Description: Tags: Utah

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Fiscal Year 2002 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - UTAH

Maximum Required
Expenditures For
Choice-Related Maximum Per-Child
Transportation Expenditure For
FY 2002 Title I And Supplemental Supplemental
LEA ID District Allocation * Educational Services** Educational Services ***

4900030 ALPINE SCHOOL DISTRICT 2,802,269 560,454 831.78


4900060 BEAVER SCHOOL DISTRICT 137,018 27,404 658.74
4900090 BOX ELDER SCHOOL DISTRICT 674,370 134,874 695.94
4900120 CACHE SCHOOL DISTRICT 682,800 136,560 689.00
4900150 CARBON SCHOOL DISTRICT 675,612 135,122 813.99
4900180 DAGGETT SCHOOL DISTRICT 20,585 4,117 935.67
4900210 DAVIS SCHOOL DISTRICT 2,983,843 596,769 733.67
4900240 DUCHESNE SCHOOL DISTRICT 808,271 161,654 942.04
4900270 EMERY SCHOOL DISTRICT 285,236 57,047 687.31
4900300 GARFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT 139,465 27,893 860.90
4900330 GRAND SCHOOL DISTRICT 299,573 59,915 805.30
4900360 GRANITE SCHOOL DISTRICT 8,336,288 1,667,258 991.59
4900390 IRON SCHOOL DISTRICT 930,478 186,096 814.07
4900420 JORDAN SCHOOL DISTRICT 3,716,949 743,390 843.99
4900450 JUAB SCHOOL DISTRICT 144,265 28,853 658.74
4900480 KANE SCHOOL DISTRICT 239,517 47,903 795.74
4900510 LOGAN SCHOOL DISTRICT 899,033 179,807 801.99
4900540 MILLARD SCHOOL DISTRICT 434,453 86,891 806.03
4900570 MORGAN SCHOOL DISTRICT 94,435 18,887 866.38
4900600 MURRAY SCHOOL DISTRICT 479,076 95,815 684.39
4900630 NEBO SCHOOL DISTRICT 1,657,477 331,495 775.97
4900660 NORTH SANPETE SCHOOL DISTRICT 290,176 58,035 777.95
4900690 NORTH SUMMIT SCHOOL DISTRICT 68,509 13,702 658.74
4900720 OGDEN SCHOOL DISTRICT 2,672,630 534,526 948.41
4900750 PARK CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT 65,121 13,024 592.01
4900780 PIUTE SCHOOL DISTRICT 62,905 12,581 861.71
4900810 PROVO SCHOOL DISTRICT 2,008,196 401,639 833.97
4900840 RICH SCHOOL DISTRICT 52,400 10,480 770.59
4900870 SALT LAKE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT 4,113,456 822,691 888.24
4900900 SAN JUAN SCHOOL DISTRICT 1,181,594 236,319 1,005.61
4900930 SEVIER SCHOOL DISTRICT 631,756 126,351 796.67
4900960 SOUTH SANPETE SCHOOL DISTRICT 407,508 81,502 799.04
4900990 SOUTH SUMMIT SCHOOL DISTRICT 112,645 22,529 712.94
4901020 TINTIC SCHOOL DISTRICT 34,009 6,802 1,133.62
4901050 TOOELE SCHOOL DISTRICT 573,913 114,783 683.23
4901080 UINTAH SCHOOL DISTRICT 1,079,425 215,885 836.76
4901110 WASATCH SCHOOL DISTRICT 204,869 40,974 663.01
4901140 WASHINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT 2,062,075 412,415 716.74
4901170 WAYNE SCHOOL DISTRICT 97,776 19,555 794.93
4901200 WEBER SCHOOL DISTRICT 1,491,371 298,274 707.82
4999999 PART D SUBPART 2 0 0 0.00
Fiscal Year 2002 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - UTAH
Maximum Required
Expenditures For
Choice-Related Maximum Per-Child
Transportation Expenditure For
FY 2002 Title I And Supplemental Supplemental
LEA ID District Allocation * Educational Services** Educational Services ***

* Actual amounts received by LEAs will be smaller than shown here due to State-level adjustments to Federal Title I allocations. States adjust
allocations, for example, to reflect LEA boundary changes or the creation of new LEAs, including charter school LEAs, that are not accounted
for in the Department's calculations. States also are permitted to reserve up to 1 percent of allocations for administration and must reserve
2 percent of allocations (rising to 4 percent in fiscal year 2004) for school improvement activities. These adjustments will reduce the actual
amounts available under all three columns of the table.

** An LEA must use up to an amount equal to 20 percent of its Title I, Part A allocation (the “20-percent reservation”) received from the State
to cover choice-related transportation costs for students who exercise a choice option and to pay for supplemental educational services for
students whose parents request such services. The 20-percent reservation may include Title I, Part A funds or funding from other Federal,
State, local, and private sources. The amount shown in this column is the Department’s estimate of the amount that affected LEAs - those
with schools identifed for improvement, corrective action, or restructuring - may have to spend to meet this requirement. Actual
expenditures will depend on such factors as the number of students exercising either a choice option or supplemental educuational services and
the costs of satisfying these requests. An LEA has discretion to determine the allocation of these funds between choice-related transportation
and supplemental educational services, except that it must spend at least one-quarter of the 20-percent reservation - or an amount equal to
5 percent of its Title I, Part A allocation - on each activity if there is demand for both from students and their parents.

*** An LEA that must arrange for supplemental educational services is required to pay, for each child receiving services, the lesser of the actual cost
of the services or an amount equal to the LEA’s Title I, Part A allocation received from the State divided by the number of poor students in the
LEA, as determined by estimates produced by the US Bureau of the Census. Thus the amount shown in this column reflects the statutory “cap”
on per-child expenditures for supplemental educational services.

You might also like