Professional Documents
Culture Documents
04-04-2007 - S208 Week 1
04-04-2007 - S208 Week 1
Week 1
4 April 2007
Janet Shim
Course Theme
meanings and interpretations of the illness experience, and the actions that ensue from that
Background
C. Wright Mills – individual experiences are inevitably/continuously shaped by and can only
be made sense of in terms of the larger society/context in which that person is living. so
there will be constant interaction between biography/everyday life of the person and the
unfolding broader history/context of the society. so the point of the sociological imagination
is to try to understand what those linkages are. ascribes a very different approach to
health/disease/illness than the biomedical model. it’s saying the entire experience of an
illness is much more than these symptoms.
symbolic interactionism
Central Issues
how health and illness are conceptualized and defined
we pay more attention to certain kinds of diseases
certain diseases much more legitimated
process by which diseases are legitimated
definitions of health vs. illness and their relation to one another
social construction is all about definition, something we do in interaction/conversation with
one another. individual and collective conceptions of what entities mean
dialogue between theory and empirical work
breaking down traditional binaries (science as objective discovery of the truth vs. science is
actually a particular way of looking at things, and we attribute particular significance to it)
Blumer, Herbert. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley: University
of California Press. Pp. 1-21.
John: people developing meanings from interaction with other people; in the absence of
interaction, we can develop meaning on our own
how does one develop meaning on their own?
John: pivots on sense of self-identity
Alyssa: self as an object
what does it mean to treat one’s self as an object?
Alyssa: meanings you attach to what you do
John: p. 12 – “The notion of oneself as an object fits into the earlier discussion of objects.
Like other objects, the self-object emerges from the process of social interaction in which
other people are defining a person to himself.”
SI is a specific kind of social psychology. sociologists have a very different definition of
social psychology than do psychologists. grew out of philosophical tradition of pragmatism.
idea that self is very important in the pragmatist view of the world. notion (Cooley) of the
looking-glass self. you can look into a mirror and see yourself the way others see you. this
becomes a metaphor for how one’s sense of self is the pivot for social interaction. ongoing
conversation between self as subject and self as object.. self as I see it, and self as others see
me. becomes difficult to distinguish object-self from subject-self
what is social about the self – this impact of society upon individual sense of self – is not so
much (in the pragmatist tradition) a determinative outcome; it’s not simply top-down, and we
aren’t simply being molded. what’s social about it is that we always have to take note of
what the governing social patterns are, regardless of whether we choose to follow them.
3 basic tenets of SI:
1. humans act toward things based on the meanings those things have for them
• (in contrast with other theoretical notions that meaning is intrinsic to an object)
• it’s the importance of the act. (prevailing question: how is action social? (socially
motivated, etc.) first premise SI says it comes out of meanings we assign to
situations/objects/other people.
• even though this process may unfold regularly, in fact it’s still
unfolding/contingent/emergent
2. meanings of things are derived/arise from social interaction
• the act/process of recognizing what’s happening.. whether more implicit or
explicit, you’re continually taking note of what’s occurring in the world around
you. it’s not just that the self is receptor for all of these things and you
automatically reproduce them; it’s that you take note of them – it’s an active
process.
• one of the ideas about SI is that the reality that matters to us is not the totality of
things in our environment. the reality that matters to us is what we take notice of,
what we deem to be important/legitimate, that attract our attention for some
reason. cognitively, we can’t take note of everything in our environment; we are
selective, and part of that is socially patterned. what’s interesting about thinking
about health and illness in this context is that you can look at health and illness
experiences in ways that haven’t been done before. premise of 3rd tenet of SI.
• prescriptive vs. descriptive agenda
3. renegotiation of meanings; meanings can be revised. but this has to happen in social
interaction.
• this is how new diseases actually arise (here’s something we haven’t noticed
before, we have to take notice)
• part of the reason Goffman studied stigma and how social institutions and
societies treat/think about stigma is in part prescriptive; he argued it does a huge
disservice in its reproduction
Goffman splits actual social identity from virtual social identity, but for most interactionists,
it’s just the self
Williams, Simon. 1987. “Goffman, interactionism and the management of stigma in everyday
life.” Pp. 134-64 in Sociological Theory and Medical Sociology, edited by Graham
Scambler. New York: Tavistock.
making the linkage between the meaning of the stigma and the actions one takes toward the
stigma and the consequences of that action for one’s interactions with others.. what are the
interactional dilemmas that follow from the strategy of passing?
you have to keep it up
issue of managing information
John: kind of information people manage is determined by the social setting
people who do not reveal they have higher education, depending on where they are working
Goffman emphasizes that everybody is already discreditable; everyone engaged in managing
info about ourselves, presenting sides of ourselves that are particularly desirable/acceptable.
whole issue of stigma and discreditability and information management are issues for all of
us.
Kim: reminds me of adolescence.
Kim: people who don’t appear to be disabled being accosted about parking in handicapped
spots
the social cost, psychological and individual costs of trying to pass all the time, because of
the significant stakes of disclosure
courtesy stigma – if you associate w/ someone who is associated w/ stigma, it brings up issue
of legitimacy, visibility, invisibility
passing = attempt to hide a minimally visible or invisible stigma.
covering = truly interactional work that one has to undertake to make the normal feel as
comfortable as s/he can, and for the normal to pretend the stigma doesn’t exist
the interactional dilemma revolves around an awkward interaction (with no socially
accepted way, at least from vantage point of normals)
-------------