Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NewEnglandWindSubmission NSW REAP
NewEnglandWindSubmission NSW REAP
3889 Sydney NSW 2001 Dear NSW Renewable Energy Taskforce Members
PO Box 991 ARMIDALE NSW 2350 | ABN 26 150 552 962 Page 1 of 7
renewables and away from fossil fuels. The affordability of NSW's energy supply rests on recognition and response to this new reality. Second, the health benefits of climate action such as renewable energy are significant. The recent briefing paper Our Uncashed Dividend2 puts the health costs of coal-fired power in Australia from lung, heart, and nervous system diseases at $2.6Bn per annum. As the largest coal-fired power user state in Australia, NSW residents bear the largest share of this health burden. Community-owned and community-scale renewable energy presents a strategically significant opportunity in progressing energy affordability, sustainability, justice and sustainability by: leveraging local investment with government and philanthropic support for community-commercial partnerships which utilise state-of-the-art renewable energy technologies. A 2004 study by the U.S. General Accounting Office found that local ownership of wind farms generates an average of 2.3 times more jobs and 3.1 times more local dollars compared to absentee ownership3 augmenting existing grid infrastructure at the points of generation and usage to significantly reduce the infrastructure costs, particularly of high voltage transmission and distribution more generally enabling local leadership, education and responsibility to solve energy needs rather than merely taking roles as advocates and complainants We thank you for your consideration of our submission which follows. Please feel free to contact the undersigned should you wish to discuss this submission further or require any additional information. Sincerely yours
Adam F Blakester Project Director | New England Wind & Executive Director | Starfish Enterprises Network adam@starfishenterprises.net | 02 6775 2501 | 0419 808 900 Attachment New England Submission regarding Draft NSW Wind Farm Planning Guidelines
2 Our Uncashed Dividend, The Climate and Health Alliance and The Climate Institute, August 2012 3 Renewable Energy: Wind Powers Contribution to Electric Power Generation and Impact on Farm and Rural Communities, U.S. Government Accountability Office, September 2004
WWW.NEWENGLANDWIND.COOP
Page 2 of 7
DETAILED SUBMISSION
POSITIVES
New England Wind applaud the NSW Government's specific consideration and support for community-renewable energy (CRE). There is a large and growing global evidence base which demonstrates the significant benefits, leveraged return on investment and important part played by CRE within the broader energy sector. We also welcome the broader focus and inclusion of energy efficiency, recognising its critical part in achieving affordable and sustainable energy overall, as well as its role in ensuring that renewable energy is only used to satisfy efficient energy demand. The creation of new resource mapping data to identify viable locations for renewable energy development, and Crown land that can be used for potential renewable energy production, is likely to be very valuable. There is an obvious opportunity, albeit complicated to realise, of identifying locations which are 'sweet spots' in that they have renewable energy resources, accessible grid capacity, suitable land and supportive landholders and neighbours. And lastly, New England Wind wishes to strongly support the continuation of the Renewable Energy Precinct Program (REPP), and the proposed review with a view to expanding the Program. The REPP has provided critically important assistance to New England Wind and other CRE projects throughout NSW. They have also played an important role in facilitating communication between the community, local stakeholders and renewable energy developers.
Page 3 of 7
These weaknesses seriously undermine the Plan with respect to realistically mapping a path to achieve the 20% renewable energy target for NSW. NSW is especially vulnerable given its very low current level of renewable energy, and the fact its current generation is predominantly from the Snowy Hydro Scheme given the increasingly variability of rainfall patterns with climate change, and increasing needs for environmental flows as highlighted in the Murray Darling Basin planning process. The proposed support to facilitate community ownership of renewable energy projects by providing funding for local feasibility studies for up to five community renewable energy projects is welcome. However, the Plan falls short of being able to meaningfully progress projects. Most CRE projects in NSW, other than New England Wind, require pre-feasibility rather than feasibility studies to move ahead. Having moved beyond this point, projects like New England Wind need more significant funds to progress to the critical point of being able issue a share offering. Sustainability Victoria provided staged funding of $1.1m for Hepburn Wind, while the Australian Government are providing a 50% capital grant for Denmark Wind Farm. New England Wind will need to undertake the commercial equivalent of $4-6m of work before being able to issue a share prospectus. The Plan also misses the critically important area of demand management, and fails to adequately address the need for fairer terms for small scale renewable energy generators (including solar hot water). These two strategies, together with energy efficiency, play a significant part in reducing both electricity usage (and bills) as well as reducing the need for energy generation. New England Wind recognises that the scale of its impact will be significantly influenced by the extent to which we can enable homes and businesses to reduce demand, increase efficiency and install embedded generation. In this way, our community-owned wind farm can best contribute to the widely shared vision for energy self-sustainability in the New England High Country. Such big goals are best achieved with each party and part of the energy system 'rowing in the same direction'. Recognising this, New England Wind works with a three-stage model for sustainable energy, and recognises that the most sustainable energy system is one where the renewable energy supplies the most essential and value-adding energy needs only (and not wasted or wasteful energy use). In contrast to the new energy resource mapping, we feel that the proposed information portal
WWW.NEWENGLANDWIND.COOP
Page 4 of 7
summarising all government programs is unlikely to create new information or address the substantive barriers to greater uptake of renewable energy. Lastly, the REAP is not sufficiently clear in how it describes the various renewable energy initiatives to distinguish between those that are situated in NSW as compared with those which are NSW Government endeavours. This leads to numerous instances where the Plan implies attribution of an initiative to the NSW Government when in fact there has been limited or no involvement. For example, Sydneys role as a major financial centre for facilitating investment in renewable energy projects is an Australian Government rather than NSW Government initiative.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The following recommendations are made to strengthen the REAP and address the weaknesses detailed above: 1. Ensure the REAP delivers affordable and sustainable for NSW residents and industry by 1.1. Include an assessment of how the Plan will contribute to achieving the 20% Renewable Energy Target, including the policy, regulatory and budgetary drivers which will do this 1.2. Clearly explain that the focus of the REAP is on the 20% Renewable Energy Target by 2020 which addresses stationery electricity only, and does not address the far greater energy demands for transport, liquid and solid fuel 1.3. Commit to review the current 20% renewable energy target in view of the ABARE modelling which highlights the likelihood of renewable energy providing a lower cost of energy than coal or gas by 2030 1.4. Ensuring the identified priorities are supported with sufficient resources and delegated responsibility, including a) sufficient capacity for the new Renewable Energy Advocate b) sufficient capacity for the current and potentially expanded Renewable Energy Precincts Program c) negotiating agreement with the various relevant non-NSW Government authorities and stakeholders identified as key d) establishment of a stakeholder mechanism to provide ongoing dialogue and facilitate collaboration, including the participation of industry, consumer, community, welfare and environmental groups 1.5. Review and incorporate the key role of the Industry Capability Network to ensure NSW businesses are informed to consider providing services to all renewable energy projects (in NSW, Australia and New Zealand) 1.6. Incorporate demand management
Page 5 of 7
WWW.NEWENGLANDWIND.COOP
2. Increase support for community-owned and community-scale renewable energy by 2.1. Funding pre-feasibility studies for new initiatives (it is suggested that grants of $50,000 per initiative would be adequate) 2.2. Provide adequate funding for projects which have progressed into feasibility study work to significantly progress their developments (it is suggested that grants of $250,000 and upwards would be required per initiative) 2.3. Investigate the merits of local and regional renewable energy generation with respect to optimising use of existing local distribution networks (and so reducing demand on the high voltage transmission network, and in turn the need for expensive capital infrastructure upgrades) 2.4. Finalise the draft guidelines for wind farms (refer enclosed copy of New England Wind submission) 2.5. Strengthening support for small-scale generation including a) a fair price for exported energy b) implementing the COAG agreement for the mandatory phase out of electric hot water systems c) review and upgrade BASIX which still enables construction of large energy using new dwellings with only the most basic considerations of embedded energy and passive and active energy efficiency
WWW.NEWENGLANDWIND.COOP
Page 6 of 7
Page 7 of 7