Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 15 PT Muddies T Point

    Uploaded by

    Francine Glazer
    31 views2 pages
    The muddiest point rubric outlines criteria for assessing student participation in online discussions about course readings and assignments. Students are evaluated on the clarity, specificity, and referencing of their questions and responses. They are also assessed on evidence of critical thinking in their posts, sufficient number of interactions, and timeliness of submissions. Points are awarded on a scale of 0 to 3 for questions, responses, critical thinking, number of interactions, and timeliness. The highest scores require clear, well-supported questions and responses that stimulate discussion and demonstrate analysis, synthesis and evaluation of course materials.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    15 Pt Muddies t Point

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The muddiest point rubric outlines criteria for assessing student participation in online discussions about course readings and assignments. Students are evaluated on the clarity, specificity, and referencing of their questions and responses. They are also assessed on evidence of critical thinking in their posts, sufficient number of interactions, and timeliness of submissions. Points are awarded on a scale of 0 to 3 for questions, responses, critical thinking, number of interactions, and timeliness. The highest scores require clear, well-supported questions and responses that stimulate discussion and demonstrate analysis, synthesis and evaluation of course materials.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    31 views2 pages

    15 PT Muddies T Point

    Uploaded by

    Francine Glazer
    The muddiest point rubric outlines criteria for assessing student participation in online discussions about course readings and assignments. Students are evaluated on the clarity, specificity, and referencing of their questions and responses. They are also assessed on evidence of critical thinking in their posts, sufficient number of interactions, and timeliness of submissions. Points are awarded on a scale of 0 to 3 for questions, responses, critical thinking, number of interactions, and timeliness. The highest scores require clear, well-supported questions and responses that stimulate discussion and demonstrate analysis, synthesis and evaluation of course materials.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    Muddiest Point Rubric

    The muddiest point discussions are critical in this online course because they are where you interact with other students and the instructor about specific questions and issues raised in our readings and course assignments. For the muddiest point activities, the following rubric will be used to assess your participation. Questions: _____ (3) Asked clear, understandable, specific questions. Referenced page numbers and/or figure numbers in the text. _____ (2) Question is clearly worded but no textbook references are provided. _____ (1) Question is worded in confusing manner; classmates need to ask for clarification of the question. Textbook references are provided. _____ (0) Question is confusing; no textbook references are provided. Responses: _____ (3) Responses to classmates' questions are clear, understandable, and specific. Referenced page numbers and/or figure numbers in the text. _____ (2) Responses to classmates' questions are clearly worded but no textbook references are provided. _____ (1) Responses to classmates' questions are worded in confusing manner; classmates need to ask for clarification of the response. Textbook references are provided. _____ (0) Responses to classmates' questions are confusing; no textbook references are provided. Evidence of Critical Thinking _____ (3) Well-developed ideas; introduces new ideas; stimulates discussion. Clear evidence of critical thinking; (application, analysis, synthesis and evaluation). Postings are characterized by clarity of argument, depth of insight into theoretical issues, originality of treatment, relevancy, and sometimes include unusual insights and flashes of brilliance. Arguments are well supported. _____ (2) Developing ideas; sometimes stimulates discussion. Beginnings of critical thinking. Postings tend to address peripheral issues. Generally accurate, but could be improved with more analysis and creative thought. Tendency to recite fact rather than address issues. _____ (1) Poorly developed ideas; does not add substance to the discussion. Poorly

    developed critical thinking. _____ (0) Did not enter the discussion. Sufficient Number of Interactions _____ (3) posted at least two questions and three substantive responses _____ (2) posted at least one question and one substantive response _____ (1) posted either questions or substantive responses, but not both _____ (0) did not enter the discussion Timeliness of questions and responses _____ (3) all questions and responses were posted before their respective deadlines _____ (2) some items were posted on time; some items were posted after the deadline _____ (1) all items were posted after the deadline _____ (0) did not post any questions or responses

    You might also like