Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Form 990 Vs Audited Financials
Form 990 Vs Audited Financials
Agenda
Why are we here? What are the major differences between Form 990 and Audited Financial Statements (AFS) reporting? How are the Form 990 and AFS similar? Tips on presenting to Boards
1
www.tatetryon.com
www.tatetryon.com
Many do not know that a 990 is even filed (& readily available to the public @ Guidestar.org) Audited Financial Statements (AFS) and the 990 are viewed as part of the same process. 990 is just similar enough to the AFS to appear the same.
3
www.tatetryon.com
Primary audience is Audit Committee, Board, and third-party users. Attempts to present an entitys economic reality at a point in time. Complete managerial transparency is not really the goal. as the reporting framework.
Primary audience is third-party users even those without any economic interest in the entity! Serves as a tax-compliance check-up to alert the IRS to potential problems. Transparency regarding basic governance practices and transactions with interested parties is a key focus. Uses a unique blend of GAAP and tax-basis accounting as the reporting framework.
5
www.tatetryon.com
www.tatetryon.com
GAAP mandates that investments be reported at fair value with the corresponding unrealized gain/loss reflected in net income. 990 follows basic tax accounting unrealized investment gains/losses are not reflected in net income. However, total net assets per AFS and 990 generally agree. This causes confusion at first glance.
7
www.tatetryon.com
Notice how the Revenue less expenses on line 19 does not equal the actual Change in net assets on line 22.
8
www.tatetryon.com
Fundamental difference between GAAP accounting and tax accounting. Under GAAPs economic reality presentation, inkind services are no different from any other type of contribution. (Subject to certain criteria.) Tax accounting precludes including in-kind services in an entitys revenue and expense. Well-designed Charts of Accounts are helpful.
9
www.tatetryon.com
www.tatetryon.com
10
Concern over valuation? Could contributed services skew program vs. supporting service expense ratios? Would contributed services muddy the calculation of gross receipts? Would contributed services make the tedious Schedule A support tests even more painful?
www.tatetryon.com
11
This causes headaches for support test calculations and also for fund raising ratios. Auditors often look at grants differently from tax accountants. A wonderfully gray area leading to scintillating debates!
www.tatetryon.com
12
GAAP states that unconditional promises to give should be recognized as temporarily restricted revenue during the period the promise is made. However, many auditors take the position that a grant agreement containing performance milestones is not a truly unconditional promise to give. As a result, grant revenue may actually be recognized over time as benchmarks are met.
13
www.tatetryon.com
To cause further confusion, there may be some debate as to which line of Form 990, Part VIII should be used to record the grant revenue. This comes up most commonly with Government awards even though GAAP explicitly says the analysis should be the same Is it a Contribution or an Exchange transaction?
www.tatetryon.com
www.tatetryon.com
15
.includes donations, gifts, bequests, grants, and other transfers of money or property to the extent that adequate consideration is not provided in exchange and that the contributor intends to make a gift, whether or not made for charitable purposes. A transaction can be partly a sale and partly a contribution.
www.tatetryon.com 16
The revenue recognition and classification is important for Schedule A and donor perceptions. Exchange transactions have a different, usually less favorable, impact on a charitys public support test. Fund raising expenses incurred to obtain the grant may be recognized by AFS in a different period from the revenue this can make fund raising costs appear high. (990 provides some wiggle room.)
17
www.tatetryon.com
www.tatetryon.com
18
www.tatetryon.com
19
GAAP generally takes a very dim view of reporting revenues and expenses at net. The 990 stipulates that certain items should be presented at net. As a result, total revenue and expense shown on the 990 and the AFS will often be different.
www.tatetryon.com
20
The reporting of fund raising events seems to be the most painful. First, the 990 wants the contribution component of the funds generated shown separately from the events earned revenue. Second, the 990 wants direct expenses related to the event netted against the direct revenues. Most AFS dont show things this way!
21
www.tatetryon.com
Other items for which the 990 mandates net reporting are:
Rental income & expense Sales of securities & other assets Sales of inventory Gaming revenue
www.tatetryon.com
22
www.tatetryon.com
23
Investment management fees the exception that proves the rule! For audit purposes, many entities show investment income net of management fees. However, the 990 mandates the reporting of investment management fees as an expense and reporting investment income at gross.
www.tatetryon.com
24
Problem #1 compensation details reported on a calendar year basis. Big-time confusion for fiscal year-end entities! Same deal as #1 above for reporting independent contractor payments. The Form 990s definition of compensation may not be intuitive to all Board members.
www.tatetryon.com
25
www.tatetryon.com
26
Explaining the reporting of deferred compensation plans is a real treat. 990 requires reporting deferred compensation earned during the period as a component of an individuals total compensation package. (This includes increases or decreases in the actuarial value of defined benefit plans.) For AFS purposes, the accrual of deferred compensation plan expenses can be a gray area and lead to differences with the 990.
27
www.tatetryon.com
www.tatetryon.com
www.tatetryon.com
29
The 990 reporting for financial statement restatements was quite clunky it has gotten better with the introduction of Part XI to the core form:
www.tatetryon.com
30
Consolidated vs. Separate Entity reporting for AFS and 990 causes more confusion than youd think. Schedule R is a good memory jogger for Board members regarding what entities exist and how they relate to each other.
www.tatetryon.com
31
www.tatetryon.com
32
www.tatetryon.com
33
www.tatetryon.com
34
The 990 uses a mix of GAAP & tax accounting, so GAAP is the fundamental building block for the 990. Functional expense allocations for joint activities (the standard formerly known as SOP 98-2) are usually the same between the AFS and 990. Endowment reporting required on Schedule D usually mirrors the data from the AFS footnote. The balance sheet usually ties nicely between AFS and 990.
35
www.tatetryon.com
www.tatetryon.com
36
(Handy tip be sure the Board gets these documents before the meeting!)
www.tatetryon.com
37
Start with the Required Communications Letter (RCL) first. This often takes the suspense out of the room.
Covers major changes in accounting principles Covers highly subjective or soft financial statement values Covers major footnotes to the AFS
Move next to the Management Letter (ML). Internal control is what Boards really want to talk about!
38
www.tatetryon.com
After the RCL and ML, most of the big issues should be dealt with. Cover the auditors opinion. Make sure Board understands the flow of restricted activities on the Statement of Financial Position and Statement of Activities. Hit any other truly odd recording/presentational items.
39
www.tatetryon.com
Most Boards are interested in a 30,000 foot overview of the Form 990 not necessarily a page by page review of the Form Make certain the pages of the Form 990 are numbered! Generally, it is best to cover the highlights of the Form, which include the following:
Governance, Management, and Disclosure Part VI Compensation Part VII (and Schedule J, if applicable) Schedule O Supplemental Information Schedule L Transactions with Interested Persons (if applicable)
40
www.tatetryon.com
Statement of Program Services Part III Statement of Functional Expenses Part IX Schedule A Public Charity Status and Public Support Schedule D Part V Endowment Funds
www.tatetryon.com
If there are any heartburn-inducing answers to tax compliance questions on Part V, or Governance disclosures in Part VI, be ready to talk about them! Plan ahead to explain differences in total income and total expense:
Provide a tailored overview of how Part XI of Schedule D navigates from the 990 to the AFS.
www.tatetryon.com
42
www.tatetryon.com
43
Speaker Biography
Douglas Boedeker, is a partner within Tate & Tryons Audit and Assurance Services unit and is also actively involved in the Firm's exempt organization tax services group. He has 20 years of experience providing an array of audit, tax, and consulting services to a variety of nonprofit organizations and employee benefit plans. He takes particular pride that his family has contained at least one CPA every year since 1923. Doug graduated summa cum laude from Susquehanna University in Selinsgrove, Pennsylvania with a Bachelor of Science degree in accounting while simultaneously completing the coursework for a second major in arts administration. Doug is a frequent speaker on a variety of exempt organization tax issues and the Form 990. He recently presented a session on easing the 990 preparation process for CFOs and auditors at the 2011 AICPA Not for Profit Industry Conference. Doug is a coauthor to Guide to the Newest IRS Form 990: Interpreting and Complying with the New Tax Reporting Requirements for Transparency and Accountability, (published by ASAE).
www.tatetryon.com
Doug Boedeker, CPA, CMA Audit Partner Tate & Tryon Direct: 202-419-5106 dboedeker@tatetryon.com
44
Speaker Biography
Fred Longwood is a manager in the Firm's Exempt Organization Tax Department with over 15 years of experience working with a broad range of tax-exempt organizations including research and educational organizations, public charities, civic leagues, membership organizations, and private foundations. Mr. Longwood has advised exempt organizations on a variety of issues including Taxation of employee benefit plans, intermediate sanctions, unrelated business income tax, and taxable subsidiaries. In addition to his exempt organization advisory and compliance experience, Mr. Longwood participated in the "Preparing for the new Form 990," Tate & Tryon client seminar series held October 2008 and March 2009 highlighting the changes to the Form 990 and was also a coauthor of the "Guide to the Newest IRS Form 990: Interpreting and Complying with the New Tax Reporting Requirements for Transparency and Accountability," (published by ASAE). Fred is a member of the American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) and the Greater Washington Society of CPAs (GWSCPA).
Fred Longwood, CPA Tax Manager Tate & Tryon Direct: 202-419-5116 flongwood@tatetryon.com
www.tatetryon.com
45