The document discusses the proposed Mining Rehabilitation Fund (MRF) model in Western Australia. It aims to address the unsustainable costs to the government of rehabilitating abandoned mine sites by establishing a fund supported by annual levies paid by mining tenement holders. Key points covered include:
- The MRF will provide secure ongoing funding for the state to rehabilitate abandoned mines and cover administrative costs.
- Most mining tenement holders will be required to pay an annual levy based on their estimated closure liability costs.
- The levies are intended to start at 1% of estimated closure costs and collect $33-45 million in the first year, growing the fund to $102-
The document discusses the proposed Mining Rehabilitation Fund (MRF) model in Western Australia. It aims to address the unsustainable costs to the government of rehabilitating abandoned mine sites by establishing a fund supported by annual levies paid by mining tenement holders. Key points covered include:
- The MRF will provide secure ongoing funding for the state to rehabilitate abandoned mines and cover administrative costs.
- Most mining tenement holders will be required to pay an annual levy based on their estimated closure liability costs.
- The levies are intended to start at 1% of estimated closure costs and collect $33-45 million in the first year, growing the fund to $102-
The document discusses the proposed Mining Rehabilitation Fund (MRF) model in Western Australia. It aims to address the unsustainable costs to the government of rehabilitating abandoned mine sites by establishing a fund supported by annual levies paid by mining tenement holders. Key points covered include:
- The MRF will provide secure ongoing funding for the state to rehabilitate abandoned mines and cover administrative costs.
- Most mining tenement holders will be required to pay an annual levy based on their estimated closure liability costs.
- The levies are intended to start at 1% of estimated closure costs and collect $33-45 million in the first year, growing the fund to $102-
Mineral Titles Government of Western AustraIia Department of Mines and PetroIeum Environment Government of Western AustraIia Department of Mines and PetroIeum Petroleum Government of Western AustraIia Department of Mines and PetroIeum Mining Rehabilitation Fund (MRF) www.dmp.wa.gov.au Questions & Answers The Mining Rehabilitation Fund (MRF) Model 1. Why do we need to move from the current mining security bonds system to the new MRF model? The principal objective of a mining securities system is to ensure that suffcient funds are available to government to rehabilitate mine sites in the event that operators do not fulfl their mine rehabilitation and closure obligations. Mining security bonds, otherwise known as environmental bonds or unconditional performance bonds, were originally introduced in the late 1980s as added assurance against companies failing to adequately rehabilitate mine sites. Whilst the mining security bonds system cover a proportion of mine rehabilitation costs, the Government would need to contribute the majority, and this is unsustainable. However, mining operators have expressed concern that increasing bonds to cover the full cost of rehabilitation would have a fnancial impact on the mining sector. The MRF will secure ongoing funding for the State to rehabilitate abandoned mine sites in Western Australia, and fund the cost of administration. This model was chosen following extensive consultation with industry, Government and conservation/community stakeholders. 2. What are the benefts of the MRF? The MRF enhances the States ongoing capacity to manage and rehabilitate abandoned mines, leading to better environmental and community safety outcomes. 3. How is the Mining Rehabilitation Fund (MRF) structured? The Mining Rehabilitation Fund (MRF) is a special purpose account under the Financial Management Act 2006. Most holders of mining tenements under the Mining Act 1978 will be required to pay a levy into the Fund, with the exception of tenements covered by State Agreements, and tenements with closure liability estimates below a threshold. The levy will consist of annual Fund contributions, calculated as a percentage likely initially to be 1% of each tenements closure liability estimate. The closure liability estimate for a tenement will be assessed in accordance with a per-hectare levy calculator (currently being developed). 4. What is the States current fnancial exposure to abandoned mines? It is estimated that the Governments current liability for rehabilitating existing abandoned mines exceeds $100 million. In addition, there are around 300 sites currently on care and maintenance (i.e. not operating, but where companies still hold the tenements). A number of these sites are likely to be abandoned over the next decade, which would add to the governments liability. 5. What is happening with the existing security bond policy? The MRF legislation does not make any changes to the Mining Act 1978, and environmental security bonds can still be applied to any Mining Act tenements in accordance with that Act. The Ministerial Advisory Panel on Reforming Environmental Regulation (MAP), which includes representatives from industry, community and government, will provide advice to the Minister by the end of 2012 on the development and implementation of compliance measures in the environmental regulatory framework within the mining portfolio. This will include advice on the security bond policy. Any changes to environmental securities or other compliance mechanisms will be undertaken in a separate legislative package. www.dmp.wa.gov.au Consultation 6. What consultation has been undertaken? An extensive and ongoing consultation program commenced in mid-2010. This included consultation with industry peak bodies, community/conservation stakeholders, and other Government agencies. Stakeholders have representatives on Ministerial Advisory Panel on Reforming Environmental Regulation, which is providing advice to the Minister on the MRF as part of a wider environmental reform program. Further consultation and regional briefngs will be undertaken regarding the MRF regulations and the reform process. Who is included in the MRF? 7. Who is liable to pay the MRF levy? It will be a legal requirement for most tenement holders operating on Mining Act tenure to provide annual levy contributions to the MRF. Penalties apply for non-payment. The tenement holder who holds the mining tenement on the due date for data submission is liable to pay the levy for that year. This liability and any penalty amount accruing because of late payment, remains with that tenement holder even if the tenement is transferred after the due date. If a tenement is transferred after the due date, adjustments for levy payment are a matter for the parties to the transaction to negotiate. 8. Will State Agreements be included in the MRF levy system? Mining tenements held by State Agreement proponents can be included in the levy system, if they are specifcally identifed in a Schedule to the MRF Regulations. This will cover both existing and new State Agreements. Existing State Agreement tenements will only be included in the Schedule to the MRF Regulations following close consideration of the effects of the applicable State Agreement Act, consultation with the proponents and stakeholders, and Government approval of their inclusion. 9. Will uranium mines be included in the MRF? Like all other mining operations, uranium mines will be included in the MRF. 10. Will care and maintenance mine sites be included in the MRF? Holders of tenements that are in care and maintenance will be required to pay into the MRF in the same way as operational sites. 11. Will petroleum and geothermal energy activities be included in the MRF? Petroleum and geothermal energy activities are not included in the MRF as they do not operate on Mining Act titles. The Petroleum Division of the Department of Mines and Petroleum will continue to follow existing processes when dealing with environmental rehabilitation for petroleum and geothermal energy activities. 12. How does the MRF link to obligations under the Contaminated Sites Act? The obligation to pay levies into the Fund is independent of any obligations under the Contaminated Sites Act 2003 (CSA). Classifcation of sites as contaminated under the CSA is a matter for the CEO of the Department of Environment and Conservation, and any responsibility for remediating sites arising under the CSA is in addition to environmental responsibilities arising because of mining approvals or tenement conditions. The extent of any responsibility under the CSA which can extend to directors of insolvent bodies corporate would be a factor taken into consideration when making decisions about declaring land to be an abandoned mine or expending Fund money on the rehabilitation of an abandoned mine How the MRF will work 13. What is the Mining Rehabilitation Advisory Panel? A Mining Rehabilitation Advisory Panel (MRAP) will be established under the MRF legislation. This statutory panel will provide advice to the Director General of the Department of Mines and Petroleum on MRF matters. The Ministerial Advisory Panel on Reforming Environmental Regulation will provide advice as to the role and constitution of MRAP. These details will be formalised in regulations to be made under the new MRF Act. 14. How will the levy amount be calculated? Tenement holders will be required to submit data to the department on the number of hectares of disturbed land in each tenement. This is then assessed against criteria, currently under development, which approximate the cost in dollars per hectare to rehabilitate the disturbed land to provide an equitable basis for levy calculation. These amounts are then totalled to determine the closure liability estimate. The levy will be charged annually at a percentage, likely initially to be set at 1% of the closure liability estimate. Mining tenements with a closure liability estimate below a threshold, likely initially to be set at $20,000, will not be charged a levy. Per-hectare dollar amounts, the levy percentage, and the threshold will be set in regulations to be made under the new Act and will be the subject of further consultation. 15. Will the MRF be tenement or project based? Contributions to the MRF will be on a per tenement basis. However, mining tenements may include more than one mining project, and mining projects may also cover more than one tenement. 16. When will the annual MRF levy commence? Subject to parliamentary processes, it is anticipated that the MRF levy will commence from 1 July 2013. All tenement holders levy liabilities will be assessed annually, as of the due date for data, and Notices of Assessment will be sent, specifying the date on which the levy payment is due. The due date for payment will not be less than 30 days from the date of the Notice of Assessment. www.dmp.wa.gov.au 17. How much money will the MRF collect? While the levy calculator is still being developed, it is estimated that the levy contributions will collect between $33 million and $45 million during 2013/14. By 2015/16, the capital component of the Fund will increase to between $102 million and $161 million. The MRF account balance and levy percentage will be monitored to ensure that the Fund is appropriately managed to meet current and emerging rehabilitation liabilities, as well as administrative costs, without accruing excessive surplus funds. 18. What can MRF money be spent on? As the MRF is a special purpose account under the under the Financial Management Act 2006, funds must be spent in accordance with the purpose stated in the MRF legislation. The principal amount will only be able to be spent on rehabilitating abandoned mines, and affected land, where payments have been, or should have been, made into the Fund. Interest earned on the principal amount will be able to be spent on: rehabilitatinglandaffectedasaresultofmining operations on mine sites abandoned before or after the establishment of the Fund; administeringtheFund,includingenforcingthe new legislation; and fundingprogramsorinformationrelatingtomine site rehabilitation. 19. Can the MRF be spent on rehabilitation work outside the boundary of declared abandoned mine land? Yes. The effect of an abandoned facility such as a tailings dam on the environment may extend beyond the boundaries of the abandoned mine, and the legislation provides for expenditure from the Fund to rehabilitate affected land. 20. How will MRF administration be staffed and funded within the department? Additional staff will be employed by the department as required to manage administration of the MRF. A proportion of existing staff resources from support areas within the department will also be used in the administration and auditing of the MRF. MRF administration costs will be fully funded out of the interest earned on the Fund. 21. Will the MRF cause additional administrative burdens upon industry? There will be a minimal administrative impact. However, information required for levy assessments will be closely related to information already submitted by many operators in Annual Environmental Reports to the department. 22. How and when does data need to be submitted? Tenement holders will be able to submit data to the department electronically via an online lodgement facility. Data will need to be entered into the system annually by a due date which will be set in the MRF regulations. Levy data can be amended or updated at any time prior to the due date. Tenement holders who are required to submit an Annual Environmental Report (AER) to the department may submit levy data with their AER, provided that the levy data is received by the due date. 23. What if the data submitted is incorrect or late? If a tenement holder realises that incorrect data has been lodged prior to the due date for data, the tenement holder can amend the data themselves. The Act will provide several mechanisms for correcting an error recognised after the due date, including reassessment of a levy amount on the CEOs initiative, lodgement of objections by tenement holders, and a SAT review for a tenement holder unsatisfed with the determination of an objection. It will be an offence to knowingly provide false or misleading information. It will be an offence not to submit information by the prescribed date. An infringement notice may be issued and penalties will apply. The CEO may estimate the levy amount, to enable a Notice of Assessment to be issued. The CEO will have the power under the legislation to require a person to provide information or documents or answer questions. 24. How long do we need to keep records for the MRF levy? Two years (for MRF purposes only; other record-keeping requirements may apply). This timeframe is consistent with similar legislation administered by the department. Levy Payment 25. What payment types will be accepted (e.g. EFT, cheque, credit card)? The department can only accept payment by EFT (Electronic Funds Transfer) or cheque. 26. Will part payments be accepted? Only full payment of the MRF levy can be accepted. Part payments will be treated as late payments. 27. How long do tenement holders have to pay the Notice of Assessment? The due date for payment will be specifed in the Notice of Assessment and will not be less than 30 days after the date of the Notice. The legislation does not include any provision for extensions of payment time. www.dmp.wa.gov.au DMPAUG12_122046 28. Are there penalties for late payment of the Notice of Assessment? Late payments will incur penalty interest (simple interest, not compounding) at a rate to be set in the regulations, likely to be 20% per annum. The department will also have the capacity to recover unpaid levies and penalty amounts in court. Penalties will only be waived if the CEO considers that there are good reasons for doing so. 29. Can the MRF levy be waived? There is no provision to waive the MRF levy. 30. What if the Notice of Assessment is incorrect? Formal objections can only be made to the CEO upon receipt of a levy Notice of Assessment or Notice of Reassessment, through the objections process specifed in the MRF levy legislation. When an objection is lodged, the CEO will review the classifcation and advise the outcome of this review. If a person is still dissatisfed with the CEOs decision on an objection, they may apply to the State Administrative Tribunal for a review of the decision. 31. Can we pay multiple Notices of Assessment with one cheque/EFT payment? It is preferred that Notices of Assessment are paid individually. There could be administrative processing delays and issues if clear and specifc instructions are not provided. 32. Does GST apply? GST does not apply to the MRF levy. Abandoned Mines & Rehabilitation 33. What is an abandoned mine, and what are the declaration criteria? Before the CEO can declare land to be an abandoned mine, the CEO must be satisfed that mining operations have been carried out on the land and have ceased. Criteria for declaration of an abandoned mine are yet to be determined, and will be applied fexibly on a case- by-case basis. However, consideration is likely to include matters such as the value of any remaining resources, heritage and scientifc value, safety and environmental issues. An abandoned mine may occupy part or all of an existing mining tenement or may be on land that is no longer, or (in the case of some pre-1904 Act mining sites) never has been, the subject of a tenement. Declaration of land as an abandoned mine means only that money can be spent from the Fund to rehabilitate the abandoned mine or affected land. It does not guarantee that all or part of the lands rehabilitation will be funded. 34. How are abandoned mines prioritised for rehabilitation? The process for prioritisation of abandoned mines is yet to be determined. However, it is likely to consider similar criteria to those used to declare an abandoned mine (see number 33). 35. Who will be undertaking the mine site rehabilitation? It is intended that the actual task of rehabilitation will be undertaken by contractors. The department will be responsible for managing and monitoring the rehabilitation of sites declared as abandoned mines, acting in accordance with procurement guidelines and Government contracting best practice. 36. How is the department going to ensure mining companies rehabilitate their sites? The department is currently working with the Ministerial Advisory Panel on Reforming Environmental Regulation on appropriate compliance measures and penalties to deter unlawful behaviour, including abandoning mine sites without meeting rehabilitation and closure obligations. Unconditional performance bonds can still be applied at any time. The department recognises that an effective and robust compliance system is critical for maintaining community, industry and government confdence in the regulation of mining, including abandoned mines and mine site rehabilitation. 37. How long will it take to rehabilitate all abandoned mine sites? Mine site rehabilitation in Western Australia will be an ongoing process. Auditing and Transparency 38. What reporting and transparency programs are being implemented for the administration of the MRF? The Fund will be subject to public scrutiny as part of the departments statutory reporting requirements. It will also be subject to audit by the Offce of the Auditor General. 39. How will you ensure that mining companies submit accurate data? The department will audit selected sites and take enforcement action for any false or misleading submissions. 40. What level of public reporting will occur on the MRF? Industry, community and Government stakeholders are currently being consulted on the transparent reporting requirements for the MRF, via the Ministerial Advisory Panel on Reforming Environmental Regulation. The Fund will also be subject to public scrutiny as part of the departments statutory reporting requirements.