Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Artemis Extractor: Getting Started Manual
Artemis Extractor: Getting Started Manual
ARTeMIS Extractor
2 1
3
Figure 1. Pictures of the plate used as the case in this getting started.The sensors are mounted for the first data set.
5
Figure 2. The sensor layout for the four data sets for the plate measurement
Data set 4
Data set 3
Data set 2
Data set 1
6
Reference sensors should be placed in a point where all modes have a significant contribution to the response, i.e. far away from any modal node. As a minimum you need one sensor for each direction, i.e. for a 1D problem one sensor, for a 2D problem two sensors, etc. If you are uncertain about where the modes might have their nodes (and you nearly always are, otherwise you would not really need to do any modal identification), then you better use several reference sensors. Performing the test, you need to decide how you should sample the signal, and how long your time series should be.Your sample frequency should at least be twice the highest natural frequency you are looking for, but for practical reasons a little higher. A good rule of thumb is that if the highest natural frequency is then the sampling frequency should be at least
If the lowest natural frequency is , then the length of the time series should at least be 1000 cycles of the corresponding period, thus, the total length of the time series should not be smaller than However, if your signals are contaminated by noise, or if you have closely spaced modes, you should take longer time series. Exciting the structure is not your problem as it is in traditional modal testing. Using output-only modal testing you let the natural and unknown forces excite the structure.You just have to use sensors sensitive enough to pick up the signal. The more inputs and the more randomly distributed, the better for the identification.
7
Can I put my reference sensor anywhere I want ?
I always hear people speak about, filters, amplifiers, and all that, is that not important any more ?
Of course ! As important as always, but this is a not problems specific for output-only modal.
9
-5.1241413e-002 -2.5620706e-002 2.5620706e-002 5.1241413e-002 2.5620706e-002 5.1241413e-002 7.6862119e-002 2.5620706e-002 -2.5620706e-002 -2.5620706e-002 -5.1241413e-002 -5.1241413e-002 -5.1241413e-002 -2.5620706e-002 5.1241413e-002 -1.7509253e-001 0.0000000e+000 0.0000000e+000 5.0026439e-002 1.2506610e-001 5.0026439e-002 1.0005288e-001 7.5039655e-002 -7.5039655e-002 -5.0026439e-002 2.5013220e-002 -1.2506610e-001 -1.7509253e-001 0.0000000e+000 2.5013220e-002 -2.0100813e-001 -1.5075609e-001 7.5378045e-002 1.5075609e-001 1.2563008e-001 7.5378045e-002 -7.5378045e-002 -1.0050406e-001 -2.5126016e-002 -5.0252032e-002 2.5126016e-002 1.0050406e-001 0.0000000e+000 -1.0050406e-001 -7.5378045e-002 -5.1720105e-002 -5.1720105e-002 0.0000000e+000 1.2930027e-001 1.2930027e-001 -2.5860053e-002 -1.5516031e-001 -1.2930027e-001 -7.7580154e-002 5.1720105e-002 1.2930027e-001 1.2930027e-001 1.0344021e-001 -2.5860053e-002 -1.5516031e-001 5.1026683e-002 1.2756671e-001 7.6540023e-002 -1.5308005e-001 -1.5308005e-001 0.0000000e+000 -2.5513342e-002 -1.2756671e-001 2.5513342e-002 1.2756671e-001 1.2756671e-001 1.2756671e-001 -5.1026683e-002 -5.1026683e-002 1.2756671e-001
Figure 3. The first 15 measurements of the first data set. First column is channel 1, second column is channel 2, etc.
Figure 4. A little bit of the time series in channel 4.This figure was plotted using MATLAB.
10
11
Do I really not have to worry about exiting the structure ?
No, you let the nature do the job for you, everything is vibrating allready, all by it self
OK, then you apply some kind of loading, but remember to make it as random and realistic as possible
If the mode is not exited by the natural loads, -is it then important?
12
configuration file.Therefore, if you have any problems reading the file into the ARTeMIs Extractor software, as a main rule, always check your configuration file with the NOTEPAD editor that is showing these kinds of unwanted control characters. The structure of a specification statement is like this: Any number of comment lines A keyword One or several lines of information An empty line that terminates the statement The keywords are: Header specifying the project header T specifying the sampling interval Nodes specifying node numbers and coordinates Lines specifying lines to be displayed Setups specifying the data sets and degrees of freedom measured. Just look into the SVSPLATE.CFG file to see all the details, it is all self-explaining. However, a few comments will be given about specifying the data sets. In this test case we have four data sets.Thus, after the keyword setups follows a lines with a label for the data set, in this case called Data set 1,2,3,4, then a line specifying the name of the data file, in this case SVSPLATE1,2,3,4, and then the different degrees of freedom. First time series in the data matrix (first column) is taken in point 17, coordinates of the direction vector is [0,0,1] (z-direction), the rest is optional. Next time series from point 1, etc. Degrees of freedom that are repeated in all data sets are automatically defined as references.
13
So if this is such a good piece of software, why does it not have a geometry generator ?
Because the people behind the ARTeMIS believe that the geometry generation should be with the measurement system.
Because you need to make up your mind about your geometry before you go out and make the test, and you need that geometry during the testing.
OK, I see the point, but nobody has this software, will I ever be able to get one ?
Actually B&K makes one that they call Operational Modal T Consultant, the est ART eMIS people are making their own solution, they call it ART eMIS T estor.
14
15
Figure 5. Project window when you open a new file
16
17
Figure 7. A spectral estimate with too few frequency lines
Figure 8. A spectral estimate with too many frequency lines allowing for too few averages
18
Spectral estimation is specified by the number of frequency lines in the spectral density functions. If this number is too low, you might have too little frequency resolution to clearly see the modal peaks in the spectal density functions, Figure 7. If the number of lines becomes too large, you will have to few data points in your time series to have a proper averaging of the spectral density function estimates, and you will have too much scatter on them, Figure 8. A good compromise of the frequency resolution is when you can clearly see the modal peaks in the spectral density functions, when the frequency resolution is just enough, and the scatter is acceptable. An example of a good compromise is shown in Figure 9. You should play with different choices and make up your mind about what is best using the Test Trial Conf. feature under the Data main task. Using this feature, you can play with different signal processing choices without changing the raw data loaded into the system. Once you have finally choosen a signal processing configuration as the one selected for analysis (you select that at the end of the signal processing wizard), then you can press the Process Data button under the Data main task, and all your data can be processed at once. After you have done that, then your data are permanently changed due to the irreversible signal processing. In this getting started case, uncheck Correlation Functions Estimation and Common SSI Input Matrix Estimation when ordering Process Data.
19
Figure 9. A good compromise:You can see the spectral peaks, and you can live with the scatter
Figure 10. You can put the cursor any place on a plot and read out the values. Here the cursor is placed to indicate the peak of the second mode.
20
21
Figure 12. When the FDD peak picking window comes up it looks like this
22
23
Figure 13. The Modal Mini Bar
Figure 14. The drop-down list for selection of active data set
Figure 15. Click on < > button to identify a new mode, double-click on the peak, and you are finished.
24
where you have your spectral peaks, and you would have noticed that the frequencies are not the same in the four data-sets - what is the reason for this frequency shifting ? The reason is that when we are moving around with the accelerometers on this tiny little structure, then we are significantly changing the mass distribution of the structure.Therefore, we have to treat each of the data sets separately. OK, so de-activate the < > button, then you will see the drop-down list for selection of active data set becoming active, Figure 14. Here is the procedure for identifying a new mode.
Choose the data set that you want to start with, you do so by using the drop-down list shown in Figure 14. Press the < > in the modal mini bar. Move the mouse into the plotting region in the FDD window, you will now see a cursor-like line and a plus-sign snapping on different points of the plot. Once the plus-sign is a the peak that you want to indicate as a modal peak, double-click using your left mouse button.Then the plus-sign changes to a square, and it snaps permanently to the peak.The window now looks like Figure 15. Go to next data set using the drop-down list, check if the selected point is at the top of the peak. If not, press the Edit Mode button in the modal mini bar and move the point where you want it to be. Go through all data sets until the selected point is at the peak point in all data sets
25
Figure 16. Inspect the mode shape by pressing the animate tab in the FDD window.
Figure 17. Start/Stop and single step control buttons for the mode shape animation.
26
27
Figure 18. Comparison of the two mode shape estimates of mode 2.They are not very close - why ? Because the reference sensor was badly placed for estimation of this mode.
28
Now, we have to know why this can happen.Why are the two mode shape estimates so different ? The difference is absolutely not acceptable, we need to be able to do much better than this ! Well the reason is simple.The reference transducer was placed at a point where this mode has nearly no amplitude.The point is close to being a node, and thus, the estimated mode shape becomes uncertain. You can check this postulate by comparing the reference signals under the Data main task (observe that the peak of the second mode nearly vanish). Alternatively, you can inspect the mode shape estimate itself, and acknowledge, that the sensor was placed in a point where the movement of the mode is nearly non-existing. Try on your own to estimate the rest of the modes and investigate by comparing different estimates for the same mode, if the rest of the modes are OK, Figure 19 You can export all graphics by Copy and Paste commands. For instance, make two versions of mode three and plot them in the Mode Comparison window.Then inside the plotting field, click the right mouse button and choose Copy.Then go to your Word, Power Point or Paint document and Paste.Then you get a figure like Figure 20. This mode is accurately estimated. You see this immediately since the plots of the two mode shape estimates are so close, that graphically it looks like one plot.
29
Figure 19. Estimating the eight first modes the window looks like this
Figure 20. Exporting mode animation by Copy/Paste to Word, Power Point or Paint
30
If you like to quantify the difference between the two mode shapes, press the Information tab in the Mode Comparison window.Then you see a list of deviations between the two mode shape estimates. Now, sort the list according to descending values of the magnitude of the difference, and you get a table like Figure 21. This table was exported by marking the first three lines in the list, exporting it to Word by Copy/Paste, blocking the lines in Word and then using a Table Insert command in Word. Now when you are sure about the modes you are ready to finally export graphics and tables and write your modal identification report. One of your main results will be a table of the modes that you have identified. If you go back to the FDD window keeping only the modes that you would like to present in your report, then you simply export it by blocking the modes, exporting by Copy/Paste, and then defining your table. Assuming that we take all 8 modes, the table of estimated modes might look like Figure 22. If you like you can put your comments in column 6 of the table, either after you exported it, or in the FDD window. In this case you have no damping estimation, the simple peak picking technique only gives you frequencies and mode shapes. If you want damping you need the enhanced FDD or the time domain techniques.
The more techniques you use, the better you can validate your results.
31
Figure 21. Exporting a list is also easy, export by Copy/Paste and define it as a table in Word.
After reading this Getting Started Manual, you should be able to perform your first identification right away. If it takes you more than a few hours to do it, please let us know, because then we have to learn to improve either our software or this getting started manual. To continue learning how to use the software take advantage of the on-line help. Just press the Help button on the main menu Have pleasure !
Structurel Vibration Solutions ApS . NOVI Science Park . Niels Jernes Vej 10, DK 9220 Aalborg, Denmark.
www.svibs.com