filed in Cal. Superior Court (No. 30-201200582135-CU-PT-CJC)

Updated: July 17, 2012

ie r

s d n

f o

b g o F e h t
Jul 2012
Jul. 2, 2012 Jul. 3, 2012 Jul. 5, 2012 Jul. 9, 2012 Jul. 12, 2012 Jul. 13, 2012

w o

m o .c
#1
93 94 95

Farrar v. Obama Appeal: Application for Stay DENIED by Justice Thomas. Taitz v. Obama CA State Case: Taitz Ex Parte Motion for Emergency Stay of Certification of Primary Election Results DENIED.

Page 12