The document discusses pending and potential future litigation related to tax increment financing (TIF) in Missouri. It notes that several cases challenging the constitutionality and application of the TIF Act are currently pending in Missouri circuit courts. It states that the outcomes of these cases could impact the establishment of tax increment financing in the redevelopment area by interpreting the TIF Act requirements in an adverse manner. The document concludes that the Authority and City cannot predict the outcome of current or future litigation regarding the TIF Act or how court decisions might apply to other tax increment projects.
The document discusses pending and potential future litigation related to tax increment financing (TIF) in Missouri. It notes that several cases challenging the constitutionality and application of the TIF Act are currently pending in Missouri circuit courts. It states that the outcomes of these cases could impact the establishment of tax increment financing in the redevelopment area by interpreting the TIF Act requirements in an adverse manner. The document concludes that the Authority and City cannot predict the outcome of current or future litigation regarding the TIF Act or how court decisions might apply to other tax increment projects.
The document discusses pending and potential future litigation related to tax increment financing (TIF) in Missouri. It notes that several cases challenging the constitutionality and application of the TIF Act are currently pending in Missouri circuit courts. It states that the outcomes of these cases could impact the establishment of tax increment financing in the redevelopment area by interpreting the TIF Act requirements in an adverse manner. The document concludes that the Authority and City cannot predict the outcome of current or future litigation regarding the TIF Act or how court decisions might apply to other tax increment projects.
UNDUE RELIANCE SHOULD NOT BE PLACED ON FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS.
ALL FORWARD-LOOKING . STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT ARE
BASED ON Th"FORMATION AVAILABLE TO THE AUTHORITY AND THE CITY ON THE DATE HEREOF, AND NEITHER THE AUTHORITY NOR THE CITY ASSUME Al'jY OBLIGATION TO UPDATE ANY SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS IF OR WHEN THEIR EXPECTATIONS OR EVENTS, CONDITIONS OR CIRCUMSTANCES ON WmCH SUCH STATEMENTS ARE BASED OCCUR OR FAIL TO OCCUR, OTHER AS INDICATED UNDER THE CAPTION "CONTINUING DISCLOSURE." LITIGATION The Authority There is no litigation, controversy or proceeding of any kind pending, or to the Authority's knowledge, threatened in which any matter is raised or may be raised questioning, disputing, challenging or affecting in any way the legal organization of the Authority, the right or title of any of the Authority's officers to their respective offices, the Indenture, the Financing Agreement, the legality of any official act taken in connection with tbe issuance of the Series 2005A Bonds or the legality of any of the proceedings had or documents entered into in connection with the authorization, issuance or sale of the Series 2005A Bonds. The City There is no litigation, controversy or other proceeding of any kind pending or, to the City'S knowledge, threatened in which any matter is raised or may be raised questioning, disputing, challenging or affecting in any way the legal organization of the City or its boundaries, the right or title of any of the City's officers to their respective offices, the Redevelopment Plan, the Redevelopment Project or the Redevelopment Project Areas, the constitutionality or validity of the Series 2005A Bonds, the legality of any official act taken in connection with the execution and delivery of the Financing Agreement or the legality of any of the proceedings had or documents entered into in connection with the authorization, execution and delivery of the Financing Agreement. The Developer There presently is no litigation, proceeding or investigation pending or, to the knowledge of the Developer, threatened against the Developer, other than claims that are not expected to materially and adversely affect the financial condition or operations of the Developer. In addition, no litigation, proceedings or investigations are pending or, to the knowledge of the Developer, threatened against the Developer seeking to restrain, enjoin or in any way limit the approval or issuance and delivery of the Indenture, the Series 2005A Bonds, the Financing Agreement or any other transaction documents, or that in any manner challenge or adversely affect the corporate existence or powers of the Developer to enter into and carry out the transactions described in this Official Statement. IlicremeiilFinaIiCiiig'Litigatioo' . ... - ........ _. ... ... -. _. -- ........ --..... _._ ..... _ .... .. - .. - ..... - .. ... - Litigation regarding the constitutionality and application of the TIF Act is currently pending in various Missouri circuit courts. Circuit courts in Missouri are trial courts and decisions in those courts are not binding on other Missouri courts. Circuit court decisions, whether favorable or unfavorable with respect to the constitutionality and application of the TIF Act, may be appealed to a Missouri Court of Appeals and, ultimately, the Missouri Supreme Court. If the plaintiffs are successful in one or more of the currently pending cases, the court's decision may interpret the requirements of the TIF Act in a manner adverse to the establishment of tax increment finane'ing in the Redevelopment Area. It is not possible to predict whether an adverse holding in any current or future litigation would prompt a challenge to the adoption of tax increment financing in the Redevelopment Area or how that decision would be applied by a court with respect to the Redevelopment Area. If current or future litigation challenging all or any part of the TIF Act were to be applied to the adoption of tax increment financing in the Redevelopment Area, the Pledged Revenues may not be available to pay principal of and interest on the Bonds and the enforceability of the Indenture could be adversely affected. The Authority and City cannot predict or guarantee the outcome of any currently pending or 'future Ijtigation challenging the constitutionality or the application of the. TIF Act or the application by a court of a potential holding in any case to other tax increment projects. "BOND OWNERS' RISKS - Tax Increment Financing Litigation." . . 33
In Re Penn Central Transportation Company. Appeal of Pinney Dock & Transport Company, Litton Industries, Inc., Litton Systems, Inc., Litton Great Lakes Corporation and Erie Marine, Inc, 771 F.2d 762, 3rd Cir. (1985)