Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Experimental Investigation of Inconel 718 During Die-Sinking Electric Discharge Machining
Experimental Investigation of Inconel 718 During Die-Sinking Electric Discharge Machining
=
Initial and final weights of work piece and electrode were measured by electronic weighing balance having a
resolution of 0.001 g. Surface roughness was measured by a contact type stylus based surface tester. The centre line
average (CLA) surface roughness parameter R
a
war used to quantify the surface roughness.
Copper electrodes of cross sections: square and circle were used to conduct the experiment. The area of both square
and circular shaped electrodes was kept same to avoid any ambiguity in machining.
3. Analysis method
3.1 Taguchis method
Taguchis method is a well accepted methodology for experiment design. In this, signal-to-noise ratio(S/N) is used
to represent a response or quality characteristics and the largest S/N ratio is required. There are three types of quality
characteristics viz. nominal-the-better, larger-the-better and smaller-the-better. In this work, experimentally
observed MRR value is larger-the-better and TWR and SR are lower-the-better. Based on Taguchis method,
S/N ratio calculation is done as below-
i) Larger-the-better
|
|
.
|
\
|
=
=
n
i
i
y
n
N S
1
2
1 1
log 10 / [1]
ISSN: 0975-5462 6466
Pushpendra.S.Bharti. et. al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology
Vol. 2(11), 2010, 6464-6473
ii) Smaller-the-better
|
.
|
\
|
=
=
n
i
i
y
n
N S
1
2
1
log 10 / [2]
Where
i
y is the experimentally observed value and nis the repeated number of each experiment.
Table 3. Design experiment of L 36(2
1
3
6
) array with different experimental parametric levels
Exp
No.
SF
T
on
(s)
I
d
(A)
(%)
V
g
(V)
P
(kg/ cm
2
)
T
L
(sec)
M SR
TWR
S/N
(MRR
S/N
(SR)
S/N
(TWR
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
4
4.25 0.0300 13.0984 -12.5678 30.4684
2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2
2
7.3 0.6995 28.0212 -17.2665 3.1041
3 1 3 3 3 3 3 3
3
9.46 0.9407 31.2768 -19.5178 0.5311
4 1 1 1 1 1 2 2
4
6.145 0.1114 13.5607 -15.7704 19.0619
5 1 2 2 2 2 3 3
3
7.9 0.9235 29.7169 -17.9525 0.6912
6 1 3 3 3 3 1 1
4
8.55 0.3780 33.8087 -18.6393 8.4509
7 1 1 1 2 3 1 2
2
5.05 0.0741 8.6729 -14.0658 22.6018
8 1 2 2 3 1 2 3
2
9 0.3960 29.5153 -19.0849 8.0465
9 1 3 3 1 2 3 1
3
11.07 0.3010 30.9475 -20.883 10.4297
10 1 1 1 3 2 1 3
1
5.36 0.0150 5.6339 -14.5833 36.4890
11 1 2 2 1 3 2 1
1
7.03 0.1029 21.0218 -16.9391 19.7523
12 1 3 3 2 1 3 2
3
10.73 0.1598 30.7536 -20.612 15.9310
13 1 1 2 3 1 3 2
2
8.05 0.3109 28.9105 -18.1159 10.1483
14 1 2 3 1 2 1 3
5
9.8 0.2391 34.8871 -19.8245 12.4298
15 1 3 1 2 3 2 1
2
4.92 0.0075 8.7134 -13.8393 42.5096
16 1 1 2 3 2 1 1
1
7.16 0.1624 24.7165 -17.0983 15.7857
17 1 2 3 1 3 2 2
3
9.63 0.5226 29.7869 -19.6725 5.6366
18 1 3 1 2 1 3 3
7
5.2 0.0479 17.4441 -14.3201 26.3999
19 2 1 2 1 3 3 3
1
6.33 0.2283 24.6541 -16.0281 12.8310
20 2 2 3 2 1 1 1
4
10 0.5958 33.5252 -20 4.4973
21 2 3 1 3 2 2 2
4
4.29 0.0215 13.8749 -12.6491 33.3329
22 2 1 2 2 3 3 1
1
5.76 0.1750 21.6117 -15.2084 15.1385
23 2 2 3 3 1 1 2
4
7.25 0.3855 32.4808 -17.2068 8.2784
24 2 3 1 1 2 2 3
4
4.67 0.0156 12.7863 -13.3863 36.1345
25 2 1 3 2 1 2 3
3
7.09 0.7231 31.9521 -17.0129 2.8160
26 2 2 1 3 2 3 1
4
6.11 0.0599 12.0518 -15.7208 24.4478
27 2 3 2 1 3 1 2
1
8.31 0.0202 23.2525 -18.392 33.8737
28 2 1 3 2 2 2 1
1
6.88 0.2196 24.4669 -16.7518 13.1675
ISSN: 0975-5462 6467
Pushpendra.S.Bharti. et. al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology
Vol. 2(11), 2010, 6464-6473
4.
Analysis of experimental results
4.1 Material Removal Rate
Table 3 shows the orthogonal array based experimental results of MRR and its corresponding S/N ratio, whose
ANOVA results are shown in Table 4. Observation of Table 6 indicates that discharge current is the most
dominant factor having percentage contribution as 89.07, followed by gap voltage and pulse-on-time. Fig. 1
shows that MRR increases with the increase in discharge current. This is because at higher discharge current,
more spark energy is induced which causes larger overcuts and thus produces larger chips. Fig. 2 shows that
MRR increases as the value of pulse-on-time increases. Higher pulse-on-time i.e. duration time of EDM sparks
indicates that spark energy is induced for a longer time which results in larger craters on work piece indicating
high MRR. But at a certain value of pulse-on-time, MRR is almost maximum and further increment in pulse-on-
time does not affect MRR considerably. Fig. 3 shows the graph between MRR and gap voltage which indicates
that initially MRR increases with increase in gap voltage but after certain point MRR decreases with further
increase in gap voltage. Further increment in gap voltage increases the discharge gap distance which in effect
reduces the effect of induced energy at work piece and hence MRR decreases. Shape factor, duty cycle, flushing
pressure and tool electrode lift time do not have considerable effect on MRR.
Fig. 1 Relationship between MRR and discharge current
29 2 2 1 3 3 3 2
3
5.82 0.0300 10.5735 -15.2985 30.4684
30 2 3 2 1 1 1 3
3
7.28 0.0874 30.0572 -17.2426 21.1659
31 2 1 3 3 3 2 3
3
6.9 0.2781 30.8659 -16.777 11.1154
32 2 2 1 1 1 3 1
4
4.49 0.0653 13.9080 -13.0449 23.6984
33 2 3 2 2 2 1 2
2
7.03 0.0694 27.0865 -16.9391 23.1781
34 2 1 3 1 2 3 2
3
7.19 0.4013 31.7398 -17.1346 7.9310
35 2 2 1 2 3 1 3
2
6.03 0.0150 8.3155 -15.6063 36.4890
36 2 3 2 3 1 2 1
2
7.32 0.3037 28.1843 -17.2902 10.3518
ISSN: 0975-5462 6468
Pushpendra.S.Bharti. et. al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology
Vol. 2(11), 2010, 6464-6473
Fig. 2 Relationship between MRR and pulse-on-time
Fig. 3 Relationship between MRR and gap voltage
4.2 Surface Roughness
Orthogonal array based experimental results of SR and their corresponding S/N ratios are represented in Table
3. ANOVA results for SR, reported in Table 5, show that discharge current is the most dominant factor having
percentage contribution as 68.42, followed by pulse-on-time and shape factor. Fig. 4 and 5 shows that SR
increases when discharge current and pulse-on-time increase. The electric-discharge machined surface consists
of a multitude of overlapping craters that are formed by spark discharges. The size of these craters depends on
the discharge energy and duration. More is the discharge energy (i.e. discharge current) and duration (pulse-on-
time), the larger are the craters resulting in more surface roughness. It is also observed from Fig. 6 that circular
tool electrode gives better surface finish than the square one. Duty cycle, gap voltage, flushing pressure and tool
electrode lift time do not have considerable effect on SR.
ISSN: 0975-5462 6469
Pushpendra.S.Bharti. et. al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology
Vol. 2(11), 2010, 6464-6473
Fig. 4 Relationship between SR and discharge current
Fig. 5 Relationship between SR and pulse-on-time
Table 4. ANOVA results for MRR
Source
Degrees of
freedom
Sum of
squares
Mean
square F-ratio
Percentage
contribution
Shape factor (A) 1 2.3 2.3 0.3970 0.0805
Pulse-on-time(B) 2 238.8017 119.40 20.6121 8.3538
Discharge
current(C) 2 2151.7568 1075.87 185.7285 75.2731
Duty cycle(D) 2 6.3 3.15 0.54378 0.2204
Gap voltage(E) 2 308.0027 154 26.5851 10.7746
Flushing
pressure(F) 2 5.3 2.65 0.4574 0.1854
Time interval(G) 2 18.7 9.35 1.61409 0.6542
Error 22 127.44 5.7927 1 4.4581
Total 2858.6 100
ISSN: 0975-5462 6470
Pushpendra.S.Bharti. et. al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology
Vol. 2(11), 2010, 6464-6473
Fig. 6 Relationship between SR and shape factor
Table 5. ANOVA results for SR
Source
Degrees of
freedom
Sum of
squares
Mean
square F-ratio
Percentage
contribution
Shape factor (A) 1 10.09 10.09 7.7344 5.6492
Pulse-on-time(B) 2 12.4 6.2 4.7526 6.9425
Discharge
current(C) 2 123.52 61.76 47.3421 69.1563
Duty cycle(D) 2 0.12 0.06 0.0459 0.0672
Gap voltage(E) 2 0.13 0.065 0.0498 0.0728
Flushing
pressure(F) 2 2.51 1.255 0.9620 1.4053
Time interval(G) 2 1.14 0.57 0.4369 0.6383
Error 22 28.7 1.304545 16.0685
Total 178.61 100
4.3 Tool Wear Rate
Orthogonal array based experimental results of TWR and their corresponding S/N ratios are represented in
Table 3. ANOVA results for TWR are reported in Table 6. ANOVA results show that discharge current is the
most dominant factor having percentage contribution as 63.24, followed by pulse-on-time, flushing pressure and
gap voltage. Fig. 7 shows that TWR increases as discharge current increases. High discharge current induces
high spark energy which facilitates more material removal from work piece and tool electrode. TWR increases
initially with increment in pulse-on-time but decreases with further increase in pulse-on-time as shown in Fig. 8.
This is because of deposition of carbon particles on tool electrode at a high temperature. While calculating the
weight loss of tool, actual loss is compensated, up to some extent, by carbon deposits. As a result tool wear rate
decreases with further increase in pulse-on-time. Fig. 9 depicts that TWR increases when flushing pressure
increases. High flushing pressure removes the eroded particles from the gap between tool and the work piece
more effectively and efficiently which in effect increases the tool wear rate. High gap voltage induces higher
spark energy which leads to more TWR. Shape factor, duty cycle, flushing pressure and tool electrode lift time
do not have considerable effect on TWR.
ISSN: 0975-5462 6471
Pushpendra.S.Bharti. et. al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology
Vol. 2(11), 2010, 6464-6473
Fig. 7 Relationship between TWR and discharge current
Fig. 8 Relationship between TWR and pulse-on-time
Fig. 9 Relationship between TWR and flushing pressure
ISSN: 0975-5462 6472
Pushpendra.S.Bharti. et. al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology
Vol. 2(11), 2010, 6464-6473
Table 6. ANOVA results for TWR
Source
Degrees of
freedom
Sum of
squares
Mean
square F-ratio
Percentage
contribution
Shape factor (A) 1 101 101 2.7237 2.1412
Pulse-on-time(B) 2 327 163.5 4.4091 6.9324
Discharge
current(C) 2 3020.2 1510.1 40.7234 64.0280
Duty cycle(D) 2 58 29 0.7820 1.2296
Gap voltage(E) 2 145 72.5 1.9551 3.0740
Flushing
pressure(F) 2 242 121 3.2630 5.1304
Time interval(G) 2 8 4 0.1078 0.1696
Error 22 815.8 37.0818 17.2949
Total 35 4717 100
7. Conclusions
The present work explains the machining characteristics of die-sinking EDM on Inconel 718. Taguchis method
has been employed as a design of experiments technique successfully for establishing the relationship between
various input parameters and performance measures. MRR increases with the increase in discharge current and
pulse-on-time. MRR increases initially, attains a maximum value and further decreases with increase in gap
voltage. SR increases with the increase in discharge current and pulse-on-time. TWR increases with the increase
in discharge current and flushing pressure. TWR increases initially with the increase in pulse-on-time but after
certain value it decreases. ANOVA has been applied to find the level of influence of input parameters on
performance measures. Discharge current is found the most influential input parameter on each performance
measure. Higher discharge current increases MRR, deteriorates surface finish and leads for more tool electrode
loss. Discharge current and pulse-on-time are identified as common influencing parameters for MRR, SR and
TWR.
References
[1] George, P.M.; Raghunath, B.K.; Manochac, L.M.; Warrier, Ashish M.(2004): EDM machining of carbon-carbon composite-a Taguchi
approach, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 145, pp. 66-71.
[2] Liu, J.W.; Yue, T.M.; Guo, Z.N. (2009): Wire elcrtochemical discharge machining of Al
2
O
3
particle reinforced Aluminium Alloy
6061, Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 14, pp. 446-453.
[3] Ramasawmy, H; Blunt, L. (2002): 3D surface characterization of electro polished EDMed surface and quantitative assessment of
process variables using Taguchi Methodology, The International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 42, pp. 1129-1133.
[4] Ramasawmy, H; Blunt, L.(2004): Effect of EDM process parameters on 3D surface topography, Journal of Material Processing
Technology, 148, pp. 115-164.
[5] Ramakrishnan, R; Karunamoorthy, L. (2008): Modeling and multi-response optimization of Inconel 718 on machining of CNC
WEDM process, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 207, pp. 343-349.
[6] Puri, A.B.; Bhattacharya, B. (2003): An analysis and optimization of the geometrical inaccuracy due to wire lag phenomenon in
WEDM, International Journal of Machine Tool and Manufacture, 43, pp. 151-159.
[7] Huang, J.Y. (2003): Determination of finish-cutting operation number and machining-parameters setting in wire electrical discharge
machining, Journal of Material Processing Technology, 87, pp. 69-81.
[8] Tzeng, Yih-fong; Chen, Fu-chen. (2003): A simple approach for robust design of high-speed electrical-discharge machining
technology, The International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 43, pp. 217-227.
[9] Lin, Yan-Cherng; Cheng, Chao-Hsu; Su, Bo-Lin; Hwang, Lih-Ren (2006): Machining Characteristics and Optimization of Machining
Parameters of SKH 57 High- Speed Steel Using Electrical-Discharge Machining Based on Taguchi Method, Materials and Manufacturing
Processes, 21, pp. 922-929.
[10] Pellicer, N.; Ciurana, J; Ozel, T. (2009): Influence of process parameters and electrode geometry on feature micreo-accuracy in
electro-discharge machining of tool steel, Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 24, pp. 1282-1289.
ISSN: 0975-5462 6473