IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In re: ) ) COLLINS & AIKMAN CORPORATION,

et al. 1 ) ) Debtors. ) ) ) ) Chapter 11 Case No. 05-55927 (SWR) (Jointly Administered)

Honorable Steven W. Rhodes

ORDER ADJOURNING HEARING ON (I) GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATIONS MOTION FOR CONTINGENT RELIEF FROM AUTOMATIC STAY TO OBTAIN POSSESSION OF TOOLING; (II) DEBTORS MOTION TO DISMISS GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATIONS MOTION FOR CONTINGENT RELIEF FROM AUTOMATIC STAY TO OBTAIN POSSESSION OF TOOLING; AND (III) DEBTORS MOTION FOR ORDER ALLOWING DISCOVERY IN CONTESTED MATTER

General Motors Corporation (GM) having filed a Motion for Contingent Relief from Automatic Stay to Obtain Possession of Tooling (the GM Motion); the Court having set this matter for hearing on September 30, 2005, and having previously

The Debtors in the joint ly administered cases include: Collins & Aikman Corporation; Amco Convertible Fabrics, Inc., Case No. 05-55949; Becker Group, LLC (d/b/a/ Collins & Aikman Premier Mold), Case No. 05-55977; Brut Plastics, Inc., Case No. 05-55957; Collins & Aikman (Gibraltar) Limited, Case No. 05 -55989; Collins & Aikman Accessory Mats, Inc. (f/k/a the Akro Corporation), Case No. 05 -55952; Collins & Aikman Asset Services, Inc., Case No. 05-55959; Collins & Aikman Automotive (Argentina), Inc. (f/k/a Textron Automotive (Argentina), Inc.), Case No. 0555965; Collins & Aikman Automotive (Asia), Inc. (f/k/a Textron Automotive (Asia), Inc.), Case No. 05-55991; Collins & Aikman Automotive Exteriors, Inc. (f/k/a Textron Automotive Exteriors, Inc.), Case No. 05-55958; Collins & Aikman Automotive Interiors, Inc. (f/k/a Textron Automotive Interiors, Inc.), Case No. 05-55956; Collins & Aikman Automotive International, Inc., Case No. 05-55980; Collins & Aikman Automotive International Services, Inc. (f/k/a Textron Automotive International Services, Inc.), Case No. 05-55985; Collins & Aikman Automotive Mats, LLC, Case No. 05-55969; Collins & Aikman Automotive Overseas Investment, Inc. (f/k/a Textron Automotive Overseas Investment, Inc.), Case No. 05-55978; Collins & Aikman Automotive Services, LLC, Case No. 05-55981; Collins & Aikman Canada Domestic Holding Company, Case No. 05-55930; Collins & Aikman Carpet & Acoustics (MI), Inc., Case No. 05-55982; Collins & Aikman Carpet & Acoustics (TN), Inc., Case No. 05-55984; Collins & Aikman Development Company, Case No. 05-55943; Collins & Aikman Europe, Inc., Case No. 05-55971; Collins & Aikman Fabrics, Inc. (d/b/a Joan Automotive Industries, Inc.), Case No. 05-55963; Collins & Aikman Intellimold, Inc. (d/b/a M&C Advanced Processes, Inc.), Case No. 05-55976; Collins & Aikman Interiors, Inc., Case No. 05-55970; Collins & Aikman International Corporation, Case No. 05-55951; Collins & Aikman Plastics, Inc., Case No. 05-55960; Collins & Aikman Products Co., Case No. 05 -55932; Collins & Aikman Properties, Inc., Case No. 05 -55964; Comet Acoustics, Inc., Case No. 05 -55972; CW Management Corporation, Case No. 0555979; Dura Convertible Systems, Inc., Case No. 05-55942; Gamble Development Company, Case No. 05-55974; JPS Automotive, Inc. (d/b/a PACJ, Inc.), Case No. 05-55935; New Baltimore Holdings, LLC, Case No. 05-55992; Owosso Thermal Forming, LLC, Case No. 05-55946; Southwest Laminates, Inc. (d/b/a Southwest Fabric Laminators Inc.), Case No. 05-55948; Wickes Asset Management, Inc., Case No. 05-55962; and Wickes Manufacturing Company, Case No. 05-55968 .

0W[;&'%

0555927060705000000000001

!a

adjourned such hearing to October 7, 2005 and then to October 14, 2005, November 10, 2005, December 8, 2005, January 5, 2006, February 16, 2006, April 6, 2006 and July 13, 2006 respectively; the Debtors having filed Debtors Motion to Dismiss General Motors Corporations Motion for Contingent Relief from Automatic Stay to Obtain Possession of Tooling (the Motion to Dismiss) and Debtors also having filed Debtors Motion for Order Allowing Discovery in Contested Matter (the Discovery Motion), which Motion to Dismiss and Discovery Motion h ave also been set for hearing on July 13, 2006, the parties having agreed through their respective counsel to further adjourn the hearing on the GM Motion, the Motion to Dismiss and the Discovery Motion, and related matters as set forth below, pursuant to that certain Stipulation to Adjourn Hearing on (I) General Motors Corporations Motion for Contingent Relief from Automatic Stay to Obtain Possession of Tooling; (II) Debtors Motion to Dismiss General Motors Corporations Motion for Contingent Relief from Automatic Stay to Obtain Possession of Tooling; and (III) Debtors Motion for Order Allowing Discovery in Contested Matter, and the Court being fully advised in the premises; NOW, THEREFORE; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearings on the GM Motion, the Motion to Dismiss and the Discovery Motion are hereby adjourned to August 17, 2006, at 2:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as counsel may be heard, before the Honorable Steven W. Rhodes in his courtroom in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, 211 W. Fort Street, Detroit, Michigan 48226.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that, notwithstanding 362(e) of the Bankruptcy Code, the automatic stay of 362 will continue in full force and effect with respect to GM, the GM Motion and the relief requested therein through the earlier of (1) the conclusion of the August 17 2006 hearing and the Courts entry of a final order regarding the GM Motion and (2) any emergency hearing on the GM Motion and the Courts entry of a final order regarding the GM Motion. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the Debtors shall have the right to file a written response to the GM Motion up to five (5) days prior to the August 17, 2006 hearing. If the hearing on the GM Motion is further adjourned to a hearing date after August 17, 2006, the Debtors shall have the right to file a written response up to five (5) days prior to the adjourned hearing on the GM Motion. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that GM shall have the right to file a written response to the Motion to Dismiss and the Discovery Motion, respectively, up to five (5) days prior to the August 17, 2006 hearing. If the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss and/or the Discovery Motion is further adjourned to a hearing date after August 17, 2006, GM shall have the right to file a written response up to five (5) days prior to the adjourned hearing on the Motion to Dismiss and/or the Discovery Motion. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that adjournment of the GM Motion, Motion to Dismiss and Discovery Motion will not preclude the parties from engaging in settlement negotiations or from entering into a settleme nt agreement, subject to approval of this Court, provided that such actions do not involve any interviews or depositions of any potential witness in this contested matter.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that nothing herein will prohibit GM from, at any time, (1) moving for an emergency hearing on the GM Motion before August 17, 2006; (2) moving for an order allowing immediate discovery in this contested matter; or (3) filing an Emergency Motion for Relief from the Automatic Stay.

Entered: July 05, 2006 _ __ _/s/ Steven Rhodes _ _ Steven Rhodes I. Chief Bankruptcy Judge