The Etruscan Seated Banquet: Villanovan Ritual and Etruscan Iconography Anthony S. Tuck American Journal of Archaeology, Vol.

98, No. 4. (Oct., 1994), pp. 617-628.

Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-9114%28199410%2998%3A4%3C617%3ATESBVR%3E2.0.CO%3B2-9 American Journal of Archaeology is currently published by Archaeological Institute of America.

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/journals/aia.html. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission.

The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academic journals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers, and foundations. It is an initiative of JSTOR, a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help the scholarly community take advantage of advances in technology. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

http://www.jstor.org Tue Sep 25 12:28:08 2007

The Etruscan Seated Banquet:

Villanovan Ritual and Etruscan Iconography

ANTHONY S. TUCK
Abstract
T h e banquet was one of the most popular and consistent funerary motifs in ancient Etruria. T h e earliest banquet scenes depict people sitting, whereas later representations show banqueters reclining on couches. By examining these primordial seated banquet scenes, we see the representation o f a n already cogent iconography T h e deceased is either depicted at a meal or ancestor figures are shown welcoming the newly deceased to the banquet. T h e characterization of the deceased at a meal is a funerary theme that also finds expression in the earlier tomb groups of the Villanovan period. It is argued here that new foreign artistic models of enthroned figures are adopted and manipulated in the Orientalizing period because they could be useti to express a preexisting funerary theme of the deceased at a meal.*

The renewal ofcontact and trade between Etruria and the eastern Mediterranean during the Orientalizing period brought new goods and materials flooding into the region. Craftsmen working in metal, ceramic, and other materials quickly assimilated foreign forms and motifs into their own production repertoire. It is within this crucible of social change that Etruscan culture emerged in its fully developed form. It is important to understand this not only as a revolution, but also an evolution. The exposure to and adoption of various artistic motifs certainly had a profound effect on the material culture of the people we today categorize as Villanovan, but these are changes in means and modes of expression. As Kidguay has put it, "any degree of indigenous ethnic unity that underlines the Villanovan culture must be attributed to the Etruscans themselves in the Iron Age phase of their development."'

In the midst of abundant evidence for the impact of eastern contact, however, the effect of any Villanovan "indigenous ethnic unity" on the development of many Etruscan practices is often overlooked. It is reasonable to assume that many elements of distinctive Villanovan cultural unity would find new means of expression in later Etruscan contexts. While the form of expression may be new, the cultural continuity between the Villanovan and Etruscan periods is illustrated by the consistency of expressed themes. One element of this cultural continuity may be found in funerary contexts with the thematic expression of the meal of the dead. In order to assess the impact of Villanovan ritual on early Etruscan banquet scenes, it is helpful to examine some of the earliest depictions of funerary banquets found in Etruria. De Marinis has noted that representations ofbanqueting in Etruscan art initially show people sitting, while in later representations funerary banquets are depicted with individuals reclining on couches.2 The earliest surviving depiction of such a funerary seated banquet in Etruscan art takes the form of an attached plastic scene found on the lid of a biconical cremation urn known as the Montescudaio urn (figs. 1-2). The urn is generally dated to ca. 650-625 B.C., based on the rendering and style of the human figures and the plastic geometric decoration on the body of the urn, although some scholars place it slightly 1ater.Vt was found just outside the town of Montescudaio, near Volterra, at the beginning of this century. In the scene, a figure is seated on a chair in front of a round tripod table. To the left of the seated figure is a standing female attendant.

* I owe an enormous debt of thanks to many people for their suggestions and support, especially Gloria Pinney, Brunilde Ridgvvay, and Jean Turfa for their insightful comments and criticisms of an earlier draft of this paper. I am also very grateful to R. Ross Holloway, Rolf Winkes, Martha S. Joukowsky, Erik Nielsen, and Mary E Tuck for their willingness to discuss many problems and suggest revisions. T h e AJA reviewers, Larissa Bonfante and Richard De Puma, were also extremely helpful in pointing out pertinent issues that I had neglected and suggesting valuable corrections. Special thanks are orved to Jen Rowle): Tony Kugler, Michael Smith, Michele Kunitz, and Anne
American Journal of Archaeology 98 (1994) 617-28

Leinster for their support and friendship. D. Ridgway, The First Western Greek (Cambridge 1992) 127. S. De Marinis, La tipologza del banchetto nell'arte etmsca arcaica (Rome 196 1 ) 1 14. %.D. Anderson, "The Etruscan Ancestor Cult-Its Origin and Development and the Importance of h t h r o pomorphization," AnalRom 21 (1993) 31; F. Magi, "Cossuario di Montescudaio," Atti del primo simposio italiano (Rome 1969) 127-28 n. 25, suggests a lower date at the end of the seventh or early sixth century B.C.

'

617

618

ANTHONY S. TUCK

[AJA 98

Across the table is a high footed olla and a scar where another element was attached, either another vessel or perhaps a chair for a second banq~eter.~ A representation of a seated banquet scene slightly later than the Montescudaio urn comes from the Tomb of the Five Chairs at Cerveteri, dated to the final third of the seventh century on the basis of the form of the rock-carved tomb.5 According to Prayon's reconstruction, a terracotta figure was originally placed on each of the five rock-carved thrones in a side chamber of the cruciform tomb (figs. 3 4 ) . Two stone tables, carved from the rock, were located in front of the chairs. To complete this arrangement, Prayon further reconstructs a large basket and libation table and a rectangular base that was used for two additional cylindrical thrones.6 Of the five figures, three are male and two are female, which is interesting since many later representations of reclining banquets depict women reclining with men. Erroneous early reconstructions of the figures placed the two surviving female heads onto two of the three surviving torso^.^ The fibula form worn by all three torsos suggests that they belong to males.8 All exhibit what Bonfante describes as a "ritual pose."g The left arm is hidden beneath a cloak or shroud and only the hand is visible. The right arm extends outward with the palm upturned. The fragmentary seated figure on the Montescudaio urn may be reconstructed as gesturing in the same way. Once again, we see this gesture on a late sixth-century funerary stele from Fiesole with two scenes of banqueting (fig. 5).1The upper register has a scene of a reclining banquet while the lower scene shows two people sitting at a table with the figure on the right side extending his right arm with palm upturned toward the figure on the left side. There are, however, scenes of people sitting and eating that do not utilize this gesture. On a bucchero chalice from Pienzall decorated with an impression from a cylinder seal as well as some cylinder seal impressions illustrated by Micali12 we see figures,
E Nicosia, "I1 cineraria di Montescudaio," StEtr 37 (1969) 389, believes another olla occupied this position; Magi (supra n. 3) 126 believes the position was occupied by a cylindrical throne for another banqueter. F. Prayon, "Zur Datierung der drei friihetruskischen Sitzstatuetten aus Cerveteri," RM 82 (1975) 166. Prayon (supra n. 5) 166-67. L. Bonfante, Etruscan Dress (Baltimore 1975) 150. Bonfante (supra n. 7) 150. Bonfante (supra n. 7) 95. lo A. Rathje, "The Adoption of the Homeric Banquet in Central Italy in the Orientalizing Period," in 0. Murray

Fig. 1. Montescudaio urn, full view. (After E Nicosia, StEtr 37 [I9691 pl. XCIIIc)

seated on campstools or chairs, eating and drinking. While the ceramics decorated with these scenes probably come from tomb contexts, there is no reason to assume that they were specifically produced
ed., Sympotica (Oxford 1989) 285, mentions several examples of Chiusine grave stelae that depict two banquet scenes, one reclining and one seated, presumably similar to the stele from Fiesole. She says, however, only that she learned of them from Kyle Phillips and mentions no bibliography. I 1 M. Monaci, "Catalogo del Museo archeologico vescovile di Pienza," StEtr 33 (1965) pl. XCIb. l 2 G. Micali, Storia degli antichi popoli italiani (Florence 1832) pl. XX.4, 19, and 21. Micali does not specify the provenance of these vases.

19941

VILLANOVAN RITUAL AND ETRUSCAN ICONOGRAPHY

619

Fig. 2. Montescudaio urn, detail of lid. (After F. Nicosia, StEtr 37 [I9691 pl. XCVII)

Fig. 3. Tomb of the Five Chairs at Cerveteri. Reconstruction of left dromos chamber. (After F. Prayon, MarbWPr 1974, fig. 2 )

Fig. 4. Tomb of the Five Chairs at Cerveteri. Reconstruction of statue on throne. (After F. Prayon, MarbWPr 1974, fig. 3)

for a funeral because of the scenes they depict. Conversely, the Montescudaio urn, the statues from the Tomb of the Five Chairs, and the stele from Fiesole all are clearly funerary and were produced specifically for that purpose. Therefore, while it is apparent that seated dining also took place in non-

funerary contexts, the common gesture of the figures at seated banquets from funerary contexts suggests that more is represented than simple scenes of people eating. The funerary seated banquet scenes may indeed employ an iconography specifically related to the death ritual.

I N Y S. TUCK

[AJA 98

: . . .. A . k.,;.;;-. . , -. . ..." ..-. ,.. , .. .... .... . . . ..'.. ':,:; . . .. ., .-... .4 ... L' ;',;.';: '. -.-;... ..; ""(:;i~-::",.Y.:.:,~..::&<,,,;~.,~~:'z . ;:-:;.. , ... .... -. <, ':g :
'

,.>

I . . . .

. I .

- > ~ ~ ! : ~ ~ . ~ ~ . : . A , X " : . * : . .*,*. *,

Fig. 5 . Stele from Fiesole. (After 1 . Martha, Cart itriirque [Paris 18891 fig. 165)

The interpretation of this gesture is a difficult isBartoloni, theorizes that a sue. Anderson, f o l l o ~ ~ i n g similar gesture seen on small standing figures from

a few early Iron .4ge Latian tomb groups is connected to e a t i n g . ' W n the dubious strength of stamped figured scenes with comparable gestures by figures with right arms outstretched and palms upturned, standing or sitting in front of a line of figures, this gesture might be construed as one of welcoming. Such an interpretation is plausible in the context of the Ibmb ofthe Five Chairs. As mentioned above, the "Cult Room" contained a stone platform that was used as a base for two cylindrical thrones that are now lost. The platform was situated on the wall adjacent to the wall with the five chairs and statues. Anderson has recently suggested that these thrones were intended to be symbolically used by the newly deceased for whom the tomb was carved, a plausible interpretation given that the tomb was designed for only two bodies.15 Anderson, following one of Prayon's original suggestions, further interprets the seated statues as representations of ancestors of the family.'Thus, a gesture of welcoming and acceptance is logical, given the interactive iconography of the room. The ancestors welcome the newly deceased to the banquet and, as h d e r s o n points out, the newly deceased then become elevated to the honorific status of ancestors themselves.I7The Montescudaio urn and the stele from Fiesole may be interpreted in the same way. On the stele, the figure on the right side welcomes the one to the left, while the scar across the table from the seated banqueter on the Montescudaio urn could have been the position for a cylindrical throne for a second banqueter. Such an emphasis on family and ancestry would be in keeping with other funerary representations of both couples and families.'"he inclusion of women in seated banquet motifs, specifically that of the Tomb of the Five Chairs, could therefore be related to the importance of accentuating aspects of the aristocratic family and also serve as a precedent for the inclusion of women in reclining banquet scenes as well. In his attempt to date stylistically the statues from the Tomb of the Five Chairs, Prayon links them to the carved figures found in the Tomb of the Statues from Ceri, near Cerveteri.lThese statues were placed in the anteroom of a two-chambered rockcarved tomb and roughly depict enthroned figures

Anderson (supra n. 3) 13. '"ficali (supra n. 12) pl. XX.5, 7, and 9. Anderson (supra n. 3) 49. l?.-\nderson (supra n. 3) 49; F Prayon, " Z u m ur. spriinglichen Aussehen und Deutung des Kultraumes in der Tomba delle Cinque Sedie bei Cerveteri," ~WarhlVPr 1974, 13, suggests that the pose o f the statues was intended to receive oKerings. T h e occurrence o f the same
':I

'"

gesture o f the figures on the hlontesc-udaio urn and stele from Fiesole ma): however, suggest a further significance. Anderson (supra n . 3) 49. L. Bonfante, "Etruscan Couples and Their Aristocratic- Societies," in H . Foley ed., Rejections of I.vomen in ilntiquitj (New York 1981) 3 2 3 4 2 . I" Prayon (supra n. 5) 172-75.

"

VILLANOVAN RITUAL AND ETRUSCAN ICONOGRAPHY

Fig. 6. Tomb of the Statues at Ceri. Reconstruction of statues. (After G Colonna and F.W yon Hase, StEtr 52 [I9861 fig. 11)

(fig. C)The schematically rendered figures are coni. sidered by Colonna and von Hase to be a few decades earlier than the statues from the Tomb of the Five Chairs.'O Although the statues from Ceri are not well preserved, both wear garments similar to those of the statues from the Tomb of the Five Chairs, which cover the left arm so that only the hand protrudes. On both figures, the right arm is free from the garment and holds an object, but only one is well enough preserved to be identified as a scepter topped with a lotus palmette. Colonna and von Hase have conclusively shown that these figures are directly paralleled by renderings of enthroned figures from Asia Minor." One example from Alalach of King Idri-Mi depicts the figure wearing a garment in the same fashion as the figures from Ceri and the Tomb of the Five Chairs.22 Three examples of ivory plaques from Nimrud show similar enthroned figures with scepters or staffs topped with lotus palmettes.'Wne of these plaques depicts an enthroned woman. The occurrence in an early seventh-century tomb of two statues that so clearly copy Near Eastern prototypes led Colonna and von Hase to suggest two possibilities for their p r o d ~ c t i o n . 'Either they are ~ the work of a Near Eastern immigrant artisan working in the area of Cerveteri, or the statues are the work of Etruscan carvers familiar with the model from Near Eastern imports in the form of small

statuary or ivory carving. While the Ceri statues are clearly derived from Near Eastern models of enthroned figures, however, the question remains of their relationship to the depiction of seated figures at banouet in Etruscan contexts. The representation of the garments worn by the three surviving figures from the Tomb of the Five Chairs and the Ceri statues is similar enough to suggest that they are loosely based on the same model. The gesture of the extended right arm with upturned palm, however, also seen on the Montescudaio urn and the stele from Fiesole, may indicate that, while the model for depicting enthroned figures stems from Near Eastern prototypes, it has been manipulated to convey a specifically Etruscan idea within a specifically Etruscan iconography. It may even be argued that the Tomb of the Statues itself serves as a sort of precedent for this kind of manipulation. While the statues themselves are derived from foreign models, both Colonna and Anderson plausibly interpret them as ancestor figures based on comparisons with later Etruscan tornbs.'j Indeed, their interpretation by both the ancient and modern viewer is defined by their purely Etruscan context. Thus, we do not have the simple copying of an image, but the adoption of a model because it adequately expresses an Etruscan idea not implicit in the original prototype.

2o G. Colonna and F.W. von Hase, "Alle origini della statuaria etrusca: la tomba della statue presso Ceri," StEtr 52 (1986) 29. Colonna and von Hase (supra n. 20) 41-48. Colonna and von Hase (supra n. 20) pl. XVIIa.

"

"

2Wolonna and von Hase (supra n. 20) pl. XVIIIa-c. 24 Colonna and von Hase (supra n. 20) 4 7 4 8 . 'Wolonna and von Hase (supra n. 20) 3 5 4 1 ; Anderson (supra n. 3) 4 4 4 5 .

622

ANTHONY S. TUCK

[AJA 98

Fig. 7. Tomb group from Poggio alla Sala, Chiusi. (After D. Randall-MacIver, Villan~ovans Early Etruscans [Oxand ford 19241 pl. 45)

The iconography of the funerary banquet is more clearly defined by the examples of funerary seated banquets from the area around Chiusi. In several examples, the bronze ossuaries were placed on thrones or chairs and situated in front of tables with
Examples include the Tomba del Trono: R. Bianchi Bandinelli, Clusium (MonAnt 30, 1925) 362-63, points out that 0. Montelius, La civilisation primitive en Italie 2 (Stockholm 1910) 964 incorrectly combines material from the Tomba del Trono and a second ziro burial from Dolciano, Tomba a Ziro 1, which according to I. Stram, "Oriental Bronze Reliefs from Chiusi," AmlRom 17-18 (1989) 13, is now lost. Apparently, D. Randall-MacIver, Villamans and Early Etruscans (Oxford 1924) 241, follows Montelius's error because he makes no mention of this second burial. Difficulty also surrounds the Tomba di Poggio alla Sala. In Montelius's drawing of the group (pl. 218), the ossuary is missing its rim and the table has curved "S" shaped legs. In Randall-MacIver's photograph of the group, however, the urn's rim is preserved and the table clearly has straight legs (fig. 45). I would tentatively suggest that Montelius has mistakenly drawn the table and ossuary from the lost Tomba a Ziro 1 in his illustration of the Poggio alla Sala burial. The Vigna Grande burial group is also problematic. This group consists of a bronze throne, table, and biconical urn. The chair and urn of the group, now in Copenhagen, differ somewhat from the drawings made prior to the museum's purchase of the artifacts. Stram

all of the equipment placed inside a large dolio or ziro (fig. 7)." Bronze and ceramic vessels usually completed the banquet service. Although these burials are dated to the end of the seventh century, they do not utilize the Chiusine cremation urn form standard for that period, the canopic urn. Instead, the urn is either biconical, or another typologically Villanovan form.27 The characterization of the urn is clear; not only does the urn represent the deceased, but the rest of the funerary arrangement characterizes the deceased at a banquet. In these Chiusine examples, the actual physical remains of the dead person are enthroned and present at the meal. This suggests that illustrations of seated banqueters from funerary contexts should also be understood as representing figures banqueting in death and not as idealized representations of figures banqueting as they may have in daily life. In recent studies examining the diffusion of banquet practices and motifs from the East into Etruria, the role of the Homeric epics has been emphasized as the medium of cultural cornm~nication.~~ According to Rathje, the practice of banqueting in aristocratic society was adopted as a way of emulating the heroic aristocrats described in the I Z d and the Odyssey with representations of seated banquets reflecting this cultural adoption. This view has recently been challenged, however, specifically with regard to the Ficana banquet service.2g is not my It intention to enter into a discussion of the social practice of the banquet, but rather to examine the use of banquet imagery in funerary contexts.
hints that this authentic chair and table may actually be associated with a bronze biconical urn now in Florence. This urn, which is authentic, was originally thought to be associated with a bronze throne and table that are now in Philadelphia, published by E. Hall-Dohan, "A Ziro Burial from Chiusi," AJA 39 (1935) 198-209, but generally accepted to be forgeries. It should also be noted that, according to Randall-MacIver (supra) 241, at least 20 other ziro burials were found within 200 m of the Dolciano burials. Unfortunately, a11 had been looted. Therefore, it seems likely that the number of seated banquet burial groups was originally much larger. 27 Cf. the Poggio alla Sala urn to the round-bodied amphora from the Monterozzi Tomba del Guerriero, H. Hencken, Tarquinia, Villanovans and Early Etruscans 1 (Cambridge 1968) 204 fig. c. 28 Rathje (supra n. 10) 279-88; A. Rathje, "A Banquet Service from the Latin City of Ficana," AmlRom 6-7 (1983) 7-29; Rathje, "Manners and Customs in Central Italy in the Orientalizing Period: Influence from the Near East," Acta Hyperborea 1 (1988) 8 1-90. 29 R.R. Holloway, The Archaeology of Early Rome and Latium (London 1994) 191-92, n. 3.

"

19941

VILLANOVAN RITUAL AND ETRUSCAN ICONOGRAPHY

623

Fig. 8. Tarquinia, Selciatello Sopra cemetery, grave 186. (After H. Hencken, Tarpinia, Villanovans and Early Etruscans 1 [Cambridge 19681 fig. 135, courtesy American School of Prehistoric Research)

The influence of the ritual and social practices of the Iron Age Villanovan period upon these Orientalizing Etruscan representations of seated banquets has hitherto been ignored. While it is possible that foreign models were used to express the idea of the funerary banquet as it is seen in the seated banquet representations, these models were adopted and manipulated because they could be used to express a concept already represented in many Villanovanperiod tomb groups. The most common type of Villanovan burial urn is the biconical ossuary. These ossuaries are usually handmade impasto and frequently decorated with incised and impressed geometric schemes. They typically have one horizontal handle attached to the lower belly. In cases where the urn is made and fired with two handles, one is almost always broken off prior to the burial. The cremated remains of the deceased were placed in the urn and the vessel was covered with a ceramic bowl. Less frequently, the urn was covered with a ceramic or bronze helmet (fig. 8). Biconical urn burials are not the only burial form found in Etruria during the Villanovan period. CreHencken (supra n. 27) vol. 2,462-64. Hencken (supra n. 27) vol. 2,640. R. Gempeler, Die etruskischen Kanopen. Herstellung, Ty-

mation burials employing urns in the shape of huts are also found, but these are far less common than biconical urns. Hut urns are more typical of the early Iron Age Latin burial ritual than that of E t r ~ r i aIn~addition to cremation, inhumation was . ~ also practiced at some sites alongside cremation by the Villanovan I1 period.31 In most regions, inhumation eventually became the standard practice by the end of the Villanovan period. The area around Chiusi is a noteworthy exception, employing the rite of cremation well into the Archaic p e r i ~ d . ~ * T h e biconical urn burials, however, are the most common as well as the most characteristically "Villanovan" of the Villanovan-period burial forms in Etruria. In the region of Chiusi during the Orientalizing and Archaic periods, cremated remains of the deceased were typically placed in a "canopic" urn, so called because these urns often had plastically rendered arms and were covered with lids shaped like heads. According to Gempeler, this type of anthropomorphization of burial urns is also evident in Villanovan tombs such as the Tarquinia Impiccato I1 burial, in which the urn was covered with a helmet.33
pologie, Entwicklungsgeschichte (Einsiedeln 1974) 25 1. 33 Gempeler (supra n. 32) 250.

3'
32

624

ANTHONY S. TUCK

[AJA 98

Fig. 9. Tarquinia, Impiccato cemetery, grave 11. Helmet with stylized face, front and back. (After H. Hencken, Tarquinia, Villanovans and Early Etruscans 1 [Cambridge 19681 fig. 159, courtesy American School of Prehistoric Research)

The helmet was decorated with a highly stylized face (fig. 9). According to Hencken's chronology, this grave falls in the Villanovan IIB stage, or ca. 750 B.C.34 Other examples of biconical urns with cephalomorphic covers, such as those from Saturnia and Vulci, discussed below, also indicate a conceptual link between the deceased and the burial urn already in existence in the Villanovan period.35 In the Impiccato I1 burial, a cap helmet functions as the cover, but also apparently anthropomorphizes the urn containing the deceased in a fashion similar to that seen in the Chiusine canopic burials. The examples of bronze and ceramic helmets covering urns suggest that we are to understand this covering as symbolizing the head of the deceased, since the bronze helmets themselves are worn on the head and the ceramic imitations obviously represent the same idea in a less expensive medium.36 Interestingly, some examples from the Cerveteri Sorbo cemetery appear to represent leather hats

rather than metal helmets, suggesting that any element worn on the head would be suitable to symbolize it.37 Furthermore, since the majority of helmets or hats used to cover urns are ceramic, it seems likely that they were produced specifically for the funerary ritual. Most biconical urn burials are not covered with bronze or ceramic helmets, however, but rather an inverted bowl. Like the burial urns, these cover bowls are typologically consistent and similar throughout the Villanovan period. They are typically open vessels with a single handle with base forms varying from flat to pedestal. Admittedly, it is more difficult to interpret these cover bowls as representations of the head of the deceased. Biconical urns from Saturnia and Vulci have been linked to the Chiusine practice of anthropomorphization, however, and are covered with bowls very similar to the standard bowl form, except that they have a round, ball-like projection at the base (fig. Possibly, the examples from Saturnia and Vulci represent the development of an idea inherent in the coverings for the biconical burials, that the cover, whether a helmet or bowl, symbolizes the head of the deceased. If we accept this premise, then it is further plausible that the urn is intended to represent the body. One dramatic example of this is mentioned by Randall-MacIver. A biconical urn was found in an excavation in Florence that was in every way like other biconical urns, except for the fact that it was half the usual size.39 The diminutive size of the urn, according to Randall-MacIver,was explained by the fact that the teeth of a child were found inside among the cremated remains.40 Therefore, it would seem that in this example the small size of the urn was related to the small size of the person it contained.

Hencken (supra n. 27) 172. Gempeler (supra n. 32) 250. Numerous examples of bronze figurines wearing Villanovan crested helmets indicate that these urn covers were helmets or intended to represent helmets. For examples of helmeted human figures, see H. Hencken, "Horse Tripods in Etruria," AJA 61 (1957) 1-4, figs. 1, 6-7; and E.H. Richardson, The Etruscans (Chicago 1976) fig. VI. 37 I. Pohl, The Iron Age Necropolis of Sorbo at Cerueteri (Stockholm 1972) 111-12. Pohl sees the upper portion of these urn covers as blends of the Latian tradition of urn covers imitating the roofs of huts, on the one hand, and helmeted burials, on the other. This blending of traditions is also seen on examples from Vulci and may be an infrequent southern Etrurian phenomenon.
34

35

"

3s For Saturnia: see L. Donati, "Un nuovo tipo di coperchio antropoide a Saturnia," in M.G. Marzi Costagli and L. Tamagno Perno eds., Studi di antichita in onore di Guglielmo Maetzke 2 (Rome 1984) 273-79; and L. Donati, Le tombe da Saturnia (Florence 1989) 38-39. For Vulci see E. Hall-Dohan, Italic Tomb Groups in the University Museum of Philadelphia (Philadelphia 1942) 81 nos. 3-4. Another similar example is now in the Villa Giulia: A.M. Fugazzola Delpino, La cultura villanoviana (Rome 1984) 73-74. Fugazzola Delpino suggests that this piece is from Vulci and there can be little doubt that it functioned in the same manner as the other examples cited. 39 Randall-MacIver (supra n. 26) 67. 40 Randall-MacIver (supra n. 26) 67.

VILLiNOlt4N RITUAL AND ETRUSCAN ICONOCR4PHY

625

Fig. 10. B~conicalu r n from Saturnla. (;\fter L. don at^. L2e Yhnhe da Sntcc~nza[Florence 19891 fig. 10)

Another example of this phenomenon is illustrated by an urn from Vulci, now in the Villa Giulia. This urn, like the example from Florence, is smaller than most biconical urns and covered with a helmetlike element. Oddly the knob of this cover is similar to the top of a hut urn, and resembles those mentioned previously from Cerveteri. Fugazzola Delpino theorizes that the size of the urn indicates that it was used for the interment of a child.41 According to Bartoloni, the customary burial practice for- infants at this time was inhumation in amphora^.^? Ridgway has noted a similar treatment of infant burials at Pithekoussai. He suggests that

infants, not yet regarded as full members of their community, were inhumed without strict observance of collective ritual and that such occasions were private matters.lYThe few examples of miniaturized biconical ossuaries were possibly children of socially prominent parents, thus explaining the different treatment of the child in the funerary ritual. If this were the case, however, we would expect to find more examples of such miniaturized urns. Until a similar urn is found in a secure context and the physical remains can be analyzed, such urns will remain enigmatic. Another element of this possible characterization of the urn as a human body comes from Tarquinia, the "Dolio with a Girdle with a Turtle" from the Monterozzi cemetery According to Hencken's description of this grave, a bronze girdle was found attached to the bronze ossuary.44 Bonfante is of the opinion that these "girdles" were worn by individuals as decorative belts.l"f this supposition is correct. then the presence of the girdle attached to the urn in the "Dolio with a Girdle with a Turtle" suggests that the urn was "dressed" in a manner like the fashion of the day. This possible dressing of the urn strongly implies that it was intended to symbolize the body of the deceased. Furthermore, Bonfante indicates that wrapping an image in cloth was a simple way of expressing the idea of a garment.4"t is therefore significant that the urn from brquinia, "Dolio with a Bronze Amphora and Bronze Pectoral," was wrapped in a brown ~ 1 0 t h . ~ ; Furthermore, it is interesting to note Schweitzer's comments about the significant debt owed to textile motifs in the development of Geometric decoration on Greek Iron Age potter): According to Schweitzer, most of the decorative motifs of the style are best explained as stemming from textile work. He states that "surely the character of the abstract surface style of decoration used in Early Geometric, clinging more and more to the tectonic structure of the vessel, like a garment, is best explained as being associated with a flourishing textile industr)i"l8 A reconstruction of a sixth-century B.C. garment from southwest Germany is decorated with woven motifs, the swastika and meander, both strikingly similar to the incised decoration cornmon on many

F ~ ~ g a z / oDelplno (iupra n 38) 75-76 la Bartolon~, cultu~a z l l n ~ ~ o v z anll'rn~zzo ~ l l u Ln v ~~a d ?torln et?rt\ca (Rome 1989) 3 1 4' Kidgwal (supra n 1) 52. 44 Hencken (supta n. 27) 192.
l'

LL

(r

$' Bonfante (s11p1-a n. 7) 22-23.

4"o~lfBnte (supra n. 7) 106.
li Hencken (supra n. 27) 198.
*". Schweitzer, Cheek (;eonwtric Arf (1.ondon 1971) 30.

Y S. TUCK

[AJA 98

Villanovan biconical urns." Barber has argued that the similarity of many Etruscan and Hallstatt woven motifs may be due to similar weaving practices.") Thus, if we are correct in seeing biconical urns as representing the deceased, then it is interesting that so many are decorated with incised geometric patterns similar to woven motifs. Although most Villanovan-period ceramics are decorated with such designs, perhaps upon a humanoid urn the incision was intended to represent a garment. live further examples from Vulci are also revealing. O n one example of an otherwise ordinary biconical urn, two raised knobs have been placed on the upper portion of the vessel, perhaps indicating breasts." From the Cavalupo necropolis, we have an example of a biconical urn adorned with a bronze necklace and pendant, hung around the neck of the vessel.j9 .As mentioned above, one unusual characteristic of the vast majority of biconical urn burials is the single handle. Usually, the handle is horizontal, but a few examples of urns exist with single vertical handles. In several instances, the urn is fired with two handles, but one is broken off before the funeral deposition. T h e consistency of this phenomenon suggests a ritual purpose to either the production of the urn with a single handle or to the breaking off of one of the handles. If we are correct in viewing the urn and the cover as symbolic representations of the deceased, then it is possible that breaking off one handle may have served ritually to disable or cripple the urn, or perhaps to lend a sense of finality to the deposition. The cases of urns produced with one handle may reflect a belief that producing the urn with one handle served the same function as breaking one handle off before the burial deposition. This practice, however, remains enigmatic.

In the majority of examples, the burial urn and cover are not the only ceramics found in these burials. Drinking cups, libation bowls, jugs, doublebodied cups, askoi, ceramic stands, plates, and small urns are all commonly associated with these burials. Unlike imported pottery, there is no reason to assume that these locally produced forms were highly valued intrinsically or that they represent prestige goods. Therefore, it is reasonable to argue that these ceramics were included in the burials because of some role they played in the ritual of the interment. Examples of such funerary assemblages are found at several sites, such as tombs 284, 299, and 32 1 from the Sorbo cemetery,"' tombs 25,5 1 , and 66 from Vulci," tombs 31 and 37 from the necropolis of Scuole Medie di Castenaso," several groups from Veii,"as well as numerous examples from Tarcpinia. IVhile a large number of these biconical urn burials do contain secondary ceramics of this nature, it must be pointed out that not all do. Some examples contain only the urn and cover, while some also include fibulae or other metal items with the urn. A large majority of biconical urn burials contain secondary ceramics, however, most ofwhich tend to be similar in form from tomb to tomb. Although assigning specific functions to vessel it types can be problen~atic, seems that these ceramic types can be generally characterized as pertaining to the serving and consumption of food and drink, especially the jugs, cups, and plates.'; Ceramic tomb groups consisting of the biconical urn, cover, and secondary ceramics relating to food consumption are found consistently throughout the chronological series of Villanovan burials at several sites.j8 The inclusion of pottery in burials is a common aspect of funeral customs all over the world. These Villanovan burials are distinctive, however, in that

49 E J M' Barber, Prehzcto~zc Extzlec Ihe DeveloFrnent of and Cloth 1n the ~Veolzth~c Bronze Age\ (Princeton 199 1) 189 "" Barbel (supra n 49) 194 " F Delplno, "Element1 antropomorfi In corredl \]Ilano\lanl," In L Olschkl ed , La clvilta urcalcn dl Vulcl e la l m a e~punrione(Florence 1977) 177, argues that s e ~ e r a of the examples clted abo\e, especlall\ the urn co\ers vlth rounded prolect~onsfrom Saturnla and Vulcl, are "precanopic" in their attempts to "humanize" the cineEary urn. M'hile I fully agree with this analysis, I would suggest that his examples and the others cited above indicate that such anthropomorphic tendencies are developments of the coherent, preexisting theme that the biconical ossuary and cover was, by itself, intended to symbolize the deceased '' F Roncalll, "Carte," In G P Carratel11 ed , Rusenna, Stona e rzz111t~ degll Elru\clzi (Mllan 1986) 547, figs 452-53

""oh1 (supra n . 37) 77-82, 177.

j4 Hall-Dohan (supra n. 38) 81-88.
-. '" E. Silvestri, in L a necropoli 7iillano.c~inna Ca' del1'0~-60
di (Bologna 1979) 80-82,84-87. jVJ. Palm, "Veiian Tomb Groups in the Museo Prehist o r i c ~Rome," OpArrh 7 (1952) 70-7 1. , j ' For a breakdown of the typology of ceramic forms found at Tarquinia, see ~ e n c k e n(supra n. 27) suppl. charts 2-6. E.g., Hencken (supra n. 27) 35. Selciatello grave 8 contained a biconical urn, cover bowl, drinking cup, two jugs, a ceramic "boat" (which Hencken suggests is a lamp but could also be a shallow pitcher), and ceramic stand. T h e last of these types seems to be connected specifically to eating in later Etruscan contexts. This grave is placed by Hencken in the Villanovan 1'4 period, therefore one of the earliest in his chronological series at Tarquinia.

"

19941

VILWKOVAK RITUAL AND ETRUSCAK ICONOGWPHY

627

the cremation urn was apparently intended to symbolize the dead person it contained. These humanoid ceramic representations were also surrounded by other ceramics that pertain to the consumption of food and drink. The representation of the deceased surrounded by dining equipment thus suggests that the dead were intended to be shown at a meal. Therefore, it seems that the idea of the deceased at a funerary meal, although represented differently is similar in both its Villanovan and Orientalizing-period manifestations. Moreover, several elements of the later Etruscan seated banquet funerary iconography reflect Villanovan influence. For example, the Montescudaio urn is itself biconical. Hencken also points out that the table on the lid is a tripod, similar to several examples of tripods found in earlier, Villanovan burials from Tarquinia."The urns used in the Chiusine seated banquet burials are either biconical or are typologically consistent with Villanovan forms. According to Zuffa, the type 1A chaire0that is associated with the Dolciano Tomb of the Throne burial has Villanovan parallels as well." Finally, the urn in the Poggio alla Sala burial was wrapped in a cloth, a practice that, as mentioned above, also occurs in the Villanovan This interpretation of banquet imagery in numerous Villanovan tomb groups perhaps offers an insight into an anomalous aspect of many later Etruscan reclining banquet scenes, the participation of women reclining with men. As many scholars have observed, the symposium of Archaic Greek society was an aspect of social and political life dominated by men. When women are depicted, the scenes are either fanciful or the women are relegated to roles such as flute girl or prostitute." The

contrast with many Etruscan scenes of couples reclining at a banquet, without any indication that the women are of inferior status, is striking. As Bonfante has persuasively argued, the aristocratic political structure of Etruscan city states helps to explain this treatment of women in Etruscan art." artistic emphasis on husband and wife as well as mother and child is logical in an aristocratic society, given the political need to focus on aspects of the family its stability, and its perpetuation. This emphasis is especially evident in funerary iconography, when the stability of the family is most at risk with the death of one of its members. It is also possible, however, that the representation of banquet imagery in so many Villanovan-period tombs reveals another stimulus for the inclusion of women in later Etruscan banquet scenes, both seated and reclining. While it is always problematic to rely solely on objects deposited in the grave to determine the sex of the individual, the state of the cremated remains of many Villanovan tombs leaves few alternatives. For example, if we are correct in assuming the bronze belts found in some Villanovan 11 graves were worn by women, as Bonfante suggests,b5 then their inclusion in a tomb strongly encourages us to assume that we are dealing with the burial of a woman. In a grave such as the "Dolio with the Girdle with a Turtle," where a belt was attached to the urn and the grave also included eating equipment, the idea of a funerary meal is expressed. This implies, or at least strongly suggests, the same conceptualization of the afterlife for both men and women in these Villanovan tombs, which perhaps finds new expression in later banquet scenes such as the Tomb of the Five Chairs and in later Archaic-period reclining banquet scenes of a funerary nature.b6

Hencken (supra n. 27) vol. 2, 586. This designation refers to the furniture typology established by S. Steingraber, Elruski~cheMohrl (Rome 1979) 5-55. ' 5 . Zu&, "Trono miniaturistico da Verrucchio," in G. Camporeale ed., Studi in onore di Luisa Bnnli (Rome 1965) 351-55. "' Cf. Bianchi Banclinelli (supra n. 26) 396, Poggio alla Sala; and Hencken (supra n. 27) 198, "Dolio with a Bronze Amphora and Bronze Pectoral." "W. Murray, Mary Flexner Lecture Series, Bryn Mawr College, 1992 (publication forthcoming). (j4 Bonfante (supra n. 18) 323-42. 'j-onfante (supra n. 7) 23 states that bronze belts of this type were usually found in the graves of women and are clearly worn by women in later figured scenes from the more conservative regions to the north of Etruria
j ' '
"(I

"

proper. De Marinis (supra n. 2) 116-17 sees a tripartite division into the artistic regions of Chiusi, Fiesole, and Tarquinia of Archaic-period representations of reclining banquet scenes. \Vomen are only represented reclining with men in those representations from the artistic orbit of Tarquinia. J.P Small, "The Banquet Frieze from Poggio Civitate," StEtr 39 (1971) 60, however, has suggested that women are depicted on the banquet frieze plaques from Murlo, which are the earliest certain surviving repre- sentations of a reclining banquet in Etruscan art and generally thought to fall under the artistic influence of Chiusi. T h e Murlo friezes are non-funerary and therefore ancillary to the question at hand, but it is interesting that Etruscan reclining banquet scenes show this tendency from a very early point.

"

628

A.S. TUCK, VILLANOVAK RITUAL AND ETRUSCAN ICONOGRAPHY

In conclusion, it seems that the representation of the seated banquet in the Orientalizing period has conceptual roots in the burial practices of the Villanovan period. Within the rapidly changing sphere of Orientalizing Etruria, the adoption and development of the motif of the seated figure was used to express a preexisting idea of the deceased at a funerary meal. The widespread thematic expression of the dead at a meal in Villanovan contexts helps to

explain the pervasive use of the iconography of the funerary banquet in tombs throughout Etruria from the Archaic period onward.
C E N T E R FOR O L D W O R L D ARCHAEOLOGY A N D ART BROWN UNIVERSITY PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND

0291 2

STOOOO52@BROWNVM.BROWN.EDU