Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Emergency VP Toolkit Special Needs Registries Overview and Planning Considerations
Emergency VP Toolkit Special Needs Registries Overview and Planning Considerations
Preface
The challenges faced during emergencies and disasters by individuals with special needs must be
addressed in every phase of emergency preparedness. The information in this document is
provided to support the efforts of local jurisdiction planners in addressing these issues. The
information has been compiled from a wide variety of public, private and advocacy organization
web sites and documents. Information has also been gathered from both “best practices” and
“lessons learned” testimony, articles and documents.
While variability exists in how a registry will be used, local county officials are responsible for
responding to emergencies. Typically, counties work collaboratively with local Emergency
Management officials, and often with public and private human services agencies and non-profit
organizations, to decide the purpose of the registry, what entity will assume administrative
responsibility, the mechanics of how the registry will work (e.g., what data goes in and how the
data is dispersed and to whom during an emergency), and who will develop privacy and security
guidelines.
All registries that have been reviewed deal in some manner with privacy, confidentiality and data
security. Most registry forms state which emergency response entities will be provided with the
registrant’s information. Some forms list specific response entities and others are less specific,
stating, for example, “emergency responders” will be provided with the information. The
registration application states that by signing the application (or by submitting the application
online) the registrant is agreeing to this use and disclosure of personal information. Many
registration sites also include HIPAA compliant authorizations and/or other specific use and
disclosure agreements. Many sites indicate that the information will be kept on a secure
database, but offer few details.
All registries encourage registrants to keep their information updated. Beyond that request,
significant variability exists in methodologies for updating data. The jurisdictions that actively
pursue registrants (making periodic phone calls, for example) to verify that data is current and
accurate are likely to have volunteers dedicated to this activity. In one North Carolina County,
for example, Retired and Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP) volunteers provide this service.
Registration guarantees neither immediate nor preferential treatment during a disaster. Most
Special Needs Registry sites stress this fact, and many note that registration does not replace the
responsibility of individuals to have their own emergency plan. It is generally believed, however,
that a registry will enhance the ability of emergency management and local officials to meet the
emergency needs of individuals with special needs.
No matter how comprehensive a registry may be, not all people with special needs will register.
In June 2007, for example, in the disaster prone area of Carolina Beach, North Carolina, only 14
residents were registered to receive special assistance; the community is performing outreach to
enhance registration. Any registry should be considered only a guide in an emergency, and not a
definitive or exhaustive list.
There does not appear to be a specific means of funding registries, and costs are not clearly
defined.
Florida
Florida requires, by state law, that each county have a Special Needs Registry that its residents
can voluntarily join. To assist the local emergency management agency in identifying such
persons, state agencies and other organizations serving special needs clients are required to
EPOC Vulnerable Populations Workgroup
6/24/2008
2
provide registration information to their clients. By law, the registries must be updated annually.
The registration program gives persons with special needs the option of preauthorizing
emergency response personnel to enter their homes during search and rescue operations if
necessary to assure their safety and welfare during disaster.
Utah
Utah has a Special Needs Registry for individuals and a separate Special Needs Registry for
facilities. The Registries are administered by the State, and the resulting database is maintained
by a State contractor. Each county or town has access to only its own data in the database. In
addition to basic information (location, contacts, etc.), the facilities registry requests information
on the average number of residents in specific categories (e.g., ventilator-dependent, requiring
oxygen, dependent on life sustaining medications), and the total average number of residents in
the facility.
This document identifies issues to be considered in the development of registries for special
needs populations. The information has been compiled from a wide variety of public, private
and advocacy organization web sites and documents, but is neither exhaustive nor equally
applicable to all situations.
Administrative Decisions
• Based on the defined purpose of the registry, decisions are made on eligibility criteria for
registrants.
• A registration application is developed based on eligibility criteria.
• The decision is made on whether the registry will be paper-based or maintained on a
database.
• The decision is made about tying the registry in with any existing automated system.
• Decisions are made on how potential registrants will be recruited.
• Decisions are made on registration procedures (e.g., apply on paper/online, notification to
registrant).
• The methodology for notifying emergency responders is established.
• The registry has been tested or utilized in an actual emergency.
• Federal and state privacy and confidentiality laws have been researched to ensure
compliance with legal mandates in the development of the registry and in how data is
disclosed/re-disclosed.
• The types of disclaimers registrants need to acknowledge (e.g., use and disclosure of
data, understanding that registration is not a guarantee of assistance, HIPAA) have been
defined.
• Safeguards are in place to protect the privacy of registrants and the confidential
information they provide.
Albany County, New York, Special Needs Registry Program (registry, transportation)
www.albanycountysheriff.com/emergcomm.html
Florida Department of Health, Chapter 64-3, Special Needs Shelters (registry, shelters)
http://www.floridadisaster.org/SpecialNeeds/Documents/2007/DOH%2064-
3%20SpNS%20rule%20Nov%2007.pdf
Indian River County, Florida, Comprehensive Emergency Plan 2007 (registry, shelters)
www.irces.com/Emergency_Management_Division/CEMP.pdf
Palm Beach County, Florida, Special Needs Program (registry, shelters, transportation)
www.ci.highland-beach.fl.us/index.asp?nid=202
Utah Special Needs Registries (one for individuals and one for facilities)
www.specialneedsutah.org/