Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Territorial Tighten Up: Relationship Between Infrastructure and Uses
Territorial Tighten Up: Relationship Between Infrastructure and Uses
E LTUR RICU AG
INFRAESTRUCTURE USES
USTRY I ND
ROT
TER
CONECTIONS DIAGRAM
ECONOMIC SECTIONS
+ 10000000 10000000 1000000 100000 10000 1000
A M CI
TY
INDUSTRIA
AGRICULTURA
VIVIENDA
F.MARITIMO
F.VEHICULO
F.TREN
The analysis deals with the following topics: Infrastructure-told within its flows. Spot-The territory through its economic output. By this way we differentiate between areas of high economic production that differ with areas of low production witch we have seen it seems the same as some environments that have in it a radical economic change. In most cases these infrastructures and economic production elements very low had ritched to be limits between the city and the different predominating uses.
D C
A V U L M N T
S
FLOW MOVEMENT IN INFRASTRUCTURE + ECONOMIC OUTPUT PER SURFACE AREA = ECONOMIC SECTIONS WITH INFRASTRUCTURES DIVISIONS
R Q P
INFRASTRUCTURE AS LANDSCAPE,LANDSCAPE AS INFRASTRUCTURE
territorial tighten up G7
01
/04
FLOW THIKNESS
ROAD STRUCTURE
A4
TRAFFIC CONGESTIONS
A12
MORNING 08.00
AFTERNOON 18.00
NIGHT 21.00
A20
A20
A15
A16
A15
INTERSTICIAL DRAIN
-We have been working by giving them a way to stich between the different parts, whether industrial or agricultural. - Reuse roads with low flow to generate more tourism or agricultural activities. -Reconnect the urban and rural areas taking advantage of Green zones witch are around infrastructure. - Dispelling saturated industrial nodes to win prominence in agricultural environments that had been forgotten. MOST IMPORTANT MEETING POINTS WITCH TOOK PLACE ON THEANALYSI 1 - Areas of economic output limits are articulated as limits 2 - industrial areas and business parks in lower economic output . 3 - Infrastructure as separation or boundary between strong economic contrasts. VARIABLES 1.economic production of surface area 2.economic production of surface area 3.economic output per surface area + movement of infrastructure
ECONOMIC PRODUCTION
100 1.000 10.000 100.000 1.000.000 10.000.000 /AO
LINES OF ACTION
+ 10000000 10000000 1000000 100000 10000 1000
unbalance the economy and the flows through: 1-intensifing all industrial production at higth performance / / bust the industry -> witch will increased flows -> reactivation surrounding areas -> green areas that are adjacent to current industry will become industrial landfills. 2 - areas converted to intensive agriculture industrial-> flows will decrease and the economy, part of the infrastructure will be unused. To produce an economy equal to the industry should multiply by 6 the current surface of the Agriculture -> Agricultural production plants 6 heights? Will produce new agricultural landscape! 3 - tolls on hight used infrastructure (if economic variable introduced in the flow) -> unuse of these pathways with the direct consequence of the use of secondary (linked to green spaces and zero production) -> these pathways become obsolete? Does it become the new economic gaps? We will produce cross relationships between the hight producing gaps and zero production ones? 4 - set nodes where there is no flow -? 5 - put all the intensive farming -> redirection of flows sometimes leading to overwork infrastructure. 6 huge economic endowents and recreational green ring. -> increased flow at certain spots of the boundaries surrounding green cities. -> Reactivation surrounding areas.
02
/04
territorial tighten up G7
INFRAESTRUCTURE
1
E30
2
E25/A20
LAKES
FOPPENPLAS
1 4
6 3 2 5 7
NORTH SEA
E25/A20
MAASSLUIS SURFPLAS
ECONOMIC
INDUSTRY NATURAL POBLATION
HEMPARK
USES
10
SPORT NAUTIC
VLAARDINGEN CENTRUM
A13 AREA: 216 HA 5,4 KM POBLATION 8,0 KM AGRICULTURE AREA: 576 HA 2.8 KM POBLATION 3.4 KM INDUSTRY 22 KM AGRICULTURE
N471
3
WIJKPARK
FUTURA A4
KETHEL PRINSES BEATRIXPARK
4
A13/E19
5
A13/E19
N209
SCHIIEBROEKSEPARK WILGENPLASPARK ARGONAUTENPARK PLASWIJCKPARK BERGSE ACHTERPLAS ROTTERDAM NOORD
N209
N219
ROTTEMEREN
6
ROTTEMEREN
ENDRAGTSPOLDER SCHIIEBROEKSEPARK HET LAGE BERGSCHE BOS ARGONAUTENPARK PLASWIJCKPARK BERG EN BROEKPARK BERGSE ACHTERPLAS /VOORPLAS PRINSENMOLENPARK KRALINGSE BOS KRALINGSE PLAS ZEVENHUIZERPLAS WOLLEFOPPENPARK A20/E25
BERG EN BROEKPARK
E25/A20 E25/A20 A4
SCHIEDAM NIEUWLAND ORANGEPARK VOLKSPARK VLAARDINGENOEST VLAARDINGEN CENTRUM
WIJKTUIN
A20/E25
7
CAPELLE SCHOLLEVAAR ROTTERDAM ALEXANDER
8
A16/E19 E25/A20 A4
ROTTERDAM STADION OUDELANDSEPARK ZWANENEILAND BARENDRECHT PARK MOLENVLIET BERNISTE PUT VAN HEENVLIET BRIELSE MEER OOSTVOOMSE MEER
10
SLUFTER
N15
BRIELSE MEER OOSTVOOMSE MEER
VOLKSPARK
NORTH SEA
BREEDEWATER
RUIGEPLAATBOS OEDEVLIETSEPARK
N57
PARK HARTE VOGELENZANG PARK
MIDDENWETERINGPARK
ZWANENEILAND ZWANENMEER
A15
QUACKJESWATER
KRIMPENHERHOUT WETERINGBOS
A29 DE VEERPLAAT AREA: 1428 HA 15,7 KM 58,5 KM AGRICULTURE 10,8 KM INDUSTRY AREA: 1413 HA 8,15 KM POBLATION 25,8 KM AGRICULTURE 30,6 KM INDUSTRY AREA: 922 HA 8,6 KM POBLATION 27,5 KM AGRICULTURE
STRATEGY SCHEMES A
The A strategy is based on creating intensive agricultural production in all areas of zero output chosen to vary both the direction of the flow, as the amount of finance led to that area, to see how far he can rotterdam even change if the same power.
10
The B strategy, think in terms of population density has rotterdam and, as in zero environments economy, housing could create elements in height, to densify it promptly, and thus, change the concept of raised low density housing, and thus in the future leave the possibility of releasing the current living spaces.
A+B+C A
A+B+C+D
B+D B
B+D
A+B+C+D C
A+B+C
A+B+C+D
A+B+C+D
B D
The C Strategy, has been designed based on pre-existing industry already had, which was irregular production. Introducing intense production industry in those spaces with high relation thereto, so that vary from the main variables such as flow and economy to rotterdam facade itself, creating an element in its most industrial.
The strategy D, is different from the rest, since in this case we do not tighten any variable, but, reaprovechamos an existing industry that are all those obsolete, giving the average user, a scenario in which you can create from trade to parks or recreation, to free choice of the population of rotterdam that will transform your taste.
territorial tighten up G7
03
/04
DISTANCE SCHEME: PROPOSAL SCHEME: This infrastructure is a limit and we want to break it, but above all, we want to weave with adjacent. Our proposal aims to create a series of actions, a number of provisions, a number of spaces, and join them by railway and a highway underground, to hide the traffic cars and motorcycles, in turn also attach a set of rails bike. This green line is physically contained in 1,600 m, and in this corridor, in the middle there is a green band, which is going to act in large part, to the sides of this line are two small channels, which are to generate a series of allocations for the generation of different water sports activities such as canoeing and kayaking. They also say that the width of this corridor is between 144 m wide.
CONCEPT SCHEME: What we propose in this proposal is to link two cities, the city of Rotterdam, city to study, and the town of Delft, we seem to have generated a great opportunity with this green line, and so we act on this site, would generate one green envelopes in this corridor. Importantly, these two locations fail to touch and this is due to agriculture, so we aim to unite these two locations with a green corridor, and unite the towns to agriculture.
ROAD SCHEME: Studying the economic composition of Rotterdam we have realized that there is an economic vacuum long wingspan, is the A4, a planned road, now is a green corridor is a road that is cut and leave this space. It's really an infrastructure, but unoccupied. And linking the cities of Rotterdam and Delft.
territorial tighten up G7
04
/04