Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Page 1 of 3

Developing Hispanic-Serving Institutions, Title V (Aid for


Institutional Development, Titles III and V) - 2002
CFDA Number: 84.031S Strengthening Hispanic-Serving Institutions

Goal 8: To assist Hispanic-serving insitutions that have limited resources and that
traditionally serve large numbers of low-income and Hispanic students to continue to
serve these students, and to improve the capacity of these insititutions to provide on-
going, up-to-date quality education in all areas of higher education.
Objective 8.1 of 2: Improve the academic quality of participating institutions.
Indicator 8.1.1 of 1: Graduation rates: Completion rates for all full-time, degree-seeking students in Title V 4-year
and 2-year colleges will increase over time.
Targets and Performance Data Assessment of Progress Sources and Data Quality

The percentage of full-time, degree-seeking students at Title Status: Unable to judge Source: NCES
V institutions completing a 4-year degree within 6 years and Survey/Assessment
a 2-year degree, certificate, or transferring to a 4-year Progress: Although graduation Survey/Assessment:
school within 3 years rates have improved over 1998 Integrated Postsecondary
levels, there is a decline (4%) at Education Data System.
Performance 4-year institutions, but an References: 1997, 1998,
Year Actual Performance
Targets increase (4.66%) at 2-year 1999, and 2000
4-year 2-year 4-year 2-year institutions compared to the Graduation Rate Surveys
previous year. This progress (GRS).
1998 32.80 19.20
indicator will be eliminated. The
1999 36.90 17.70 new progress indicator will be Frequency: Annually.
2000 37.40 17.70 based on the Performance Collection Period: 2001
Measurement System, with - 2002
2001 33.40 22.36 expected results available in Data Available: January
March, 2003. 2004
Validated By: NCES.
Explanation: The data is
representative of the 1999 and Limitations: In 2000-
2000 cohort of Title V grantees. 2001 data were
Although prior to the time period voluntarily submitted by
that grantees actually received 70% of 4-year Title V
funds in 1999, the graduation institutions and 98% of 2-
rates for proceeding years are year Title V institutions. In
provided for reference. These addition, the data tend to
graduation rates understate be several years old.
actual graduation rates, as this
analysis only includes the full- Improvements: ED is
time, first-time cohort of students currently implementing a
enrolled in degree-seeking (or new Performance
certificate) programs, and only at Measurement System
the Title V institutions students that will collect data that
initially attended. As a result, the is more relevant to the
graduation rates presented here impact that Title V
do not include part-time, transfer, projects have on
or returning students, which academic quality at
represent a significant portion of grantee institutions. Title
the student body at Title V V grantees are reporting
institutions. to the measurement
system for the first time
and aggregate 2002 data
will be available March,
2003.

Objective 8.2 of 2: Improve the fiscal stability of participating institutions.

1/31/2003
Page 2 of 3

Indicator 8.2.1 of 2: Fiscal balance: The percentage of Title V institutions having a positive fiscal balance will
increase over time.
Targets and Performance Data Assessment of Progress Sources and Data Quality

The percentage of Title V institutions with a positive fiscal Status: Unable to judge Source: NCES
balance Survey/Assessment
Progress: The 1999-00 data Survey/Assessment:
Performance established a baseline for the Integrated Postsecondary
Year Actual Performance
Targets Title V program with the goal of Education Data System.
Public Private Public Private continuous improvement. The References: Finance
Institutions Institutions InstitutionsInstitutions percentage of public institutions Survey.
having a positive fiscal balance
2000 53.60 87.50
has increased, although the Frequency: Annually.
2001 70.51 75 percentage of private institutions Collection Period: 2001
has decreased. The number of - 2002
private institutions included in Data Available: January
this analysis increased from 9 2004
institutions to 24, which may Validated By: NCES.
account for the decreased Data validated by NCES
percentage of private institutions review and NCES
having a positive fiscal balance. statistical standards.
In addition, the downturn in the
national economy has had a Limitations: Data tend to
profound impact on the fiscal be several years old.
operations at institutions of
higher education. Improvements: New
Performance
Explanation: 108 Hispanic Measurement System will
Serving Institutions (HSI) provide more relevant
received funding under the Title data on the impact of
V program in 1999 and 2000. 84 Title V grants on fiscal
of the funded HSIs are public stability.
institutions and 78 reported
revenue and expenditure data to
the IPEDS finance survey. Of
these 78 public institutions 55
reported having a positive fiscal
balance in 2000-01. All 24
private institutions reported
financial data, of these 18
reported positive fiscal balances
in 2000-01.
Indicator 8.2.2 of 2: Endowment: The percentage of Title V institutions having an endowment will increase over
time.
Targets and Performance Data Assessment of Progress Sources and Data Quality

The percentage of Title V institutions with a positive Status: Unable to judge Source: NCES
endowment. Survey/Assessment
Progress: Relative to previous Survey/Assessment:
Performance year, the percentage of Title V Integrated Postsecondary
Year Actual Performance
Targets public institutions with a positive Education Data System.
Public Institutions Public Institutions endowment has increased by References: Finance
2.7%. Survey.
2000 46.70
2001 49.40 Explanation: Of the 83 public Additional Source
Title V institutions completing the Information: Finance
IPEDS financial survey, 41 survey conducted as part
institutions reported a positive of the Integrated
endowment and 42 either did not Postsecondary Education
report endowment information, or Data System (IPEDS).
did not have an endowment.
Data has been corrected to only Frequency: Annually.
include institutions reporting data Collection Period: 2001
to IPEDS and only institutions - 2002
receiving funds during the Data Available: January

1/31/2003
Page 3 of 3

reporting year. 2004


Validated By: NCES.
Data validated by NCES
review and NCES
Statistical Standards.

Limitations: Data tend to


be several years old.
Data on endowment
balances of private
institutions is not
available at this time.

1/31/2003

You might also like