COLEMAN YOUNG.

II
1ST OISTRICT
P.O_ BOX 30038
lANSING_ MI 48909-7538
PHONE: (517) 373-7346
FAX; (5171 373-932Q
sencyo ung@senate.michlgan_gov


...
..
I 0
THE SENATE
STATE OF MICHIGAN
November 1,2012
The Honorable Officers & Members of the Detroit City Council
do Council President Charles Pugh &
Council President Pro-Tempore Gary Brown
1340 Coleman A. Young Municipal Center
Two Woodward Avenue
Detroit, M1 48226
Dear Honorable Councilmembers:
In Response to City Council's Request: The Following is a
Discussion of The Proposed Detroit Lighting Authority &
The Reasons I am Opposed to this Proposal
52%. Fifty two percent! That is the percentage of street the proposed Lighting Authority will reduce in the Oty of
Detroit.
Here's more facts about the proposed Lighting Authority legislation in Michigan House Bills 5688, 5705 and Michigan
Senate Bill 970. 0
1. All the lights in the alleyways will be turned off, making alleys hotspots for assault, rape, murder, and other criminal
activity.
2. Right now, 33,000 street lights are on the Oty of Detroit's Public Lighting Department's (PLD) grid. 55,000 of
the 0 City of Detroit's street lights are currently on the electric grid for a private company. The proposed
legislation transfers all of the street lights to the private electric grid. How does transfer oj the City of Detroit's lights
to a private company's grid change the Current status of the lighting system?
3. The City of Detroit will have to go further into debt in order to establish the authority. AIl of the current City of
Detroit Pill revenue generating customers, (eo'g. Detroit Board of Education. Wayne State University. Detroit
Receiving HospitallDMC. General Services Administr.ation (Federal), Detroit Wayne Joint Building Authority. Detroit
Institute of Arts (DIA). Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) and others), will become the customers of
the private company. Due to borrowing more money, the Lighting Authority provides for all the funding for the
upgrades to the City of Detroit owned. street lights, but all of PLD's customer revenues goes to the private company.
The Lighting Authority will pay a private coIilpciny to upgrade, maintain and operate the street lights. SiDiply pU4 the
corporation makes all the revenue and profit from the lighting authority and the taxpayers pay all the debt.
This is aD example of private profit and socialized debt.
4. Now I'm well aware that the counter argument is that 35,000 of the lights in Detroit don't work now. But"where
are those 35,000 located. Ifit is on your block and you want the street lights turned back on then you think, ..
But what if the street lights are barely on in your area now and your neighborhood is not one of the areas where City
services are planned? Guess what, then you lose your lights and all of the lights in your entire community wiD be
out. Your community will become a darkened signal for criminal activity.
These are four (4) reasons for why I am opposed to the Lighting Authority:
1. Taxation without representation.
The City of Detroit's plan only provides designated neighborhoods with street but every taxpayer in the City of
Detroit will pay for the lights. That is service rationalization, picking winners and losers, and taxatiori without representation
in its purest form.. The last time I checked, a revolutionary war was fough.t in this country over taxation without representation!
Government, state, local and federal must represent and serve all of the people not 300/0 or 47% but 100% of the people.

S04759'11 (S-5) KAS
SB-0970, As Passed Senate, December 4, 2012












SUBSTITUTE FOR

SENATE BILL NO. 970












A bill to amend 1964 PA 284, entitled

"City income tax act,"

by amending section 3 of chapter 1 (MCL 141.503), as amended by

2011 PA 56.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN ENACT:

CHAPTER 1 1

Sec. 3. (1) The governing body of a city, by a lawfully 2

adopted ordinance that incorporates by reference the uniform city 3

income tax ordinance set forth in chapter 2, may levy, assess, and 4

collect an excise tax on income as provided in the ordinance. The 5

ordinance shall state the rate of the tax which shall be the rate 6

authorized by 1 of the following: 7

(a) The uniform city income tax ordinance under section 11 of 8


2

S04759'11 (S-5) KAS
chapter 2. 1

(b) Subsection (2). 2

(c) Section 3a, 3b, or 3c of this chapter. 3

(2) Except as otherwise provided in subsections (3), (4), and 4

(5), in IN a city with a population of more than 600,000, the 5

governing body may levy and collect a tax at a rate to be 6

determined from time to time, that rate to be not more than 2% on 7

corporations and the following maximum tax rates on resident 8

individuals and nonresident individuals for the following years: 9

(a) Before July 1, 1999, 3.00% on resident individuals and 10

1.50% on nonresident individuals. 11

(b) Beginning July 1, 1999 and each July 1 after 1999 THROUGH 12

JULY 1, 2012, except for 2008 and 2009, the maximum tax rate under 13

this subsection on resident individuals shall be reduced by 0.1 14

until the rate on resident individuals is 2.0%. The tax rate 15

imposed on nonresident individuals shall be 50% of the tax rate 16

imposed on resident individuals each year. 17

(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, for 18

the 2008 and 2009 calendar years, the city shall impose the same 19

tax rate on resident individuals and nonresident individuals as the 20

city had imposed for the 2007 calendar year. 21

(D) EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED UNDER SUBDIVISION (E), 22

BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2013 AND EACH YEAR AFTER 2013, A RATE OF NOT 23

MORE THAN 2.40% ON RESIDENT INDIVIDUALS AND 1.20% ON NONRESIDENT 24

INDIVIDUALS. 25

(E) BEGINNING JANUARY 1 OF THE YEAR IMMEDIATELY SUCCEEDING THE 26

YEAR THAT ALL BONDS, OBLIGATIONS, AND OTHER EVIDENCE OF 27


3

S04759'11 (S-5) KAS
INDEBTEDNESS ISSUED BY A LIGHTING AUTHORITY HAVE BEEN FULLY PAID 1

AND EACH YEAR THEREAFTER, A RATE OF NOT MORE THAN 2.20% ON RESIDENT 2

INDIVIDUALS AND 1.10% ON NONRESIDENT INDIVIDUALS. 3

(3) If any 3 of the following conditions exist in a city with 4

a population of 600,000 or more, the city may apply to the state 5

administrative board for certification that those conditions exist 6

and the maximum tax rate under subsection (2)(b) shall not be 7

further reduced as provided in subsections (4) and (5): 8

(a) Funds have been withdrawn from the city's budget 9

stabilization fund for 2 or more consecutive city fiscal years or 10

there is a balance of zero in the city's budget stabilization fund. 11

(b) The city's income tax revenue growth rate is 0.95 or less. 12

(c) The local tax base growth rate is 80% or less of the 13

statewide tax base growth rate. 14

(d) The city's unemployment rate is 10% or higher according to 15

the most recent statistics available from the Michigan jobs 16

commission. 17

(4) If the state administrative board certifies within 60 days 18

of application that any 3 of the conditions set forth under 19

subsection (3) are met, the maximum tax rate under subsection (2) 20

shall not be further reduced from the date of the state 21

administrative board's certification until the July 1 following the 22

expiration of 1 year after the state administrative board's 23

certification unless the city applies for certification that the 24

conditions continue to exist. Before the expiration of the 25

certification, the city may apply to the state administrative board 26

to certify that the conditions continue to exist and if the state 27


4

S04759'11 (S-5) KAS
administrative board so certifies, the certification may continue 1

until the July 1 following the expiration of 1 year after the state 2

administrative board's certification that the conditions continue 3

to exist. The city may continue to apply for certification until 4

the conditions under subsection (3) no longer exist. 5

(5) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, if on 6

July 1 the maximum tax rate on resident individuals is reduced 7

under subsection (2) after a year or years in which the maximum tax 8

rate was not reduced because of subsections (3) and (4), the 9

maximum tax rate on resident individuals shall be the maximum tax 10

rate in effect on June 30 of that year reduced by 0.1 and the rate 11

on nonresident individuals shall be 50% of the rate imposed on 12

resident individuals. On each subsequent July 1, subsection (2) 13

applies to the maximum tax rates, subject to subsections (3) and 14

(4). 15

(3) NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW OR ANY 16

ORDINANCE OF THE CITY TO THE CONTRARY, A CITY THAT FORMS A LIGHTING 17

AUTHORITY SHALL DEPOSIT AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE SUM OF THE REVENUE 18

COLLECTED FROM 0.2% OF THE RATE LEVIED ON RESIDENT INDIVIDUALS 19

PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (2)(D) AND 0.1% OF THE RATE LEVIED ON 20

NONRESIDENT INDIVIDUALS PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (2)(D) DIRECTLY INTO 21

THE BUDGET OF THE CITY'S POLICE DEPARTMENT AND USE IT EXCLUSIVELY 22

TO RETAIN OR HIRE POLICE OFFICERS. THE TRANSFER AND USE OF THE 23

REVENUE AS PROVIDED UNDER THIS SUBSECTION SHALL CONTINUE UNTIL ALL 24

BONDS, OBLIGATIONS, OR OTHER EVIDENCE OF INDEBTEDNESS ISSUED BY A 25

LIGHTING AUTHORITY HAVE BEEN FULLY PAID AND REVENUE IS NO LONGER 26

BEING PLEDGED FROM TAXES LEVIED UNDER THE CITY UTILITY USERS TAX 27


5

S04759'11 (S-5) KAS
ACT, 1990 PA 100, MCL 141.1151 TO 141.1177, TO THE LIGHTING 1

AUTHORITY. AS USED IN THIS SUBSECTION, "LIGHTING AUTHORITY" MEANS A 2

LIGHTING AUTHORITY INCORPORATED UNDER THE MUNICIPAL LIGHTING 3

AUTHORITY ACT. 4

(4) (6) The governing body of a city may adopt the uniform 5

city income tax ordinance with the alternative sections as set 6

forth in chapter 3 instead of the similarly numbered sections as 7

set forth in chapter 2. The uniform city income tax ordinance may 8

be lawfully adopted or rescinded by the governing body at any time. 9

The adoption of an ordinance is effective on and after January 1 or 10

July 1 following adoption of the ordinance, as specified in the 11

ordinance, but an ordinance shall not become effective earlier than 12

45 days after adoption or until approved by the electors if a 13

referendum petition is filed as authorized in this act or a 14

referendum is otherwise required. The rescission of an ordinance 15

shall become effective on the following December 31. The ordinance 16

may be rescinded at any time by the governing body in the same 17

manner in which it was adopted and with appropriate enforcement, 18

collection, and refund provisions with respect to liabilities 19

incurred prior to the effective date of the rescission of the 20

ordinance. The ordinance shall not be amended except as provided by 21

the legislature. A city may amend the ordinance to change the tax 22

rate to a rate authorized by this act. 23

(5) (7) Petitions for a referendum election on the question of 24

adopting an ordinance adopted by the governing body may be filed 25

with the city clerk not later than the sixth Monday following the 26

adoption of the ordinance. The petitions shall be signed by a 27


6

S04759'11 (S-5) KAS
number of registered electors of the city equal to at least 10%, 1

but not more than 20%, of the registered electors of the city 2

voting in the last general municipal election prior to the adoption 3

of the ordinance by the governing body. If proper petitions are 4

filed, the question of adopting the ordinance shall be submitted by 5

the governing body to the city electors at the next primary or 6

general election or at a special election called for the purpose, 7

in any case held not less than 45 days nor more than 90 days after 8

the clerk has reported the filing of the referendum petition to the 9

city's governing body. The checking of names on the petitions, the 10

counting, canvassing, and return of the votes on the question, and 11

other procedures for the election shall be as provided by law or 12

charter. Upon a favorable vote of the city electors, the ordinance 13

shall be effective as specified in the ordinance which may be 14

amended by the governing body of the city following the election to 15

specify July 1 or January 1 as the effective date of the ordinance, 16

if the effective date originally specified in the ordinance is 17

considered impractical or inconvenient for any reason. The 18

provisions in this section for a referendum election, and for 19

delaying the effective date of the ordinance if petitions for a 20

referendum are filed, are not applicable to a city that on January 21

1, 1964 had in effect a valid ordinance levying and imposing an 22

excise tax levied on or measured by income. Notwithstanding any 23

other provision of this act, if an ordinance becomes effective on 24

any date other than January 1, each tax year shall end on December 25

31, and the provisions of the ordinance based on a full tax year 26

are modified accordingly to be applicable to the partial tax year. 27


7

S04759'11 (S-5) KAS
(8) The city shall annualize the rates under this section as 1

necessary. 2

(9) As used in this section: 3

(a) "Consumer price index" means the Detroit consumer price 4

index for all urban consumers as defined and reported by the United 5

States department of labor, bureau of labor statistics, and as 6

certified by the state treasurer. 7

(b) "Income tax revenue growth rate" means a number the 8

numerator of which is the income tax collections of the city for 9

the city fiscal year immediately preceding the city's application 10

under subsection (3) and the denominator of which is the product of 11

the income tax collections of the city for the city fiscal year 12

immediately preceding the city fiscal year used to determine the 13

numerator multiplied by 1 plus the corresponding percentage change 14

in the average consumer price index for the calendar year ending in 15

the city fiscal year used to determine the numerator. 16

(c) "Local tax base growth rate" means the total taxable value 17

of real property and personal property in the city for the most 18

recent year for which data is available divided by the total 19

taxable value of real property and personal property in the city 20

for the second year immediately preceding the most recent year for 21

which the data is available. 22

(d) "Statewide tax base growth rate" means the total taxable 23

value of real property and personal property in the state for the 24

most recent year for which the data is available divided by the 25

total taxable value of real property and personal property in the 26

state for the second year immediately preceding the most recent 27


8

S04759'11 (S-5) Final Page KAS
year for which the data is available. 1

Enacting section 1. This amendatory act does not take effect 2

unless all of the following bills of the 96th Legislature are 3

enacted into law: 4

(a) House Bill No. 5688. 5

(b) House Bill No. 5705. 6

Page 1 of 3 sb970etal./1112
LIGHTING AUTHORITY; DETROIT TAXES S.B. 970 (S-1) & H.B. 5688 (H-1)
& 5705 (H-1): FLOOR SUMMARY







Senate Bill 970 (Substitute S-1 as reported)
House Bill 5688 (Substitute H-1 as reported by the Committee of the Whole)
House Bill 5705 (Substitute H-1 as reported by the Committee of the Whole)
Sponsor: Senator Bert Johnson (S.B. 970)
Representative Maureen Stapleton (H.B. 5688)
Representative John Walsh (H.B. 5705)
Senate Committee: Government Operations
House Committee: Local, Intergovernmental, and Regional Affairs (H.B. 5688 & 5705)

CONTENT

Senate Bill 970 (S-1) would amend the City Income Tax Act to do the following:

-- For a city with a population over 600,000 (Detroit), specify a maximum tax rate of 2.5%
on residential individuals and 1.25% on nonresident individuals (the rates that applied
until July 1, 2012, when the maximum rate on residents was reduced to 2.4% and the
nonresident rate was reduced to 1.2%).
-- Discontinue a requirement that Detroit's maximum tax rate be reduced each July 1 by
0.1 until it is 2.0% on resident individuals; and delete provisions allowing the city to
apply to the State Administrative Board for certification that the rate not be reduced if
specified conditions exist.
-- Require the city each year to deposit the revenue collected from 0.2% of the rate levied
on residents and 0.1% of the rate levied on nonresidents into the budget for the city's
police department, and use it exclusively to retain or hire police officers.
-- Require this transfer and use to continue until all bonds, obligations, or other evidence
of indebtedness issued by a lighting authority (incorporated under the Municipal Lighting
Authority Act) had been fully paid and revenue was no longer being pledged to the
lighting authority from taxes levied under the City Utility Users Tax Act.

House Bill 5688 (H-1) would create the "Municipal Lighting Authority Act" to do the
following:

-- Allow one or more cities, villages, or townships to adopt articles of incorporation by a
majority vote of their governing bodies and incorporate an authority for the purpose of
acquiring, owing, improving, constructing, operating, or maintaining a lighting system
and providing lighting services.
-- Provide that a lighting authority would be a public municipal corporation.
-- Prohibit an authority from paying net proceeds or profits to its constituent local
governments, but permit it to pay them for services provided.
-- Require an authority to be governed by a board consisting of five or eight members
appointed as provided in the Act (described below).
-- Provide that an authority board would be subject to the Open Meetings Act and the
Freedom of Information Act.
-- Require an authority board to implement a best value supply chain and procurement
practice, and report annually to the governing body of each constituent local
government.
-- Require a board, by March 15 after it was created and then every two years, to prepare
a plan for the next three years and submit it to the governing bodies of its constituent
local governments.

Page 2 of 3 Bill Analysis @ www.senate.michigan.gov/sfa sb970etal./1112
-- Require the plan to include a budget, among other items, and require the budget to
provide that any money derived from the collection of rates and charges would be
applied and used in the manner and priority set forth in the Act.
-- Allow the governing bodies of the constituent local governments to vote to accept or
reject the plan, and provide for the plan to be revised and resubmitted if it were
rejected.
-- Allow an authority, after initial service rates were established and contracts for
construction, purchase of power, and related services were executed, to borrow money
and issue revenue bonds and notes for the purpose of constructing, acquiring,
improving, or extending a lighting system.
-- Limit the aggregate principal amount of the bonds and notes at any time to 5% of the
total State equalized valuation of the property assessed in the local governments
comprising the authority.
-- Provide that bonds issued under the Act could not mature more than 30 years from the
date of the original issuance.
-- Require bonds issued under the Act to be sold to the Michigan Finance Authority.
-- Authorize an authority to enter into ancillary facilities (various types of financing or
investment agreements) for specified purposes, as it determined necessary or
appropriate.
-- Allow an authority and any local government to enter into a contract providing for the
construction, acquisition, improvement, or extension of a lighting system; and require a
contract to provide for the rates and charges for each local government.
-- Allow a local government to pledge its full faith and credit for the payment of the
obligation and, if it did so, to include in its annual tax levy an amount sufficient to pay
the portion of the obligation falling due before the following year's tax collection.
-- Provide that the tax could be in addition to any tax that the local government otherwise
could levy and could be imposed without limitation, if the local electors had approved
the contract or an unlimited tax pledge in support of the contract.
-- Allow the contract to provide for other funds to be raised and pledged by each
contracting local government by the following methods: the levy of special assessments;
the levy and collection of charges to users and beneficiaries of the services furnished by
the lighting system; a pledge of revenue that the local government otherwise would
receive under the City Utility Users Tax Act; the receipt of money from the imposition of
taxes by the State, except as prohibited by the State Constitution; and the receipt of
other funds that could be validly used for this purpose.
-- Provide that, if an authority issued bonds to be paid from revenue from a contract, a
local government could pledge revenue it would receive under the City Utility Users Tax
Act to bonds of the authority issued pursuant to the contract, after it first entered into a
trust agreement with the authority, the Michigan Finance Authority, and a trustee.
-- Provide that a local government could not enter into a contract pledging utility users tax
revenue that would result in outstanding bonds secured by the pledged revenue having
an aggregate annual debt service that exceeded $12.5 million in any one year taking
into account any anticipated Federal credits.
-- Provide that the property of an authority and its income and operations would be
exempt from all taxes and special assessments of the State or a political subdivision.
-- Provide that an authority could hold, manage, sell, exchange, or lease its property, but if
the property came from a constituent local government, the authority could not dispose
of it unless the other party to the transaction were the local government.

If an authority had only one local government (other than Detroit) as a member, the
authority board would have to consist of three residents of the local government appointed
by the chief executive officer and two residents appointed by the governing body of the local
government.

If an authority had only one local government as a member, and that local government
were Detroit, the board would have to consist of one member appointed by the Governor,

Page 3 of 3 Bill Analysis @ www.senate.michigan.gov/sfa sb970etal./1112
one member appointed by the Governor upon the recommendation of the Senate Majority
Leader, one member appointed by the Governor upon the recommendation of the Speaker
of the House, and five residents of Detroit appointed by the city's governing body.

If an authority had more than one local government as a member, the board would have to
be appointed as provided in the authority's articles of incorporation.

House Bill 5705 (H-1) would amend the City Utility Users Tax Act (which authorizes Detroit
to levy a tax of up to 5% on the amount paid for certain utility services and requires the
revenue to be used to hire or retain police officers) to do the following:

-- Require the city, if it formed a lighting authority, to pay $12.5 million annually to that
authority from the proceeds of the utility users tax.
-- Provide that, if the lighting authority issued bonds pursuant to a contract with the city
and pledged revenue from the city utility users tax, the revenue would have to be
deposited and used as provided in the Act.

All of the bills are tie-barred to each other.

MCL 141.503 (S.B. 970) Legislative Analyst: Suzanne Lowe
141.1152 et al. (H.B. 5705)

FISCAL IMPACT

Senate Bill 970 (S-1) would increase local income tax revenue in the City of Detroit and
restrict the distribution of that revenue. The city's income tax rate was identical to that
specified in the bill until July 1, 2012, when the rate was reduced by 0.1 percentage point as
required by the Act. The bill would reinstate the rate that had been in effect before July 1,
and prevent future reductions. The bill also would require a portion of the revenue
generated by the tax to be deposited into the police department budget for the retention or
hiring of police officers, rather than being left in the general fund for appropriation to the
police department or other departments and expenditures.

The bill would have no impact on State revenue or expenditures.

House Bills 5688 (H-1) and 5705 (H-1) would increase both local unit revenue and
expenditures by an unknown amount depending upon the number of communities that
created or joined a lighting authority, the operational decisions of the authorities, and the
terms of any bonds and/or revenue pledges related to the authorities. House Bill 5705 (H-
1) would reduce city utility users tax revenue to the City of Detroit police department
budget by approximately $12.5 million per year and direct it to a lighting authority. House
Bill 5688 (H-1) would limit the aggregate annual debt service on any bonds issued by an
authority to $12.5 million. The debt service limit would apply to all lighting authorities, not
just an authority associated with the City of Detroit.

The bills would have no impact on State revenue or expenditure.

Date Completed: 8-7-12 Fiscal Analyst: David Zin


Floor\sb970
This analysis was prepared by nonpartisan Senate staff for use by the Senate in its deliberations and does not constitute an
official statement of legislative intent.
Search legislation
2012 Senate Bill 970: Allow higher Detroit city income
tax (Senate Roll Call 799)

Passed 20 to 18 in the Senate on December 4, 2012, to allow Detroit to
suspend a state-mandated gradual reduction of its city income tax to the
maximum rate allowed for other cities (1 percent for residents and 0.5 percent
for non-residents). This would allow the current the city to keep its current rates
of 2.4 percent and 1.2 percent, repectively, until debt incurred to fix broken
streetlights is repaid (see House Bill 5688). When the mandated tax rate
reduction was first enacted Detroit's income tax took 3 percent from residents
and 1.5 percent from nonresidents who work in the city.
View All of Senate Bill 970: History, Amendments & Comments
The vote was 20 in favor, 18 against, and 0 not voting.
(Senate Roll Call 799)
Allow higher Detroit city income tax
IN FAVOR
SENATE DEMOCRATS
Gleason (D) Gregory (D) Hunter (D) Johnson (D) Smith (D)
Warren (D) Whitmer (D)
SENATE REPUBLICANS
Booher (R) Caswell (R) Jansen (R) Kahn (R) Kowall (R)
Marleau (R) Meekhof (R) Nofs (R) Pappageorge (R) Proos (R)
Richardville (R) Schuitmaker (R) Walker (R)
AGAINST
SENATE DEMOCRATS
Anderson (D) Bieda (D) Hood (D) Hopgood (D) Young (D)
Home Create an account Advanced searches Scorecards Links About Log on
SENATE REPUBLICANS
Brandenburg (R) Casperson (R) Colbeck (R) Emmons (R) Green (R)
Hansen (R) Hildenbrand (R) Hune (R) Jones (R) Moolenaar (R)
Pavlov (R) Robertson (R) Rocca (R)
SENATE LEGISLATORS ALL VOTES
n Anderson (D) n Bieda (D) Y Booher (R) n Brandenburg (R) n Casperson (R)
Y Caswell (R) n Colbeck (R) n Emmons (R) Y Gleason (D) n Green (R)
Y Gregory (D) n Hansen (R) n Hildenbrand (R) n Hood (D) n Hopgood (D)
n Hune (R) Y Hunter (D) Y Jansen (R) Y Johnson (D) n Jones (R)
Y Kahn (R) Y Kowall (R) Y Marleau (R) Y Meekhof (R) n Moolenaar (R)
Y Nofs (R) Y Pappageorge (R) n Pavlov (R) Y Proos (R) Y Richardville (R)
n Robertson (R) n Rocca (R) Y Schuitmaker (R) Y Smith (D) Y Walker (R)
Y Warren (D) Y Whitmer (D) n Young (D)
Senate Roll Call 799 on 2012 Senate Bill 970
Copyright 2012 Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Terms of use