Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Study Habits Presentation Rubric
Study Habits Presentation Rubric
CATEGORY Requirements 4--Excellent Work All requirements are met and exceeded. Source information collected for all graphics, facts and quotes. All documented in desired format. Has at least 2 outside sources. 3--Good Work All requirements are met. Source information collected for all graphics, facts and quotes. Most documented in desired format. Has at least 1 outside source. Includes essential knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge appears to be good. Rehearsed/Developed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audience attention most of the time. Makes good use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance to presentation. Uses headings or bulleted lists to organize, but the overall organization of topics appears flawed. Rough draft brought on due date. Student shares with peer and peer makes edits. 2--Needs Improvement One requirement was not completely met. Source information collected for graphics, facts and quotes, but not documented in desired format. Has at least 1 outside source. 1--Unacceptable Work More than one requirement was not completely met. Very little or no source information was collected.
Sources
Content
Covers topic in-depth with details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent.
Includes essential information about the topic but there are 12 factual errors.
Presentation
Delivery not smooth, but able to maintain interest of the audience most of the time.
Attractiveness
Makes excellent use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance the presentation. Content is well organized using headings or bulleted lists to group related material.
Makes use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. but occasionally these detract from the presentation content. Content is logically organized for the most part.
Use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. but these often distract from the presentation content. There was no clear or logical organizational structure, just lots of facts.
Organization
Rough Draft
Rough draft brought on due date. Student shares with peer and extensively edits based on peer feedback. Product shows a large amount of original thought. Ideas are creative and inventive.
Provides feedback and/or edits for peer, but own rough draft was not ready for editing.
Rough draft not ready for editing and did not participate in reviewing draft of peer.
Originality
Product shows some original thought. Work shows new ideas and insights.
Uses other people's ideas (giving them credit), but there is little evidence of original thinking.
Uses other people's ideas, but does not give them credit.