The rubric assesses essays on the analysis of characters and conflicts in a novel about humanity. It evaluates thesis statement, textual examples, topic sentences, introduction/conclusion, and formatting. Higher scores are given for clear and thoughtful analysis tied to a cogent thesis, well-chosen examples, topic sentences connecting ideas, and proper formatting meeting standards. Lower scores mean weaker or missing analysis, thesis, examples, topic sentences, or introduction/conclusion that do not contextualize the issue or answer "so what?". Proper formatting is also required for full points.
The rubric assesses essays on the analysis of characters and conflicts in a novel about humanity. It evaluates thesis statement, textual examples, topic sentences, introduction/conclusion, and formatting. Higher scores are given for clear and thoughtful analysis tied to a cogent thesis, well-chosen examples, topic sentences connecting ideas, and proper formatting meeting standards. Lower scores mean weaker or missing analysis, thesis, examples, topic sentences, or introduction/conclusion that do not contextualize the issue or answer "so what?". Proper formatting is also required for full points.
The rubric assesses essays on the analysis of characters and conflicts in a novel about humanity. It evaluates thesis statement, textual examples, topic sentences, introduction/conclusion, and formatting. Higher scores are given for clear and thoughtful analysis tied to a cogent thesis, well-chosen examples, topic sentences connecting ideas, and proper formatting meeting standards. Lower scores mean weaker or missing analysis, thesis, examples, topic sentences, or introduction/conclusion that do not contextualize the issue or answer "so what?". Proper formatting is also required for full points.
The rubric assesses essays on the analysis of characters and conflicts in a novel about humanity. It evaluates thesis statement, textual examples, topic sentences, introduction/conclusion, and formatting. Higher scores are given for clear and thoughtful analysis tied to a cogent thesis, well-chosen examples, topic sentences connecting ideas, and proper formatting meeting standards. Lower scores mean weaker or missing analysis, thesis, examples, topic sentences, or introduction/conclusion that do not contextualize the issue or answer "so what?". Proper formatting is also required for full points.
Analysis and Thesis Textual Topic Introductio Formatting
interpreta- Statement Examples Sentences n and tion of Conclusion characters and conflict 4 Essay cogently Thesis Textual Paragraphs Intro is 12 point font and carefully statement is examples are include highly cogent, double-spaced analyzes how precise and highly effective topic contextual- one-inch the novel’s effective; it is appropriate and sentences at or izes the issue margins characters and thoughtful or especially near the and smoothly grammar and conflicts can be provocative fitting for the beginning of and logically punctuation interpreted as and focuses on context. paragraphs; leads into the exceed CIM making some a major Evidence topic sentences thesis; standards. statement statement clearly are clearly conclusion is Page numbers about humanity about humanity explained and connected to careful and are noted that the novel tied back to thesis effective; correctly makes thesis answers the “so what?” question 3 Essay analyzes Thesis Textual Paragraphs Intro briefly 12 point font and interprets statement is examples are include contextual- double-spaced the characters effective; it appropriate and effective topic izes the one-inch and conflicts focuses on a fitting for the sentences at or issue; lead-in margins but not major context. near the to the thesis grammar and necessarily statement Usually tied beginning of unsubtle; punctuation with nuance about humanity back to thesis. paragraphs; conclusion is meet CIM and not that the novel Evidence is topic sentences effective and standards. necessarily makes explained, but are connected careful; Page numbers with consistent not always to thesis briefly, are noted cogency thoroughly. answers the correctly “So what?” question 2 Essay attempts Thesis state- Textual Paragraphs do Intro. Margins, to analyze and ment is not examples are not always attempts to spacing and interpret effective. It not always include topic contextualize font do not characters and attempts to appropriate or sentences at or issue, but conform to conflict, but focus on a fitting for the near the does so standard. lacks major context. Rarely beginning of unevenly; Grammar and understanding statement tied back to paragraphs; conclusion punctuation or cogency about humanity thesis. topic sentences lacks a sense meet CIM that the novel Evidence is not attempt to of importance standards. makes but consistently connect to of your Page numbers does so explained. thesis findings are not noted inadequately or correctly without clarity 1 Essay makes Thesis Textual Paragraphs do Intro is Handwritten. little or no statement is examples are not include ineffective; Grammar and attempt to ineffective or not appropriate topic sentences conclusion punctuation analyze and non-existent or fitting or are or they are does not do not meet CIM standards. interpret an nonexistent. vague in their indicate Page numbers characters and Evidence not connection to implications are not noted conflicts adequately thesis of your correctly explained findings NAME________________________ Grading Rubric for “Ah, Humanity!” Essay