Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1951 Replay 07-13
1951 Replay 07-13
is It?
All the News That Fits, We Print
VOL. 1, No. 89
G 74 58 67 66 77 76 74 76 72 73
AB 294 214 261 246 334 319 299 278 279 278
R 67 38 57 42 60 51 47 48 52 46
AVG. .367 .346 .333 .333 .332 .332 .328 .320 .319 .317
Ashburn, Phi. Furillo, Bro. Wyrostek, Cin. Thomson, N.Y. Jones, Phi. Gordon, Bos.
HR: Zernial (Phi.) 22; Wertz (Det.) 19; Mantle (N.Y.) 19; Doby (Cle.) 16; Robinson (Chi.) 16. RBI: Zernial (Phi.) 78; Robinson (Chi.) 73; Williams (Bos.) 68; Fain (Phi.) 66; Rosen (Cle.) 63. Wins: Raschi (N.Y.) 11-3; Wynn (Cle.) 10-5; Pierce (Chi.) 9-4; Lopat (N.Y.) 9-4; Shantz (Phi.) 9-4. Strikeouts: Raschi (N.Y.) 97; Gray (Det.) 77; Reynolds (N.Y.) 72; Trout (Det.) 66; Feller (Cle.) 64. ERA: Lopat (N.Y.) 2.39; Parnell (Bos.) 2.75; Marrero (Was.) 2.80; Pierce (Chi.) 2.91; Raschi (N.Y.) 3.03.
HR: Thomson (N.Y.) 22; Musial (St.L) 20; Sauer (Chi.) 19; Hodges (Bro.) 18; Pafko (Bro.) 17. RBI: Musial (St.L) 72; Hodges (Bro.) 63; Sauer (Chi.) 62; Thomson (N.Y.) 62; Jones (Phi.) 56. Wins: Jansen (N.Y.) 10-5; Maglie (N.Y.) 10-7; Roe (Bro.) 9-3; Newcombe (Bro.) 9-4; Hearn (N.Y.) 9-5. Strikeouts: Newcombe (Bro.) 86; Queen (Pit.) 80; Jansen (N.Y.) 80; Blackwell (Cin.) 72; Maglie (N.Y.) 69. ERA: Jansen (N.Y.) 1.88; Newcombe (Bro.) 2.02; Branca (Bro.) 2.39; Roe (Bro.) 2.44; Blackwell (Cin.) 2.81.
Page 2
The Sportlight
By Grantland Rice
For the Hall of Fame NEW YORK There seems to be a rather sudden outburst lately in conjunction with baseballs Hall of Fame. It is just as well that we have the spotlight thrown on this famous hall, for as time moves along too many are forgotten with the rush of the years. We know that not too very far away this hall must make room for Joe DiMaggio, Stan Musial and Ted Williams. Possibly also for Jackie Robinson, if his present play continues. Certainly for Joe DiMaggio, one of the all-time greats. DiMaggio, Williams and Musial are practically in the must class. But their date with destiny waits on ahead. There are several who must be handled before their time arrives. In this list we have Harry Heilmann, who died recently, and Al Simmons, two famous sluggers two fine ballplayers.
Heilmann Worthy
ball than two-thirds of those who now belong to the hallowed hall. In addition to his surpassing ability as a pitcher, Dean has contributed a breeziness, a new outlook, a keener run of natural honor than anyone I know. I have known many types in baseball. I have known only one Dizzy Dean, to my complete regret.
Two Catchers Stand Out
Ty Cobb thinks that Harry Heilmann belongs. So do I. Heilmann deserves first call. I also believe Al Simmons, one of Connie Macks leading stars, is entitled to his spot. I must say that I believe Heilmann and Simmons deserve this ranking above several who have already received the crown and purple toga. But Heilmann and Simmons, who after long years finished with all-time averages well above 30 of the selected immortals, are not the only ones to be considered. What about a pitcher remembered as Charles Albert Bender, the Chippewa Chief? Years ago Connie Mack told me he would rather have Bender pitch a million-dollar game for him than anyone else. Bender was a brilliant pitcher, with a distinct personality.
Dizzy One of a Kind
In my incomplete book baseball has known two great catchers, and many who were close. The two tops were Mickey Cochrane of the Athletics and Tigers, and Bill Dickey of the Yankees. Gabby Hartnett, Roger Bresnahan and Johnny Kling, plus Ray Schalk, were not far away. Cochrane and Dickey stand above them all. Both had power. Cochrane had more speed and a greater offensive drive. Dickey was a better handler of pitchers. Cochrane is in Dickey is out. And they run neck and neck among the great catchers of the game. Roger Bresnahan. McGraws choice, told me one day that he never saw the time he could match Bill Dickey. Bill Dickey has all the qualities that belong to the leaders in baseballs Hall of Fame. Bresnahan is in Dickey is out.
Too Many Young Voters
What about a fellow known as Dizzy Dean? Dean, as great as he was, had a rather brief career. But he has left a deeper imprint on base-
This all means that the sports writers who have made their decisions in voting honors to the most deserving men left must be especially careful before sending through their ballots. There have been many incredibly careless votes, or votes from baseball writers with shallow backgrounds. Too many young writers are voting on ballplayers they have never seen. The present system is entirely wrong. I know many deserving stars from the past may be left out. I mean Heilmann, Simmons, Dickey, Bender, Dean, great ballplayers Ive watched and followed through the years. They must be taken care of before Musial, DiMaggio and Williams arrive. Right Field Dixie Walker was a good hitter but Carl Furillo is also a .300 batter and miles ahead of Dixie in the outfield. Catching Mickey Owen was then outstanding, but not great. Campanella is great in all respects and a more powerful batter. Pitching Thanks to Ralph Brancas fine comeback, our pitching is much better than was predicted and I think good enough to win the pennant although three of our pitchers havent helped us at all. We have been winning with seven pitchers. In 1941, all 10 pitchers were major leaguers. Also, as a four-man staff, Whitlow Wyatt, Curt Davis, Kirby Higbe and Freddie Fitzsimmons were better than we have today, although Newcombe and Roe would hold their own on any Brooklyn staff. Summary I can give the 1941 team the edge in only three positions third base, center field and pitching. This team is better at six positions.
DRESSEN
FROM PAGE 1
Third base Billy Cox is a great fielder, but you have to give that position to the 1941 team. Cookie Lavagetto was more than adequate in the field and a much better batter than Cox. Shortstop Pee Wee Reese, who played on both teams, was younger and faster in 41. But he wasnt the smart competitor then that he is today. Nor was he anything near the .300 batter he is this season. Left field Joe Medwick was once a better hitter than Andy Pafko, but he was on his way down in 1941. Also, he could never field with the man we have there now. Center Field Duke Snider is a fine player and getting better all the time, but he still isnt the player Pete Reiser was 10 years ago. Reiser led the league in batting, was the best outfielder in the league, had the best arm and was the best base-runner.