Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Thursday,

April 6, 2000

Part VII

Department of
Education
Office of Elementary and Secondary
Education; Safe and Drug-Free Schools
and Communities National Programs;
Federal Activities; and Alcohol and Other
Drug Prevention Models on College
Campuses Grant Competition; Notice

VerDate 20<MAR>2000 15:30 Apr 05, 2000 Jkt 190000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\06APN6.SGM pfrm08 PsN: 06APN6
18204 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 67 / Thursday, April 6, 2000 / Notices

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION notice of proposed priority, eligible competition only those applications that
applicants, and selection criteria and meet the following absolute priority:
Office of Elementary and Secondary this notice of final priority, eligible Under this priority, an IHE that
Education; Safe and Drug-Free applicants, and selection criteria. wishes to be considered for an award for
Schools and Communities National a model program must identify, propose
Programs; Federal Activities; Alcohol Analysis of Comments and Changes to maintain, improve, or further
and Other Drug Prevention Models on In response to the Secretary’s evaluate, and propose to disseminate
College Campuses Grant Competition invitation in the notice of proposed information about an effective alcohol
priority, two parties submitted or other drug prevention program
AGENCY: Office of Elementary and
comments on the proposed priority. An currently being used on its campus.
Secondary Education, Department of
analysis of the comments follows. Applications must:
Education. (1) Describe an alcohol or other drug
Comments that propose changes the law
ACTION: Notice of final priority, eligible does not authorize the Secretary to make prevention program that has been
applicants, and selection criteria. under the applicable statutory authority implemented for at least one full
are not addressed. academic year on the applicant’s
SUMMARY: The Secretary announces a
campus;
final priority, eligible applicants, and Eligible Applicants (2) Provide evidence of the
selection criteria for fiscal year (FY)
Comments: One commenter effectiveness of the program;
2000 under the Safe and Drug-Free (3) Provide a plan to maintain,
recommended that eligible applicants
Schools and Communities National improve, or further evaluate the
include park and recreation sites
Programs—Federal Activities—Alcohol program during the year following
adjacent to campuses.
and Other Drug Prevention Models on award; and
College Campuses Grant Competition. Discussion: In the original
authorization for this program (Section (4) Provide a plan to disseminate
The Secretary may use this priority, information to assist other IHEs in
eligible applicants, and selection criteria 120(f) of the Higher Education Act, as
amended), Congress clearly intended implementing a similar program.
for competitions in FY 2001 and later Eligible Applicants: Institutions of
years. The Secretary takes this action to the recipients of grant awards to be
IHEs. Although the current grant higher education (IHEs) are the eligible
use Federal financial assistance to applicants under this competition. To
identify and disseminate models of program is being administered under
the Safe and Drug-Free Schools and be eligible, an IHE must not have
alcohol and other drug (AOD) received an award under this
prevention at institutions of higher Communities National Programs, the
Secretary plans to follow as closely as competition (under either CFDA
education (IHEs). 84.116X or 84.184N) during the
possible the original intent of Congress
EFFECTIVE DATE: This priority, eligible previous two (2) fiscal years.
to award funds to IHEs.
applicants, and selection criteria are Selection Criteria: The Assistant
Changes: None.
effective May 8, 2000. Secretary uses the following selection
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Absolute Priority criteria to evaluate applications for new
Kimberly Light, U.S. Department of Comments: One commenter suggested grants under this competition. The
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW— that student assistance programs be maximum score for all of these criteria
Room 3E222, Washington, DC 20202– among the models emphasized under is 100 points. The maximum score for
6123. Telephone: (202) 260–2647. If you the priority. each criterion or factor under that
use a telecommunications device for the Discussion: The priority language is criterion is indicated in parentheses.
deaf (TDD), you may call the Federal (1) Significance. (25 points)
broad enough to include a wide range of
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at In determining the significance of the
alcohol and other drug programs, which
(800) 877–8339. model, the following factors are
may include student assistance
Individuals with disabilities may considered:
programs. It is not necessary to (a) The extent to which the program
obtain this document in an alternate emphasize any particular type of
format (e.g., Braille, large print, involves the development or
program within the priority. demonstration of innovative strategies
audiotape, or computer diskette) on Changes: None.
request to the contact person listed in that build on, or are alternatives to,
the preceding paragraph. General existing strategies. (15 points)
Note: This notice of final priorities does (b) The potential replicability of the
In making awards under this grant program, including, as appropriate, the
not solicit applications. A notice inviting program, the Secretary may take into
applications under this competition is potential for implementation in a
published elsewhere in this issue of the
consideration the geographic variety of settings. (5 points)
Federal Register. The notice inviting distribution of the projects and the (c) The extent to which the results of
applications will specify the date and time by diversity of activities addressed by the the program are to be disseminated in
which applications for this competition must projects in addition to the rank order of ways that will enable others to use the
be received by the Department. Applications applicants. information or strategies. (5 points)
received after that time will not be eligible Contingent upon availability of funds, (2) Quality of the program design. (40
for funding. Postmarked dates will not be the Secretary may make additional points)
accepted. awards in FY 2001 from the rank- In determining the quality of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The ordered list of nonfunded applications design of the program, the following
Secretary published a notice of from this competition. factors are considered:
proposed priority, eligible applicants, Priority: Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3) (a) The extent to which the design of
and selection criteria for this and the Safe and Drug-Free Schools and the program reflects up-to-date
competition in the Federal Register on Communities Act of 1994, the Secretary knowledge from research and effective
February 14, 2000 (65 FR 7370–7372). gives an absolute preference to practice. (20 points)
Except for minor editorial revisions, applications that meet the following (b) The extent to which the goals,
there are no differences between the priority, and funds under this objectives, and outcomes of the program

VerDate 20<MAR>2000 16:23 Apr 05, 2000 Jkt 190000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06APN6.SGM pfrm04 PsN: 06APN6
Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 67 / Thursday, April 6, 2000 / Notices 18205

are clearly specified and measurable. (5 (3) Quality of the project evaluation. This document provides early
points) (35 points) notification of our specific plans and
(c) The extent to which the design of In determining the quality of the actions for this program.
the program is appropriate to, and evaluation, the following factors are Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7131.
successfully addresses, the needs of the considered:
target population or other identified (a) The extent to which the methods Electronic Access to This Document
needs. (10 points) of evaluation are thorough, feasible, and You may view this document, as well
(d) The quality of the plan to appropriate to the goals, objectives and as all other Department of Education
maintain, improve, or further evaluate outcomes of the program. (10 points) documents published in the Federal
the program. (5 points) (b) The extent to which the evaluation Register, in text or Adobe Portable
In applying the above criteria, the data provide evidence of the Document Format (PDF) on the Internet
following information is considered: effectiveness of the program in reducing at either of the following sites:
(1) The quality of the needs either alcohol or other drug use, in
http://ocfo.ed.gov/fedreg.htm
assessment and how well this reducing the problems resulting from
http://www.ed.gov/news.html
assessment relates to the goals and either alcohol or other drug use, or in
meeting outcome objectives that are To use the PDF, you must have the
objectives of the program. Adobe Acrobat Reader Program with
associated with reductions in alcohol or
(2) How well the program is Search, which is available free at either
other drug use or resulting problems.
integrated within a comprehensive of the previous sites. If you have
(25 points)
alcohol and other drug prevention questions about using the PDF, call the
In applying the above criteria, the
effort. U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO)
following information is considered:
(3) The level of institutional (1) The quality of the evaluation toll free at 1–888–293–6498; or in the
commitment, leadership and support for methodology and evaluation Washington, DC area at (202) 512–1530.
alcohol and other drug prevention instruments. Note: The official version of this document
efforts. (2) Whether both process (formative) is the document published in the Federal
(4) The clarity and strength of the and outcome (summative) data are Register. Free Internet access to the official
institution’s alcohol or other drug included for each year that the program edition of the Federal Register and the Code
policies and the extent to which those of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
has been implemented, including data Access at:
policies are broadly disseminated and collected both before and after initiation
consistently enforced. of the program. http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/
(5) The extent to which students and (3) How evaluation information has index.html
employees are involved in the program been used for continuous improvement (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
design and implementation process. of the program. Number 84.184N Office of Elementary and
(6) The extent to which the institution Intergovernmental Review: This Secondary Education—Safe and Drug-Free
has joined with community leaders to program is subject to Executive Order Schools and Communities National
address AOD issues. 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR Programs—Federal Activities—Alcohol and
Other Drug Prevention Models on College
(7) If applying to be considered as an part 79. One of the objectives of the Campuses Grant Competition)
alcohol prevention model, what steps Executive order is to foster an
the institution is taking to limit intergovernmental partnership and a Dated: March 31, 2000.
alcoholic beverage sponsorship, strengthened federalism. The Executive Michael Cohen,
advertising, and marketing on campus; order relies on processes developed by Assistant Secretary for Elementary and
and what steps are being taken to State and local governments for Secondary Education.
establish or expand upon alcohol-free coordination and review of proposed [FR Doc. 00–8453 Filed 4–5–00; 8:45 am]
living arrangements for students. Federal financial assistance. BILLING CODE 4000–01–U

VerDate 20<MAR>2000 15:30 Apr 05, 2000 Jkt 190000 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06APN6.SGM pfrm08 PsN: 06APN6

You might also like