Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ontario - Institutional Vision, Proposed Mandate Statement and Priority Objectives - University of Guelph
Ontario - Institutional Vision, Proposed Mandate Statement and Priority Objectives - University of Guelph
-1-
University of Guelph
University of Guelph
http://www.21c.uoguelph.ca Robert C. Dickeson, Prioritizing Academic Programs and Services: Reallocating Resources to Achieve Strategic Balance (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2010)
2
-3-
University of Guelph
Redesign large first-year courses for enhanced productivity and learning: Guelph already leads the system in technologically assisted delivery of distance education offerings;3 we will use our experience to redesign face-to-face, on-campus offerings. Working with the National Center for Academic Transformation (NCAT) in the United States, we will redesign instructional approaches using technology to achieve cost-savings and to improve learning. NCAT, established with Pew Trust and Lumina Foundation grants, uses a proven, systematic program to help universities understand the full instructional cost of course delivery; to determine how to use technology as an instructional aid and labour-saving device; and to assess learning effectiveness. The program offers five flexible yet distinct course redesign models that both improve learning and reduce costsparticipating schools have reduced instructional costs by an average of 37 per cent. Guelph is the only Canadian institution to work with NCAT. Technology does not guarantee improved teaching and learning. NCATs redesign approach incorporates highly effective pedagogical practices4 in high-enrolment courses, which would be impossible to do without assistive technologies. Reducing faculty and instructor time spent on teaching, by transferring some tasks to technology-assisted learning is key. This counters the conventional wisdom that highquality learning requires low student-faculty ratios and that large lecture presentation techniques are the only way to lower costs. NCAT has proven that redesigning courses to employ technology-based approaches and learner-centred principles helps to resolve the classic cost-quality tension. Guelph has a strong core technology platform for assisted learning, including technology-enabled classroom spaces. We have allocated some of our internal Priority Investment Fund toward expanding this capacity and hope to attract additional external funding, as with our First-Year Seminar Program. The redesign initiative is clearly one area where prioritized, targeted, accountable investment would have a significant impact. Emerge as leaders in the creation of pathways programs to facilitate credit transfer: Guelph is a recognized leader in student mobility and the emerging credit-transfer economy, partly due to our unique initiatives at Guelph-Humber. Besides our successful partnerships with Humber, Conestoga and Fanshawe colleges, we are cultivating other college partners to ensure applicant pools and appropriate programming, bridge courses and curriculum foundations in such focused areas as engineering, computing, agriculture, environment and health professions. As well, Guelph and six other Ontario universities have formed the University Credit Transfer Consortium, which has set clear standards for inter-institution equivalency of foundational courses, and will integrate expanded credit-transfer processes and agreements in upper-year courses and professional programs. Focused enrolment management: In order to maintain total enrolment even as growth slows in the 101 pool, we will need to establish enrolment targets for transfer students and other applicants in the 105 pool, including out-of-province and international students. Only modest overall net growth is planned on the main campus, but we will need to rebalance programs under changing demographics and demand, and employ other strategies to hold enrolment at current levels.5 Introducing a range of summer semester offerings to support the bridge program, along with proposed changes to re-emphasize a summer academic semester in many co-op programs, will help reinvigorate our summer semester and increase enrolments, especially in face-to-face classes. This expanded summer course offering has enabled the
Guelph remains a Canadian leader in the delivery of on-line courses and continuing education programs. It is even possible to achieve a BA at Guelph entirely through distance education. 4 Arthur W. Chickering and Zelda F. Gamson, "Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education" American Association of Higher Education Bulletin (1987) 39:7, 3-7 5 However, the University of Guelph-Humber continues to provide opportunities to absorb a significant portion of the system growth projected for the GTA.
-43
University of Guelph
Universitys ESL/Open Learning program to increase international student enrolment by helping students to develop their English language skills and to prepare conditionally admitted students for success. Metrics and Assessment We will have achieved transformative program innovation if, by the end of the planning cycle in 2016-17, we: Set and meet our established transfer target and maintain overall total enrolment. To do this, we will need to establish and begin using 10 pathways programs with community colleges, including the degree completion program at Guelph-Humber; Streamline admissions processes for seamless credit transfer; Complete an action plan following the review of science on campus; Undertake a program prioritization process to focus on transformation and innovation, including continuous review of low-enrolment courses, programs, majors and secondary areas of study; and Work with NCAT to transform two large first-year courses per year, thereby increasing productivity/cost savings by 12 to 15 per cent.
Donald W. Harward, ed., Transforming Undergraduate Education: Theory that Compels and Practices that Succeed (Plymouth: Rowan and Littlefield, 2012
-5-
University of Guelph
the Bachelor of Arts and Sciencehave already introduced portfolios into their programs; 1,500 undergraduate students are using them this year. By expanding D2L, we will use analytics to further assess and document learning outcomes. This program has been successfully tested in the United States, and we are the first Canadian school to use these analytics. Designated Courses: Besides the ePortfolios, we are now designating courses to reflect acquired or developed skills. These designations will eventually appear in the course calendar and on transcripts, enhancing transparency for students planning programs, for employers hiring graduates and for other institutions encountering students moving through the system. Together these two initiatives afford what some have called double-click degreesmaking plain students record of learning and their specific, demonstrated skills and competencies. This initiative complements our co-curricular transcripts as they document students valuable learning experiences outside of the classroom. Deep Learning: Decades of research, including NSSE results, show which active learning practices lead to deep and engaged learning. These practicesincluding First-Year Seminars; core courses; learning communities; writing-intensive courses; collaborative assignments and projects; undergraduate research opportunities; diversity-oriented and globally focused learning; service learning and community-based learning; internships/practicums/co-op; capstone courses and projectshave been shown to support student retention, enhance student achievement and promote timely program completion. At Guelph, we recognize the importance of such experiences but also appreciate the costs. Not all of a students classes can employ these formats. We must strive for a balance that allows students to experience these learning practices. We are attempting to measure how many such experiences our students encounter and to ensure that they accumulate a guaranteed minimum number before they leave the University. Research shows that these experiences help to ensure that students acquire generic and specific skills needed for work or graduate studies. Enhance and sustain our commitment to a supportive learning environment: With early signs of sliding retention rates and changes in our student populationespecially more commuters and more transfer and international studentswe must continue to provide appropriate academic and non-academic support programs. Extensive research shows that early-intervention strategies are valuable and more costeffective than trying to fix a problem. Similarly, prompt and earnest engagement of students by faculty is tremendously effective, especially early and frequent performance feedback. If students receive little indication of how they are doing until the end of the semester, it is more difficult to seek additional support and for the University to help. Rather than direct most support resources to students already in difficulty we need to promote a healthy campusone that supports the health and wellness of all members of our community. Metrics and Assessment We will have enhanced student success if, by the end of the planning cycle in 2016-17, we: Establish a baseline and create and post curriculum maps in all academic units, including majors, secondary areas of study and distribution requirements. These maps will indicate program objectives and expectations, and specify which courses focus on particular knowledge and skills/competencies (writingintensive, research-intensive, global literacy, inquiry-based, etc.); In keeping with the Quality Assurance Framework, state learning outcomes for graduate and undergraduate programs. All departments and schools will document their learning outcomes in this manner as they come up for review under the Quality Assurance Framework; Establish a baseline and then document student learning with evidence-based measures. This will involve
-6-
University of Guelph
increasing the number of programs using e-learning portfolios by 25 per cent; adopting and using University-wide, Senate-approved learning outcomes; and completing and analyzing exploratory results from the HEQCO-sponsored project using the CLA; Establish a baseline and increase by 15 per cent the number of students participating in highly effective learning practices. The proportion of faculty providing these opportunities should increase by 10 per cent. We will work toward ensuring that Guelph graduates have experienced at least eight of these practices during their program of study and can demonstrate this achievement to others; Using the results from the last NSSE survey as a baseline, improve our NSSE ratings on learning environment, level of interaction with faculty and academic challenge; and Improve retention rates from 89 per cent to 92 per cent and develop a comprehensive early warning system to identify students in academic jeopardy.
University of Guelph
perspectives and experiences. We take pride in our ability to find answers to critical problems, but we recognize that we do not always have the answers or even recognize all of the questions. Collaboration lies at the root of community-engaged scholarship, and we value the engagement of communities and citizens in helping to create, design, implement and apply scholarship to meet their needs. Centre for Business and Social Entrepreneurship (CBaSE): Launched in 2009 in partnership with The Co-Operators, CBaSE is dedicated to preparing a new generation of business leaders committed to community involvement, sustainability and entrepreneurship. The CBaSE platformapplied communitybased projects, product development and business developmentprovides transformational learning experiences and research opportunities to faculty and students in collaboration with leaders of local organizations and enterprises. As entrepreneurial centres become more prominent in Ontario universities, CBaSE will remain competitive by distinguishing itself as a leader in socially oriented, community engagement-driven entrepreneurship. Global literacy: Our mission is to help our students discover a vast world of knowledge. This is not just an abstractionthe world itself may be getting smaller in terms of interconnections, but it still offers surprising diversity and variety. Many students, especially those in technical and scientific fields, too easily become enmeshed in their fields specialized modes of thinking and develop a limited world view. Global literacy helps students to consider global impact and context in solving problems and making decisions. It also extends liberal education beyond analytic knowledge and canonical texts to competencies needed by individuals to make responsible, globally informed decisions. We must embed a global dimension in courses across the disciplines. Metrics and Assessment We will have fostered engagement if, by the end of the planning cycle in 2016-17, we: Consistent with our strategic direction of internationalism, complete a global literacy process. Modelled on the one at Carnegie Mellon University, this process will ensure that we have defined global literacy outcomes and are promoting global awareness; Launch a new certificate in Civic Engagement and Global Citizenship. Admit 35 students in the first year and increase enrolment by 25 per cent each year; Create and maintain a sustainable School of Civil Society. Maintain an annual enrolment of at least 125 students, with increases of 10 per cent a year over the five-year planning period. Secure at least three of five planned Knowledge Exchange Chairs to support the School; Establish a baseline and increase by 25 per cent the number of students involved in community-engaged service learning in Canada and abroad; Establish a baseline and increase by five per cent annually the number of scholarships on campus that support experiential learning activities; and Establish a baseline and increase by 25 per cent the number of students engaged in sustainability courses across the University.
-8-