Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Banach Algebras and Spectral Theory (Lectures) - Coleman
Banach Algebras and Spectral Theory (Lectures) - Coleman
Robert F. Coleman
The following are notes to a course taught in 1996. They have not been seriously
edited, some things are repeated because they werent proven n the lecture where
they rst appeared and the reader will see that attempts were made to correct
mistakes made at one point (especially in the homework assignments) at a later
point. Lectures 1-26 are based on notes of Arveson although I take credit for any
errors. The remaining lectures are derived from Gohberg-Krejn, Introducuction
a la theorie des Operateurs lineaires non auto-adjoints dans un espace Hilbertien;
Grothendieck, La Theorie de Fredholm; Riesz-Nagy, Functional Analysis; Conway,
A Course on Functional Analysis and Dunford and Scwartz, Linear Operators, Part
II.
Lecture 1
The prerequisites for this course include linear algebra and some familiarity with
real and complex analysis as, well as measure theory. You should have seen Banach
and Hilbert spaces before. Some theorems that will be used without proof are:
The Baire category theorem The Hahn-Banach Theorem
The open mapping theorem The closed graph theorem
The Stone-Weierstrass Theorem and The Riesz-Marcov Theorem
A good reference for some of this material is Linear Operators: Part I by Nelson
Dunford and Jacob Schwartz as well as Notes on Measure Theory and Integration
on Locally Compact Spaces by William Arveson.
There will be weekly to biweekly homework assignments. My oce hours will
be Monday 4-5 and Wednesday 3-4. My email address is coleman@math.
Suppose V is a Banach space. This course will concern itself with continuous
linear operators L : V V . The basic problems are: given v V , determine
whether the equation
Lw = v
1
has a solution, nd one or get as close as you can to doing so.
The nite dimensional situation is one of the main motivations for the develop-
ment of the theory.
In the nite dimensional case you are given an n n matrix M = (a
ij
) and an
n-vector g = (g
1
, . . . , g
n
) and you want to solve the equation Mf = g, i.e., nd
(f
1
, . . . , f
n
) such that
j
a
ij
f
j
= g
i
.
Here V = C
n
. Now suppose V is the space of all square integrable functions on
the interval [a, b], L
2
([a, b]), and k L
1
([a, b]
2
). Let g V , Then we might want to
solve the equation
_
b
a
k(x, y)f(y)dx = g(x),
i.e., if M is ther operator on V ,
f
_
b
a
k(x, y)f(y)dx,
you might want to solve Mf = g.
Examples. 1. Fourier Inversion
Suppose V = L
2
(R). Find f such that
_
e
ixy
f(x)dy = g(x)
Solution:
f(y) =
1
2
_
e
ixy
g(x)dx.
2. Volterra (ca. 1900)
Suppose V = C([0, 1]) and k is the characteristic function of y < x on
[0, 1] [0, 1]. Let C. Solve the equation:
_
1
0
k(x, y)f(y) f(x) = g(x).
When ,= 0, ! a solution. What about = 0?
One application of the theory is:
2
Theorem. (Weiner) Suppose F() is a function on the unit circle with an absol-
lutely convergent Fourier series. I.e.,
F() =:
a
n
e
in
and
[a
n
[ < . Then if F has no zeroes, its inverse also has an absolutely
convergent Fourier series.
One has an analogue of the determinant when the operator M is compact;
there is an entire series whose zeroes are the inverses of the non-zero eigenvalues of
M (see Grothendieck, La Theorie de Fredholm Bull. Soc. Math. de France, 1956.)
3
Lecture 2
1. Review of operators on a Banach Space (Chapt III)
Let X be a Banach space over the complex numbers, i.e. a vector space over the
complex numbers complete with respect to an absolute value.
By an operator on X, I mean a continuous linear transformation T: X X
and B(X) will denote the set of all such.
Note B(X) is a ring. Moreover a linear map L: X X is in B(X) if and only if
Sup xX
|x|1
[L(x)[ < .
We let B
(X).
The Closed Graph Theorem. If A: X X is a linear transformation such that
the following set (the graph of A) is closed if and only if A B(X):
(x, A(x)) X X : x X.
4
2. The spectrum of an operator.
Let I B(X) be the identity.
Denition. Let A B(X). Then (A) is the set of C such that
AI
is not invertable. (A) is called the spectrum of A.
What we said about Volterras equation can be restated: Let V = C([0, 1]) and
k be the characteristic function of y < x on [0, 1] [0, 1]. Let A be the operator
on V
A(f) =
_
1
0
k(x, y)f(y).
Then our claims imply (A) = 0.
3. Spectra in nite dimensions (review)
Suppose X is nite dimensional. Then B(X) =? If A B(X), what is (A)? If
X ,= 0, (A) ,= . If (A) there exists a non-zero u X such that Au = u.
That is u is an eigenvector.
If dimX = then Aneed not have any eigenvectors. Eg. Suppose X = C([0, 1])
and
(Af)(x) = xf(x),
then A has no eigevectors (why?), but
Theorem (Gelfand). If X ,= and A B(X), (A) ,= .
5
4. Banach Algebras
Denition. A Banach algebra (over C) is a C-algebra A (not necessarily with
identity) complete with respect to a norm [[ [[: A [0, ).
Examples. 1. The Disk Algebra. 2. l
1
(Z)). 3. L
1
(R). (exercise (for Friday): show
associativity, does L
1
(R) have an identity?) 4. Any Banach space X. 5. ?
Homework problems due Friday Septemer 6
A. Let X be the Banach space of complex values continuous functions on ther unit
interval, C[0, 1] with the sup-norm. Set
V f(x) =
_
x
0
f(t)dt.
(This is the Volterra operator we talked about in class.) (i) Show V B(X) and
[[V [[ 1. (ii) Show V is injective and its range is all dierentiable functions on
[0, 1] (C
1
[0, 1]) which vanish at the origin. (iii) Show 0 is the spectrum of V .
B. Suppose Y and Z are Banach spaces. Let Y
i j
[a
i j
[.
Example. 8. Suppose G is locally compact group. Eg. R or Z under addition or
SL
n
(C) or the group of as transformations x ax +b.
Then there is a Haar measure on G and we let L
1
(G) be the set of all measurable
functions on G such that
[[f[[ =:
_
G
[f[d < .
We dene a convolution product on L
1
(G),
f g(y) =
_
G
f(x)g(yx
1
)d(x),
7
2. Quick review of Haar measures
Suppose X is a locally compact Hausdor space.
Denition. Suppose B is the -algebra determined by the topology on X. A
Radon measure on X is a countably additive measure : B [0, ] such that
(i) (E) = sup KE
K cpt
(K)
(ii) (K) < for all compact subsets of X.
Theorem (Loomis). If G is any locally compact group then there exists a Radon
measure ,= 0 on G unique up to a scalar multiple such that
(xE) = (E) if x G and E B.
3. The regular representation
Suppose A is a Banach space and an algebra (but not nec. a Banach algebra). For
a A let L
a
be the linear map A A, x ax and let R
a
denote the linear map
x xa. We say multiplication on A is separately continuous if R
a
and L
a
are
in B(A) for all a A
Theorem. If A has an identity 1
A
, and multiplication is separately continuous,
then the map a L
a
is a continuous isomorphism from A onto a Banach subalgebra
of B(A) such that L
1
A
= 1 and [[1
A
[[
1
[[x[[ [[L
x
[[ C[[x[[.
Lemma. If multiplication on A is separately continuous then there exists a con-
stant C > 0 such that
[[xy[[ C[[x[[ [[y[[.
Proof. We have to show Sup
|x|1
[[L
x
[[ < .
Now use,
PUB (Chapt. III 14). If / is a subset of B(X) such that for all x X,
Sup[Ax[: A / < then Sup[[A[[: A / < .
8
Homework problems due Friday Septemer 6
A. Let X be the Banach space of complex values continuous functions on ther unit
interval, C[0, 1] with the sup-norm. Set
V f(x) =
_
x
0
f(t)dt.
(This is the Volterra operator we talked about in class.) (i) Show V B(X) and
[[V [[ 1. (ii) Show V is injective and its range is all dierentiable functions on
[0, 1] (C
1
[0, 1]) which vanish at the origin. (iii) Show 0 is the spectrum of V .
B. Suppose Y and Z are Banach spaces. Let Y
.
Suppose A is a unital Banach algebra such that [[1
A
[[ = 1. We will write 1 for
1
A
. (We will suppose the norm of the identity is 1 whenever we talk about unital
Banach algebras.)
Theorem. If x A and [[x[[ < 1, then
(i) 1 x A
.
(ii)
[[(1 x)
1
[[
1
1 [[x[[
and [[1 (1 x)
1
[[
[[x[[
1 [[x[[
.
Corollary 1. A
x
1
is continuous.
Corollary 2. A
Corollary 2. A
0
1
0
_
(x )
1
(x
0
)
1
_
= (x )
2
.
Proof of Theorem.
Suppose (x) = . Let A
such that g[
V
= h and [g[ = [h[. (See Conway, Chapt. II Cor. 6.5)
Now we claim f is entire and lim
f() = 0.
Corollary 1. If x is quasi-nilpotent (x) = 0.
Corollary 2. The only Banach division algebra over C is C.
(The only nite dimensional division algebra over C is C (exercise).)
12
2. The Spectral Radius
Suppose A is a unital Banach algebra.
Denition. Suppose x A. Then set r(x) = Sup[[: (x), This is the
spectral radius of x.
Remarks. 1. r(x) [[x[[.
2. r(x) = [[r(x).
3. If P(x) is a polynomial and (x) then P() (P(x)).
4. r(x) liminf
n1
[[x
n
[[
1/n
.
Theorem (Gelfand-Mazur). For all x A,
r(x) = lim
n
[[x
n
[[
1/n
.
Claim. Fix x A, [[ < 1/r(x). Then (x)
n
: n Z is bounded.
Suppose we knew this, then
[[
n
[[x
n
[[ M < so [[x
n
[[
1/n
M
1/n
1
[[
if ,= 0.
Homework problems due Friday, September 13
1. Let V be the Volterra operator on C[01]. (a) Show V is quasinilpotent. (Hint:
Give an explicit formula for V
n
.) (b) Deduce that (V ) = 0.
2. Show the only (non-zero) nite deimensional division algebra over C is C
3. Let X be a compact Hausdor Space and A = C(X) (the Banach algebra of
continuous complex valued functions). (a) Show that (f) = f(X). (b) Deduce
that r(x) = [[x[[ in this Banach algebra.
4. Let H be a Hilbert space and suppose e
1
, e
2
, . . . is an orthonormal basis for H.
Suppose a
1
, a
2
, . . . is a sequence of complex number. (a) Show there is an A B(H)
such that Ae
n
= a
n
e
n
, n 1. (b) Show that A is quasi-nilpotent.
13
Lecture 6
1. Homework problems
Correction to homework problem for this week. Problem 4. should be:
Let H be a Hilbert space and suppose e
1
, e
2
, . . . is an orthonormal basis for H.
Suppose a
1
, a
2
, . . . is a sequence of complex numbers such that a
n
0. (a) Show
there is an A B(H) such that Ae
n
= a
n
e
n+1
, n 1. (b) Show that A is quasi-
nilpotent. To solve B (i): Suppose Y and Z are Banach spaces. For a Y Z,
set
[[a[[ =: inf
_
y
1
z
1
++y
n
z
n
=a
[y
i
[ [z
i
[
_
,
where the inmum is taken over all representations of a as a sum of tensors. Show
[[ [[ is a norm. Suppose [[a[[ = 0. We want to show a = 0. We will use the
Hahn-Banach Theorem.
Suppose A: Y Z C is a continuous linear map w.r.t. [[ [[, then, claim,
[[A[[ = max
||y||1,||z||1
[[A(y z)[[ := M.
It is clear that M [[A[[. Also, [[A(y z)[[ [[y[[ [[z[[M.
2. The Gelfand-Mazur Theorem
Suppose A is a unital Banach algebra.
Remarks. 1. If P(x) is a polynomial and (x) then P() (P(x)).
2. r(x) liminf
n1
[[x
n
[[
1/n
.
Theorem (Gelfand-Mazur). For all x A,
r(x) = lim
n
[[x
n
[[
1/n
.
Claim. Fix x A, [[ < 1/r(x). Then (x)
n
: n Z is bounded.
Suppose we knew this, then
[[
n
[[x
n
[[ M < so [[x
n
[[
1/n
M
1/n
1
[[
if ,= 0.
14
Proof of Claim.
By the PUB theorem (see Chapt. III Cor. 14.3), it suces to show for every A
sup
n1
[(
n
x
n
)[ < .
Consider the function on the disk B(0, 1/r(x)) around the origin of radius 1/r(x)
in C,
f() = ((1 x)
1
).
But (i) f is analytic and (ii) on disk B(0, 1/[[x[[),
f() =
n=0
n
(x
n
).
15
Lecture 7
1. Examples of operators
1. Multiplication operators
Let (S, ) be a -nite measure space. Let X = L
p
(S, ).
Denition. Suppose f L
(S, ). Let M
f
: X X be x fx.
Proposition. (i) M
f
is continuous,
(ii) [[M
f
[[ = [[f[[
(iii) r(M
f
) = [[M
f
[[.
Moreover the map f M
f
is an isometric isomorphism of L
into B(X).
Proof. Clearly, [[M
f
[[ [[f
[[. Now (L
1
)
= L
.
Suppose
1
p
+
1
q
= 1 and
h
n
=
k
n
[k
n
[
[k
n
[
1/p
and g
n
= [k
n
[
1/q
Then [[g
n
[[
q
1, [[h
n
[[
p
1 and
[M
f
h
n
, g
n
)[ [[M
f
[[;
while [M
f
h
n
, g
n
)[ [[f[[
. Thus, [[M
f
[[
n
= [[M
n
f
[[.
Suppose S = [0, 1], = dt and f = e
2ix
. Then (M
f
) = S
1
the unit circle.
2. Weighted shifts on l
2
.
16
Suppose H is a Hilbert space with orthonormal basis e
1
, e
2
. . .. Suppose
i
is
a bounded sequence in C. Claim: ! A B(H) such that
Ae
i
= a
a
e
i+1
.
The spectrum of A is a union of circles around the origin.
Suppose a
i
= 1 for all i. Then (A) = B[0, 1]. Let A
be the adjoint of A.
17
Lecture 8
1. The operator M
e
2it
What we need is:
Spectral Permanence Theorem. Suppose B is a complete Banach subalgebra
of a Banach algebra A and x B. Then,
B
(x)
A
(x).
2. Nuclear operators
Denition. Let X be a Banach space. By a nuclear operator, we mean an oper-
ator in the image of X
X in B(X).
Suppose (M, ) is a locally compact space with a measure.
Proposition (Grothendieck). Suppose M is compact and K(s, t) a continuous
function on M M. Then the operator
I
K
: f
_
K(s, t)f(T)d(t).
is nuclear with norm equal to
_
sup
s
[K(s, t)[d[[(t).
Denition. Suppose E is a Banach space. Then L
1
E
(M, ) is the Banach space of
L
1
() functions (or rather classes of functions) on M with values in E with norm,
[[ [[
,
[[f[[
=
_
[[[f(s)[[d[[(s)
Theorem (Grothendieck). The natural map from L
1
(M, )
E into L
1
E
(M, ) is
an isometry.
Proof. (Exercise.)
The proposition I stated in the notes last time is false. Please delete it from your
les. The correct statement is:
18
Corollary. Suppose E is a Banach space. There is a natural injection T
from
L
1
E
(M, ) into C
0
(M)
E such that if C
0
(M), f L
1
E
(M, ),
_
(s)f(s)d(s) = T
(f)().
Moreover, the norm of the linear map T
(f)() from C
0
(M) into E is
_
[[f(s)[[d[[(s). Moreover, C
0
(M)
E =
Im(T
E and
there is a natural map of L
1
(M, ) into C
0
(M)
f(x) =
_
x
0
(x t)f(t)dt,
then [[C
f[[
p
[[[[
1
[[f[[
p
.
Proof. Choose g L
q
, g 0 and [[g[[
q
1.
Hence, [[V
n
[[
1
n!
so is quasi-unipotent.
Homework problems due Friday Sept. 20
1. Let e
1
, e
2
, . . . be an orthonormal basis for a Hilbert space H. Suppose
1
,
2
, . . . is as bonded sequence of complex numbers. Let A B(H) be the weighted
shift dened by
Ae
n
=
n
e
n+1
, n = 1, 2, . . .
19
a) Show that for every C, [[ = 1, there is a unitary operator U
such that
U
AU
1
= A.
b) Deduce that the Spectrum of A is a union of circles centered at ther origin.
2. Suppose x is an element of a unital Banach algebra A whose spectrum is the
unit circle S
1
. Show that for any circle T in the complex plane, there is an element
of A whose spectrum is T.
3. Let A be a unital Banach algebra and let M
n
be the set of n n matrices over
C. Let be a surjective homomorphism from A onto M
n
.
a) Show that the kernel of is maximal.
b) Show that all maximal ideals are closed.
b) Deduce that is continuous if the topology on M
n
is determined by some norm.
4. Prove Grothendiecks theorem about L
1
E
(M, ).
20
Lecture 9
1. Volterra on L
p
[0, 1]
For 1 p < , f L
p
[0, 1] let V f(x) =
_
x
0
f(t)dt.
1. [[V [[ 1 (when p = 2, [[V [[ = 2/ (exercise)).
2. V
n
f(x) =
1
(n1)!
_
x
0
(x t)
n1
f(t)dt.
Claim: If L
1
[0, 1] and
C
f(x) =
_
x
0
(x t)f(t)dt,
then [[C
f[[
p
[[[[
1
[[f[[
p
.
Proof. Choose g L
q
, g 0 and [[g[[
q
1.
Hence, [[V
n
[[
1
n!
so is quasi-unipotent.
2. Ideals in a Banach Algebra
Suppose A is a Banach algebra (not necessarily) with a unit.
For us by an ideal I in A will be a two sided ideal, i.e. AI I IA.
Example. Suppose X is a Banach space, then the sets of nuclear or compact
operators are ideals in B(X) (exercise).
If I is an ideal of A, then A/I is a quotient ring and the sequence
0 I A A/I 0
is exact. Moreover, A/I is naturally a Banach algebra such that A A/I is
continuous if I is closed.
Remark. The closure of an ideal is an ideal.
Lemma. Let A be a unital Banach algebra and I an ideal in A. Then the following
are equivalent:
(i) I ,= A
21
(ii) 1 / A,
(iii) 1 /
I
(iv) [[1 z[[ 1 for all z I.
Corollary. If A is unital, maximal ideals are closed.
3. Homomorphisms
Suppose : A B is a continuous homomorphism of Banach algebras. Then we
get an injection
A/Ker()
B.
Proposition. is continuous, Ker() is closed and
[[ [[ [[[[.
Remark. If I is a maximal ideal, then A/I is simple (i.e. has no two sided ideals
besides 0 and A). If A is unital and communative then you know what A/I is.
3. Commutative Banach Algebras (Gelfand Theory)
Suppose A is a commutative unital Banach algebra
Denition. The spectrum of A is (A) = Hom
C
(A, C). (For us a homomorphism
of unital rings will take 1 to 1.)
The theorem we are going after is:
Theorem (Gelfand). If x A,
(x) = (x): (A).
Proposition. If (A), is continuous. (ii) (A) maximal ideals of A. (iii)
If (A), and x A,
[(x)[ r(x).
Corollary. If (A), [[ = 1.
Note: (A) ,= .
22
Lecture 10
0. Some measure theory.
To prove Grothendiecks Theorem on L
1
E
(X, ) all one needs is:
Corollary III.3.8 (Dunford and Schwartz). Suppose (X, ) is a measure space, F
is a Banach space and 1 p < . Then the set of -simple, integrable functions
with values in F is dense in L
p
F
(XC, ).
1. Homomorphisms revisited
Suppose : A B is a continuous homomorphism of Banach algebras. Then we
get an injection
A/Ker()
B.
Proposition. Ker() is closed, is continuous, and
[[ [[ [[[[.
2. Commutative Banach Algebras (Gelfand Theory)
Suppose A is a commutative unital Banach algebra
Denition. The spectrum of A is (A) = Hom
C
(A, C). (For us a homomorphism
of unital rings will take 1 to 1.)
Proposition. If (A), (i) is continuous. (ii) (A) maximal ideals of A.
(iii) If (A), and x A,
[(x)[ r(x).
Corollary. If (A), [[ = 1.
Note: (A) ,= .
23
3. The topology on the Spectrum of A
Some recollections on weak* topologies
If X is a Banach space, a basis of open neighborhoods of the origin in X
for the
weak* topology is:
B(S, ) =: h X
: [h(x)[ <
where S is a nite subset of X. It follows that if h
n
is a sequence of elements in
X
,
h
n
0 (weakly) if and only if h
n
(x) 0
for all x X.
Remarks. 1. (A) ball(A
).
2. (A) is weak* closed.
Proof. Suppose f A
l
1
(Z)
by
(a) =
n
a
n
n
,
for a = (a
n
) l
1
(Z). Set =
{1}
l
1
( z). Remarks: (i) A
1
(ii) [[
n
[[ = 1
(iii) a =
n=
a
n
n
, a = (a
n
) l
1
(Z).
(iv)
(A).
Proposition. The map
from S
1
to (A) is a homeomorphism.
Conclusion. If A = l
1
(Z) then
A is the algebra of all functions on S
1
which have
absolutely convergent Fourier series.
Is the map A
A is an isomorphism in this case?
25
3. Wieners Tauberian Theorem
Let AC be the ring of absolutely convergent Fourier series.
Theorem (Wiener). Let f AC C(S
1
) and suppose that f never vanishes.
Then f
1
AC.
Gelfands proof: AC = x: x l
1
(Z).
4. A =: C(X)
Suppose X is a compact Hausdorf space. For p X and f A, set
p
(f) = f(p).
Theorem. The map p
p
is an isomorphism of X onto (C(X)) and
f(
p
) = f(p).
Denition. If Y is a bounded subset of C, let
c(Y ) =
D: D Y, D is a closed disk.
It will be enough to prove:
Claim. If (C(X)) and f
1
, . . . , f
k
are real valued functions in C(X), the there
exists a p X such that
(f
i
) = f
i
(p).
To prove this we will use Riesz-Marcov and
Lemma. Let A
n=0
a
n
z
n
, [z[ < 1
be the power series expansion of f. Suppose
(i) f(z) ,= 0, for all [z[ 1. (ii)
n=0
[a
n
[ < . Show that if the power series
expansion of 1/f(z) is
n=0
b
n
z
n
, then
n=0
[b
n
[ < .
3. Show that the Gelfand transform for A = l
1
(Z) is an injection and its image is
not dense in C((A)).
27
Lecture 12
1. A =: C(X)
Suppose X is a compact Hausdor space. For p X and f A, set
p
(f) = f(p).
Theorem. The map p
p
is a homeomorphism of X onto (C(X)).
It will be enough to prove:
Claim. If (C(X)) and f
1
, . . . , f
k
in C(X), the there exists a p X such that
(f
i
) = f
i
(p).
To prove this we will use Riesz-Marcov.
2. The Riez-Marcov Theorem
In this section, suppose X is a locally compact Hausdor space. Let C
c
(X) be
the linear space of compactly supported continuous functions on X. A linear func-
tional on C
c
(X) is said to be positive if for all real valued f C
c
(X) such that
f(x) 0, x X,
(f) R and is 0.
(Note: If X is compact, C
c
(X) = C(X) and positive linear functionals are contin-
uous.) Also a Radon Measure is a positive inner regular Borel measure nite on
compact sets.
Theorem (Riez-Marcov). Let be a positive linear functional on C
c
(X). Then
there exists a unique Radon measure such that
(f) =
_
X
fd.
This gives a bijection between positive linear functionals for all opens U X,
(U) = sup(f): f C
c
(X), supp(f) U, 0 f 1.
28
3. End of Proof
Return to the notation and hypotheses of 1.
Denition. If Y is a bounded subset of C, let
c(Y ) =
D: D Y, D is a closed disk.
Lemma. Let A
i=1
[f
i
(p) (f
i
)[
2
.
29
Lecture 13
1. The radical of a commutative Banach algebra
Suppose A is unital commutative Banach algebra.
We have dened the Gelfand transform G: A
A C((A)). The kernel of G is
called the radical of A, denoted rad(A). We know
Proposition. rad(A) is the intersection of the maximal ideals of A.
Denition. The ring A is semisimple if rad(A) = 0 and called radical if
A/rad(A)
= C.
Examples. (i) If X is compact and A = C(X).
(ii) A = l
1
(Z)
(iii) V is the Volterra operator on L
2
[0, 1] and A is the completion of the subalgebra
of B(L
2
[0, 1]) generated by 1 and V .
In general, A/rad(A) is semi-simple.
2. Weighted convolution algebras
Let (w) = w
0
, w
1
, . . . be positive real numbers such that
(i) w
0
= 1
(ii) w
m+n
w
m
w
n
.
Examples. w
n
= r
n
or w
n
=
1
n!
.
Denition. We dene l
1
(Z
+
, w) to be the Banach algerbra consiting of sequences
a := (a
n
) of complex numbers such that
[[a[[ :=
n0
[a
n
[w
n
< .
Moreover, if b := (b
n
) l
1
(Z
+
, w), we set
(a b)
n
=
i+j=n
a
i
b
j
.
Let A = l
1
(Z
+
, w).
30
Lemma. (A, [[ [[) is a commutative unital Banach algebra.
Lemma. Let (A) and = (
{1}
. Then if a = (a
n
),
(a) =
n0
a
n
n
Proposition. (A) is isomorphic to the closed disk of radius inf w
1/n
n
.
Examples. If w
n
= r
n
, then A is semi-simple. Also,
(a
n
) =
n0
a
n
n
: [[ r.
If w
n
=
1
n!
, then A is radical.
3. Relative Spectra
Suppose A is a unital (not necessarily commutative) Banach algebra and B is a
closed unital subalgebra.
How does the spectrum of an element x of B relative to B compare to the spectrum
of x relative to A?
We know
B
(x)
A
(x).
Example. A = C(S
1
) and B, the closure of the subring P of polynomials. We know
(A) = S
1
. Claim: (B) = B[0, 1].
31
Lecture 14
1. The Spectral Permanence Theorem
Denition. Suppose X is a compact subset of C. By a hole of X, we mean a
bounded component of CX.
Now suppose B A are unital Banach algebras. Then,
Proposition. If x B,
B
(x)
A
(x) =
_
i
H
i
,
where the H
i
are some of the holes of
A
(x).
This is based on,
The Spectral Permanence Theorem. Let 1 B A be as above. Then,
B
(x)
A
(x).
Proof. Suppose 0
B
(x) and 0 ,
A
(x). Then
n
C(x),
n
0.
Corollary. Suppose H is a hole of
A
(x). Then either H
B
(x) or H
B
(x) = .
Proof. Let X =
B
(x) H. Then
X =
B
(x) H
A
(x) CH.
Corollary. Let x A and H
.
4. For T B(H), dene the numerical radius of T, w(T), by
w(T) = sup
||x||=1
[Tx, x)[.
Show
1
2
[[T[[ w(T) [[T[[.
5. For a nite dimensional vector space V over C, show that there is a natural map
from V
V with linear maps from V to itself, this is the trace. (iii) If X is a Banach
space, show that this map extends to X
X.
33
Lecture 15
1. End of the Spectral Permanence Theorem
The Spectral Permanence Theorem. Suppose B A are unital Banach alge-
bras. Then,
B
(x)
A
(x).
Corollary. Then, if x B,
B
(x)
A
(x) =
i
H
i
, where the H
i
are some of the
holes of
A
(x).
Corollary. Let x A and H
, ! h
0
H such that
L(h) = h, h
0
).
Moreover, [[L[[ = [[h
0
[[.
Proposition. For all L B(H), ! L
y).
Denition. A sesquilinear form [ , ] is bounded on H if and only if C R
such that
[[x, y][ C[[x[[ [[y[[.
34
Lemma (Riesz). For each bounded sesquilinear forms [ , ] on H ! T B(H) such
that
[x, y] = Tx, y).
Proof. Consider L
x
:= y [x, y].
Proof of Proposition.
Look at [x, y] = Lx, y).
3. Properties of the Adjoint Map
(i) A
= A
(ii) (aA+bB)
= aA
bB
(iii) (AB)
= B
(iv) [[A
A[[ = [[A[[
2
.
By an involutive Banach algebra we mean a Banach algebra with an involution
a a
satisfying (i)-(iii).
Examples. (i) l
1
(Z). (ii) Convergent power series on B[0, 1]. (iii) C(X).
4. C
-algebras
Denition. A C
a[[ = [[a[[
2
.
Examples. Let H be a Hilbert space. Then any norm closed subalgebra A of B(H)
such that A
= A.
What about l
1
(Z)?
Theorem. If A is a commutative unital C
y).
The following arer true:
(i) A
= A
(ii) (aA+bB)
= aA
bB
(iii) (AB)
= B
(iv) [[A
A[[ = [[A[[
2
.
By an involutive Banach algebra we mean a Banach algebra with an involution
a a
satisfying (i)-(iii).
Examples. (i) l
1
(Z). (ii) Convergent power series on B[0, 1]. (iii) C(X).
2. C
-algebras
Denition. A C
a[[ = [[a[[
2
.
Lemma. (i) [[A
[[ = [[A[[ so that A A
n=0
a
n
n!
Proposition. If x, y A such that xy = yx, then
exp(x +y) = exp(x) exp(y).
Lemma. Suppose a
n
b
n
A such that
n
[[a
n
[[ and
n=0
[[b
n
[[ are nite. Then,
_
n=0
a
n
__
n=0
b
n
_
=
n=0
c
n
,
where c
n
=
i+j=n
a
i
b
j
. Moreover,
n=0
[[c
n
[[ < .
37
Lecture 17
Example. The series
0
x
n
n
2
has radius of convergence 1 and converges on the unit
circle. Now a nd an example which is not absolutely convergent.
1. Commutative C
-algebras
Theorem. If A is a commutative unital C
=
x.) For all x A,
one can write x = x
1
+ ix
2
where x
i
= x
i
. Now suppose y A and y
= y and
consider exp(ity).
First supppose x
= x. We know [[ x[[
= [[x[[ we only
have to show [[x
2
[[ = [[x[[
2
.
Now apply Stone-Weierstrass.
Corollary. If x A is self-adjoint, then (x) R.
2. Spectral Permanence Re-emerges
Theorem. Suppose B A are unital C
. Claim: If x A
1
then x B
1
.
Also, if y
y is invertible y
1
= (y
y)
1
y
.
Corollary. For all T B(H),
(T) =
C
(T)
(T).
3. Functional Calculus for Normal Operators.
An operator a A is said to be normal if
aa
= a
a.
Let X =
A
(a).
38
What we want to do is to be able to evaluate functions continuous f on X at a
so that f(a) C
(a) and,
(i) f(a) = c if f is the constant function on X, x c.
(ii) z(a) = a
(iii)
f(a) = f(a)
.
I.e., we want to dene a -homomorphism from C(X) to C
(a).
Proposition. The map (C
(a) C((C
(a))
= C(X). The inverse is
the map we want.
Spectral Mapping Theorem. Suppose f C((a)), then
(f(a)) = f((a)).
Homework problems due Friday, Oct. 10
Let X and Y be compact Hausdor spaces and let : C(X) C(Y ) be a homo-
morphism of complex algebras (do not assume continuity).
1. Suppose is an isomorphism. (i) Let p Y . Show there ! q X such that,
f(p) = f(q), f C(X).
(ii) Show thwere exists a homeomorphism : Y X such that,
f = f , f C(X).
(iii) Conclude that is a self-adjoint linear map satisfying,
[[f[[ = [[f[[, f C(X).
2. Formulate and prove a theorem that characterizes unital homomorphisms
: C(X) C(Y ).
3. Show that neither l
1
(Z) nor the ring of convergent power series on B[0, 1] (with
the involutions and norms we have dened) are C
-algebras.
39
Lecture 18
1. Functional Calculus for Normal Operators. (Conway VIII 2)
An operator a A is said to be normal if
aa
= a
a.
Let X =
A
(a).
What we want to do is to be able to evaluate functions continuous f on X at a
so that f(a) C
(a) and,
(i) f(a) = c if f is the constant function on X, x c.
(ii) z(a) = a
(iii)
f(a) = f(a)
.
I.e., we want to dene a -homomorphism from C(X) to C
(a).
Proposition. The map (C
(a) C((C
(a))
= C(X). The inverse is
the map we want.
Spectral Mapping Theorem. Suppose f C((a)), then
(f(a)) = f((a)).
40
2. Positive elements of a C
-algebra (VIII, 3)
Suppose A is a C
[[ = [[a[[.
Such an algebra is called a -Banach algebra. (Eg., l
1
(Z).)
Denition. A representation of A is a -homomorphism of A into B(H) for
some Hilbert space H. Denote the set of these rep(A, H).
Note, we do not assume is bounded.
Denition. Set N
= 0, i.e., if
(A)x = 0 x = 0.
Remarks: (i) N
= ((A)H)
:= span(A)H
(iii) H = H
+N
.
Thus we can always suppose is non-degenerate by replacing with its projection
e
to H
.
(iv) [[(a)[[ = [[
e
(a)[[.
(v) If 1 A, non-degenerate implies (1) = 1.
Theorem. If rep(A, H), [[[[ 1.
43
Lecture 20
1. Representations are Continuous
Theorem. Suppose A is a -Banach algebra and H is Hilbert space. If
rep(A, H), [[[[ 1.
Proof. WOLG is non-degenerate.
Case 1: 1 A so (1) = 1. Claim: If a A, ((a)) (a).
Case 2: 1 , A. Extend to A
e
, via
((a, )) = (a) +.
2. Examples of representations
(i) Suppose H is a Hilbert space and N is a normal operator in B(H). Let
X = (N). Then we have an element in rep(C(X), H).
(ii) If X is a compact Hausdor space and is a Borel measure on X, (f) = M
f
is an element of rep(C(X), L
2
(X, )).
(iii) We have a representation of l
1
(Z) into B(L
2
[0, 1]).
3. The Spectral Theorem: Foreshadowing
Theorem. Suppose H is a nite dimensional Hilbert space. Let N be a normal
operator on H, let
1
, . . . ,
n
be the distinct eigenvalues of N and let E
i
be the
orthogonal projection of H onto Ker(N
i
). Then,
N =
n
i=1
i
E
i
.
This follows from the functional calculus for nite dimernsional Hilbert spaces. We
want to generalize this to arbitrary Hilbert spaces.
44
Denition. Suppose X is a set and is a -algebra on X and H is a Hilbert
space. A spectral measure on (X, ) is a function E: B(H) such that
(a) For each S , E(S) is a projection.
(b) P() = 0 and P(X) = 1.
(c) E(S T) = E(S)E(T) for S, T .
(d) If S
n
n=0
is a disjoint sequence of elements of , then
E(
_
n=0
S
n
) =
n=0
E(S
n
).
Remark: In fact, (a), (b) and (c) imply the series of operators above converges in
B(H) (exercise).
If X is a compact Hausdor space, f C(X)
_
fdE is a representation. Now
we can state:
The Spectral Theorem. Suppose N is a normal operator on a Hilbert space H.
Then there is a unique spectral measure on the Borel -algebra of (N), E
N
,
N =
_
zdE
N
(z),
if U is a non-empty open subset of (N), E
N
(U) ,= 0 and if A B(H), AN = NA
and AN
= N
A if and only if AE
N
(S) = E
N
(S)A for every Borel set S.
Homework problems due October 18
1. Suppose X is a Banach space. (i) Show that if I is a non-zero closed ideal which
is unital as a Banach algebra then I = B(X). (ii) Conclude that if X is innite
dimensional, the algebra of compact operators from X to itself is not unital. (iii)
Show the set of nuclear operators N (i.e., operators in the image of X
X) from X
to itself is a closed ideal and conclude N is not unital as an algebra if X is innite
dimensional.
2. A representation rep(A, H) is said to be cyclic if there is a vector e H
such that (A)e = H. Show example (ii) above is cyclic.
3. Prove that properties (a)-(c) of the spectral measure imply the sum in (d)
converges.
45
Lecture 21
Exercise: Self-adjoint projectors are orthogonal projectors. Also, Multiplication
operators are normal.
1. The extended functional calculus.
Suppose N B(H) is a normal operator. We want to dene a spectral measure
on X = (T). This turns out to be equivalent to an extention of our representa-
tion : C(X) B(H) to a representation : B(X) B(X) where B(X) the set
of bounded Borel measurable functions on X with a certain continuity property.
Recall:
Denition. A real valued Borel measurable function on a locally compact set
X is a function f such that f
1
((a, b)) is a Borel set for all real a < b. A complex
valued function is Borel measurable if and only if its real and imaginary parts are.
General setting
Suppose X is a compact Hausdor space, C(X) the continuous functions on X and
B(X) the set of bounded Borel measurable functions on X.
Note: 1. B(X) is a unital C
algebra.
[[f[[ = sup
xX
[f(x)[.
2. B(X) is inseparable if X is uncountable.
3. If f
n
B(X) is a sequence of functions satisfying
(i) [[f
n
[[ M <
(ii) lim
n
= f(x) exists for all x X.
Then f B(X).
4. Let f B(X), > 0 then a simple function f
0
such that [[f f
0
[[ < .
Denition. A representation : B(X) B(H) is said to be admissable if for all
sequences f
1
, . . . , f
n
, . . . such that [[f
n
[[ M < and lim
n
f
n
(x) = 0, x X,
46
one has
lim
n
[[(f
n
)h[[ = 0, h H.
2. Topologies on B(H).
1. Norm topology.
2. Strong and -strong:
(a) Suppose S = h
1
, . . . , h
n
H, then we dene the strong semi-norm;
[T[
S
= (
n
k=1
[[Th
k
[[
2
)
1/2
.
(b) Suppose S = h
1
, h
2
, . . . H such that
k=1
< , then we dene the
-strong semi-norm; [T[
S
= (
k=1
[[Th
k
[[
2
)
1/2
.
3. Weak and -weak:
(a) Weak seminorms; [T[ = [
n
j=1
Th
i
, g
i
)[.
(b) -weak semi-norms; [T[ = [
i=1
Th
i
, g
i
)[, where
[[h
i
[[
2
< and
[[g
i
[[
2
< .
4. Basic neighbnorhoods of 0:
(a) strong; T: [[Th
1
[[ < 1, . . . , [[Th
n
[[ < 1.
(b) -strong T:
i=1
[[Th
i
[[
2
< 1, if
i
[[h
i
[[
2
< .
(c) weak; T: [Th
i
, g
i
)[ < 1, 1 i n.
(d) -weak; T: [f
j
(T)[ < 1, 1 j m where f
j
(T) =
i=1
Th
j
i
, g
j
i
), etc.
Remark: Let : B(X) B(H) be a representation. TFAE:
(i) is admissable.
(ii) For all bounded sequences f
n
B(X) such that f
n
(p) f(p), p X,
(f
n
) (f) strongly.
(iii) . . . , (f
n
) (f) weakly.
Proof. Let g
n
= f
n
f. For (iii) (ii), consider [[(g
n
)h[[
2
.
47
Lecture 22
Mala pointed out that we dont need the ideal in Problem 1 to be closed and I dont
know if the ideal of nuclear operators is closed.
1. Some Basic Neighbnorhoods of 0:
Suppose h
1
, . . . , h
n
, g
1
, . . . , g
n
H.
Strong; T: [[Th
1
[[ < 1, . . . , [[Th
n
[[ < 1.
Weak; T: [Th
1
, g
1
)[ < 1, . . . , [Th
n
, g
n
)[ < 1.
Recall: A representation : B(X) B(H) is said to be admissible if for all se-
quences f
1
, . . . , f
n
, . . . such that [[f
n
[[ M < and lim
n
f
n
(p) = 0, p X, one
has
lim
n
[[(f
n
)h[[ = 0, h H.
Lemma. Let : B(X) B(H) be a representation. Then, the following are equiv-
alent:
(i) is admissible.
(ii) For all bounded sequences f
n
B(X) such that f
n
(p) f(p), p X,
(f
n
) (f) strongly.
(iii) For all bounded sequences f
n
B(X) such that f
n
(p) f(p), p X,
(f
n
) (f) weakly.
Proof. Replace f
n
by g
n
= f
n
f. For (iii) (ii), consider [[(g
n
)h[[
2
.
2. A General Extension Theorem
Theorem. Let rep(C(X), H) be a non-degenerate representation. Then there
is a unique admissible representation rep(B(X), H) such that
[
C(X)
= .
First we prove uniqueness.
Suppose rep(B(X), H) is admissable. Dene for all x, y H, f B(X)
()
x,y
(f) = (f)x, y).
48
Then:
1.
x,y
is a nite Borel measure.
Proof.
(i) Countable Additivity. Suppose E is a disjoint union of the Borel sets
E
1
, . . . , E
n
, . . . and
f
n
=
n
i=1
E
i
=
n
i=1
E
i
.
(ii)
_
fd
x,y
= (f)x, y)
Now suppose and are two admissible extensions of . Use Riesz-Marcov.
To prove existence, we have to talk about spectral measures.
3. Spectral Measures and admissible representations
Recall: Suppose (X, ) is a Borel space and H is a Hilbert space. A spectral
measure on (X, ) is a function E: B(H) such that
(a) For each S , E(S) is a (orthogonal) projection.
(b) E() = 0 and E(X) = 1.
(c) E(S T) = E(S)E(T) for S, T .
(d) If S
n
n=0
is a disjoint sequence of elements of , then
E(
_
n=0
S
n
) =
n=0
E(S
n
).
Proposition. Suppose rep(B(X), H) is admissible. Then P(S) = (
S
) is s
spectral measure.
Theorem. There is a one-to-one correspondence between spectral messures on X
and admissible representationsn of B(X).
49
Lecture 23
1. Back to the General Extension Theorem
Theorem. Let rep(C(X), H) be a non-degenerate representation. Then there
is a unique admissible representation rep(B(X), H) such that
[
C(X)
= .
End of the proof of uniqueness:
Suppose rep(B(X), H) is admissable. Dene for all x, y H, f B(X)
x,y
()(f) = (f)x, y).
We showed:
x,y
() is a nite Borel measure.
Now suppose and are two admissible extensions of . Then, by Riesz-Marcov,
x,x
() =
x,x
() for all x.
2. Existence.
Lemma. For all x, y H
x,y
M(X) (nite Baire measures on X) such that
f C(X),
_
fd
x,y
= (f)x, y).
Claim: [[
x,y
[[ [[x[[ [[y[[.
Finally, claim: for any f B(X), ! (f) B(X) such that
(f)x, y) =
_
fd
x,y
.
Now we have to show is an admissable representation. I.e.,
(A) (
f) = (f)
.
(B) (fg) = (f) (g).
(C) is admissable.
(A) Claim:
x,y
=
y,x
.
50
Now
(f)
x, y) =
(B) Claim: f B(X), f
x,y
=
(f)x,y
=
x,(f)
y
. First suppose f C(X).
Suppose g C(X). Consider,
_
gfd
x,y
(C) Suppose f
n
B(X), [[f
n
[[ M < , f
n
0 pointwise. (Use the dominated
convergence theorem.)
Homework problems due Fri. Oct. 25
Let H = L
2
[0, 1] and Af(x) = xf(x) for f H, x [0, 1].
1. Show there is a unique representation rep(C[0, 1], H) satisfying (1) = 1
and (u) = A where u(x) = x. Give an explicit description of this representation.
2. Compute, explicity, the admissible extension of to B[0, 1].
3. Let E be the spectral measure attached to A. Show that E is supported on [0, 1]
and show that for S B([0, 1]), E(S) = 0 if and only if m(S) = 0 where m is the
Lebesgue measure on [0, 1].
4. Let H = l
2
(Z). Let U be the unitary operator on H which takes e
n
:=
{n}
to
e
n+1
. (i) Show (U) = S
1
. (ii) Compute the spectral measure attached to U.
51
Lecture 24
1. Some clarcation:
In the existence part of the proof of,
Theorem. Let rep(C(X), H) be a non-degenerate representation. Then there
is a unique admissible representation rep(B(X), H) such that
[
C(X)
= .
we showed: For all x, y H !
x,y
M(X) such that f C(X),
_
fd
x,y
= (f)x, y)
and [[
x,y
[[ [[x[[ [[y[[. I claimed that it followed that for any f B(X), !
(f) B(X) such that
(f)x, y) =
_
fd
x,y
.
For this we need,
x,y
=
y,x
and a corollary of the Riesz Representation Theorem.
2. Spectral Measures and Admissible Representations
Theorem. There is a one-to-one correspondence between spectral measures on X
and admissible representations of B(X).
Recall: Suppose (X, ) is a Borel space and H is a Hilbert space. A spectral
measure on (X, ) is a function E: B(H) such that
(a) For each S , E(S) is a (orthogonal) projection.
(b) E() = 0 and E(X) = 1.
(c) E(S T) = E(S)E(T) for S, T .
(d) If S
n
n=0
is a disjoint sequence of elements of , then
E(
_
n=0
S
n
) =
n=0
E(S
n
).
Proof of theorem.
First suppose is an admissable representation. Set E(S) = (
S
).
52
Lemma. For each a spectral measure, P, with values in B(H) there exists a unique
bounded linear map
P
: B(X) B(H) such that [[
P
(f)[[ [[f[[
P
(
E
) = P(E).
Proof. Uniqueness is easy. For existence, dene, for S ,
x,y
(S) = P(S)x, y).
Claim: The map (x, y)
x,y
is a sesquelinear map of HH into M(X) such that
[[
x,y
[[ [[x[[ [[y[[,
where the left hand side is the total variation of the measure. Let S
1
, . . . , S
n
be
disjoint Borel subsets of X. Then,
i
, [
i
[ = 1, such that
i
[
x,y
(S
i
)[ =
i
P(S
i
)x, y)
By Riesz, f B(X), !
P
(f) B(H) such that
P
(f)x, y) =
_
fd
x,y
, x, y H.
Moreover, [[
P
(f)[[ [[f[[. Claim:
P
is an admissable representation.
3. The Spectral Theorem
The Spectral Theorem. Suppose N is a normal operator on a Hilbert space H.
Then there is a unique spectral measure on the Borel -algebra of (N), E
N
,
N =
_
zdE
N
(z).
Moreover, (i) if U is a non-empty open subset of (N), E
N
(U) ,= 0 and (ii) if
A B(H), AN = NA and AN
= N
A if and only if AE
N
(S) = E
N
(S)A for every
Borel set S .
53
Lecture 25
1. Frasers improvement
Recall, we stated,
Theorem. Let rep(C(X), H) be a non-degenerate representation. Then there
is a unique admissible representation rep(B(X), H) such that
[
C(X)
= .
But we never needed to be non-degenerate.
Also, we proved that if P is the spectral measure corresponding to an admissable
representation of B(X) into B(H),
(f) =
_
fdP.
2. The end of the proof of the Spectral Theorem
The Spectral Theorem. Suppose N is a normal operator on a Hilbert space H.
Then there is a unique spectral measure on the Borel -algebra of (N), E
N
,
N =
_
zdE
N
.
Moreover, (i) if U is a non-empty open subset of (N), E
N
(U) ,= 0 and (ii) if
A B(H), AN = NA and AN
= N
A if and only if AE
N
(S) = E
N
(S)A for every
Borel set S.
Proof. Let X = (X) and for h B(X), let h(N) =
_
hdE
N
denote its image in
B(H) under the extended functional calculus.
For (ii), we rst prove that if A commutes with N and N
is nite.
55
Lecture 26
1. The end of the end of the proof of the Spectral Theorem
Theorem. Suppose N is a normal operator on a Hilbert space H and E
N
is the
corresponding spectral measure. Then, if A B(H), AN = NA and AN
= N
A
if and only if AE
N
(S) = E
N
(S)A for every Borel set S.
Proof. Let X = (N) and for h B(X), let h(N) =
_
hdE
N
. We know this is
the unique admissible extention of the functional calculus. Recall, for x, y H we
produced a Borel measure
x,y
such that for all f B(X),
inf fd
x,y
= f(N)x, y).
We proved that if A commutes with N and N
is nite.
Theorem. If H is a separable Hilbert space, then the only ideal in B(H) which
contains a non-compact operator is B(H).
We will need,
56
Proposition. Suppose A is a C
algebra. If a A then a
a.
Proof of theorem. Note: All separable Hilbert spaces are isomorphic.
Corollary. If H is a separable Hilbert space, the only closed ideals in B(H) are
0, B
0
(H) and B(H).
For this we need,
Proposition. If H is a Hilbert space, every non-zero ideal in B(H) contains all
operators of nite rank.
Homework problems due Fri. Nov. 1
Consider the Hilbert spaces H
1
= l
2
(Z
+
), H
2
= L
2
[0, 1], H
3
= L
2
([0, 1] [0, 1]).
Let r
1
, r
2
, . . . be a countable dense subset of [0, 1]. Dene operators A
i
on H
i
by,
A
1
f(n) = r
n
f(n), A
2
f(x) = xf(x) and A
3
f(x, y) = xf(x, y).
1. Show that if H is a Hilbert space and A B(H), then A
= A if and only if
Ax, x) if real for all x H.
2. Show that (A
1
) = (A
3
) = [0, 1].
3. Compute the spectral measures E
A
1
E
A
2
and E
A
3
of A
1
, A
2
and A
3
. (You may
cite previous problem sets for A
2
.)
4. Show there is a Baire set X [0, 1] such that E
A
1
is concentated on X and E
A
2
is conentated on [0, 1]X.
57
Lecture 27
1. Spectral Theorem for Compact Normal Operators
Theorem. Suppose N is a compact normal operator on the Hilbert space H. Then
the spectrum of N is countable and if S is the set of non-zero elements in (N) and
P
S
P
.
Lemma. If N is a normal bounded operator on a Hilbert space H, h H and
C, then if Nh = h, N
h =
h.
Proposition. If N is a normal bounded operator on a Hilbert space H and h H,
C such that Nh = h, then f(N)h = f()h if f is a Borel function on (N)
such that either f is continuous or f vanishes in a neighborhood of .
Proof. (Exercise) Is the converse true for continuous functions? What is the right
statement for Borel functions which includes the statement for continuous functions?
Proposition. Suppose N is a normal operator and is an isolated point of the
spectrum of N. Then if U = ,
U
(N) is the orthogonal projector onto the
-eigenspace of N.
Proof. First z
U
(z) =
U
(z). Next if Nx = x,
Proof of theorem.
2. The Riesz projector
(For me projectors are not necessarily orthogonal.)
(See Gohberg-Krejn, Introduction to the Theory of Linear Nonselfadjoint Operators.
(1969).)
For a bounded operator L on a Banach space, let (L) = C(L). This is called
the resolvant set of L.
58
Suppose X is a Banach space and A is a bounded linear operator on X. For
(A) the operator R() := R
A
() = (A )
1
is called a resolvant. The
function R() from C(A) to B(X) is an analytic function (exercise).
Suppose G is a bounded open subset of C whose boundary, :=
G
is a nite
union rectiable closed curves contained in (A). Such an open set is called an
admissable domain. Orient
G
positively with respect to G. Let
P
:= P
(A) =
1
2i
_
R()d.
Proposition. The operator P
= P
X and (1 P
)X,
are closed and invariant under the action of A. Moreover, (i) the spectrum of the
restriction of A to L
then P
(A) = P
. Then,
P
2
S
= (
1
2i
)
2
_
dd
Next claim:
(A)
1
2i
_
R
z
z
dz =
_
P
S
C
G
1 P
S
G
.
59
Lecture 28
1. The Riesz projector
Suppose X is a Banach space and A is a bounded linear operator on X. Suppose G
is an admissable domain for A with boundary :=
G
. an admissable domain.
Let S = G(A) and S
= (A)S. Orient
G
positively with respect to G. Recall,
we dened
P
S
=
1
2i
_
R()d.
and we proved it is a projector and depends only on S. Also, if
L
S
= P
S
X and N
S
= (1 P
S
)X
then L
S
and N
S
are closed subspaces invariant under the action of S. We used the
fact that
1
2i
_
1
z
dz =
_
1 if G
0 if ,
G
to prove,
(A)
1
2i
_
R
z
z
dz =
_
P
S
C
G
1 P
S
G
.
Proposition. (i) the spectrum of the restriction of A to L
is S,
(ii) the spectrum of its restriction to N
is S
and
(iii) P
S
= 1 P
S
.
Proof. Indeed, (A[
L
S
) (A) and (A[
N
S
) (A).
60
2. Radical Multiplicty
Suppose A is a bounded operator on a Banach space X. A point C is called
normal for A if there exists an integer n 0 such that
N
:= (A)
n
X = (A)
n+1
X, L
:= Ker(A)
n
= Ker(A)
n+1
L
is closed and N
and
X = N
.
The subspace L
S
(A) =
S
dim(N
(A)).
The theorem we want to prove is:
Theorem. Suppose G is an admissable domain for A such that S := G(A) is a
nite set of normal points of A. Then there exists a constant > 0 depending only
on A and G such that for all B B(X) such that [[AB[[ < , G is an admissable
domain for B, (B) G =: T is a nite set of normal points for B and
S
(A) =
T
(B).
Theorem. For a point
0
(A) to be a normal point for A it is necessary and
sucient the
0
be an isolated point of (A) and P
0
be a nite rank operator.
Moreover, in this case P
0
X = L
0
and N
0
. Let R = (A
2
0
)
1
. Then,
(A
l
)
1
=
(A
2
)
1
=
61
Lecture 29
Suppose A is an operator on a Banach space X.
1. Radical Multiplicity
A general lemma we have used a couple of times is,
Lemma. Suppose X = Y Z and Y and Z are A-stable closed subspaces. Then
(A) = (A[
Y
) (A[
Z
). Or equivalently, A is invertible if and only if its
restrictions to Y and Z are.
If is an isolated point of (A), let P
= P
{}
.
Theorem. For a point
0
(A) to be a normal point for A it is necessary and
sucient that
0
be an isolated point of (A) and P
0
be a nite rank operator.
Moreover, in this case P
0
X = L
.
Proof. Suppose
0
(A) is normal and let A
1
and A
2
be the restrictions of A to
L
0
and N
0
. Let n = dimL
0
and P be the projection of X onto L
0
with kernel
N
0
.
We showed that for ,=
0
but close to
0
, (A)
1
=
(
0
)
1
n
k=0
_
A
1
0
0
_
k
P + (A
2
0
)
1
k=0
_
0
A
2
0
_
k
(1 P).
Theorem. Suppose G is an admissible domain for A with boundary . Then every
point of G is normal if and only if the the the Riesz projector P
X and N = (1 P
)X. Let A
L
and
A
N
be the corresponding restrictions. We know (A
L
) is nite, disconnected from
(A
N
) and equal to (A) G.
62
For the other direction we need another lemma on the Riesz projector,
Lemma. Suppose S and T are to disjoint closed-open subsets of (A). Then,
P
S
P
T
= P
T
P
S
= 0.
Proof. (Exercise.)
Corollary. If S is a nite discrete subset of (A),
P
S
=
S
P
and P
= 0 if ,=
.
Back to the proof of the theorem.
2. Towards Stability of Radical Multiplicity
Lemma. Suppose P and Q are two projectors in B(X) such that [[P Q[[ < 1.
Then, dim(PX) = dim(QX) (which may be innite).
Proof. First, claim: If f QX, [[Pf[[ (1 [[P Q[[)[[f[[.
Homework problems due Nov. 8
1. Show if N is a normal bounded operator on a Hilbert space H and h H, C
such that Nh = h, then f(N)h = f()h if f is a Borel function on (N) such that
either f is continuous or f vanishes in a neighborhood of . Is the converse true
for continuous functions? Formulate a statement for Borel functions which includes
the statement for continuous functions?
2. If A is a normal operator on a Hilbert space H and S is closed open subset
of (A) and is the chacteristic function of S, show P
S
= (A). (Hint: First
show that if P and Q are commuting projectors which commute with A, then
(PQA) (PA) (QA).)
63
Lecture 30
Suppose A is a bounded operator on a Banach space X.
1. Normal points
We proved,
Theorem. Suppose G is an admissible domain for A with boundary . Then every
point of G is normal if and only if the the the Riesz projector P
S
(A) =
S
dim(N
(A)).
Theorem. Suppose G is an admissable domain for A such that S := G(A) is a
nite set of normal points of A. Then there exists a constant > 0 depending only
on A and G such that for all B B(X) such that [[AB[[ < , G is an admissable
domain for B, (B) G =: T is a nite set of normal points for B and
S
(A) =
T
(B).
In fact, if is the boundary of G, R() is the resolvant of A at and
= min
1
[[R()[[
= min
min
xX
||x||=1
[[(A)x[[,
one can take
=
2
+l()/2
(< ).
64
Proof. Suppose B B(X) and [[AB[[ < . Then (B) because
(B ) =
_
1 (AB)R()
_
(A).
Now,
[[P
(B) P
(A)[[ =
1
2
R()
j=1
_
(AB)R()
_
j
d
l()
2
max
[[AB[[ [[R()[[
2
1 [[AB[[ [[R()[[
.
We conclude
[[P
(A) P
(B)[[ < 1.
Example. (Exercise) Suppose X = C[0, 1] and h(x) = 1 for x [0, 1]. Let
Af = f(0)h. What is (A)? Let G = B(1, r) for r < 1. What is ? First
l() = 2r.
max
xI
[f(0) f(x)[ max [f(0)(1 )[, [[f(0)[ [[[
One more homework problem due Nov. 8.
3. Suppose S and T are to disjoint closed-open subsets of (A). Show,
P
S
P
T
= P
T
P
S
= 0.
65
Lecture 31
The Fredholm Determinant
Suppose E is a Banach space. If u E
n=1
Tr (u
n
)
z
n
n
_
.
We will prove:
Theorem. If u F(E), det(1 zu) converges on the entire complex plane. All
non-zero complex numbers are are normal points for u and if C
, 1/ is a zero
of the Fredholm determinant of u of order n if and only if the radical multiplicity
of u at is n.
2. Some linear Algebra
(I generalized vector spaces while giving this lecture to A-modules.) For a vector
space E,
E will denote its dual and , ) the natural pairing between E and
E. An
n-linear map from V to W is a map f(x
1
, . . . , x
n
) from V
n
to W, which is linear
in each variable. It is said to be symmetric if
f(x
1
, . . . , x
n
) = f(x
(1)
, . . . , x
(n)
),
for all S
n
the symmetric group on 1, . . . , n. There is a obvious pairing between
n
E and
E,
x
1
x
n
, x
1
x
n
) = x
1
, x
1
) x
n
, x
n
),
66
and between
_
n
E and
_
n
E,
x
1
. . . x
n
, x
1
. . . x
n
) = det(x
i
, x
j
)).
There exist a canonical homomorphism
n
from
n
E into
_
n
E,
n
(x
1
x
n
) = x
1
x
n
and one, a
n
, the other way,
a
n
(x
1
x
n
) =
1
n!
S
n
x
(1)
x
(n)
.
If F is another vector space and u
1
, . . .
,
u
n
L(E, F), we dene u
1
u
n
in
L(
n
E,
n
F) by
x
1
x
n
u
1
(x
1
) u
n
(x
n
),
and u
1
u
n
in L(
_
n
E,
_
n
F) by
u
1
u
n
=
1
n!
n
(u
1
u
n
) a
n
.
(This needs to be modied when one talks about modules (See the notes The
determinant, after lecture 35).) In particular, u
1
u
n
takes
x
1
x
n
to
1
n!
S
n
u
1
(x
(1)
) u
n
(x
(n)
),
and if u
1
= u
2
= = u
n
= u, this map takes x
1
x
n
to u(x
1
) u(x
n
).
In general, u
1
u
n
is n-linear and symmetric.
If u
i
= e
i
f
i
, e
i
E and f
i
F, then
i
u
i
= ( e
1
e
n
) (f
1
f
n
)
and
i
u
i
=
1
n!
( e
1
e
n
) (f
1
f
n
)
67
Lecture 32
Fix a commutative unital ring A. Recall, if E and F are A-modules
L(E, F) := L
A
(E, F) denotes the A-homomorphisms from E to F and
E = L(E, A).
Let L
f
(E, F) =
E F. Also set L(E) = L(E, E) and L
f
(E) = L
f
(E, E).
Fundamental Forms
We have a natural map L
f
(E) L(E) (an injection when E is free) and we have
a trace map
Tr L
f
(E) A
e
i
f
i
e
i
(f
i
)
Last time we made a map fromL(E, F)
n
to L(
_
n
E,
_
n
F), (u
1
, . . . , u
n
) u
1
u
n
such that if u
i
= e
i
f
i
,
i
u
i
=
1
n!
( e
1
e
n
) (f
1
f
n
),
where
( e
1
e
n
)(e
1
e
n
) = det(e
i
, e
j
)).
This means (u
1
, . . . , u
n
) u
1
u
n
,
L
f
(E)
n
L
f
(
n
E),
Denition. If E is an A-module and n is a positive integer, let the fundamental
form
n
on L
f
(E)
n
be the symmetric linear form dened by
n
(u
1
, . . . , u
n
) = Tr u
1
u
n
.
In particular, if u
i
= e
i
f
j
,
n
(u
1
, . . . , u
n
) =
1
n!
det( e
i
, f
j
)).
We set
n
(u) =
n
(u, . . . , u) and
0
(u) = 1. We signal, L(E) acts on L
f
(E) from
both sides and if A L(E),
n
(u
1
A, . . . u
n
A) =
n
(Au
1
, . . . , Au
n
).
The theorem we want is
68
Theorem. Suppose E is free of rank n and u L(E). Then
det(1 +u) =
n=0
n
(u).
This latter sum is nite because:
Proposition. Suppose u L(E, F) and u(E) is contained a submodule generate
by m elements. Then
_
k
u = 0 for all k > n.
Proof. Recall,
_ _
k
u
_
(x
1
x
k
) = ux
1
ux
k
.
Our form
n
is n-linear form on L
f
(E) so we can think of it as a linear form on
n
(
E E) and so a 2n-linear form on E
n
E
n
, where it is
1
n!
det(e
i
, e
j
)). This
is clearly alternating in the variables e
1
, . . . , e
n
and in the variables e
1
, . . . , e
n
. Say
such a form is bi-alternating.
Lemma. If f is a n-times linear bi-alternating form on L
f
(E)
n
, there exists a
unique linear form g on
_
n
E
_
n
E such that
f(u
1
, . . . , u
n
) = g(u
1
u
n
).
Proposition. If E is free of nite rank, any n-linear bi-alternating form on L
f
(E)
n
such that
f(u
1
A, . . . u
n
A) = f(Au
1
, . . . , Au
n
) ( for A, u
i
L
f
(E))
is a multiple of
n
.
Proof. Such an f corresponds to a g as above such that
g(BU) = g(UB) [U =
i
u
i
, B =
n
A, A, u
i
L
f
(E)].
Homework problems due Nov. 15
Compute for the radical multiplicity example of Monday.
69
Lecture 33
1. Research Problem
Suppose E is Banach space and A is a unital comutative Banach algebra contained
in B(E). Let E
A
= Hom
Cont
A
(E, A). If h (A) then we set h(E) = E
h
C so
we have a homomorphism E h(E), e 1 e which we will call h. We also
have a homomorphism E
A
h(E)
A
h(E
A
) h(E)
which we call h
. For a
series, f(T) =
n=0
a
n
T
n
A[[T]], let h(f(T)) =
n=0
h(a
n
)T
n
. Then h
h is
a homomorphism from E
A
A
E to h(E)
A
E so that h
h is continuous h (A),
if E
E A.
and if for u E
E
det
A
(1 Tu) = exp
_
n=1
Tr (u
n
)
z
n
n
_
,
then
h
_
det
A
(1zu)
_
= det(1 zh(u)).
2. Some Ideas
Its clear what semi-norm to put on E
A
E. Namely,
[[u[[ = sup
h(A)
[[h(u)[[.
For various reasons I dont think this will work in general. But there is one case I
expect it to work, i.e., when E has a basis over A. That is, suppose there exist
e
i
E, i 0 such that for each d E there exist unique a
i
A, i 0 so that
n
i=0
a
i
e
i
d.
70
Lecture 34
1. More on the Fundamental Forms
Suppose E is an A-module and n is a positive integer. Recall, we dened the
fundamental form
n
on L
f
(E)
n
by
n
(u
1
, . . . , u
n
) = Tr u
1
u
n
.
Our form
n
is an n-linear form on L
f
(E) so a linear form on
n
A
(
E
A
E) and
so a 2n-linear form on E
n
E
n
, where it is
1
n!
det(e
i
, e
j
)). This is alternating
in the variables e
1
, . . . , e
n
and in the variables e
1
, . . . , e
n
. Say such a form is bi-
alternating.
Lemma. If f is a n-times linear bi-alternating form on L
f
(E)
n
, there exists a
unique linear form g on
_
n
E
A
_
n
E such that
f(u
1
, . . . , u
n
) = g(u
1
u
n
).
Proof. Functorial properties of and imply the existence of a unique linear form
g on
_
n
E
_
n
E such that if e
i
E and f
i
F,
f( e
1
f
1
, . . . , e
n
f
n
) = n! g
_
( e
1
e
n
) (f
1
f
n
)
_
.
Also recall, if u
i
= e
i
f
i
, then
i
u
i
=
1
n!
( e
1
e
n
) (f
1
f
n
).
Lemma. If E is free of nite rank, any n-linear bi-alternating form on L(E)
n
is a
multiple of
n
if
f(u
1
A, . . . u
n
A) = f(Au
1
, . . . , Au
n
) (for A, u
i
L(E)).
Proof. Such an f corresponds to a g as above, such that
g(BU) = g(UB) [U =
i
u
i
, B =
n
C, C, u
i
L
f
(E)] ().
71
The point is that,
Cu
1
. . . Cu
n
= (
n
C)(u
1
. . . u
n
).
Check when n = 2: Suppose x
1
, x
2
E and u
i
= a
i
b
i
. Then, 2(CC)((u
1
u
2
)(x
1
x
2
))
= (C C)
_
a
1
(x
1
)b
1
a
2
(x
2
)b
2
a
1
(x
2
)b
1
a
2
(x
1
)b
2
_
= a
1
(x
1
)C(b
1
) a
2
(x
2
)C(b
2
) a
1
(x
2
)C(b
1
) a
2
(x
1
)C(b
2
)
= 2(Cu
1
Cu
2
)(x
1
u
2
)
Now it follows that () holds true for all U
_
n
E
A
_
n
E and for all
B = C
1
C
n
(C
i
L(E)).
Hence for all B
_
n
E
A
_
n
E. Let F =
_
n
E. Then from (), we know g is
proportional to the trace form which is what we wanted.
Proposition. This conclusion of the lemma will hold if we can write E = M N
with the properties that u
i
(M) = 0, u
i
(E) N and N is free of nite rank.
Proof. Just restrict to N.
This is always the case when A = C.
72
Lecture 35
1. More on the Fundamental Forms
Suppose E is an A-module and n is a positive integer. Recall, we dened the
fundamental form
n
on L
f
(E)
n
by
n
(u
1
, . . . , u
n
) = Tr u
1
u
n
.
Lemma. If f is a n-times linear bi-alternating form on L
f
(E)
n
, there exists a
unique linear form g on
_
n
E
A
_
n
E such that
f(u
1
, . . . , u
n
) = g(u
1
u
n
).
Lemma. If E is free of nite rank, any n-linear bi-alternating form on L(E)
n
is a
multiple of
n
if
f(u
1
A, . . . u
n
A) = f(Au
1
, . . . , Au
n
) (for A, u
i
L(E)).
2. Taylor series for det(1 +u).
Theorem. Suppose E is free of rank m and u L(E). Then
det(1 +u) =
n=0
n
(u). ()
Proof. First
m
(u) = det(u).
Also,
n
(1) =
_
m
n
_
.
Lemma. Suppose p m. Then.
n
(u
1
, . . . , u
p
, 1, . . . , 1
. .
np
) =
__
m
n
_
_
_
m
p
__
p
(u
1
, . . . , u
p
)
73
Proof of Theorem.
Now if E is not free of nite rank but u L
f
(E), the right hand side of () still
makes sense and this well take as a denition of the left hand side in this case.
(Warning: we may not be able to identify L
f
(E) with a sub-module of L(E) in
general.)
Call a direct summand of E which is free of nite rank a DSFR. If N is a DSFR
and u(E) N, then
det(1 +u) = det((1 +u)[
N
). (exercise)
(This is false in general (see note below, The determinant).) So in particular, if
u, v and uv all have images inside the same DSFR, (this is false in general) then
det(1 +u) det(1 +v) = det
_
(1 +u)(1 +v)
_
Homework problems due Fri. Nov. 22
A. Do the exercise above.
B. Generalize Theor`eme 1, Chapitre II of La Theorie de Fredholm to our context
of Banach A-modules.
ermail note:
Dear Class,
Mala pointed out to me that problem A is false as stated. It is true when L
f
(E)
injects into L(E) and in general the two sides dier by an invertible element of A.
Prove this instead. To prove the second of these two assertions, assume
det(1 +u)det(1 +v) = det((1 +u)(1 +v)),
for u and v in L
f
(E), which we will prove.
Also, to convince you that we are not just barking at the wind, a good example
of a Banach A-module is: the module C(X, E) over the ring A = C(X), where X
is a compact Hausdor space, E is a Banach space and C(X, E) is the space of
continuous functions from X into E. See you tomorrow,
Robert
74
The Determinant
Suppose A is a commutative unital Q-algebra. Let T be the category of triples,
(M, N, ( , )) where M and N are A modules and
( , ): M N A
is a A-bilinear pairing, with the obvious morphisms. Supppose T = (M, N, ( , )) T .
Then we can make an A-algebra R
T
out of M N by setting,
(mn) (l p) = (l, n)mp.
We also have an A-module homomorphism Tr : R
T
A determined by
Tr (a b) = (a, b).
We can make a monoid G
T
out of R
T
by setting
f g = f +g +fg.
We will label the element in G
T
corresponding to a R
T
, 1 +a. We wish to make
a homomorphism from G
T
into the monoid A under multiplication,
det
T
: G
T
A.
We have a symmetric A-module n-linear map R
n
T
_
n
M
_
n
N written
(u
1
, . . . , u
n
) u
1
u
n
described on decomposable elements as follows:
( e
1
d
1
, . . . , e
n
d
n
) goes to
1
n!
e
1
e
n
d
1
d
n
.
We also have a pairing between
_
n
M and
_
n
N dened by
( e
1
e
n
, e
1
e
n
)
n
= det(( e
i
, e
j
))
75
and so we have an element
_
n
T :=
_ _
n
M,
_
n
N, ( , )
n
_
of T and an A-module
homomorphism
Tr :
n
M
n
N A.
Now, we dene, for u
i
R
T
,
T,n
(u
1
, . . . , u
n
) = Tr (u
1
u
n
)
and if u R
T
we put
T,n
(u) =
T,n
(u u), n > 0,
T,0
(u) = 1 and we set
det
T
(1 +u) =
n=0
T,n
(u).
(This is a nite sum.) Claim: det
T
: G
T
A is a homomorphism of monoids.
By what we did in class, we know det
T
is a homomorphism (honestly, the determi-
nant) when M is free of nite rank over A, N =
M and ( , ) is the natural pairing.
(In this case, R
T
is the ring of n n matrices over A.) We will prove the general
case, by using this and functoriality.
Clearly, the associations T R
T
and T G
T
are functorial, T
T,n
is functorial
as well and so is T det
T
. Suppose u =
n
i=1
a
i
b
i
and v =
m
i=1
c
i
d
i
are ele-
ments of R
T
. Let F be the free A-module on the symbols x
1
, . . . , x
n
and y
1
, . . . , y
m
.
Let f: F M be the A-module homomorphism determined by f(x
i
) = a
i
and
f(y
i
) = c
i
and let S be the element of T , (F, N, ( , )
) where
(x, n)
= (f(x), n).
Clearly there is a morphism from S to T which takes
u
=
n
i=1
x
i
b
i
and v
=
m
i=1
y
i
d
i
to u and v respectively and so
det
S
(1 +u
) = det
T
(1 +u), det
S
(1 +v
) = det
T
(1 +v) and
det
S
_
(1 +u
)(1 +v
)
_
= det
T
((1 +u)(1 +v)
_
.
76
Now there is also an obvious morphism from S to T
= (F,
F, , )) where , ) is
the natural pairing. Let u
and v
the image of v
in R
T
.
Then,
det
S
(1 +u
) = det
T
(1 +u
), det
S
(1 +v
) = det
T
(1 +v
) and
det
S
_
(1 +u
)(1 +v
)
_
= det
T
((1 +u
)(1 +v
)
_
.
The claim now follows from the fact that det
T
: G
T
A is a homomorphism.
Examples:
(i) Suppose A = C[x]/x
2
, M = xA and N =
M with the natural pairing. Then
N
= M and generated by the homomorphism : M A, m m. The module
MN ,= 0 (in fact, is isomorphic to M and generated by u := x) but the natural
map from MN to End
A
(M) is 0. We note that Tr u = x and det(1+u) = 1+x.
(ii) Now let A = C[a, b, c, d]/(a
2
+ bc, d
2
+ bc, (a + d)b, (a + d)c). (Think of
B =
_
a b
c d
_
and suppose B
2
= 0.) Let M be the module
Ae
1
+Ae
2
(ae
1
+ce
2
, be
1
+de
2
).
(Think of the column vectors
_
a
c
_
and
_
b
d
_
. (Do these generate the module of
v A
2
such that Bv = 0?)) There are elements f
1
and f
2
M determined by
f
1
(e
1
) = a and f
1
(e
2
) = b
f
2
(e
1
) = c and f
2
(e
2
) = d
Let u = f
1
e
1
+ f
2
e
2
M M. Then the image of u in End
A
(M) is 0,
Tr u = a +d and det(1 +u) = 1 + (a +d) + (ad bc). One can show (a +d)
3
= 0
and (ad bc)
2
= 0 but, (a +d)
2
,= 0.
If u M
M and u
2
= 0, I think, Tr u is nilpotent.
77
The Exponential and the Determinant
Denote the T in the section The determinant by T
A
(we will be changing rings).
We will say an element T = (M, N, ( , )) T
A
is free of nite rank if M is free of
nite rank, N =
M and ( , ) is the natural pairing.
Suppose T = (M, N, ( , )) T
A
. First, we can make an element
T(z) = (M(z), N(z), ( , )
z
) of T
A[z]
by setting
M(z) = M
A
A[z], N(z) = N
A
A[z]
and extending ( , ) in the obvious way. If u R
T
, then zu R
T(z)
.
Proposition. If u R
T
,
det(1 zu) = exp
_
n=1
Tr (u
n
)
z
n
n
_
. ()
Proof. If B is a square matrix over C
det
_
exp(B)
_
= exp(Tr B).
which one proves by checking it is true for upper triangular matrices and is well
behaved under conjugation. It follows that it is true for square matrices B over
C[z] and then after completing z-adically for square matrices B over C[[z]]. Now
suppose, A = C and T T
A
is free of nite rank. Let u R
T
. Set B = log(1 zu)
(thinking of u as a square matrix) and we deduce () in this case. Now, still in this
case, we may regard the coecients on both sides of () as polynomials over Q in
the entries in the matrix corresponding to u. From this we deduce that () is true
for any T T
A
free of nite rank over any Q-algebra A. The result, in the general
case, follows by functoriality.
78
Lecture 36
1. Determinants
Denition.. Suppose E is an A-module and and u L
f
(E). Then we set
det(1 +u) =
n=0
n
(u). ()
When E is free of nite rank this is a true formula.
Call a direct summand of E which is free of nite rank a DSFR. If N is a DSFR
and u(E) N, then
det(1 +u) = det((1 +u)[
N
). (exercise)
So in particular, if u, v and uv all have images inside the same DSFR, then
det(1 +u) det(1 +v) = det
_
(1 +u)(1 +v)
_
2. Banach A-modules.
Suppose E is a Banach space and A is commutative unital Banach algebra which
acts continuously on E. Call such a thing a Banach A-module. Suppose that E
is the submodule of
E consisting of continuous A-module homomorphisms E A.
For u E
1
A
A
E
n
, set
[[u[[ = inf
_
m
i=1
[y
i 1
[ [y
i n
[
_
,
where the inmum is taken over all representations
y
1 1
y
1 n
+ +y
m1
y
mn
= u.
Let E
1
A
E
n
denote the corresponding completion.
79
3. The Fredholm Determinant
Proposition. On (E
A
E)
n
,
[[
n
[[
k
n
n!
,
where
k
n
= sup
(x
i
)E
n
,(x
i
)E
n
||x
i
||=||x
j
||=1
[[ det(x
i
, x
j
))[[.
Proof.
Theorem. Suppose the Gelfand transform of A isometric. Then, the n-times linear
map
n
on (E
E)
n
extends by continuity to (E
E)
n
and the series
n=0
n
(u).
is absolutely convergent on E
E.
Proof. Use Hadamard and Stirling: n!
2n
_
n
e
_
n
.
Corollary. The series det(1 Tu) is entire in T.
80
Lecture 37
1. The Fredholm Resolvant
For u E
E set R(u, T) =
det(1 uT)/(1 uT) = 1 +
_
u
1
(u)
_
T + +b
n
(u)T
n
+
where b
n
(u) = b
n1
(u)u
n
(u) and b
0
(u) = 1.
Theorem. If A = C or (?), the series R(u, T) is entire in T.
Corollary. If A = C, the set of inverses of non-zero elements in the spectrum of
the image of u in B(E) is the zero locus of det(1 Tu).
2. Analysis of the Fredholm resolvant.
Assume: If w E and h(w) = 0 for all h
E, then w = 0.
Proposition/Denition. Given u
1
, . . . , u
n
L
f
(E) there exists an
R
n
(u
1
, . . . , u
n
) L(E) determined by the identity
Tr(vR
n
(u
1
, . . . , u
n
)) = (n + 1)
n+1
(u
1
, . . . , u
n
, v).
Set R
n
(u) = R
n
(u, . . . , u).
Proof. We can suppose u
i
= x
i
x
i
and v = x
x. Set x
n+1
= x and x
n+1
= x
and let M = (x
i
, x
j
))
1i,jn
. Then
(n + 1)!
n+1
(u
1
, . . . , u
n
, v) = det(x
i
, x
j
))
= det M x, x
) +
1i,jn
ij
x
i
, x
)x, x
j
).
Now set
R
n
(u
1
, . . . , u
n
) =
1
(n + 1)!
det
_
_
_
_
M
x
1
.
.
.
x
n
x
1
. . . x
n
1
_
_
_
_
82
Proposition. For A,
R(u, ) =
n=0
R
n
(u)
n
.
Lemma. If u
1
, . . . , u
n
and v are elements of L
f
(E), (n + 1)
n+1
(u
1
, . . . , u
n
, v) =
i=1
n
(u
1
, . . . , u
i1
, y
i
, u
i+1
, . . . , u
n
) +
n
(u
1
, . . . , u
n
) Tr v
where y
i
can be either u
i
v for all i or vu
i
for all i.
Proof. Wolog u
i
= x
i
x
i
and v = xx. Expand by minors. The key point is that
u
i
v = x, x
i
) x x
i
and x
i
, x) x
i
x.
Corollary.
R
n
(u) =
n
(u) uR
n1
(u) =
n
(u) R
n1
(u)u.
83
Lecture 38
1. Analysis of the Fredholm Resolvant (continued)
Assume: If w E and h(w) = 0 for all h
E, then w = 0.
Proposition/Denition. Given u
1
, . . . , u
n
L
f
(E) there exists an
R
n
(u
1
, . . . , u
n
) L(E) determined by the identity
Tr(vR
n
(u
1
, . . . , u
n
)) = (n + 1)
n+1
(u
1
, . . . , u
n
, v).
Set R
n
(u) = R
n
(u, . . . , u).
Proposition.
R(u, T) = det(1 +uT)/(1 +uT) =
n=0
R
n
(u)T
n
.
Lemma. If u
1
, . . . , u
n
and v are elements of L
f
(E), (n + 1)
n+1
(u
1
, . . . , u
n
, v) =
i=1
n
(u
1
, . . . , u
i1
, y
i
, u
i+1
, . . . , u
n
) +
n
(u
1
, . . . , u
n
) Tr v
where y
i
can be either u
i
v for all i or vu
i
for all i.
Proof. Wolog u
i
= x
i
x
i
and v = xx. Expand by minors. The key point is that
u
i
v = x, x
i
) x x
i
and x
i
, x) x
i
x.
Corollary.
R
n
(u) =
n
(u) uR
n1
(u) =
n
(u) R
n1
(u)u.
84
2. Entirety of Fredholm Resolvant
Suppose now A is a commutative unital Banach-Algebra. To prove the Fredholm
resolvant series is entire we need an assumption in addition to that the Gelfand
transform is isometric:
Denition. Call a Banach A-module E with the following property a Hahn-
Banach module. If w E,
[[w[[ = sup[[h(w)[[ : h Hom
A,cont.
(E, A), [[h[[ = 1.
Proposition. If the Gelfand-Transform of A is isometric and E is a Hahn-Banach
A-module, then the n-times linear map R
n
on (E
A
E)
n
to L(E) extends by
continuity to (E
A
E)
n
and the series
n=0
R
n
(u)
is absolutely convergent on E
E.
Homework problems due Monday, Dec. 1
A. Suppose E is a Banach space and X is a compact Hausdor space. Let A = C(X)
and M = C(X, E) denote the set of continuous maps of X into E. (i) Show the
Gelfand transform of A is isometric. (ii) Show M is a Hahn-Banach A-module with
norm, the sup norm. (iii) If U is a continuous map from X into B(E), then the map
N
U
(f)(x) = U(x)(f(x))
is an operator on M over A. Suppose V is a nuclear operator on E and
V U = (x V U(x)). Show N
V U
is nuclear over A (i.e. in the image of M
A
M).
(iv) If U(x) is in nuclear for all x, is N
U
nuclear over A? If not, nd additional
hypotheses to force it to be.
85
Lecture 39
1. Entirety of Fredholm Resolvant
Suppose now A is a commutative unital Banach-Algebra.
Denition. Call a Banach A-module E with the following property a Hahn-
Banach module. If w E,
[[w[[ = sup[[h(w)[[ : h Hom
A,cont.
(E, A), [[h[[ = 1.
Assume from now on that the Gelfand transform of A is isometric and E is a Hahn-
Banach A-module. We know: Given u
1
, . . . , u
n
L
f
(E) there exists an
R
n
(u
1
, . . . , u
n
) L(E) determined by the identity
Tr(vR
n
(u
1
, . . . , u
n
)) = (n + 1)
n+1
(u
1
, . . . , u
n
, v).
Moreover, if R
n
(u) = R
n
(u, . . . , u),
R(u, T) = det(1 +uT)/(1 +uT) =
n=0
R
n
(u)T
n
.
Proposition. If the Gelfand-Transform of A is isometric and E is a Hahn-Banach
A-module, then the n-times linear map R
n
on (E
A
E)
n
to L(E) extends by
continuity to (E
A
E)
n
and if u E
E, the series
n=0
R
n
(u)
is absolutely convergent.
This follows from,
Lemma. On (E
A
E)
n
,
[[R
n
[[
k
n+1
n!
,
where
k
m
= sup
(x
i
)E
m
,(x
i
)(E
)
m
||x
i
||=||x
j
||=1
[[ det(x
i
, x
j
))[[.
86
2. The Fredholm Determinant and the Spectrum
Set L
(E) = E
E. Suppose u L
(E) and u = 0,
then 1u is invertible in L
e
(E). (ii) The element 1 u is invertible in B(E) if and
only if 1 u is invertible in L
e
(E).
Proof. Suppose 1 u is invertible. Write its inverse in the form 1 v. Then
v = u+ uv so v = w for some w L
= M/I
M =: M
C,
where I
and
for e M
, put [[e[[
= E for all .
87
Lecture 40
Riesz Theory
Now we follow Serres Endomorphismes compl`etements continues des espaces de
Banach p-adiques, Publ. Math. I.H.E.S., 12 (1962) 69-85.
Let D =
d
dT
. We say a is a zero of H(T) in A of order h if D
s
H(a) = 0 for s < h
and D
h
H(a) A is invertible.
Let u L
(E) and set P(T) = det(1 Tu) and R(T) = R(u, T).
Proposition. Suppose a A is a zero of P(T) of order h. Then we have a unique
decomposition
E = N(a) F(a)
into closed submodules such that 1au is invertible on F(a) and (1au)
h
N(a) = 0.
Proof. From (1 uT)R(T) = P(T), we get
(1 Tu)D
n
R(T) nuD
n1
R(T) = D
n
P(T).
Suppose for simplicity, h = 2. And let c = D
2
P(a). Then,
(1 au)R(a) = (1 au)DR(a) uR(a) = 0
(1 au)D
2
R(a) 2uDR(a) = c.
Set
e = c
1
(1 au)D
2
R(a), and f = c
1
uDR(a).
Then e +f = 1 and fe
2
= 0. Now dene projectors p = e
2
and q = 2ef +f
2
.
Corollary. When A = C, dimN(a) = h.
We will need,
88
Proposition (Proposition 2 of Grothendieck). Suppose A = C and E can be
expressed as a direct sum M
1
M
2
of closed subspaces and p
1
and p
2
are the
corresponding projections. Then L
(E
i
) is naturally isomorphic to p
i
L
(E)p
i
and
if uM
1
M
1
,
det(1 +u) = det(1 +u
M
1
) det(1 +u
M
2
) (u
M
i
= p
i
up
i
)
Proof of Corollary.
Suppose M
1
is a nite dimensional subspace of N(a) left invariant by u, say of
dimension m. Then, using the Hahn-Banach theorem, there exists a closed comple-
ment M
2
. Let u
1
and u
2
be as in the proposition . Since M
1
is nite dimensional
and (1 au)
h
M
1
= 0, L
(M
1
)
= End(M
1
) and det(1 u
1
T) = (1 aT)
m
. Thus
(1 aT)
m
[P(T) and so m h and so n := dim(N(a)) h.Also, using the proposi-
tion with respect to the decomposition:
E = N(a) F(a)
P(T) = (1 aT)
n
det(1 au
F(a)
).
But since 1 a u is invertible on F(a), n = h.
I think one can prove more gernerally:
Theorem. Suppose P
u
(T) = Q(T)S(T) where Q(T) is a polynomial of degree d
whose leading coecient is a unit, Q(0) = S(0) = 1 and (Q(T), S(T)) = 1. Then
there is a direct sum decomposition
E = N F
into closed submodules such that Q
(u)N = 0, Q
(T) = T
d
Q(T
1
).
89
Lecture 41
1. Hilbert-Schmidt and Nuclear Operators
(See Dunford and Schwartz, Vol. 2 XI.6 & XI.9 and Gohberg and Krejn Chapt.
III 8-10.) Suppose (X, ) is a pair consisting of a locally compact Haus-
dor space X and a positive Borel measure . Let H = L
2
(X, ). Then if
k(x, y) L
2
(X X, ) we have dened an operator K on H by
Kf(x) =
_
X
k(x, y)f(y)d(y). ()
These are called Hilbert-Schmidt operators.
Theorem. The set of Hilbert-Schmidt operators is the -ideal of operators K in
B(H) characterised by the property that for an orthonormal basis B of H the
sum
[[K[[
2
:=
_
hB
[[Kh[[
2
_
1/2
is nite. In fact, all Hilbert-Schmidt operators are compact and the above sum is
independant of the choice of B.
We also have dened nuclear operators to be those operators in the image of H
H.
Lemma. The map H
H B(H) is an injection.
Theorem. The product of any two Hilbert-Schmidt operators is nuclear and if K
is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator,
[[K[[
2
=
_
Tr (K
K).
Proposition. If X = [a, b], = dt and k(x, y) is continuous then the operator K
dened in () is nuclear if it is self-adjoint and positive and if it is nuclear
Tr K =
_
b
a
k(x, x)d(x).
90
2. Classes of Compact Operators
If T is a compact operator on a Hilbert space H, so is T
1
(T)
2
(T)
be the points in the spectrum of A listed with multiplicty. We set
[[T[[
p
=
_
i=1
i
(T)
p
_
1/p
,
for p < , [[T[[
i
(Z)( , e
i
)f
i
= Z.
Idea of Proof.
Using the polar decomposition, we can write Z = UP, where U is a partial isometry
and P = (Z
Z)
1/2
. Now apply the spectral theorem to P.
This is called the Schmidt series for Z.
Denition. An operator A on H is said to have nite matricial trace if and only
if the sum,
(A
i
,
i
)
91
is nite for any orthonormal basis
i
of H.
Theorem. An operator A B(H) has a nite matricial trace if and only if it is in
S
1
. Moreover, the sum
(A
i
,
i
)
is independant of the choice of the basis.
Lemma. Suppose B is a self-adjoint positive operator. The sums, M
i
(B
i
,
i
),
where
i
is an orthonormal basis, are independant of the choice of the basis and
B has nite matricial trace if and only if B S
1
.
Proof. Let C = B
1/2
. If
j
is another orthonormal basis
M
k=1
[[C
k
[[
2
=
j
[(C
k
,
j
)[
2
=
Proof of Theorem.
We use the Schmidt series for A. In fact, we claim all these sums equal
j
(A)(f
i
, e
i
)
Call the sum in the theorem Tr A.
Corollary. The map H
H into S
1
:
u := ( , h), g) L
u
: v v, h)g.
The trace norm of L
u
is [[h[[ [[g[[. This gives us a map from H
H to S
1
of norm
at most 1. To go the other way, we use the Schmidt series.
92
Lecture 42
Gohberg-Krejn Win
Gohberg-Krejn prove (Dunford-Schwartz do also) that all the [[ [[
p
are norms.
Lemma. [[ [[
p
[[ [[.
Lemma. Suppose A B
0
(H) and
j
s
j
(A)( , e
j
)f
j
is its Schmidt series. Let
B B(H) and
i
be any orthonormal basis. Then
i
(AB
i
,
i
) =
i
(BA
i
,
i
) =
i
s
i
(A)(Bf
i
, e
i
).
Proof.
AB =
j
s
j
(A)( , B
e
j
)f
j
BA =
j
s
j
(A)( , e
j
)Bf
j
and
i
(
j
s
j
(
i
, b
j
)a
j
,
i
) =
j
s
j
i
(a
i
,
i
)(
i
, b
i
).
Call,
i
(C
i
,
i
), Tr C (which could be ).
Corollary. If Aand B are as in the proposition, Tr AB = Tr BAand Tr A
= Tr A.
Proposition.
[[A[[
1
= sup
||B||1
[ Tr AB[. ()
Proof. Let U[A[ be the polar decomposition of A. If B = U
[[
1
= [[A[[
1
. (iii) S
1
is a -ideal complete
w.r.t. [[ [[
1
. (iv) H
A S
1
and
so S
2
is a -ideal.
Corollary. If A, C S
2
, AC S
1
.
Proof. Let B = C
. Then
(A+B)
(A+B) A
AB
B = A
B +B
A
(A+iB)
(A+iB) A
AB
B = iA
B iB
A
Theorem. Suppose H = L
2
(X, ) and k(x, y) L
2
(X X, ) =: H
2
. Then
the operator on H
Kf(x) =
_
X
k(x, y)f(y)d(y)
is in S
2
(H) and [[K[[
2
= (k, k)
2
.
Proof. Let
i
be an on basis for H. Let f
ij
=
i
(x)
j
(y). Then f
ij
is an on
basis for H
2
. Then
(k, k)
2
=
i
[(k, f
ij
)
2
[
2
,
and
(k, f
ij
)
2
=
_
XX
k
(x)k(x, y)
j
(y)dxdy
= (K
j
,
k
).
Proposition. Suppose (X, ) = ([a, b], dt), k(x, y) is continuous and K is self-
adjoint and positive. Then K is nuclear and
Tr K =
_
b
a
k(x, x)dt.
Idea of proof. Let
i
(x) be an orthonormal set corresponding to s
i
(K). Then
k(x, y) =
i
s
i
(K)
i
(x)
i
(y).
94
Lecture 43
Odds and Ends (Dunford-Schwartz come back)
Proposition. S
1
is complete with respect to the trace norm.
Proof. Suppose [[A
n
A
m
[[
1
0. Then A B(H) such that [[A A
n
[[ 0.
Suppose k R, k [[A
n
[[
1
, n. Let B B(H), [[B[[ 1, let
i
iI
be an
orthonormal basis and let J be a nite subset of I. Then,
iJ
(AB
i
,
i
)
= lim
n
iJ
(A
n
B
i
,
i
)
k.
Proposition. S
2
is a -ideal complete w.r.t. [[ [[
2
.
Proof. Suppose A S
2
. Then we know [A[
2
= A
A S
1
. Let U[A[ = A be the
polar decomposition of A. Then
AA
= U[A[
2
U
.
Now, we know [[A[[
2
=
( Tr A
A)
1/2
=
_
i
(A
A
i
,
i
)
_
1/2
=
_
ij
[(A
i
,
j
)[
2
_
1/2
.
Hence,
[[A+B[[
2
=
_
ij
[((A+B)
i
,
j
)[
2
_
1/2
ij
[(A
i
,
j
)[
2
_
1/2
+
_
ij
[(B
i
,
j
)[
2
_
1/2
= [[A[[
2
+[[B[[
2
.
Proposition. Suppose (X, ) = ([a, b], dt), k(x, y) is continuous and K is self-
adjoint and positive. Then K is nuclear and
Tr K =
_
b
a
k(x, x)dt.
95
Idea of proof. Let
i
(x) be an orthonormal set corresponding to s
i
(K). Then
k(x, y) =
i
s
i
(K)
i
(x)
i
(y).
(One needs to know that one can choose the
i
to be continuous (and not just in
L
2
which is easy and Mercers Theorem which asserts that then the right hand side
uniformly converges to the left (Riesz-Nagy 98) to make this work.)
Highlights of the Course
The main object in this course was the spectrum (T) of an operator T in a Banach
algebra A. One basic fact is:
the radius spectral of T [[T[[
with equality if A is a C
B
(x) =
A
(x)
_
i
H
i
where the H
i
are some holes of
A
(x) and
B
(x) =
A
(x) if A and B are C
algebras.
If N is a normal operator on a Hilbert space then the functional calculus tells us
we can evaluate continuous functions f on (N) at N and the spectal theorem is
the assertion that there is a reasonable way to evaluate Borel functions too.
One corollary of the spectral theorem we used while studying compact op-
erators is that if Z is a compact operator there exist positive real numbers
1
(Z)
2
(Z) such that
i
(Z)( , e
i
)f
i
= Z.
96
We spent some time trying to understand Grothendiecks paper on the Fredholm
determinant and managed to generalize the main results to operators on a module
over a Banach algebra. This and the result we proved about the stability of radical
multiplicity sheds some light on how the spectrum changes as the operator varies.
97