Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fluidized Bioreactor For Ethanol
Fluidized Bioreactor For Ethanol
Fluidized Bioreactor For Ethanol
Sinsupha Chuichulcherm
Department of Chemical Engineering, Srinakharinwirot University, Thailand
Due to an increase in fuel price, ethanol is an interesting alternative fuel since it can be fermented from agricultural waste. A system allowed higher ethanol production and shorter fermentation period compared to a conventional system is preferred. A fluidized bed reactor was investigated. A 20 L anaerobic fluidized bed reactor was constructed for ethanol fermentation. PVC pellets were used as the solid support for biomass. The reactor was designed and constructed from material available in Thailand. 16L pineapple juice was fermented by saccharomyces cerevisiea in the fluidized bed reactor with a circulation flow rate of 16L/min. A final concentration of 17vol% ethanol production was obtained from the system within 200 hours in a batch mode during the start-up period. A conventional method for ethanol fermentation in 20L tank without circulation was also performed. After the fermentation was completed, the ethanol concentration in the fluidized bed reactor was 132.72 g/L which is 30%higher than the ethanol concentration in the fermentation batch tank and also contained less residual sugar concentration. It could be concluded that the fluidized bed reactor can be used in ethanol fermentation process with a higher efficiency compared to a conventional one.
Keywords: fluidization, ethanol, reactor design
Introduction
Ethanol is a product of sugar fermentation under anaerobic conditions. In order to get a high ethanol concentration, an immobilization of microorganisms either inside or at the surface of a support is needed since the immobilized microbes can tolerate more severe conditions than individual cells especially when the product is a growth inhibitor (Nagpal et al.,2000). Moreover, advantages of using an immobilized bioreactor over a continuous stirred tank bioreactor are (i)the achievable biomass concentration, (ii) the longer hydraulic resident time or a higher dilution rate (Marin et al., 1999). Biofilm formation onto the surface of the support is the result of a number of processes, including growth of microbes, attachment and adhesion, decay of microbes and detachment from the support surface (Nioella et.al, 1999). When the biofilm grows, it alters size, shape, density and surface roughness and bulk density of the support particle. It can also increase the surface area so that the heat and mass transfer can be obtained easily. A fluidized bed bioreactor is a fermenter that uses the advantages of immobilized biomass. Moreover, the temperature of the liquid in the reactor is almost constant since the immobilized biomass particles behave like a fluid resulted in a good mixing. The use of fluidized bed technology for wastewater treatment has been studied at the laboratory scale and pilot plant level. It is also applied to ethanol fermentation. Nevertheless, the fluidized bed reactor used in Thailand is usually bought from aboard. Due to a large number of variables involve in a fluidized bed bioreactor
design, empirical values are more useful than the theoretical one. The design strategy will be based on experimental result from published work and it is adapted for the material that can be found in Thailand.
fermentation broth. Then, the volume flow rate of the fermentation broth can be determined by multiply the velocities calculated with a cross-sectional area of the column. Once the volume flow rate known, a suitable recirculating pump and rotameter can be selected.
b) Microorganism and fermentation: Saccharomyces cerevisiea were cultivated in pineapple juice to be used as a starter. 16L boiled pineapple juice was fermented in the fluidized bed bioreactor in a batch mode during a start-up period. Sugar and ethanol concentrations in the fermentation broth were measure using phenol-sulfuric method and gas chromatography method respectively.
Figure 2 pictures of PVC pellets before and after use in the bioreactor
50 45 40
800
35 30 25 20 15 10 0 5 10 15 20 25 200 400
Figure 3 a plot between bed height and pressure drop when altering liquid flow rate. Results obtained during the experiment on fluidization behavior using tap water as liquid. Ethanol fermentation After circulating a mix of pineapple juice and starter for a week and the yeast was attached onto the support particles, freshly boiled pineapple juice was substituted to the previous one to start a new fermentation batch. Sugar and ethanol concentrations were measured at a time interval. The results were compared with the results from pineapple fermentation using conventional method without immobilized biomass. Initial sugar concentration in each fermentation broth was 350g/L. While the fermentation proceeded, the sugar concentrations decreased and ethanol concentration increased as can be seen in figure 5. After the first 3 hours, the sugar concentrations decreased gradually due to a use in cell growth, maintenance and ethanol formation. However, the sugar concentration in the fluidized bed bioreactor was lower than that in the conventional fermenter after 30 hours. The sugar concentration in the conventional fermenter still decreased until it was constant at 31.67g/L within 200 hours while the residual sugar concentration in the fluidized bed bioreactor was constant at 8.33g/L after 170 hours and it is lower than that reported by Posuwan et al., (1996). Posuwan et al. fermented pineapple juice in a batch process with suspend culture and found the sugar left in the fermentation broth after the process had completed was 24.6g/L. A reason why the sugar concentration in the fluidized bed bioreactor was lower may be because an accumulation of biomass layers onto the support particles made the microorganism more tolerate to ethanol, which is a product inhibitor, than the suspend
microorganism. 97.41% conversion of the sugar in the fluidized bed bioreactor was obtained while 90%conversion was obtained in the conventional fermenter. Also, the ethanol concentration in the fluidized bed bioreactor increased until it reached 132g/L with a yield of 76.72% after 168 hours while the final ethanol concentration in the conventional fermenter was 102.42g/L at 200 hours.
500 ethanol in the fluidised bed reactor ethanol in the conventional reactor sugar in the fluidised bed reactor sugar in the conventional reactor
500
400
400
300
300
200
200
100
100
time (hour)
Figure 4 residual sugar and ethanol concentration during the fermentation process.
Conclusion
Ethanol can be successfully produced using a fluidized bed bioreactor assembled from materials available in Thailand. PVC pellets were used as support particles. Higher percentage of sugar conversion was achieved when using a fluidized bed bioreactor compared to that using a conventional fermenter.
Acknowledgement
The author would like to thank Miss Kanjana Sudjit, Miss Piyapa Boonsang and Mr. Sutus Sonkami for their help in assembling the experimental apparatus and doing some experiments.
Symbols
Dp Ut VOM M particle diameter terminal velocity minimum superficial velocity for fluidization minimum porosity for fluidization or void fraction sphericity
References
Di Filice R (1996) A relationship for the wall effect on settling velocity of a sphere at any flow regime, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 22, p527-533 Geanckoplis, Christie J (1993) Transport Processes and Unit Operations, 3rd edit, Prentice Hall PTR, NewJersey, p 123 Marin P., Alklay D., Guerrero L., Chamy R., and Schiappacasse M C. (1999) Design and startup of an anaerobic fluidized bed reactor, Wat.SciTech., 40(8), p 63-70. McCabe W L., Smith J C., and Harriott P., (1993) Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering, 5th edit, McGrawHill, Singapore, p 173-174 Nagpal S., Chuichulcherm S., Peeva L., and Livingston A. (2000) Microbial sulfate reduction in a liquid-solid fluidized bed reactor, Biotechnol Bioeng, 70(4), p370-380 Nicoella C., van Loosdrecht M M C., Di Filice R., and Rovatti M. (1999) Terminal settling velocity and bed expansion characteristics of biofilm-coated particles, Biotechnol Bioeng., 62(1), p 62-70