Professional Documents
Culture Documents
001 - Terminology
001 - Terminology
001 - Terminology
`
(
> <
)
(1.1)
splitting up into qualitative regimes 2 3
;
of different types of behaviour; vs. 2 1
C C
x y
T T T T x y
(
`
(
>
)
(1.2)
Fine. But what about,
0.01 0.0001 Unsuitable for affirming statistical hypotheses, e.g., confirming Higgs boson
;
1 20 Suitable for intuitive grasp of physical picture, e.g., is it a SHO with corrections?
x y
x y
>> >>
`
<< <<
)
(
(
(1.3)
Orders of magnitude: what about ~ vs. <
vs. >
vs. >
: they mean less or of the order of; in essence, these symbols are the respective
opposites of and (note the reversed-order). Example: you could have,
0 0 1 1 1
10 1 2 ~10 , 0.1 10 ~10 10 10
= < = < =
(1.6)
Approximately equal: Finally: lets think about the symbol (more restrictive than above),
; ; ; x y x y z z x z y << < <
(1.7)
Caution: common misconception is the use of 0 x . Untrue. Suppose
5
10 x
= . The problem is that you have
infinite orders of magnitude
7 18 1234897 910234098234
10 ,10 ,10 ,10 ,...,10 0
= between x and 0. Instead, you are
supposed to write 0 x .
Example: proton vs. neutron mass:
27
2 1.67 10
p
m kg
= vs.
27
4 1.67 10
n
m kg
= , so:
p n p
m m m << .
Proportionality: this is old hat,
2 1 2
1
, , , , , 2
( / ) ; / ; ; [not useful...]
V F B B F V F V F B F V F V F B
C k n k T E C T C k T E C n C k (1.8)
Warning: In extracting the dependence of a physical quantity on some parameter, be careful: apparently-
different factors may depend on the same parameter. Example: consider a system with varying temperature, but
1
Again: conclusions are in the eye of the beholder; when things are so close, behavior changes noticeably, and noticeability is a
subjective term.
fixed N (particle-number) vs. fixed (chemical potential). For the former case,
/ 2 1 / 2
,
d d
F V F
E n C n
,
while for the latter
1
, F V F
E C n = .