Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2007 10 7 Column - Rays Gambling Receopts
2007 10 7 Column - Rays Gambling Receopts
C O M M E N T A R Y II
Bingo, tip book sales in Allen County
The following organizations reported to the Ohio Attorney Generals Office these amounts of revenue, expenses and profit from bingo games from November 2005 to October 2006. Type 1 is traditional bingo; Type 2 is instant bingo tickets sold during traditional bingo games; and Type 3 is instant bingo also called tip books, Joes or pull-offs sold outside traditional bingo games, according to the Ohio Attorney Generals Office. Organization
director shortly. The woman Magnus has identified to reporters as his fiance, Marie Daley, runs the cat shelter that receives profits from the bingo sales at Magnus bar. Although the Ohio Attorney Generals Office lists Cats Haven, the holder of the bingo permit, as being in Wapakoneta and the Allen County Auditors Office puts it in Cridersville, it actually is in Allen County. The cat rescue is at a Perry Township home Magnus and Daley own at 6105 McClain Road, across the street from Auglaize County. The Form 990 for Cats Haven filed with the Internal Revenue Service for 2006 shows she spent more than $295,000 providing care for cats. In 2006, the Form 990 for Cats Haven shows, bingo brought in more than $298,000. Tip book expenses, which include paying winners, totaled almost 80 percent of the money taken in. The reporting periods for the tax returns and the bingo sales are different, so it would take an office with actual auditing power to determine if all the reporting is accurate. Lets assume it is. So Magnus has broken no law again even as he dances right up to the line of questionable behavior, particularly for someone who proposes to oversee a branch of Lima city government. But this much in tip book sales and youre not mentioning it to anyone other than a state agency in Columbus, even as you vote on a casino? Its an issue Magnus let slide and all the local media ignored even after a letter writer brought up the tip book sales in April 2006. Daley answered that letter with one of her own. From The Lima News of April 14, 2006: I am the good cause Ray Magnus sells tip books for. I supply the tickets and 100 percent of the profit goes to my nonprofit organization. These proceeds have helped thousands of cats get medical attention, food, shelter and sterilized. Would I, or any other animal organization, receive the same from a casino? How can church groups speak out against bars? Bars are not to blame for drunken driving; people are. And, with that, the issue went away. Perhaps we all assumed the sales volume was tiny. We were wrong way wrong. Its none of their business, its for a charity, Magnus said when I asked if he should have told other councilors how many tip books his bar sold. I just sell them for a charity, so why is it any of their business, something that goes to a charitable organization? I mean, this isnt no big secret. Weve been doing this for quite a while, so let me ask you a question. Why is it any of anybody on City Councils business what I do for charitable organizations and who I give my money to? What to say about the numbers, now that theyre out? Im shocked. Im shocked to Comment on this column and learn that Ray sells almost $1.5 other topics on Ledermans blog: million a year in gambling tip www.limaohio.com/lederman.
books from his bar, Law Director Geiger said after I told him how much the Ohio Attorney General Office reported Magnus bar sold. I dont think anyone would have guessed such a large amount of gambling money could be flowing through such a small corner bar owned by a City Council member in the north end of Lima. But, having learned that now, officially, I dont think theres enough evidence at this time to indicate an actual direct conflict for Ray because it would be extremely speculative as to whether a casino would really interfere with his tip book business. Maybe it would, maybe it wouldnt. I would not say there is a direct conflict of interest, but there certainly is the potential for an indirect conflict and I think, in my opinion, there clearly is an appearance of a conflict. But it would be up to Ray to decide how to deal with the appearance-ofconflict issue. I cannot say its illegal based just on that information, but, in my opinion, it looks bad. I asked whether taking in that much while voting against a casino creates an obligation to let people know about what some might consider reason to try to stifle competition. Magnus ignored the openness part of the question. He said theres no competition because Ohios smoking ban has cut into his business and the tip book sales. He said he knows Im going to slant my reporting. He told me about all the good Daley does for cats. He said he isnt opposed to casinos. Keep in mind that Magnus abstains from voting on issues involving Greater Ohio Ethanol, as he owns shares in the emerging company. Magnus also abstains from voting on liquor licenses because he is a bar owner. Geiger pointed out that Councilman Walter Potts abstained from voting on the casino ballot issue after someone complained to him that he might have a conflict because of some business interests. Neither Potts nor Geiger has said from whom the complaint came or what was said. Potts did not have a conflict of interest as alleged, Geiger told me, yet he abstained to avoid the appearance of conflict. Magnus who owns a bar that has a form of gambling didnt even mention almost $1.5 million in gambling that passed through his bar while he was voting on a gambling establishment that would have sold alcohol. Im extremely frustrated that Ray took the public positions against the casino that he did without at least disclosing the huge amount of money at stake for him through competition from the casino, Geiger said. In my opinion, there clearly is an appearance of a conflict. I think it looks bad, and its very frustrating to me that Ray did not come forward with this information to explain his position. In my opinion, it definitely calls into question Rays position and motives on the casino issue as well as his overall judgment. Magnus said that, because he has to pay for the tickets when he picks them up, all he can do is lose money. And, with the smoking ban, theres no increased business, so theres no problem. Since those such as Councilman Pitts and the Rev. Menke have made clear that gambling is the devils tool, one wonders: How do they feel about having formed an alliance with someone who pushes the devils game? For his part, Magnus again has shown he isnt fit to serve on City Council, much less lead it.
Expenses $2,599,201 $2,599,201 Expenses $154,170 $144,068 $1,212,418 $1,510,657 Expenses $492,955 $911,687 $1,404,643 Expenses $1,341,143 $1,341,143 Expenses $1,167,525 $1,167,525 Expenses $1,162,209 $1,162,209 Expenses $441,663 $795,940 $38,274 $1,275,877 Expenses $484,408 $872,441 $1,356,850 Expenses $885,098 $885,098 Expenses $731,064 $731,064 Expenses $654,971 $654,971 Expenses $265,302 $315,948 $34,424 $615,674 Expenses $405,536 $221,727 $627,263 Expenses $360,480 $60,698 $421,178 Expenses $161,851 $238,745 $8,723 $409,320 Expenses $355,639 $355,639 Expenses $300,030 $300,030 Expenses $103,219 $103,219 Expenses $55,268 $22,730 $77,998 Expenses $806 $806
Net profit $580,018 $580,018 Net profit $0 $34,002 $295,677 $329,679 Net profit $107,861 $220,145 $328,006 Net profit $315,772 $315,772 Net profit $308,897 $308,897 Net profit $291,831 $291,831 Net profit ($69,024) $228,583 $8,761 $168,320 Net profit ($152,052) $190,997 $38,944 Net profit $202,960 $202,960 Net profit $166,627 $166,627 Net profit $168,794 $168,794 Net profit $12,343 $93,035 $9,495 $114,875 Net profit $28,988 $34,133 $63,122 Net profit $8,130 $36,963 $45,094 Net profit ($27,850) $63,963 $1,837 $37,949 Net profit $77,052 $77,052 Net profit $73,998 $73,998 Net profit $26,961 $26,961 Net profit $1,239 $8,361 $9,600 Net profit $214 $214
Spyder's Boxing Club Inc., of Lima, the YWCA of Lima and the Spencerville High School Family Career and Community had bingo licenses but did not have any revenue during the time reported with these numbers. The Lima News left off the cents in the above figures, so some gross receipts will not match the combined expenses and net profit numbers. Source: Ohio Attorney Generals Office
NATE WARNECKE The Lima News